Motorola Razr (2025) vs Razr Ultra (2025): one is a pretty cover, the other is the whole package
But here's the real question: if you're looking at Motorola's foldable lineup, is the Ultra worth the Ultra price tagover the standard Razr? Or is the regular Razr good enough?
Let's dive in — spec sheets are fine, but how these phones feel, look, and perform in the hand matters more.
$200 off (13%) The Motorola Razr Ultra is here, and the official store has a splendid deal to help you celebrate it! For a limited time, you can buy the 1TB variant at the price of the 512GB model, which saves you $200. Select colors are available right now. Buy at Motorola
The Motorola Razr+ (2025) has finally been announced. You can buy the high-end flip phone with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chip at the Motorola Store. You can trade in an eligible device to score some savings. Buy at Motorola Don't want to pay top dollar for your next flip phone? Consider the Motorola Razr (2025), now available for purchase. The handset features a MediaTek Dimensity 7400X chip and sports AI features. Buy at Motorola
Motorola Razr 2025 vs Razr Ultra 2025 differences explained:
Table of Contents:
Design and Display
Performance and Software
Camera
Battery
Audio
Specs
Conclusion
Both Razrs follow the same DNA and come in as elegant lifestyle accessories first. This is due to Motorola always picking fresh colors in partnership with color expert Pantone. But it's not just the hues — Razr and Edge phones come with different stylish finishes on the back, not just the boring old glass. First, Motorola started dressing its phones in vegan leather. Now, the Ultra models also get wood or velvet covers, which is pretty neat!
But even if you go for the base Razr 2025, you will still get a faux leather-covered shell, or stylish latex wrapping. Depending on which color you choose, it'll have different patterns over it.
The Razr (2025) comes in:
Pantone Gibraltar Sea (dark blue)
Pantone Spring Bud (green)
Pantone Lightest Sky (cream)
Pantone Parfait Pink (pink)
The Razr Ultra is available in the following colors:
Pantone Scarab (black, with a leather/velvet back)
Pantone Rio Red
Pantone Mountain Trail (wooden back)
Pantone Cabaret Both phones feel pretty nice to handle and open / close. Motorola has been working on that hinge for a while now and it incorporates titanium elements that will hopefully make it last longer. It certainly feels sturdy and both phones open and close with pleasing snaps, and are able to hold the screen open at multiple angles.
You'd expect some trade-offs between models, but this these are quite close. The Razr Ultra has a 7.0-inch internal display with 165 Hz refresh rate, while the regular Razr "settles" for a 6.9-inch panel at 120 Hz. OLED panels, of course, with a few different color profiles to pick from — from natural and grounded, to punchy, vibrant and saturated.
Brightness? The Ultra edges ahead slightly with 2,400-ish nits at 20% APL vs the Razr's ~2,100. A 20% APL test measures a more "realistic" scenario for smartphone usage and those numbers here mean that these look excellent outdoors. Too bright to be outshone! But, if peak brightness is what interests you — the Razr 2025 specs say 3,000 nits peak, the Razr Ultra 2025 goes up to 4,500! (Peak brightness only measures a small portion of the screen for limited time)
A minimum of 2 nits is not an excellent bedside reader, and 2.4 is slightly worse. These won't be poking your eyes out per se, but you will probably avoid using them when the lights are off.
Then there's the cover screen. The Ultra's 4-inch external display is a whole productivity panel compared to the 3.6-inch one on the regular Razr. It looks better, too, with the entire upper shell of the Ultra housing a screen, instead of having a thick-ish bezel. Still, both are usable in the typical Motorola style — there are useful widgets to be found here, but you can launch full apps if you so desire. Android will re-scale them to fit (most of the time).
The fingerprint scanners on both phones are located in the power button — they work lightning fast on both, even if it's not the most optimal positioning.
Here's where things get spicy. The Razr Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Elite, backed by a hefty 16 GB of RAM and 512 GB storage out of the box.
The regular Razr? Well, it cuts some corners and ends up with the far less powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, 8 GB RAM, and 256 GB storage.
Daily use? Both are OK, though if you engage with the AI more often, the Snapdragon definitely feels faster — of course. Once you start gaming, video editing, or multitasking like a maniac, the Ultra's extra horsepower becomes very real. The Motorola Razr 2025 is only here as your daily communicator, not the pocket computer experience.
And yeah, if you ever doubted it, the CPU benchmarks show that the Razr Ultra is up to 3 times faster — barely any surprise there. While the regular Razr's score looks quite bad in comparison, we do emphasize that it runs daily tasks just fine.
In the graphics department, the Ultra is three to five times better — depending on whether it's throttling or not. Considering it's a clamshell smartphone, we do find its thermals to be doing a pretty decent job at keeping it productive!
Motorola gave both Razrs a 50 MP main camera, but the Ultra doubles down with a 50 MP ultrawide, while the regular Razr gets… a 13 MP secondary sensor. It's also worth noting that these 50 MP main cameras are not the same — the Ultra's sensor is bigger than the one in the vanilla Razr, and you will spot that in the samples below.
