Why Donald Trump's response to the King's speech should focus Canadian minds
Think of it as the real response to King Charles' Throne Speech, the one that really counts—for the moment, at least.
Or call it Donald Trump's bluff to Prime Minister Mark Carney: I'll see your king and raise you…a missile defence shield.
In veiled terms, that was the message the U.S. president sent to his northern neighbour, bringing the pomp-and-circumstance of Tuesday's historic Royal visit back to the harsh-and-crude basics of modern-day geopolitics.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
'I told Canada, which wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation,' Trump wrote on social media, 'but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our the cherished 51 st State.'
Federal Politics
Mark Carney confirms Canada in talks to join Donald Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile defence system
Alex Ballingall
The plans for an American missile defence system were unveiled earlier this month. The purpose is to better protect against the advanced and aggressive capabilities developed by adversarial countries like China, Russia, North Korea and Iran that could be launched from the ground, sea or space.
In a very real way, the longstanding question of continental defence from such a hypothetical attack neatly explains part of America's uncomfortable interest in taking on, or taking over, Canada.
In the Cold War with the Soviet Union, a system of radars was established across the Canadian Arctic, known as the Distant Early Warning Line. It was a geographic reality that this country would have been the front or the no-man's land in a dreaded nuclear war between Washington and Moscow that never came to pass.
That nature of the threat is in constant flux, but the reality that the Canadian and American fates are intertwined when it comes to the defence of the continent hasn't fundamentally changed.
Canada rejected the overtures of then-president George W. Bush to join the Ballistic Missile Defence system in 2005, with then-prime minister Paul Martin ultimately deciding it was better to bend to the will of opposition parties in a minority Parliament than to an American leader burnishing his credentials as a war monger and pariah.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
'We respect the right of the United States to defend itself and its people,' Martin said at the time. 'However, BMD is not where we will concentrate our efforts.'
Classic Canadian good manners won't count for much this time around.
With Trump in his second presidential term keen to exert greater influence in the region—from Panama's canal in the south to Greenland's shores and resources in the north—opting out of a common defence project only bolsters the view of Canada as a weak link in North America.
Pulling out or refusing to pay a part of the estimated US$175-billiion bill (CAD$242 billion) would leave Canada to be viewed in Washington as a risk for the U.S. in a much more concrete way than the exaggerated earlier claims that this country is a conduit for U.S.-bound fentanyl and migrants.
Trump ended Wednesday's online intervention, saying of Canada: 'They are considering the offer.'
Federal Politics
Opinion
Susan Delacourt: It might have been the King's speech, but the message to Donald Trump was all Mark Carney
Susan Delacourt
This is no doubt true. The prime minister has already confirmed that talks are underway about Canada joining the Golden Dome project. It's one piece in a wider discussion about Ottawa upping its security and defence game.
One of his first acts upon taking over the Liberal leadership and becoming Prime Minister was to travel to Nunavut and announce the purchase of a $6 billion radar system from Australia.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Against the menace of U.S. trade tariffs, the announcement was seen as rebuke to our neighbours—a message that you can't target Canada and expect Canadian tax dollars to continue being spent on military equipment that enriches American defence companies.
But reversing decades of Canadian defence policy and joining Trump's Golden Dome project could be just as difficult to pull off, James Fergusson, a University of Manitoba associate professor of politics, wrote in an April analysis of Canada's ballistic missile 'dilemma' for the Canadian Global Affairs Institute.
'To reverse Canadian policy, likely interpreted as caving into Trump, will require bold leadership which is not necessarily the hallmark of Canadian governments,' he noted.
Be it sovereignty, statehood or something else along that spectrum, the stakes are high if Canada blinks in the missile-defence gamble.
Those fed up with Trump's threats may bristle at yet another instance of American interference. But for those who hope that the Carney government follows through on its solemn vow to make Canada more strong, more sovereign, less dependent on our neighbours to the south in every respect, Trump's message—essentially, pay up or give up—could be a a motivator and welcome reminder.
