Elon Musk's Hyperloop has a key flaw. Chinese scientists may have found ‘cure'
Chinese scientists claimed to have solved a critical flaw in the futuristic vision of ultra-high speed ground travel, potentially salvaging vacuum-tube maglev technology and casting new light on the challenges faced by Elon Musk's Hyperloop concept.
A study published by China's peer-reviewed Journal of Railway Science and Engineering on May 16 showed that even minor imperfections – such as uneven coils or bridge deformations – would turn a journey into an ordeal, even in near-airless tunnels.
But the engineers – who are working at the world's first full-scale test line in central China – also said they found a way to slash turbulence intensity by nearly a half, reducing 'extremely severe bumps' to levels that were 'pronounced, but not unpleasant'.
The researchers, led by Zhao Ming from the maglev and electromagnetic propulsion division of state-owned China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC), said they used supercomputer simulations and scaled-down prototype tests for the study.
The team found that track irregularities and electromagnetic resonance were enough to trigger violent low-frequency vibrations in maglev cars travelling at the technology's cruising speed of 1,000km/h (612mph).
Using the 1940s-era Sperling Index, an international metric for ride comfort, the study showed that oscillations amplified at specific speeds, with a peak at 400km/h (249mph) reaching a level of vibration deemed 'extremely unpleasant'.
At the next peak, which occurred when the cars were travelling at 600km/h (373mph), the researchers recorded a Sperling Index of 4.2 – a level at which prolonged exposure to the vibrations would be harmful.
According to the paper, once the test cars reached cruising speeds of 1,000km/h, the vibrations lessened to 3.1 on the Sperling Index – defined as 'barely tolerable'.
A system that propels magnetically levitated pods through low-pressure tubes at near-supersonic speeds was first proposed by Musk in 2013, in a white paper that captivated engineers around the world.
Attempts to develop the Hyperloop concept at a SpaceX test track ended in 2023, after a number of technical hurdles, including the challenge of maintaining vacuum integrity and stabilising pods at extreme velocities.
In contrast, China is charging ahead, with the stakes transcending the engineering challenges.
Beijing has made ultra-high-speed magnetic levitation tech a national research priority that could not only redefine global transit, but also transform other critical sectors, including the race to achieve low-cost space launches.
The test facility in Datong, Shanxi province, represents Beijing's bet that China will dominate the next generation of public transport. To that end, its engineers have achieved airtight concrete, millimetre-precision joints and other hard-won feats.
According to the research team, without physical contact between train and track, the system's electromagnetic forces interact with the cabin in unpredictable ways. The result is resonance that would rattle passengers 'with extreme levels of instability'.
'Our research accounted for track irregularities, vertical bending of bridges, and single-frequency excitations induced by lateral irregularities in ground coils,' wrote Zhao and his colleagues.
'Under track excitation at an equivalent speed of 1,000km/h, the car body exhibited peak vibration amplitudes at frequencies of 2.6 Hz, 5.2 Hz, 7.8 Hz, and 10.4 Hz,' they added.
To overcome the problem, the Chinese team developed a hybrid suspension system combining passive air springs with electromagnetic actuators that are controlled by artificial intelligence.
The electricity-powered actuators adopt two cutting-edge control strategies, the paper said. One is a so-called sky-hook that mimics an imaginary damper linking the cabin to a stationary 'sky', using real-time velocity feedback to neutralise low-frequency jolts.
The other strategy, PID control, adjusts suspension forces via proportional, integral, and derivative algorithms, optimised by an NSGA-II genetic AI method to handle variable track conditions.
When tested on a 1:10 scale model with six-axis motion simulators, the system reduced vertical vibration intensity, measured as a root mean square acceleration, by 45.6 per cent under realistic track profiles.
Sperling Index scores stayed below 2.5 – 'more pronounced but not unpleasant' – across all speeds, according to the study.
