logo
'Do we want Edinburgh as a Harry Potter theme park?'

'Do we want Edinburgh as a Harry Potter theme park?'

Regularly ranking among the world's best cities, boasting postcard-worthy views around virtually every corner, and hosting the globe's largest performing arts festival, The Fringe - alongside increasingly bustling Christmas markets - the city has become a year-round tourist destination for culture vultures, influencers, history buffs, and Harry Potter fans alike.
This supports tens of thousands of jobs, stimulates significant investment in business and keeps Edinburgh squarely on the global map. But for the local population, especially in the city centre where the majority of visitors congregate, it often means overcrowded streets, an escalating cost of living and strained infrastructure.
Balancing the mass tourism driving what some call Edinburgh's 'Disneyfication' - or perhaps more accurately, its Potterfication - with the needs of residents remains a key challenge for the city. The introduction of the UK's first Transient Visitor Levy (TVL), or 'tourist tax', comes as a direct response to these pressures. However, it is unlikely to be a silver bullet.
In the second of an exclusive two-part interview for The Herald's series looking at the Future of Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh Council's leader Jane Meagher and chief executive Paul Lawrence reflected on the impact of tourism and opportunities of the forthcoming visitor levy.
Councillor Meagher acknowledged there are a 'whole lot of issues relating to the city centre' as a result of Edinburgh's strong visitor economy.
'One concern is about managing what kind of city centre we want this to be,' she said, adding: 'Do we want it to be a Harry Potter theme park or do we want it to be a living city centre where people live and work?
Read more from our Future of Edinburgh series:
'That's where things like the visitor levy come in. Clearly, one of the aims of the visitor levy is to make the visitor experience more sustainable.
'What that means is providing visitors with a reason to move outwith the city centre and go and visit Lauriston Castle, Craigmillar Castle, go and visit the other World Heritage Site out at Queensferry and take advantage of the shorefront that people can enjoy.
'What tends to happen is some people congregate around the Royal Mile to the exclusion of even places like the Botanical Gardens, so part of the visitor levy is going to be to make what we're packaging as sustainable.
'In other words, not concentrating on the middle of the city.
'As well as thinking about the city centre we need to bear in mind there are areas outwith the city centre that will become in their own right visitor venues. The Granton Gasholder is a recent excellent example of that park and its attractions.'
The proliferation of city centre gift shops, sometimes dubbed 'tartan tat' retailers, is a hot button issue for locals in Edinburgh who complain about a lack of essential amenities like grocery stores in the centre of town.
On this point, Meagher said: 'I think there's an overprovision of certain types of shop. I have friends, some of whom live at the foot of the Royal Mile, and it is quite difficult to find corner shops. I think we need a better mix.'
Mr Lawrence agreed there are 'too many of a certain kind of retail offer in certain places' and said it was 'clear to see' this needed rebalancing. However, the council's chief officer contended Edinburgh has 'the best blend of restaurants, pubs and shops in the UK by a mile'.
He said: 'A lot of places suffer from only having chain pubs, restaurants and so on. We have a thriving independent sector, which through the visitor levy we also want to support. So if you look at the diversity as a whole, walk from here to Leith, and in Leith Walk we have one of the most exciting streets in the UK. I think the mix compared to others is spectacular.
'If you're on the Royal Mile you can be at a Lidl on Nicolson Street in five minutes, that's not the case in most places.
'But are there pockets where there are over concentrations of a certain kind of provision? Of course there are.'
This issue was debated in the City Chambers last year after a councillor said the number of gift shops on the Royal Mile in council-owned commercial units had become "embarrassing,' and complained the capital's 'window on the world has a See You Jimmy Hat in it'.
Lawrence said: 'If we own something then we can decide who to lease it to. So, for example, if we want to ensure that some of our properties are used for charitable or social purposes we can, but the council has a policy of no concessionary lets on our property estate because our property estate cross-subsidies some of the council's core services, so there is a consequence.
'Both as a property owner, as a licensing authority and a planning authority we have a lot of policies that dig into these issues, and like most things there's always a balance involved in all of this.'
Another ongoing challenge for the authority is reducing traffic levels while increasing pedestrian space to handle heavy footfall. Questions persist over how the council plans to meet its target to cut car kilometres driven in the city by 30% by 2030, especially after the Scottish Government recently ditched its less ambitious target of 20%. Meanwhile, plans to remove through traffic from key city centre roads including the North and South Bridges and The Mound were delayed last year due to a lack of funding from the Scottish Government.