On the front, the Razr Ultra triples down with yet another 50 MP camera, while the Razr (2025) has the still respectable 32 MP resolution for selfies. All that's left is to see how they do!
As can be seen from our camera score, that main camera makes quite the difference. Despite both being 50 MP, the base Razr fell short with more oversharpening and artifacts. Both ultra-wide cameras scored about the same, despite their vast differences in hardware. And both phones don't do well with zooming, though with different issues. Let's look at the samples:
Both cameras deal well with wide dynamics, but the Ultra does allow itself to amp up highlights just a bit more. Color reproduction from both is pretty down to earth and pleasant, with just a tinge of saturation to make that photo shareable on social media. However, when it comes to detail, the Ultra definitely takes it — fine details are visible, but soft and natural. Whereas the 50 MP snapper of the Razr (2025) presents a lot of oversharpening, even in the perfect lit conditions.
These phones don't have dedicated zoom cameras, so any magnification they give you is a digital crop-in. The Razr Ultra tops out at 30x, but you won't be using it — it's pretty degraded at that point. The Razr (2025) maxes out at 10x, and it's very fuzzy there, too. At 2x (the samples above), they are both quite usable. Though, the base Razr's tendency to oversharpen is amplified, while the Ultra photo still looks good.
Here's a comparison at 10x: As mentioned at the start of the camera section, their zooms are bad for different reasons. The base Razr has a lot of noise. The Razr Ultra photo looks "cleaner" at first glance because it applies a ton of noise reduction. As a result, the image becomes washed-out, painting-like. We won't be knocking these a lot — they are not zoom camera phones and not marketed as such.
The ultra-wide camera of the Ultra presents a bit more neon-y colors in the skies but definitely has a much better dynamic range and slightly better details. The ultra-wide of the Razr (2025) has more natural colors, but is darker, crushes shadows, and it shows a lot more HDR bloom than the one on the Razr Ultra does.
The selfie camera of the Razr (2025) is a bit too warm, a bit too red, and a bit too soft. Not bad in general, but when compared side-by-side, the Razr Ultra selfie looks more realistic and sharper.
The video quality of the Razr Ultra is hands-down just better. Colors are more realistic, details are slightly sharper, the stabilization is more... stable, and the microphone does a better job at noise reduction. The Razr (2025) video, in comparison, looks murky, the grass is a bit too saturated, the sky is a weird dark hue, and its microphone is noisier. It's still usable, but loses in this side-by-side.
The Motorola Razr Ultra has a slightly bigger body, which allows it to fit a slightly bigger battery — 4,700 mAh. That's not a huge difference from the 4,500 mAh cell of the base Razr (2025), however there's another factor to consider — the processors. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is built on a 3 nm process, which is more energy-efficient than the 4 nm process of the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X. But then again, the Dimensity should require less power, since it's not as big of a monster. So, we went into our tests with curiosity:
With a massive 24 hour endurance in our browsing test, the Razr Ultra shows that it can comfortably be a 2-day phone with casual use. Curiously, it fell behind in the video streaming test, where it should've scored another easy win. But then, at the gaming test, it lasted 3 hours longer than the base Razr, showing that even though that Snapdragon is a fire breather, the Ultra still makes good use of the energy it has on hand.
The Razr Ultra is also a bit faster to charge — 30 minutes on a 68 W charger got us up to 80%! The Razr (2025) supports 30 W charging and only got up to 60% in the same time frame. Still respectable and can get you out of a pickle if you forgot to charge.
The speakers of the Razr (2025) noticeably lack depth and bass, and they have a pronounced mid hump. So, videos with speech will come through, but you won't enjoy the soundtracks. Its vibration is not a click, but a tight buzz — still pretty satisfying, just noticebly different from flagships.
The Ultra, on the other hand, has surprisingly boomy speakers which put a smile on our face. Not to the level of an iPhone Pro Max or Galaxy Ultra, but definitely more usable. The haptic motor here is a click — quick, pronounced, and satisfying.
But if you want the best flip phone Motorola has ever made — no compromises, no 'if onlys' — the Razr Ultra (2025) is worth the splurge. Bigger, faster, sharper, bolder.
