Independence support at 58 per cent if Nigel Farage becomes PM

A Norstat survey for The Sunday Times has suggested that the rise of Reform UK and the failings of the Labour government have helped to increase support for Scottish independence.
Data from the poll, which was published Saturday evening, shows the Yes side has opened up an eight-point lead, sitting at 54%, when undecided voters are excluded.
READ MORE: Police ignore watchdog's Operation Branchform forensics review offer
The poll also showed that if Farage were to enter Downing Street and become prime minister, support for Scottish independence would be at 58%.
It suggests that with Farage leading the UK, it would leave independence campaigners within touching distance of 60% support, which many believe would represent a tipping point, making a refusal to grant a second independence referendum unsustainable.
Norstat survey comes with just days to go before the Holyrood by-election in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse constituency, where Scotland's First Minister John Swinney says the contest is between the SNP and Reform.
Labour appears to be out of the running for the by-election following a disastrous campaign by their candidate, Davy Russell, in a blow to Anas Sarwar's dreams of success at next year's Holyrood elections.
Norstat polling showed more woes for Sarwar and co, with fewer than one in five Scots planning to back Scottish Labour next year, in a devastating reversal of fortunes when the party won 37 seats in Scotland in the 2024 General Election.
A third of Scots, 33%, said they would vote for SNP with their constituency vote, meanwhile 28% said they would back the party on the regional list. Both represent a drop of two points compared with Norstat's polling by The Times three months ago.
However, according to projections by the polling expert John Curtice, a fracturing of the Unionist vote means the SNP remains on course to be comfortably returned as the largest party after next May's elections, with 54 of the devolved parliament's 129 seats.
Labour would be the second largest party with 20 seats, while Reform would have 18, one ahead of the Conservatives, who would have 17.
The Liberal Democrats would return 11 MSPs, up by five, and the Greens 9, a rise of two.
(Image: Colin Mearns)
On the recent polling figures, Curtice said: 'John Swinney is in pole position to remain Scotland's first minister after next year's Holyrood election. But his party is still struggling to recover from its sharp reversal of fortune last year.
'Key to the SNP's lead is the rise of Reform. Nigel Farage's party is now breathing down Labour's neck in the race for second place at Holyrood.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

ITV News

22 minutes ago

• ITV News

Oaths, committees, and presidents: the next steps in Guernsey's election process

Guernsey 's General Election has drawn to a close, with the island choosing its 38 new deputies. Voters backed change, electing 20 new faces alongside 18 sitting deputies. With several well-established politicians - such as Peter Ferbrache, Carl Meerveld, Andrea Dudley-Owen, Victoria Oliver, and Rob Prow - all missing out on re-election, the make-up of the island's top decision-makers is going to look quite different for the next political term. But who will they be, and how are they decided? Here is what the next couple of weeks will look like for the future States of Guernsey... 20-30 June: Get to know one another Until the night of Monday 30 June, the previous States are officially still in government. However, it will not be a relaxing week for the newly elected deputies - they will spend this time getting to know one another, figuring out where their beliefs overlap and policies align, and declaring which positions and roles they might like to hold. Whilst some declared their ambitions going into the election, many Deputies Elect told ITV News shortly after they got in that they are keen to work collaboratively, saying the jobs they may go for will be contingent upon the broader makeup of the Assembly. Returning Deputy Sasha Kazantseva-Miller said: "The most important thing now is building an Assembly that can work together and putting good people in the right places. "I'm really keen we approach it in a constructive, collegiate way." She added that she felt the large turnout signalled an "exciting day for our democracy, with a good Assembly to take forward". 1 July: Swearing in On Tuesday 1 July, the Deputies Elect will be officially sworn in, promising to serve the island and the Crown to the best of their abilities. This means they are the official States members for the next political term. 1 July: Election for Chief Minister Tuesday 1 July will also be the day the island's most senior politician - the President of Policy & Resources - is decided. As well as leading the Committee, they will become Guernsey's next Chief Minister. The States will hold a secret ballot to determine the President, with successive rounds of voting held until an outright winner is elected. Some of those who have already signposted that they would like the top job include former P&R Committee member Mark Helyar, and Charles Parkinson, who came third in the popular vote. Former Chief Minister Jonathan le Tocq also suggested he would be willing to throw his hat into the ring, telling ITV News: "I'm conscious of the fact that we need leadership and stability and continuity, someone that can bring all sides together, so I think it's likely I will put my name forward for President of P&R". Another potential candidate for Chief Minister is poll-topper Lindsay de Sausmarez, who received the backing of 54% of the electorate. However, she is yet to declare this ambition, saying, "My thoughts are all over the shop because I have not had a chance to really sit down and even look at who my colleagues are going to be". 2 July: Election for the Policy & Resources Committee The day after politicians choose their P&R President, they will elect the four other States members to join the committee. This is the island's most senior team, responsible for developing policies relating to leadership and coordination, fiscal policy, economic affairs, and external relations. The committee will likely be formed of people whose beliefs and goals align with those of the President. 4 July: Election of other Presidents On Friday 4 July, the States will elect the Presidents of the other committees. Each potential team leader will have to be nominated by two of their colleagues, and will be elected via a secret ballot similar to the system used to decide the President of P&R. The other Presidents will chair the following committees: The States will also elect a president for the newly created Housing Committee. With housing having been a particularly contentious election topic, it will be interesting to see who is chosen for this role and what their plan is for fixing some of the island's issues in this area. 7 July: Election for other committee members Monday 7 July will see the members of various committees decided upon, giving Deputies their official roles and responsibilities for the next four years. The work Deputies do as part of committees determines which policy areas they will work on and will shape their political careers. The only committee which will not be voted for is the Civil Contingencies Authority, which is formed of the Presidents of Policy & Resources, Environment & Infrastructure, Health & Social Care, and Home Affairs. 15 July: Ratify 2024 accounts Finally, on 15 July, the new States Assembly will conduct their first official piece of political business - the ratification of the 2024 accounts. With core government spending having been £44 million in deficit in 2024, this will be a significant moment that brings new Deputies immediately into the reality of political life. Want the inside track on the key issues that will shape Guernsey's Election this June? Listen to Guernsey Votes, an ITV Channel podcast packed with expert guests, local insight and analysis you can trust...

