You can still rent a Hamptons home for summer 2025 — if you think outside the box
In spring, the poolside conversation at the Setai in Miami Beach turns to the Hamptons: 'Who is paying these prices?' someone asks. 'Where are they coming from?' 'Should we go to St. Tropez instead?'
This season, the search for the perfect summer rental is leaving these masters of the universe at an unfamiliar loss. Brokers say their frustration is understandable. Each year, the same Hamptons houses come up for rent again and again. And each year they depreciate — their furnishings wear, along with their novelty.
Yet demand and asking prices are going up, not down. And while new rentals do hit the market, the inventory of deluxe summer palaces that tick the vast checklists top renters demand remains miniscule.
Advertisement
5 On the waterfront in Sag Harbor, the four-bedroom 54 Bay View Drive will set you back $360,000 from July through Labor Day.
Courtesy of Compass Realty
5 One of the quirky Sag Harbor rental's four bedrooms.
Courtesy of Compass Realty
'March was insane,' says Compass broker Yorgos Tsibiridis, who is currently listing a quirky-cool four-bedroom waterfront home at 54 Bay View Drive in Sag Harbor for $360,000 from July through Labor Day. 'And the money people are spending! It's the strongest rental season I have seen. I have a couple houses in Amagansett and honestly I could have rented them over and over, like 10 times.'
Advertisement
That's a sour pickle for the Setai set to swallow. They're happy plunking down $1 million for the season, but they expect quality in return: homes built within the last five years, fresh interiors, a beautiful yard, a large pool with a hot tub, proximity to the ocean or a village and a minimum of six or seven bedrooms.
Good luck with that this season, says Tsibiridis, with as few as 30 to 50 new homes meeting that criteria on the market from East Hampton to Montauk, and many times that number of interested parties. 'The more expensive houses are the ones that are in most demand right now,' he says. So what gives? 'This year we had a flood of people from LA [due to the January wildfires]. They moved to New York and now they want a house in the Hamptons. I'm also noticing more people this year from Miami and Palm Beach.'
5 While 10 & 12 Fair Lea Road may be historic, is has a very modern pool to enjoy.
Courtesy of Douglas Elliman Real Estate
So what's a choosy renter to do? Try something new. Consider something with historic charm, like 10 & 12 Fair Lea Road in Southampton. It's one of the village's 19th-century originals, with a conspicuous octagonal turret reminiscent of a lighthouse.
Advertisement
This 13-bed classic is asking $1.35 million for Memorial to Labor Day with Erica Grossman of Douglas Elliman.
Or if you've never strayed from the beach, explore the eight-bed estate at 10 Morgan Hill Way in Bridgehampton.
5 You can rent the eight-bedroom estate at 10 Morgan Hill Way in Bridgehampton — complete with a sprawling lawn and pool — for $950,000 for the entire season.
Courtesy of Compass Realty
5 Be a good sport and hit the Bridgehampton property's tennis court.
Courtesy of Compass Realty
Advertisement
Yes, it's an impatient six-minute drive to the sand, but what you get in return is 1.4 acres of lawn-pool-and-tennis, surrounded by hectares of protected farmland.
It's asking $950,000 for the season with Compass' Breitenbach Advisory Team.