The researchers said there were still some challenges ahead, such as scaling up the suspension tech for full-sized trains and ensuring that they would work in emergency braking and other extreme conditions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
How Tesla plans to remotely control its robotaxis — but experts warn of tech gaps
AUSTIN, June 23 — Tesla tiptoed into its long-awaited robotaxi service in Austin, Texas yesterday with about 10 of its Model Y SUVs that will operate within strict limits. The rides were being offered yesterday for a flat fee of US$4.20 (RM18), CEO Elon Musk said in an X post, and social media influencers were seen booking and taking rides in the robotaxis in several Austin locations, according to videos reposted by Musk. Musk has said the company is being 'super paranoid' about safety and that humans will remotely monitor the fleet, which also have safety monitors in front passenger seats. Remote access and control — known in the industry as 'teleoperation' — is used in varying degrees by the handful of robotaxi startups operating around the globe. The technology has clear advantages and important limitations. Here are some details of how it works: What is teleoperation? Teleoperation is the control of machines by humans in a different location, usually over a wireless network. It is used to train robots to operate autonomously, monitor their autonomous activity, and take over when required. How do robotaxi operators use teleoperation? The global robotaxi industry is still in test mode, as companies deploy the vehicles in limited geographic areas and continually adjust the artificial intelligence software that controls them. Teleoperation is often used to intervene when a vehicle is unsure of what to do. Alphabet's Waymo, for example, has a team of human 'fleet response' agents who respond to questions from the Waymo Driver — its bot. 'Much like phone-a-friend, when the Waymo vehicle encounters a particular situation on the road, the autonomous driver can reach out to a human fleet response agent for additional information,' Waymo said in a blog post last year. Former Waymo CEO John Krafcik told Reuters, 'the cars aren't being actively monitored,' adding that the software is 'the ultimate decision-maker.' A Waymo video shows a car asking a remote operator whether a street with emergency response vehicles is open to traffic. When the human says yes, the vehicle proceeds. In contrast, other companies, such as Baidu's Apollo Go in China, have used fully remote backup drivers who can step in to virtually drive the vehicles. Baidu declined to comment. A Tesla robotaxi drives on the street along South Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas June 22, 2025. — Reuters pic What are the limitations? Driving vehicles remotely on public roads has a major potential problem: it relies on cellular data connections that can drop or operate with a lag, disconnecting the vehicle from the remote driver in dangerous situations. Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said that approach could work for a small test deployment of 10 vehicles, such as Tesla's initial effort in Austin, but he called teleoperation 'inherently unreliable technology.' 'Eventually you will lose connection at exactly the worst time,' he said. 'If they've done their homework, this won't ever happen for 10 cars. With a million cars, it's going to happen every day.' Former Waymo CEO Krafcik agreed, adding that the time delay in cell signal makes remote driving 'very risky.' On the other hand, relying on the vehicle to reach out for help and allowing the vehicle to be the decision-maker are risky as well, Koopman said, as it does not guarantee the vehicle will make the right decision. Waymo declined to comment on the limitations of its approach. Koopman also noted there are limits to how many vehicles one person can safely monitor. A group of Democratic Texas lawmakers had asked Tesla on Wednesday to delay its robotaxi launch until September, when a new autonomous-driving law is scheduled to take effect. The Austin-area lawmakers said in a letter that delaying the launch 'is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' A Tesla robotaxi with no backseat passengers drives on the street along South Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas June 22, 2025. — Reuters pic What is Tesla's approach? Musk for years has promised, without delivering, that its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) advanced driver assistance software would graduate to completely self-driving and control robotaxis. This year, he said Tesla would roll out a paid service in Austin underpinned by an 'unsupervised' version of the software. 'Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin,' Musk told analysts and investors in January. In May, he told CNBC that the robotaxi would only operate in parts of Austin that are safe for it, would avoid difficult intersections, and would use humans to monitor the vehicles. What those teleoperators are doing is not clear. For years inside Tesla, company executives have expected to use teleoperators who could take over in case of trouble, said one person familiar with the matter. For instance, if a robotaxi were stuck in a crowded pedestrian area and confused about what to do next, a human teleoperator could take over and guide it, the source said. Tesla advertised for teleoperation positions, saying the company needs the ability to 'access and control' autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely. Such employees can 'remotely perform complex and intricate tasks,' it said in the advertisements. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. 'We are being super paranoid about safety,' Musk said in a post ahead of the launch. — Reuters
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Stone carving discovered in Qinghai stirs debate