The Royal Mile (Image: Colin Mearns) At the time, former transport convener Scott Arthur said it was 'not just as simple as putting planters in,' while senior officer Gareth Barwell added it was 'very hard to go cheap and nasty' in a World Heritage Site'. However, the slow progress to make the centre of Edinburgh more pedestrian friendly and less congested has made some question how committed the council is to implementing changes.
Lawrence highlighted the closures of the Old Town's Cockburn Street and Victoria Street to through traffic 'at little or no cost because we have not done large scale new street designs'.
He said: 'We've simply said you can't drive your car down there anymore and some people have agreed with that and some people have disagreed with that.
'There's somewhere like George Street, potentially the finest street in Edinburgh, one of the finest streets in the UK, where I don't think that approach would be right.
'We have a scheme from Meadows to George Street which would improve the public realm significantly. We're under a lot of pressure, and understandably so, from organisations like Living Streets to improve the pavement experience both in the city centre and elsewhere.
'In a World Heritage centre, that has to be done right. And that's not cheap.
'There are some times when we can take a relatively low intervention approach, if I can call it that. There are others where we need substantive street redesign from building line to building line. We have to do that respectfully to the heritage of the city. We've inherited some of the most spectacular street designs in Europe and we can't ignore that.'
Read more:
Meagher added: 'Edinburgh is one of the easiest places to walk around as opposed to any other ways of getting around the city, but there's no doubt - I mean look at Princes Street, the pavements on Princes Street are in a shocking state.'
The council chiefs said a potential £50m a year generated by the visitor levy - a 5% charge on overnight stays capped at five nights from July 2026 - will fund essential improvements to pedestrian spaces including the neglected Princes Street.
'We now have the opportunity with the visitor levy before us,' Lawrence said, 'we are working to bring forward proposals via the new Visitor Levy Forum to elected members later in the year on the first tranche of visitor levy investment.
'Those issues of the quality of the public realm in the city centre, whether it's from a day to day point of view - so graffiti removal and so on - or more substantive works like the quality of Princes Street, we are working hard on those to bring them to members later in the year to be considered, only considered because there's a lot of claims on that money, to be considered as first priority.'
Meagher said: 'That £50m anticipated from the visitor levy has been spent many, many times over in people's imaginations. But I think it would be hard not to justify something to be done on Princes Street on things like improved lighting.
'We need to think long-term and have some sort of staged, strategic approach to the use of the visitor levy, rather than a whole random collection of one-off pieces of investment. We also need to see that over the years it's going to be spent in a strategic way.'
Read more on the Future of Edinburgh:
Lawrence stressed his team of officers 'will be looking for a balance between the city centre and other parts of the city in the visitor levy proposals'.
He said: 'If we say it should all be spent on one square mile we know what the political reaction would be. What we are working on is basically everything we have heard from communities and elected members and others over the years to go 'what does a balanced package of investment look like so we can hopefully get political support for that later in the year?'. Public toilets are a good example.'
Addressing the soaring cost of performing at Edinburgh's world-famous festivals could also be aided by TVL money, he added.
'If you talk to folk in the festival communities, they do talk about affordability both for audiences and performers as a challenge. So we need to work with them to go 'what interventions can help with that affordability challenge'.
'People have said for 40 years it's incredibly expensive to put on a show in Edinburgh and all the rest of it. People still come, but there's lots of other cities catching up with us and we need to stay ahead of the pack. If affordability is a challenge to people coming here, then what interventions might address that in the right way?
'The conversation we want to have with the festival community, in particular, is not just whether it's expensive, but how that relates to the programmes they want to put on.
Jane Meagher has been City of Edinburgh Council's leader since December 2024 (Image: Gordon Terris) 'If you want more international performers to come for the Fringe or the International Festival then how do we create packages? So it's based on their development ambitions and their programme ideas, not just a kind of blanket approach.
'Affordability is clearly a challenge, but what are our shared ambitions and therefore what is the right intervention to make?
'That's why we're having those conversations which is why it's going to take time to bring forward proposals.
'Whether members want to spend the money on paving Princes Street or somewhere else, we will put forward a menu of choices later in the year.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SNP's Fergus Ewing to stand as an independent in 2026
SNP's Fergus Ewing to stand as an independent in 2026

