Procter & Gamble to cut 7,000 jobs over the next two years
Procter & Gamble has said it will cut six percent of its workforce, or 7,000 jobs, over the next two years as it undertakes a restructuring programme as tariffs raise costs and uncertainty for businesses and consumers.
The world's largest consumer goods company, which makes products ranging from Tide detergent to Pampers diapers, announced the job cuts on Thursday at a Deutsche Bank's Consumer Conference in Paris.
The Cincinnati, Ohio-based consumer goods giant also plans to exit some product categories and brands in certain markets, including some potential divestitures, as part of the broader two-year restructuring plan.
The restructuring will help simplify the organisational structure by 'making roles broader' and 'teams smaller', P&G said.
'The two-year window … gives them some flexibility in terms of timing and depth of cuts, as the tariff situation is very fluid,' said Christian Greiner, senior portfolio manager at F/m Investments that owns shares in P&G.
The company had about 108,000 employees as of June 2024. The job cuts would account for roughly 15 percent of its non-manufacturing workforce.
P&G expects to record charges of $1bn to $1.6bn before tax over the two-year period, with a quarter of the charges expected to be non-cash.
Chief Financial Officer Andre Schulten and operations head Shailesh Jejurikar, speaking at the Deutsche Bank conference, said that the geopolitical environment was 'unpredictable' and that consumers were facing 'greater uncertainty.'
In April, P&G said it would raise prices on some products, and Schulten said it was prepared to 'pull every lever' in its arsenal to mitigate the impact of tariffs, primarily through higher prices and cost-cutting.
The Pampers maker imports raw ingredients, packaging materials and some finished products into the United States from China. About 90 percent of what it sells is produced domestically, P&G has said.
President Donald Trump's sweeping levies on trading partners have shaken global markets and sparked concerns of a recession in the US.
P&G on Thursday estimated it would have about a $600m before-tax hit in its fiscal year 2026, based on current tariff rates, a number that has frequently shifted.
Overall, the trade war has cost companies at least $34bn in lost sales and higher costs, a Reuters analysis showed.
It is also affecting US consumer sentiment, which fell slightly in May for the fifth straight month, surprising economists. The preliminary reading of the University of Michigan's closely watched consumer sentiment index declined 2.7 percent on a monthly basis to 50.8, the second-lowest level in the nearly 75-year history of the survey. The only lower reading was in June 2022. Since January, sentiment has tumbled nearly 30 percent.
Shares of P&G were down about 2 percent in early trading. That has since ticked upward as of 11:15am ET (15:15 GMT), but it is still about 1 percent lower than yesterday's market close. P&G's stock has trended downward in the last five trading days by 2.7 percent and is down about 1.2 percent from the beginning of the year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US Supreme Court declines to speed up decision to take up fight over tariff
The court declined to fast-track the review of the dispute over Trump having legal power to impose broad tariffs. The United States Supreme Court has declined to speed up its consideration of whether to take up a challenge to President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs even before lower courts have ruled in the dispute. The Supreme Court denied on Friday a request by a family-owned toy company, Learning Resources, that filed the legal challenge against Trump's tariffs to expedite the review of the dispute by the nation's top judicial body. The company, which makes educational toys, won a court ruling on May 29 that Trump cannot unilaterally impose tariffs using the emergency authority he had claimed. That ruling is currently on hold, leaving the tariffs in place for now. Learning Resources asked the Supreme Court to take the rare step of immediately hearing the case to decide the legality of the tariffs, effectively leapfrogging the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Washington, where the case is pending. Two district courts have ruled that Trump's tariffs are not justified under the law he cited, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Both of those cases are on appeal. No court has yet backed the sweeping emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US Supreme Court lets fuel producers challenge California emissions rules