Telegraph

32 minutes ago

• Telegraph

British rocket launch backed by Labour falls further behind in space race

A British rocket start-up backed by Labour has pushed back the date of its first launch and is hunting fresh funding as the UK faces falling further behind in the space race. Orbex, which in January received a £20m investment from the taxpayer, confirmed its first test launch from the Shetland Islands would be in 2026, rather than later this year as hoped. The start-up is building its 62ft Orbex Prime rocket at a factory in Scotland, which is intended to carry small satellites into space. After securing taxpayer support, Orbex is now seeking a further £120m in funding from private investors over the next four years to bring its ambitions to reality, it said in a submission to MPs. The company is also pushing for further government backing, calling for support for its bid to build a new, larger rocket for the European Space Agency. The space organisation, of which the UK is a member, is offering companies up to £144m for its European Launcher Challenge as Europe seeks alternatives to its current reliance on Elon Musk's SpaceX. Orbex has been lobbying for Labour's £7bn National Wealth Fund to back the space sector, which it said in a consultation filing to MPs could 'level the playing field and unlock significant value for the UK economy'. The delay to Orbex's mission comes after a series of setbacks for Britain's fledgling launch industry. After a failed launch from Cornwall in 2023, Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Orbit went bankrupt. Since then, no new attempts at an orbital mission have gone ahead. Now, a number of small rocket companies are seeking to launch from UK soil, largely from Saxavord, a spaceport on the Shetland Islands, although they have faced delays. German start-up, Rocket Factory Augsburg, is still targeting a mission this year from Shetland, although its last test ended with its rocket exploding on the launchpad. Skyrora, a Scottish start-up, is hoping to launch from Shetland next year. A spokesman for Orbex said: 'There are many factors at play in determining our launch schedule, including licensing and launch logistics. This is not unusual.' The spokesman added government support would be needed to build a European rocket: 'National funding commitments and private investment will both be needed for winning bidders. 'UK Government support for our sector will send a clear signal to ESA that UK orbital launch companies like Orbex are a smart choice and long-term partner.'