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

SNP's Fergus Ewing to stand as an independent in 2026

The veteran MSP and former minister said his decision was 'not an easy one' but was driven by disillusionment with the direction of his party and the state of the Scottish Parliament. READ MORE Mr Ewing said his party had "deserted many of the people whose causes we used to champion". 'I have taken [the decision to stand as an independent] because I love the people of Inverness and Nairn and the people of Scotland more than my party, which I have been in for more than half a century,' he said. 'I believe the SNP has lost its way and that devolution itself, presently, is letting Scotland's people down.' Mr Ewing, first elected in 1999, served in the governments of both Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon. In recent years, however, he has become one of the SNP's most vocal internal critics, repeatedly challenging party bosses, particularly around the failure to dual the A9. He also criticised party policy on North Sea oil and gas, the proposed deposit return scheme, gender recognition reform, and plans for Highly Protected Marine Areas. He was suspended from the SNP Holyrood group in 2023 after voting against then Green minister Lorna Slater in a motion of no confidence, defying party whips. In March this year, he announced he would not stand for re-election as an SNP candidate, but threatened to stand as an independent. In a statement confirming that he would now contest the vote, Mr Ewing criticised what he described as the increasingly 'fractious and tribal' nature of the Scottish Parliament. 'Too much power rests unchecked in the hands of party leaders, free to choose candidates who will slavishly support them rather than stand up for the people who sent them to Holyrood,' he said. 'Choosing the pliant over the talented.' He added: 'It's time for Holyrood to live up to the high expectations people rightly held for it, when my mother, Winnie, reconvened our own Parliament in 1999. It came of age some years ago; surely now it's time for it to grow up.' Mr Ewing urged politicians in the main parties to work together, "whether in a grand coalition or a less formal arrangement", to reform public services and maximise economic growth. When approached by The Herald, Mr Ewing said he had not quit the SNP. However, in a statement, First Minister John Swinney said it "was with real sadness and deep regret that I heard of Fergus Ewing's decision to leave the Scottish National Party". The SNP constitution states that a member "may not contest or be a member of any organisation contesting elections in opposition to the Party", and that the National Secretary has the power to suspend a member who does. A party source said Mr Ewing's membership ceased when he declared their intention to stand against the party. In his statement, the First Minister said: "We have both served the SNP and the cause of independence for many years, and I commend him for all that he achieved while serving in the SNP Government until 2021. 'Fergus had the option of standing at the forthcoming election for the SNP, given his status as an approved candidate. He chose not to accept that opportunity, and I regret that he has ultimately decided instead to leave the party. 'The SNP approaches the 2026 election ahead in the polls, with growing support for independence, and I am looking forward to taking our positive, ambitious vision for Scotland's future to the people.' Earlier this year, there was speculation that Mr Ewing could be barred from standing for the SNP again. Although he ultimately passed vetting, the episode sparked tensions within the party. Former cabinet secretary Alex Neil said any move to deselect Mr Ewing would have triggered 'a massive revolt from both the public and within the party', describing him as 'one of the most effective MSPs in Scotland'. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, a close ally of Mr Ewing, also intervened in the row, urging the SNP to consider his 'long-standing contribution' to the party and its values. READ MORE Ms Roddick took to social media shortly after Mr Ewing's announcement to say the election was "about one person or one issue." She said: "I'm honoured to have been overwhelmingly backed by local members to stand as the SNP candidate for Inverness and Nairn. This is my home, and I care deeply about making it the best place to live, work and study. "I know how tough things are for many families right now and the scale of the challenges ahead of us. I've never stayed silent on the issues that matter and I won't start now. "I'm SNP because I believe a better future for the Highlands is possible with Scotland as an independent country - and that we only get there by working together. "This election isn't about one person or one issue - it's about who will actually deliver on housing, healthcare, the cost of living, and, of course, infrastructure like the A9. "You'll always get energy, hard work, and honesty from me because I believe the people of Inverness and Nairn deserve nothing less." 🧵 I'm honoured to have been overwhelmingly backed by local members to stand as the SNP candidate for Inverness and Nairn. This is my home, and I care deeply about making it the best place to live, work and study. — Emma Roddick MSP (@EmmaRoddickSNP) June 20, 2025 Shaun Fraser, Scottish Labour candidate for Inverness and Nairn, said he was not surprised by Mr Ewing's decision. He said: "It must have taken a lot of deliberation and heartbreak for Fergus to decide to stand against the SNP next year. His family pedigree runs through the history of the party like a stick of rock. "I can't say that I'm surprised by his decision, however – it's been a long time coming. Inverness and Nairn need a change of government at Holyrood; only Scottish Labour can deliver that. I wish Fergus well for his retirement after the election." Mr Ewing won the constituency in 2021, with 48% of the vote, and a majority of 9,114. Scottish Conservative Highlands and Islands MSP Edward Mountain came second. He said: 'By standing as an independent Fergus Ewing has made it clear he simply cannot defend his party's record to voters while out on the campaign trail. 'The SNP have shamefully abandoned the Highlands over their 18 years in power. They continue to put lives at risk with their broken promises on dualling the A9 and A96. 'Countless public services have been downgraded or centralised away from rural and remote areas and there is a chronic lack of housing available to ensure local people can stay in these communities. 'Given someone who was born into the SNP won't stand under their banner, the anger among local voters will be palpable. Next year's election offers those in the Highlands and across Scotland a chance to remove the SNP from office and ensure the focus is finally on people's real priorities.' The Lib Dem candidate for Inverness and Nairn, Neil Alexander, said Mr Ewing should not be allowed to "walk away from the big part he has played" in the SNP's "record of failing the Highlands." He added: "While the two nationalists try to turn our constituency into a battleground for their party feud, I'm focused on what really matters to people here. 'I'm listening to residents across Inverness and Nairn, and the message is clear - we need real action on dualling the A9 and A96, proper investment in Raigmore Hospital, urgent improvements in mental health services and an end to the sewage scandal affecting our rivers and beaches."