Throne speeches, which mark the opening of a new session of Parliament, are too-often filled with platitudes and vague promises to be forgotten or to go unfulfilled. How many pledges have been abandoned to the realities of parliamentary politics?
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
This is particularly true for a minority government that must seek issue-by-issue support from opposition parties to implement its agenda.
The Carney Liberals form such a minority government. But with the NDP reduced to a leaderless 7-MP rump, Pierre Poilievre leading the Conservative Party from outside the House of Commons, and the Bloc Quebecois offering to collaborate—at least in the short term—it has a fair bit of breathing room.
Room that will be needed to pass enhance border security, negotiate new trade and defence partnerships, hire more police officers, strengthen gun controls and adopt stiffer penalties for law-breakers.
King Charles uses throne speech to bolster Canada's autonomy against Donald Trump's threats
All of these were promised in a Throne Speech that appears to be focused, laser-like, on building Canada stronger in response to the weaknesses exposed with Trump's return to power.
Whatever one thinks about the merits or effectiveness of the president's bully approach to, well, everything, it has sharpened Canadian minds on a national project, the likes of which the country hasn't had in some time.
Every Canada-focused intervention, every all-caps message about the 51 st state, every tariff taunt is a reminder that Washington is watching with an unforgiving eye that will not be lifted, even if the president's megaphone mouth goes temporarily quiet.
Correction - May 28, 2025
This article was updated to note that US $175 billion is $242 billion Canadian. The Canadian conversion was misstated in millions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
The Latest: US strikes 3 Iranian sites, joining Israeli air campaign
The U.S. military struck three sites in Iran early Sunday, directly joining Israel 's war aimed at decapitating the country's nuclear program in a risky gambit to weaken a longtime foe amid Tehran's threat of reprisals that could spark a wider regional conflict. The decision to directly involve the U.S. comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. But U.S. and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and a 30,000-lb. bunker buster bomb they alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily-fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear program buried deep underground.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
US strikes 3 Iranian sites, joining Israeli air campaign against nuclear program
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Iran's nuclear agency on Sunday confirmed attacks took place on its Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz atomic sites, but is insisting its work will not be stopped. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran issued the statement after President Donald Trump announced the American attack on the facilities. 'The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran assures the great Iranian nation that despite the evil conspiracies of its enemies, with the efforts of thousands of its revolutionary and motivated scientists and experts, it will not allow the development of this national industry, which is the result of the blood of nuclear martyrs, to be stopped,' it said in its statement. THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP's earlier story follows below. TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — The U.S. military struck three sites in Iran early Sunday, directly joining Israel 's war aimed at decapitating the country's nuclear program in a risky gambit to weaken a longtime foe amid Tehran's threat of reprisals that could spark a wider regional conflict. President Donald Trump was the first to disclose the strikes. There was no immediate acknowledgment from the Iranian government. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported that attacks targeted the country's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. The agency did not elaborate. The decision to directly involve the U.S. in the war comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that aimed to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. But U.S. and Israeli officials have said that American stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound (13,500-kilogram) bunker buster bomb they alone can carry offered the best chance of destroying heavily fortified sites connected to the Iranian nuclear program buried deep underground. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Trump said in a post on social media. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.' Trump added in a later post that he would address the nation at 10 p.m. Eastern time, writing 'This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's decision to attack in a video message directed at the American president. 'Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities, with the awesome and righteous might of the United States, will change history,' he said. Netanyahu said the U.S. 'has done what no other country on earth could do.' The White House and Pentagon did not immediately elaborate on the operation. But Fox News host Sean Hannity said shortly after 9 p.m. Eastern that he had spoken with Trump and that six bunker buster bombs were used on the Fordo facility. Hannity said 30 Tomahawk missiles fired by U.S. submarines 400 miles away struck the Iranian nuclear sites of Natanz and Isfahan. The strikes are a perilous decision, as Iran has pledged to retaliate if the U.S. joined the Israeli assault, and for Trump personally. He won the White House on the promise of keeping America out of costly foreign conflicts and scoffed at the value of American interventionism. Trump told reporters Friday that he was not interested in sending ground forces into Iran, saying it's 'the last thing you want to do.' He had previously indicated that he would make a final choice over the course of two weeks. