Do we actually need a new Archbishop of Canterbury?
Here's a tale of two versions of the Church of England. This past week, I've been talking to some of the churchwardens, parochial church council secretaries and treasurers, curates and vicars, who not only put on services and keep food banks and lunch clubs going, but are responsible for repairing the roofs and rebuilding the buttresses.
And then there's the other Church of England – the one that is represented by its high-ups, that I usually come into contact with at this time of year when the Archbishop of Canterbury hosts his summer party at his Lambeth Palace home.
But this year, there is no clinking of glasses and the Archbishop's apartment lies empty. Justin Welby, who dramatically resigned in November, days after a report into a prolific child abuser associated with the Church of England, finally moved out earlier this summer.
If that departure took a long time, then finding his replacement is taking even longer, and is now predicted to last until the end of the year – 12 months on from his resignation. As my conversations with the people who attend and run Anglican churches highlighted, for them it is business as usual – regardless of Welby quitting just before Christmas.
Meanwhile, Stephen Cottrell, who has the CofE's number two job as Archbishop of York, can sign off any urgent institutional business, while he offers spiritual leadership by way of his current tour of the north, talking about the Lord's Prayer.
So, if the Church of England has carried on regardless, might it not just give up on the protracted process of finding a replacement for Welby? Well, it might not affect Matins in Maidstone or Evensong in Evesham, but it's a certainly a problem for the established Anglican Church.
The Archbishop of Canterbury is always one of the 26 Anglican bishops in the House of Lords, and Welby's speeches were frequently reported on (including his final one, viewed as tone-deaf). Now there's a void.
Then there's the order of precedence; the Archbishop of Canterbury is always first after the Royal Family in this country, so when Donald Trump makes his state visit to Britain in the autumn, there will be an ecclesiastical-shaped hole at the state banquet (unless Cottrell returns from his tour of the north to play stand-in).
Welby's most prominent moment, of course, as part of Establishment Britain, came with his crowning of the King at the Coronation. But there's more to the relationship than that. Meetings may not be as frequent as the weekly audience of the prime minister, but the private talks between the archbishop and the regal Supreme Governor of the Church of England do happen.
It is this aspect of the Church of England – being the established church – that is causing the problem with finding a successor to Welby. A 20-strong Crown Nominations Commission (CNC) headed by former MI5 boss Lord Jonathan Evans with representatives of the Church of England and the Crown is wading through paperwork, studying comments sent in by the public and assessing candidates.
A quarter of the CNC represents the global Anglican Communion. One can imagine the hours of discussion about hot-button topics such as same-sex blessings and whether the Archbishop might be a woman this time. And after that, the chosen name must be submitted to the prime minister and approved by the King.
There is, of course, a simpler way of choosing a church leader. I know, as a Roman Catholic, that I will seem parti-pris, and this will send Henry VIII spinning his grave (no bad thing), but the Vatican knows how to make people focus on the task in hand.
So, Church of England: stick all the members of the CNC in a locked room and only let them out when they've made a decision. It worked for Rome. The conclave took just two days to elect Pope Leo XIV.