'We are trying to get customers to buy less packaging'
'We are trying to get customers to buy less packaging'

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

'We are trying to get customers to buy less packaging'

And that can ultimately mean customers ordering a lower volume of products from the company, which was originally formed as a commercial stationery business by the late Lord Macfarlane of Bearsden shortly after the Second World War. Macfarlane provides packaging that helps high-profile retailers such as Dunelm, Currys, Lakeland and Halfords fulfil e-commerce orders, in addition to designing and manufacturing protective solutions for the automotive, aerospace, defence, and other sectors. It employs around 1,200 people across 40 sites. In an exclusive interview with The Herald, Mr Atkinson said it is 'often quite disconcerting for shareholders' to hear that 'one of the things we are doing is trying to get customers to buy less packaging, to make them more efficient and make them more sustainable'. He said: 'If you are a shareholder you are saying: 'you should be encouraging customers to buy more, shouldn't you?'. But in reality it is getting a lot more customers to buy less. So our objective is to get the existing customers to buy less and become stickier, and then obviously attract more and win new customers.' Mr Atkinson added: 'It's more about getting customers to use their packaging more efficiently. So it's not necessarily that we are, in all cases, giving them better value packaging. It's more that we are giving them a way of using their packaging in a more efficient way, or giving them better ways of packing their products. Because clearly if you are a customer like Dunelm or any of these guys, they have got products, we supply them packaging [and] those two have then got to be connected. 'If we can find a way of enabling them to use less labour to pack their products, that is a far bigger benefit to them than 10p off the price of a box, with labour costs and national insurance [contributions] as they are.' Read more: Mr Atkinson highlighted the benefits consumers are gaining from innovation in packaging, which have made it easier to return goods that are not wanted. 'If you find a box that is re-usable, that is easy to return and it saves all the hassle of finding another box and so on,' he said. 'If the packaging has just got a tear strip to open and all you need to do is put the goods back in, close the box and put tape round it, that's a far easier solution than if you have got to tear the thing open to get the goods out, then rebuild the box or find another box. That's about the [role of the Macfarlane] innovation labs and how we design the products.' Macfarlane's approach to innovation was one of a number insights provided by Mr Atkinson on the operation of a company that has routinely grown profits since he took the helm in 2003. As well as bringing more focus to its customer interactions, Mr Atkinson's early days at Macfarlane were spent consolidating a diverse business that had interests around the world, from 'Milngavie to Mexico' as he said in a previous interview with The Herald. Narrowing the focus to packaging distribution and the design and manufacture of packaging solutions, he put in place a growth strategy that has now seen Macfarlane undertake 22 acquisitions (and seven disposals) over the course of his tenure. Its recent £18m acquisition of Scottish firm The Pitreavie Group was the company's biggest since its purchase of National Packaging for £21.7m in 2001. Mr Atkinson said the pipeline of potential acquisitions remains strong, noting that it has 'only just touched the surface in Europe'. Following its acquisition of Germany firm PackMann around three years ago, a managing director was recently appointed to lead its expansion across the Channel. 'It's great to start off with a team of a well-meaning Brits, but you get to a stage where you need to have that experience,' Mr Atkinson said. 'So we brought in a new MD for Europe (Joost Meijs) at the beginning of this year, and he has added materially to our knowledge and our understanding of the European market, and the range of contacts and relationships he's got because he is steeped in the industry. He strengthened our approach to Europe in a very short space of time." Many potential acquisitions present themselves because company owners are seeking an exit to retire. 'There's one we are working on at the moment, which we've been working on for probably four years,' Mr Atkinson said. 'Because it's a retirement decision, you can't force it. They've done their plans. They've worked out, you know, what their numbers are in terms of their pension pots etc. And they know they're going to sell the business in 2028, so in that sense, what we're doing is courting them, building up a relationship with them so that when that date comes we are in the prime position.' Mr Atkinson has steered Macfarlane through several major political and macroeconomic events during the course of his 22-year tenure. He is aware that major government decisions, such as the recent increase in employer national insurance contributions and national minimum wage, cause a degree of uncertain among the group's staff, but said the firm strives to be as 'fair with people as we can'. 'We try as try as best as we can to give them security, to give them a degree of certainty, and a degree of fairness,' he said. 'And we are very open with our employees… we have regular dialogue sessions with all our employees to ensure that they're aware of how the company [is doing] and more importantly what the plan is going forward.'