BEIJING: A stone carving that some scholars believe dates back more than 2,200 years and could carry major cultural significance has ignited a heated debate among history enthusiasts, as several university professors have raised concerns that the inscriptions may be modern forgeries. The controversy began with a June 8 report in Guangming Daily, in which Tong Tao, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' Institute of Archaeology, claimed archaeologists had recently discovered a stone carving linked to Emperor Qinshihuang — the first Chinese ruler to hold the title huangdi, or "emperor" — who founded the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BC). According to the report, the inscriptions were found near Gyaring Lake in present-day Madoi county, Qinghai province, at an altitude of about 4,300 metres. Photos published alongside the story showed that the characters were clear and in relatively good condition. Carved in xiaozhuan, a signature script of the Qin era, the inscription was interpreted as describing a team of fangshi (alchemists) led by a wudafu (a minister-level official), who were traveling by wagon to Kunlun Mountain in search of elixirs for immortality. The text claims the group reached the lake in the third month of the 26th year of Qinshihuang's reign, and would travel another 150 li (about 62 kilometres) to reach their final destination. In ancient Chinese texts, Kunlun Mountain is imbued with mythological importance, akin to Mount Olympus in Greek mythology. It is also believed to be the birthplace of the Yellow River, often referred to as the "mother river" of China. Today, Kunlun refers to a long mountain range in western China, but its precise location in pre-Qin times is still debated among scholars. "The carving was found by Gyaring Lake, with the Bayan Har Mountains to the south. So the search for elixirs in Kunlun should refer to Bayan Har, which undoubtedly corresponds to the 'Sacred Kunlun Mountain' in pre-Qin classics," Tong wrote. He added that the identification of Kunlun "matches perfectly with pre-Qin geographical texts that pointed to Kunlun as the source of the Yellow River", noting that modern hydrological studies confirm the Gyaring Lake and Bayan Har Mountains as headwaters of the river. Historical texts state that seven stone monuments were carved to commemorate Emperor Qinshihuang's achievements following his inspection tours across the unified empire between 219 and 211 BC. Only two fragmentary examples have survived, both badly damaged and nearly illegible. Tong called the new find "the only existing Qin Dynasty carving at its original site and the most complete one". Some online commenters hailed the find as monumental. "Historical maps will be redrawn and the debate over Kunlun's location will be resolved. Salute to archaeologists who braved the elements," one person wrote. However, the carving has also drawn skepticism — including from academics — over its authenticity. "If the inscriptions' meaning was interpreted correctly, then I highly suspect this is a modern forgery. That would mark a new level of falsification," said Xin Deyong, a history professor at Peking University, without elaborating. He repeated his doubts in later social media posts and said he plans to write a book analysing what he called an "unbelievably fake" inscription. Liu Zongdi, a professor at Beijing Language and Culture University, pointed out logistical inconsistencies in the story. For the team to arrive at the location by the stated time, he said, they would have had to set out the previous autumn or winter — an implausible scenario given the high altitude and harsh climate. He also questioned how the travelers could have anticipated the formal use of the title "emperor", which was proclaimed during the same year as their supposed journey. Additional doubts have been raised regarding the inscribed date, grammar and terminology, with both supporters and skeptics presenting arguments. For instance, Liu Zhao, a professor of ancient texts at Fudan University, said the engraving technique — particularly the direction of certain character strokes — aligns with the known calligraphic style of the Qin period. He also noted that a rare way of writing "Kunlun" seen in the inscription matches that on Qin-era bamboo slips unearthed in Hunan province. Because that writing style has only been documented in the past 20 years and is otherwise unknown, Liu argued that it would require "a forger with deep and niche academic knowledge" to replicate it. Nanjing-based Ziniu News reported that Hou Guangliang, a professor at Qinghai Normal University, first identified the inscription in July 2020 during a field survey. At the time, he said only a few characters — including huang — could be clearly made out. Hou initially suggested the inscription may have been created after the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368), using Qin-style characters for visual effect. He also said the harsh conditions around Gyaring Lake make long-term preservation of carvings difficult, and that only from the Yuan period onward did the region come under stable government control, allowing large expeditions to be logistically feasible. However, Hou has since reconsidered. In a recent interview with Southern Metropolis Daily, he described his earlier comments as "a bit shallow" and said further research is needed. In a commentary, The Beijing News encouraged the public to see the controversy as a process of "academic refinement" and an opportunity to popularise archaeology. "The truth will gradually emerge through rigorous research and evidence-based discussion," the editorial said. - China Daily/ANN
Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
India grants licence to Musk's Starlink
The launch of Starlink has sparked fierce debate in India over issues ranging from predatory pricing to spectrum allocation. (AFP pic) NEW DELHI : New Delhi has granted a licence to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, opening India's 'next frontier of connectivity', according to the country's communications minister. The launch of Starlink, which provides high-speed internet access to remote locations using low Earth orbit satellites, has sparked fierce debate in India over issues ranging from predatory pricing to spectrum allocation. Communications minister Jyotiraditya Scindia said he held a 'productive meeting' with Gwynne Shotwell, president and COO of Starlink owner SpaceX. Shotwell 'appreciated the licence granted to Starlink, calling it a great start to the journey', the minister said late yesterday on Musk-owned social media platform X. It follows two of India's biggest telecom service providers – Jio Platforms and its rival Bharti Airtel – in March announcing deals with SpaceX to offer Starlink internet to their customers. SpaceX owner Musk has butted heads with Asia's richest man and Jio Platforms owner Mukesh Ambani over how the satellite spectrum should be awarded. While Musk's business interests in India are currently limited to X, the tech mogul's electric vehicle maker Tesla is preparing its entry into the country.