The dispute centred on an exception granted to California on national vehicle emission standards, allowing it to set stricter rules than federal standards. The United States Supreme Court has sided with fuel producers that had opposed California's standards for vehicle emissions and electric cars under a federal air pollution law, agreeing that their legal challenge to the mandates should not have been dismissed. The justices in a 7-2 ruling on Friday overturned a lower court's decision to dismiss the lawsuit by a Valero Energy subsidiary and fuel industry groups. The lower court had concluded that the plaintiffs lacked the required legal standing to challenge a 2022 US Environmental Protection Agency decision to let California set its own regulations. 'The government generally may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders,' conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority. Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the decision. The dispute centred on an exception granted to California during Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration to national vehicle emission standards set by the agency under the landmark Clean Air Act anti-pollution law. Though states and municipalities are generally preempted from enacting their own limits, Congress let the EPA waive the preemption rule to let California set certain regulations that are stricter than federal standards. The EPA's 2022 action reinstated a waiver for California to set its own tailpipe emissions limits and zero-emission vehicle mandate through 2025, reversing a 2019 decision made during Republican President Donald Trump's first administration rescinding the waiver. Advertisement Valero's Diamond Alternative Energy and related groups challenged the reinstatement of California's waiver, arguing that the decision exceeded the EPA's power under the Clean Air Act and inflicted harm on their bottom line by lowering demand for liquid fuels. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit threw out the lawsuit in 2024, finding that the challengers lacked the necessary standing to bring their claims because there was no evidence that a ruling in their favour might affect the decisions of auto manufacturers in a way that would result in fewer electric and more combustion vehicles to be sold. Sceptical court California, the most populous US state, has received more than 100 waivers under the Clean Air Act. Sign up for Al Jazeera Americas Coverage Newsletter US politics, Canada's multiculturalism, South America's geopolitical rise—we bring you the stories that matter. Subscribe Your subscription failed. Please try again. Please check your email to confirm your subscription By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy protected by reCAPTCHA The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has taken a sceptical view towards broad authority for federal regulatory agencies and has restricted the powers of the EPA in some important rulings in recent years. In 2024, the court blocked the EPA's 'Good Neighbor' rule aimed at reducing ozone emissions that may worsen air pollution in neighbouring states. In 2023, the court hobbled the EPA's power to protect wetlands and fight water pollution. In 2022, it imposed limits on the agency's authority under the Clean Air Act to reduce coal and gas-fired power plant carbon emissions.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US extends TikTok sale deadline by another 90 days
United States President Donald Trump has signed an executive order extending the deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest its US assets of the short-form video app TikTok by another 90 days, he says, despite a law that mandated a sale or shutdown. 'I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025),' the president said in a post on Thursday on his social media platform, Truth Social. The ban would have otherwise kicked in on Thursday. 'We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users and 7.5 million US businesses that rely on the platform as we continue to work with Vice President [JD] Vance's Office,' TikTok said in a statement. Vance's office has been involved in negotiations with the platform. Passed in April 2024 and known as the the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, the law required TikTok to stop operating in the US by January 19 unless ByteDance had completed divesting itself of the app's US assets or demonstrated significant progress towards a sale. The law was challenged in the Supreme Court in January, but the nation's highest court upheld the ban. This is the third time the president has extended the deadline. Trump began his second term as president on January 20 and opted not to enforce the law. He first extended the deadline to early April and then again last month to June 19. Democratic senators argued that Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and suggested a deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements. The White House on Tuesday said the app will be 'mandated a sale or shutdown absent significant progress'. 'President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday. She added that the administration will spend the next three months making sure the sale closes so Americans can keep using TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure. In March, Trump said he would be willing to reduce tariffs on China to get a deal done with ByteDance to sell the app. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm majority-owned and operated by US investors. That was put on hold after China said it would not approve that deal because of the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. TikTok has a wide US user base, especially among younger audiences. According to a survey from Pew Research conducted in December, a third of all US adults use TikTok, and among the under 30 demographic, it is higher at 59 percent while 67 percent of teens use the platform.