Senior Edinburgh councillors back giving themselves a pay hike
Senior Edinburgh councillors back giving themselves a pay hike

Edinburgh Reporter

time11 hours ago

  • Edinburgh Reporter

Senior Edinburgh councillors back giving themselves a pay hike

Senior Edinburgh councillors have backed giving themselves a pay hike, with only one member speaking out in opposition. In February, Edinburgh Council agreed to freeze pay for senior councillors – including political group leaders and committee conveners – at the previous year's levels. But at Thursday's meeting all political groups except the SNP voted in favour of raising pay for senior councillors, with most getting an uplift of £4,637 to their annual pay packets – an 11.6% jump. Council committee conveners, as well as the SNP, Conservative and Liberal Democrat group leaders, will all get £4,637 added to their annual pay, bringing them to £44,644 per year, up from £40,027 from the previous year. And the depute council leader, Labour's Mandy Watt, will also get a £4,637 pay hike, bringing her total compensation to £52,669, up from £48,032 before. A council spokesperson said the increase in pay for senior councillors was intended to match the pay hike given to non-senior councillors by the Scottish Government. While local authorities have the power to set the pay of senior councillors, the rates for all other councillors are set by the Scottish Government, including the council's leader and Lord Provost, based on the fidings of the Scottish Local Authorities Remuneration Committee (SLARC). Earlier this year, it mandated that the salary for most councillors be raised to £25,982 per year, up £4,637 from their previous pay of £21,345, which stood unchanged for several years. Labour councillor and council leader Jane Meagher is paid £71,519 per year, while Lord Provost Robert Aldridge is paid £53,640. Depute council leader, Labour councillor Mandy Watt, said: 'I sat down and read the guidance, and it does say that in your approach to this, you should be doing councillor remuneration from the bottom up, not the top down. 'I very much appreciate the support that I've had [from officers] to get all this together.' An SNP source said: 'Councillors have been chronically underpaid for decades, and normally I'd take the view that we remunerate the position held, rather than the individual holding it. 'But the current crop of administration conveners are so inept that we could not support them getting a pay hike.' A council spokesperson said: 'While we don't set the rates of pay for non-senior councillor roles it's appropriate that we publish them and provide elected members with the opportunity to scrutinise rates for full transparency. 'The increase in Senior Councillors' remuneration was agreed by Council yesterday, and now includes the increase to the Councillor basic pay set by the Scottish Government.' Only one member, Labour councillor Katrina Faccenda, spoke out against the pay hikes. She said: 'I think you should take note of which councillors are getting extra money, and you should work out whether you are getting value for money from those councillors. 'Since this is public money, and I don't think anyone in here would support the misuse of public money, I'd ask the public to have a look at that, and work out if they think that in Edinburgh Council, the extra money they have to spend to subsidise councillors is being used in the right way.' Cllr Faccenda, who will not financially benefit from the pay increase for senior councillors, voted to support the hike. Meanwhile, independent councillor Ross McKenzie voted with the SNP to oppose the pay hike. Green co-convener, councillor Chas Booth, said: 'Greens think it is right that people are paid appropriately for the work they do, and we welcomed the recommendations of the Scottish Local Authority Remuneration Committee around councillors' salaries. 'Pay is a significant barrier to people from marginalised groups entering politics, and if we want to see more diversity in our councillors to reflect the rich diversity of the communities we serve, then we need to ensure people without independent income can become elected representatives. 'However, we acknowledge that while so many people in Edinburgh continue to face a cost-of-living crisis caused by years of austerity which is now being continued by the Labour government at Westminster, the Labour council administration doesn't feel that big increases in senior councillor pay were not appropriate. 'Therefore Green councillors were happy to support their proposals around this.' By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store