Whichever high-impact home you choose, you won't have to sacrifice splendor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
8 hours ago
- Business Upturn
CODI FRAUD ALERT: Compass Diversified Investors are Reminded of Ongoing Securities Fraud Class Action — Contact BFA Law by July 8 Legal Deadline (NYSE:CODI)
NEW YORK, June 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Compass Diversified Holdings and Compass Group Diversified Holdings, LLC (NYSE: CODI) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Compass you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting Investors have until July 8, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Compass securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and is captioned Matthews v. Compass Group Diversified Holdings, Inc., et al. , No. 25-cv-981. Why was Compass Sued for Securities Fraud? Compass is a statutory trust that acquires and manages a group of small and middle-market businesses. This includes Lugano Holdings, Inc., a designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end jewelry. The complaint alleges that the Company's fiscal 2024 financial statements contained material misstatements relating to unrecorded financing arrangements and irregularities identified in sales, cost of sales, inventory, and accounts receivable recorded by Lugano. The Stock Declines as the Truth is Revealed On May 7, 2025, after the market closed, Compass announced that investors should not rely on its fiscal 2024 financial statements amid an ongoing internal investigation, led by outside counsel and a forensic accounting firm, into Lugano. The Company stated that it has 'preliminarily identified irregularities in Lugano's non-CODI financing, accounting, and inventory practices.' The Company also announced that it intended to delay the filing of its Q1 2025 financial results, and that Lugano's founder and CEO, Moti Ferder, resigned from his positions at Lugano and will not receive any severance compensation. On this news, the price of Compass stock declined roughly 62%, from $17.25 per share on May 7, 2025, to $6.55 per share on May 8, 2025. Click here if you suffered losses: What Can You Do? If you invested in Compass you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212-789-3619
Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
Majority of staff axed at Voice of America
The Trump administration on Friday sent out termination notices to hundreds of employees at Voice of America. Included in that group are employees working for the network's Persian-language service who were called back from administrative leave just last week in the wake of Israel's attack on Iran, according to two people familiar with the decision. The move — which makes official what has long been expected since hundreds of contract employees got termination notices in early May — is a part of the Trump administration's sweeping target to downsize the government and remake America's role in the global order. Critics of the administration's focus on VOA have said that the network has played a vital role in combatting disinformation abroad. But the administration says these cuts are in service of 'cutting waste' and putting 'American taxpayers first.' 'Today, we took decisive action to effectuate President Trump's agenda to shrink the out-of-control federal bureaucracy,' senior presidential adviser Kari Lake said in a statement released Friday . The move eliminates 1,400 jobs at U.S. Agency for Global Media, VOA's parent agency, roughly an 85 percent cut to the workforce. The last day on payroll for the employees will be Labor Day. Some of those affected by Friday's cuts who are not old enough for mandatory retirement, are being terminated without severance pay, according to one of the people. The move would contradict USAGM's policy on severance. 'As our legal team fight[s] for our rights under the law, we call on Congress to continue its long tradition of bipartisan support for VOA,' the named plaintiffs in VOA's lawsuit against the Trump administration said in a statement. 'Moscow, Beijing, Tehran and extremist groups are flooding the global information space with anti-American propaganda. Do not cede this ground by silencing America's voice.' Lake said in her statement that 250 employees will remain across the USAGM, VOA and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting. She noted that none of the OCB's 33 employees were terminated. The government-funded network, which was founded 80 years ago to combat Nazi disinformation during World War II, has — largely unsuccessfully — fought the administration's decision in court. The administration sent RIF notices to employees in small batches for weeks. But Friday's notice could deliver the coup de grâce for Voice of America after decades of providing the world with accurate information in countries where media is state-run.
Miami Herald
4 days ago
- Miami Herald
Zillow says it's fighting for buyers. Compass says it's fighting for sellers. What if neither is fighting for you?
As two real estate giants escalate a war over how homes should be listed for sale online, both sides say they're acting in the interest of consumers. Both sides also stand to make a lot of money if they win. The issue intensified at the end of 2024, when Compass, the country's largest brokerage by sales volume, began advising its sellers to use a three-phased marketing approach - making their homes visible only to Compass agents and clients as a "private" listing, making them viewable only via and reserving the option to later make them public on popular house-hunting sites like Redfin and Zillow. In the real estate industry, listings are currency. Faced with thousands of them disappearing from its site, Zillow punched back. The Seattle-based company, starting at the end of June, plans to block any former private listings from appearing on its site - an ultimatum it hopes brings an end to Compass's practice of selectively sharing listings before they appear on big search portals. Redfin will follow with a similar ban in September. Each of these players pitches itself as a pro-consumer brand. Compass says its selective marketing