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned the United States on Wednesday that strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them.' And Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei declared 'any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region.' Trump has vowed that he would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon, and he had initially hoped that the threat of force would bring the country's leaders to give up its nuclear program peacefully. The Israeli military said Saturday it was preparing for the possibility of a lengthy war, while Iran's foreign minister warned before the U.S. attack that American military involvement 'would be very, very dangerous for everyone.' The prospect of a wider war loomed. Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen said they would resume attacks on U.S. vessels in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joined Israel's military campaign. The Houthis paused such attacks in May under a deal with the U.S. The U.S. ambassador to Israel announced that the U.S. had begun 'assisted departure flights,' the first from Israel since the Hamas-led attack on Oct. 7, 2023, that sparked the war in Gaza. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that Trump planned to make his decision on the strikes within two weeks. Instead, he struck just two days later. Trump appears to have made the calculation — at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republican lawmakers — that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear program, perhaps permanently. The Israelis say their offensive has already crippled Iran's air defenses, allowing them to already significantly degrade multiple Iranian nuclear sites. But to destroy the Fordo nuclear fuel enrichment plant, Israel appealed to Trump for the bunker-busting American bomb known as the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets and then explode. The bomb is currently delivered only by the B-2 stealth bomber, which is only found in the American arsenal. If deployed in the attack, it would be the first combat use of the weapon. The bomb carries a conventional warhead, and is believed to be able to penetrate about 200 feet (61 meters) below the surface before exploding, and the bombs can be dropped one after another, effectively drilling deeper and deeper with each successive blast. The International Atomic Energy Agency has confirmed that Iran is producing highly enriched uranium at Fordo, raising the possibility that nuclear material could be released into the area if the GBU-57 A/B were used to hit the facility. Previous Israeli strikes at another Iranian nuclear site, Natanz, on a centrifuge site have caused contamination only at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA has said. Trump's decision for direct U.S. military intervention comes after his administration made an unsuccessful two-month push — including with high-level, direct negotiations with the Iranians — aimed at persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear program. For months, Trump said he was dedicated to a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. And he twice — in April and again in late May — persuaded Netanyahu to hold off on military action against Iran and give diplomacy more time. The U.S. in recent days has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel and U.S. bases from Iranian attacks. All the while, Trump has gone from publicly expressing hope that the moment could be a 'second chance' for Iran to make a deal to delivering explicit threats on Khamenei and making calls for Tehran's unconditional surrender. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Trump said in a social media posting. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' The military showdown with Iran comes seven years after Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' Winnipeg Jets Game Days On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. The 2015 deal, signed by Iran, U.S. and other world powers, created a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Trump decried the Obama-era deal for giving Iran too much in return for too little, because the agreement did not cover Iran's non-nuclear malign behavior. Trump has bristled at criticism from some of his MAGA faithful, including conservative pundit Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that further U.S. involvement would be a betrayal to supporters who were drawn to his promise to end U.S. involvement in expensive and endless wars. ___ Madhani reported from Washington. Rising reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writers Nasser Karimi in Iran; Mehmet Guzel in Istanbul; Josef Federman in Jerusalem; Samy Magdy in Cairo; Matthew Lee and Josh Boak in Washington; and Farnoush Amiri and Jon Gambrell in Dubai contributed to this report.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
US strikes 3 Iranian sites, joining Israeli air campaign against nuclear program
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — The U.S. military struck three sites in Iran early Sunday, directly joining Israel 's war aimed at decapitating the country's nuclear program in a risky gambit to weaken a longtime foe amid Tehran's threat of reprisals that could spark a wider regional conflict. President Donald Trump was the first to disclose the strikes. There was no immediate acknowledgment from the Iranian government. Iran's state-run IRNA news agency reported that attacks targeted the country's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. The agency did not elaborate.