Why not have an Anglican conclave, put everyone out of their misery and send up some white smoke?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Met Police chief 'shocked' by planned Palestine Action protest in London
The Metropolitan Police chief has said he is "shocked and frustrated" at a planned protest in support of Palestine Action in London on Sir Mark Rowley said while the right to protest is essential, "actions in support of such a group go beyond what most would see as legitimate protest".It comes as the home secretary is understood to be preparing a written statement to put before Parliament on Monday to proscribe the group, effectively branding it a terrorist Friday, Palestine Action activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and sprayed two military planes with red paint in protest of the UK's support of Israel over the war in Gaza. The planned protest in central London is supported by 35 groups including various other pro-Palestinian groups, the Stop the War Coalition, Cage and Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND).Describing Palestine Action as a "organised extremist criminal group", Sir Mark said that until the group is proscribed, the Met had no legal power to prevent the protest taking place."We do, however, have the power to impose conditions on it to prevent disorder, damage, and serious disruption to the community," he added, saying "breaches of the law will be dealt with robustly."The Met said it would release conditions for the protest "once they have been confirmed".In an earlier post on social media, Palestine Action said "the political establishment rush to call us 'terrorists', whilst they enact the worst crimes against humanity".One of the group's members, Saeed Taji Farouky, told the BBC on Saturday that government plans to proscribe the group were "absurd". He said the move "rips apart the very basic concepts of British democracy and the rule of law", and added: "It's something everyone should be terrified about."Palestine Action has engaged in activities that have predominantly targeted arms companies since the start of the current war in Gaza, with the group claiming responsibility in May for the daubing of a US military plane in Farouky said the group's "whole reason for being is to break the material supply chain to genocide" and said Friday's incident was an "escalation in tactics because the genocide has escalated".Israel has strongly denied allegations of genocide relating to the ongoing war in Minister Sir Keir Starmer described the incident at RAF Brize Norton as "disgraceful". Counter-terrorism police are investigating the break in to the move to ban Palestine Action was welcomed by some in Westminster, including former Home Secretary Suella Braverman, who said the move to ban the group was "absolutely the correct decision".Others have reacted critically, including Labour MP Zarah Sultana, who recalled protests against the 2003 war in Iraq: "A million people marched against the illegal war in Iraq and they were right. Now the same script is playing out again."Amnesty International UK said on Friday that it was "deeply concerned at the use of counter terrorism powers to target protests".Regular protests related to the war in Gaza have been held in London since Israel began a military campaign to destroy Hamas in response to the unprecedented cross-border attack on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken than 55,000 people have been killed in Gaza since then, including more than 15,000 children, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
JK Rowling praises BBC newsreader Martine Croxall for refusing to say ‘pregnant people' live on air
AUTHOR JK Rowling has praised BBC newsreader Martine Croxall after she refused to refer to "pregnant people" live on air. The Harry Potter writer, 59, joked that she had a "new favourite BBC presenter" after Martine overruled her autocue which referred to "pregnant people" being at risk during the recent hot weather. 4 4 JK Rowling has been a prominent women's rights campaigner and has often been vocal on what she calls "sex-based rights" for several years. In the clip from a recent BBC News show, Martine introduces comments from new research about the number of heat-related deaths expected during the ongoing hot weather period. However, as she reads along the autocue, she raises an eyebrow and smirks at the camera after having to say "pregnant people" could be at risk in the heat. She then quickly overrides this, saying "women" instead, before moving on with the rest of the script. Martine read: "Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people - women! - and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions." Reposting the clip on X, JK Rowling praised the BBC presenter, saying she was her "new favourite". It is understood that the term "pregnant people" had been written by the researchers and was being quoted, rather than the BBC having written the phrase. Other commenters also jumped in to praise "brilliant" Martine, with one saying: "I hope you don't get hauled before the BBC News break." In response, Martine joked: "Braced x". Martine has been a veteran broadcaster for the BBC, having first joined the company more than 30 years ago in 1991. USA Gymnastics Reconsiders Trans Athlete Policy Amid Biles-Gaines Feud She then began working for the BBC News team in 2001. This comes just weeks after the same presenter challenged a transgender activist who questioned whether the definition of a woman could be determined by biological sex. While interviewing ex-Labour MSP candidate Heather Herbert, following the Supreme Court's ruling that the term women referred to one's biological sex, Martine found herself in a heated debate. JK Rowling in bitter spat with Boy George as singer calls her 'rich bored bully' over trans rights JK Rowling has blasted Boy George for calling her a 'rich bored bully' – pointing out he once served time for whipping a male escort with a chain. The Harry Potter author posted a furious response on X after the Culture Club singer waded into a spat with another user who claimed Ms Rowling was 'the person maybe most responsible for the push to take away trans rights'. When Ms Rowling asked the X user 'which rights have been taken away from trans people?', Boy George responded: 'The right to be left alone by a rich bored bully!' Ms Rowling posted a