approach offers sellers privacy and control. Some sellers want to market to more exclusive groups before their home appears on big listing sites, which feature details like days on market and price cuts, which can signal a seller is willing to negotiate on price. Zillow and Redfin say they are for transparency in the market, which is good for both homebuyers and sellers. The only way to know a home's true price, they argue, is to advertise it as broadly as possible. But Brian Boero, chief executive of 1000watt, a marketing agency for residential real estate companies, says their pro-consumer stances are largely just messaging. "These companies are using the consumer as almost like a human shield here to protect their business interests," Boero said. "They may believe these things sincerely, but this is first and foremost about rational self-interest." Should Compass win the private listings war, it would upend the paradigm in home listings that buyers have grown used to over the last two decades. When Zillow and Redfin arrived in the mid-2000s, they promised to democratize the home search, pulling back the curtain on a market once controlled by agents and the local databases they operated called multiple listing services. For buyers, the experience changed overnight: Homes that were once buried in classified ads or hidden in books that could only be viewed alongside a broker were suddenly just a click away. Sellers' agents at first rejoiced - they didn't have to work as hard to advertise their properties, and listing on the sites was free. But someone was paying: buyers' agents. When a prospective buyer clicks a listing's "Contact an Agent" button, Zillow or Redfin sells that inquiry to a paying agent. They also take as much as 40% of the agent's commission if they close the sale. Brokerages like Compass have long bristled at the steep fee. But as home sales drag for a third straight year, Compass is trying to change the game. By publishing listings exclusively on it cuts out the referral middlemen. "Organized real estate has been implementing rules that have been stripping homeowners and their agents of flexibility and choice," Rory Golod, president of Growth and Communications at Compass, said in an interview. "They are trying to monopolize where inventory goes and how people sell." Redfin and Zillow, of course, have their own interests to protect - as well as the model that's come to shape the modern home-buying experience. "This isn't just about Zillow or Redfin - the internet has changed home search for the better, where every buyer can have access to all of the inventory," said Joe Rath, Redfin's head of industry relations. "Gatekeeping in any form is antithetical to the internet." Matt Kreamer, Zillow's spokesperson, said that transparency is core to Zillow's philosophy: "We believe that home listings that are available to some buyers should be available to all buyers," he said. Their calls for openness also happen to preserve their business: more listings, more traffic, more fees. Ultimately, Boero, the marketing chief, believes that Zillow's market power will force Compass to blink. "Zillow is the most powerful brand in the history of housing," Boero said. "You just can't imagine not having your home on Zillow as a home seller - it sounds like a stupid thing to have happen." But others see an opportunity for Compass to prevail in bringing traffic directly to its site. "Southwest Airlines didn't sell tickets on any of the online aggregators for years, and they're doing great," said Mike DelPrete, a real estate tech consultant. "People look at multiple sources." The dispute appears to be heading toward a compromise that would allow both Compass and the listing aggregators to uphold their business models, rather than a solution centered around buyers and sellers. Redfin's Joe Rath said his company would be open to hiding certain data, like days on market and price drops, if that's what it took to keep listings public. "We would much rather give ground there and have the listing," he said, "than not have the listing at all." Because all of these companies are paid a percentage of a home's ultimate sales price, it benefits both the brokerages and the search portals to keep buyers in the dark about details that might lead to a lower price. The battle over transparency, it seems, has limits. Whether Compass or the search portals win, both victories would also preserve an as-yet unshakable status quo in real estate: a 2% to 3% commission for buyers' agents. A landmark legal settlement earlier this year threatened that fee structure paradigm - but so far, traditional models have held, although a few flat-fee agencies have broken the mold. So why are the rules governing home listings decided by two major corporations that stand to benefit from pushing prices as high as possible? "With how important housing is to our economy, society and individuals, there is a question of why the information about homes for sale isn't federally regulated," Boero said. But government intervention in home sales isn't likely to happen at the federal level under President Donald Trump, who has promoted deregulation and free markets. The state's regulator, the California Department of Real Estate, lacks the legal authority to make a ruling on private listings that would tip the scales toward either Compass or Zillow. But it can, for example, require agents to give sellers adequate warning on the financial consequences of not appearing on the major home listing sites, said Summer Goralik, a former investigator with the department who now works as a compliance consultant to brokerages. "They'll need to explore whether brokers are breaching fiduciary duty to sellers," Goralik said. "Are they giving all of the information that seller needs to make an informed decision about listing privately?" For her part, Goralik doesn't believe the push for private sales and putting listings back into the brokerages' hands helps buyers or sellers. "A wide-scale campaign for private listings seems to do more harm than good," she said. "It seems like we'd be going back in time. I'm for the future." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