You get what you pay for — and in this case, what you pay for a pretty good camera, better speakers, a prettier external display, more premium finishes, and very fast performance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
With this new capability, Gemini moves closer to being the perfect Assistant replacement
As you probably know by now, Google is phasing out the Google Assistant on Android phones and is replacing it with Gemini. When you think about it, this should raise the bar for digital assistants since Large Language Models can answer just about any question. Google uses its Utilities extension and Gemini's integration with Android's default Clock app to set timers and alarms. One Google Assistant feature that had been missing from Gemini was the Assistant's ability to identify songs. This is not as important to those with a Pixel phone since these handsets have the Now Playing feature that shows on the lock screen what song is playing within earshot. Regardless, if you currently use Gemini instead of Google Assistant, you'll be happy to know that you can now ask Gemini for the name of the song that you can hear playing around you in the background. Previously, when asked "What song is this?," Gemini would respond by telling you to install a music recognition app. On the other hand, asking that question to Google Assistant would result in the correct answer being displayed on the phone. However, Google has recently updated Gemini on Android to allow it to run the Google app's "Song Search" feature which can find the name of a song even when you merely hum the tune. Ask Gemini to name a song on Android and you'll get a quick response via the Google app. | Image credit-PhoneArena Now when you ask Gemini to tell you the name of the song playing in the background you'll see a multi-colored oscillating sphere. This will be followed by a response from the Google app using its "Song Search" feature which includes the name of the song, the artist, an option to see an overview of the song or view the lyrics, and a video of the tune. On iOS, asking Gemini to identify a song playing in the background comes up empty as the app states that it is a text-based AI and cannot hear any audio. Also with iOS, asking the Google app to identify a song results in a suggestion that you use a music recognition app like Shazam. Asking Siri to name a song gets excellent results because Siri simply opens the Shazam music recognition app to get your answer even if you don't have Shazam installed on your phone. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Apple sued again over broken AI promises, and this time by its own shareholders
Apple is now facing a new legal challenge, this time from its own shareholders. A proposed securities fraud class action was filed in federal court on June 20, accusing the company of misleading investors about the timeline and capabilities of its artificial intelligence features, particularly those tied to Siri and the iPhone 16. The lawsuit, filed in San Francisco's Northern District of California, claims Apple downplayed how long it would take to deliver the AI upgrades it introduced as part of Apple Intelligence. The plaintiffs argue that these delays contributed to a decline in iPhone sales and a significant drop in the company's stock value. The case, Tucker v. Apple Inc, names CEO Tim Cook, CFO Kevan Parekh, and former CFO Luca Maestri as defendants. According to the complaint, investors were led to believe that Apple Intelligence would be a key selling point for the iPhone 16 lineup, offering smarter and more capable Siri experiences. But shareholders claim Apple did not actually have a working version of those features when it made those announcements during the June 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference. The situation became more complicated earlier this year when Apple reportedly postponed some of the new Siri capabilities to 2026. That initial delay came in March, and was followed by a WWDC 2025 presentation that left many analysts underwhelmed with the company's AI progress. In the months since, Apple shares have fallen nearly 25 percent from their all-time high in late December 2024, wiping out about $900 billion in market value. Apple's broken AI promise prompted this new round of litigation. | Image credit — Apple via Wayback Machine From a consumer standpoint, I think it was only a matter of time before legal action followed. Many users were expecting next-gen Siri features out of the box. Now that the lawsuit is official, Apple may need to move quickly to restore trust. Ideally, that means delivering more AI upgrades sooner, though it's likely the company will now be more cautious about overpromising in the future. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
GSM Arena
2 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Trump launches carrier and T1 Phone, Phone (3) gets 7 yr support, Week 25 in review
The Trump Organization, run by US President Donald Trump's sons Donald Jr. and Eric while he's in office, announced this week that it's going to offer wireless service in the US, branded Trump Mobile. It will be an MVNO (Mobile Virtual Network Operator), using the actual networks of AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. Its plan will cost $47.45 per month, because Donald Trump is the 47th President of the United States - this is called The 47 Plan, and will include unlimited talk, text, and data. It will involve "no contracts" and "no credit check". Trump Mobile is also hyping up an exclusive smartphone, the T1 Phone, which is going to be gold-colored and will set you back $499. This is coming in August or September (the website mentions both) and is allegedly "proudly designed and built in the United States". Nothing's co-founder confirmed that the upcoming Phone (3) will have 5 years of major OS updates and 7 years of security patches. Vivo's X200 FE will launch on June 23. It has a 6.31-inch ZEISS Master Colour Display. The phone will be available in four colors - black, blue, pink, and yellow. It's built around a punch-hole display and features a triple camera setup on the rear, co-developed with ZEISS. "Real American Wireless For Real Americans". It breaks down with 5 years of major OS updates and 7 years of security patches. It might not be an entirely new smartphone. Infinix launched its Smart 10 series with three devices – Smart 10, Smart 10 Plus, and Smart 10 HD. The trio brings entry-level specs, DTS-tuned loudspeakers and several flashy color options. All three phones sport 6.67-inch IPS LCDs with HD+ resolution and 700 nits peak local brightness. Smart 10 HD features a 90Hz refresh rate while the other two get 120Hz panels. The Smart 10 trio also offers dual speakers with DTS-tuning and a 300% volume mode. The series launched in Malaysia. Google's Pixel 10 series will add close-up photo capabilities to the Pixel telephoto camera, finally. Expect the series' announcement on August 20 and availability on the 28. Smart 10 and Smart 10 Plus are already available in Malaysia. The devices are expected to be unveiled in August. The display, the camera island, and even the branding will be affected. We were able to do an exclusive Poco F7 unboxing before the phone's June 24 announcement. Poco confirmed that the phone will use a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 SoC. A look at the upcoming Poco F7's design and box contents. It's launching next week. It will have a 7,550 mAh battery under the hood. The phone will be powered by the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and a massive 7,550mAh battery.