lengthy rebuttal in which she accused the Karma Chameleon singer, whose real name is George O'Dowd, of sneering at 'unenlightened plebs' who reject the notion that trans women are women. She added: 'I've never been given 15 months for handcuffing a man to a wall and beating him with a chain.' Boy George was jailed in 2009 for handcuffing an escort to his bed and inflicting 'wholly gratuitous violence' at a property in Shoreditch, east London, in April 2007. The court was told that the cocaine-fuelled attack on Audun Carlsen, a Norwegian man, had been 'premeditated and callous' and had left the victim 'traumatised'. Boy George had been found guilty at an earlier trial of false imprisonment and beating Carlsen with a chain with the help of another man, whom he had never identified. Ms Rowling rejected Boy George's claim that she was entitled. During a conversation on clarifying "what the word woman means", Heather declared she felt like she was "under attack" from Martine's questioning. The veteran BBC newsreader countered by questioning how it could be an "attack" when all she was asking for was clarification. She then told Heather that the ruling made it clear "sex is binary and immutable" after the trans activist denied that local authorities - who have not protected single sex spaces based on biological sex - may have to reverse policies as a result of the ruling. 4
Telegraph
7 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rayner facing fight over China ‘super-embassy' in heart of London
Robert Jenrick has called for a judicial review if the Government approves plans for a new Chinese 'super-embassy' in London. In a highly controversial move, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, is expected to wave through proposals for a new Chinese complex near the city's financial hub within weeks. The proposed 'mega embassy' at the former Royal Mint site, near the Tower of London, has been locked in a planning battle for years, with the decision called in for review by Ms Rayner last year. The Planning Inspectorate, a Government agency, has now reportedly given the development the green light, with the Deputy Prime Minister set to rubber stamp the decision by September. There have been fears the building could effectively become a nest of spies in the heart of London. The US has reportedly warned the UK to reject the proposals on security grounds given the site's proximity to a hub of sensitive data near key financial centres. Tory critics of the controversial proposals have accused the Government of capitulating to China and warned that the new embassy would pose a threat to Britain's national security. Ms Rayner also faces a backlash from her own party if she waves through the application, with one Labour MP telling The Telegraph they thought it would be wrong to approve it. The backbencher said they had concerns about the possible security implications and warned the UK would 'do well' to listen to Sir Richard Dearlove, a former head of MI6, who highlighted the site's proximity to sensitive communication cables. Mr Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said he would support a judicial review into the decision if the plans were approved. This would involve challenging the lawfulness of the decision, raising the prospect of it being overturned in the courts. A judicial review is different to an appeal. It would look at whether the decision was made in the proper manner, rather than the merits of the decision itself. Mr Jenrick told The Telegraph: 'The super-embassy 'spy hub' would be damaging for our national security, and must be stopped. The process is a fiasco and needs to be reviewed.' The expectation that the decision will be approved by September was first reported by The Sunday Times, which said the Planning Inspectorate's report had landed on Ms Rayner's desk just under two weeks ago. Mark Francois, the shadow defence minister, told The Telegraph: 'This Government is rapidly running out of people to surrender to. 'Whether it's the transport unions over drivers' pay, the EU over our fishing rights, Mauritius over the Chagos Islands, Spain over the border at Gibralta, Gerry Adams over Northern Ireland Veterans and now China over their desired 'mega embassy' – atop cables which are critical to the financial security of the Western economies. And this all in less than a year. 'Just think how many other countries and organisations they could abjectly capitulate to, with a bit of real extra effort, over a whole Parliament?' In a debate on the development earlier this month, Marie Rimmer, the Labour MP for St Helens South and Whiston, warned that China had a 'track record of aggressive state-backed espionage'. 'Surely this country cannot afford to make a massive underestimation of the risk should this go ahead as expected,' she said. 'Experts warn that there could be the foreign leverage of signals, interception and monitoring of sensitive Government and corporate communications. To what extent can individuals make representations, because everyone is extremely concerned that such a massive and historic building was sold some years ago? 'This is pre-empted. This is how China works – it plans years ahead. We cannot not say anything in this House, we must comment on what we see. Please, understand that we must.' Mark Sewards, the Labour MP for Leeds South West and Morley, added: 'I appreciate that the Minister cannot comment on individual planning applications from the despatch box, but when I speak to Hong Kongers in my constituency, they are seriously concerned about the risks that come with transnational repression and that might come along with the creation and construction of this embassy.' The row presents an awkward dilemma for Sir Keir Starmer, who has pursued a strategy of engagement with Beijing while attempting to maintain a positive relationship with Donald Trump, a prominent China sceptic. Earlier this month, Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, said the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any security fears raised. He said: 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process. But just to reassure people, we deal with embassies and these sorts of infrastructure issues all the time. We are very experienced of it, and we are very aware of these sorts of issues constantly, not just when new buildings are being done, but all the time.'