The Herald Scotland

an hour ago

• The Herald Scotland

Starmer steel deal shows Swinney how nationalisation should work

A compelling read it certainly wasn't but it helped pass the time before the sun started to go down and I could think about dinner. Economists have never agreed on the benefits of nationalisation and history is littered with failed examples, particularly in the UK. But the two leaders currently occupying Bute House and Downing Street certainly seem to be in agreement that it's a good thing. And in many cases it is good but it's what you do with the assets as a Government after it is been taken into public control that is the important thing. It is here that John Swinney and Sir Keir Starmer diverge dramatically if recent events are anything to go by. Last week, a £500 million five-year deal was struck between Network Rail and British Steel to help save the Scunthorpe steelworks. British Steel is to supply 337,000 tonnes of rail track, which will secure thousands of manufacturing jobs. Why this is important is that it comes just two months after the UK Government used emergency powers to prevent the blast furnaces from immediate closure. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, said it 'truly transforms the outlook for British Steel and its dedicated workforce in Scunthorpe'. British Steel is to supply a minimum of 337,000 tonnes of long and short rail. A further 80-90,000 tonnes is to be provided by other European manufacturers and deals are expected to be announced shortly, the Department for Transport (DfT) said. In March, Chinese firm Jingye, which bought British Steel in 2020, proposed to shut Scunthorpe's two blast furnaces and other key steelmaking operations. Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late This came despite months of negotiations and a £500 million co-investment offer from the UK Government. As a result, Jingye launched a consultation which it said would affect between 2,000 and 2,700 jobs. In April, the UK Government used emergency powers to take control of British Steel and continue production at the site. The Scunthorpe plant has been producing steel for Britain's railways since 1865. The Network Rail contract, worth an estimated £500 million, starts on July 1 and is set to provide the company with 80% of its rail needs. To ensure security of supply, Network Rail is set to award smaller contracts to some European manufacturers, who will supply specialist rail products alongside British Steel. The agreement is the first major public procurement since the emergency legislation was passed. Both Network Rail and the Scunthorpe steel plant are both owned by the UK Government and the swift deal is clearly a direct benefit of being nationalised. No need for public procurement rules when both sites are state-owned. The Government sees it as being complimentary to the UK and US trade deal which aims to lower tariffs and protect jobs across key sectors, including steel. The deal also compares to the complete and utter horlicks that the Scottish Government has made following nationalisation of key industries. Ministers, of course, took over the stricken Ferguson Marine shipyard in Port Glasgow in 2019 after it collapsed into administration. It seemed to be the right decision as the shipyard's main customer was the state-owned ferry body CMAL, so a steady stream of orders should have been expected. Instead the yard is facing an uncertain future after losing out on several publicly funded ferry building contracts. Now ministers have even halted a vital subsidy for the yard that is needed to bring in vital work to keep it alive, it can be development has raised alarm that the yard will not survive beyond any delivery of the much-delayed and over budget CalMac ferry Glen Rosa. The yard's business plan to 2029 assumed that the Scottish Government would sanction a direct award of the small vessel replacement programme. It was an integral part of a plan to deliver a 'sustainable, profitable, efficient and competitive yard'. After it was decided that the £175m contract would go to a competitive tender, CMAL, the state-controlled ferry procurer declared in March that the job to build seven new loch-class electric ferries would go to Poland .It previously awarded two other ferry contracts worth to £220m to Cemre Marin Endustri A.S (Turkey) - with Ferguson Marine again losing out. Transport secretary Fiona Hyslop confirmed a 'substantial subsidy' was needed to allow it to get a direct uncontested contract to build seven new small ferries and secure its future. But she admitted in correspondence with former community safety minister Ash Regan that that subsidy was not justified. Ms Regan has raised concerns that it was 'not the direct award that's the issue it's the unwillingness to put public money behind a public asset'. Ferguson Marine has been dogged with issues with the delivery of ferries Glen Sannox and Glen Rosa which were due online in the first half of 2018. The last estimates suggest the costs of delivery of the vessels for CalMac will have soared to more than five times the original £97m cost. The shipyard firm currently employs more than 400 staff including over 100 sub-contractors. Goodness knows how they must be feeling, knowing full well that the Scottish Government is in the process of sinking the yard once and for all. For all the arguments against nationalisation, no book on economics will ever list sheer incompetence by Government ministers as a reason it will fail. While there are very good reasons that the yard is struggling, one of the main reasons is the sheer complexity of the two ferries which have made them very difficult to build. As it was the current administration that insisted on the specifications of being dual fuel and 'green' then it seems extremely harsh for ministers to now throw the workforce under a bus. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has shown exactly how nationalisation should work for the benefit of the workforce and the economy as a whole. For it to be a success, there has to be a will, strategy and above all, economic competence amongst ministers. Ministers at Holyrood have shown none of that and the Ferguson's workforce and islanders have been left high and dry as a result.