Trump's actions show he wants to reorder society
James Oliphant and Jeff Mason,
Reuters
In just 10 weeks in office, Donald Trump has imposed his will on perceived adversaries in business, politics, the media and allied nations by leveraging power in ways no other modern US president has tried. His administration has sought the arrest and deportation of student protesters, withheld federal funds from colleges, ostracized law firms tied to his political opponents, threatened judges and tried to pressure journalists. At the same time Trump has downsized the federal government dramatically and purged it of workers who could stand in his way. Central to this effort has been Trump's use of policy-making executive orders to target opponents as never before. He has been unafraid to employ lawsuits, public threats and the power of the federal purse to bring institutions to heel.
'What unites all these efforts is Trump's desire to shut down every potential source of resistance to the MAGA agenda and to his personal power,' said Peter Shane, a law professor at New York University. Some targets have rushed to placate the president, a few have fought back and many are still trying to figure out how to respond. Many of Trump's actions are being challenged in courts, where some judges have tried to slow him down.
The stunning speed and breadth of the Republican president's actions have caught Democrats, public-service unions, CEOs and the legal profession off guard. Trump's supporters say he is simply using the full reach of his presidency to achieve the goals he set as a candidate.
'He's laid out these broad battle lines, whether it's with people that he thinks have tried to ruin him personally, whether it's with people he thinks have tried to ruin Western civilization,' said Republican strategist Scott Jennings, a longtime adviser to Senator Mitch McConnell. 'Everything he said he was going to do on the campaign, he's doing.'
Trump's aims are not just political. His actions show he wants to reorder American society with an all-powerful executive at the top, where financial, political and cultural institutions carry his stamp and where opposition is either co-opted or curtailed. With a compliant Congress controlled by his party and a US Supreme Court dominated by conservatives, Trump is operating with fewer checks on his power than any of his modern-day predecessors.
Trump has attempted to subdue and cajole his adversaries on an almost-daily basis, backed by the fearsome might of the law enforcement and regulatory agencies at his command. He has often succeeded.
He managed to wring concessions out of several of his targets, including storied Columbia University, powerful law firms and corporate titans such as Meta and Disney. All of them settled with the White House rather than endure the pressure, surrendering some independence and setting what some view as damaging precedents.
Others are taking preemptive measures to avoid Trump's wrath.
More than 20 of America's largest companies and financial firms, including Goldman Sachs, Google and PepsiCo, have rolled back diversity programs that had drawn Trump's ire.
Three law firms cut deals with the administration rather than risk losing their lawyers' security clearances, access to government buildings and perhaps, as a result, clients, while three others targeted by Trump's executive orders sued in response. Trump's orders have also been his vehicle to remake the government, deport alleged Venezuelan gang members with little due process and levy tariffs against U.S. trading partners.
He has sued US media corporations and silenced the Voice of America, taken control of the Kennedy Center, a leading arts facility, and sought to put curbs on the Smithsonian Institution, whose mission is to chronicle history. His administration has detained student protesters whose political views it says are a threat to the country.
Trump has pushed a mineral-rights deal on Ukraine's leadership with the veiled threat of ending U.S. support for Kyiv in the Russian war in Ukraine. He has threatened NATO ally Denmark to try to wrest control of Greenland, spoken of annexing Canada and threatened to take the Panama Canal back from its home country.
Mark Zaid, a Washington lawyer who represents whistleblowers against the federal government and who himself had his security clearance stripped away by Trump, said the president's conduct is like nothing he has seen in his 30-year career. 'Executive orders have never been designed to specifically target individuals nor non-government actors for purposes of retaliation or retribution,' Zaid said.
The White House and Trump's allies deny the president is acting out of revenge. A White House spokesman said more traditional approaches have failed to bring meaningful change. 'Unconventional is precisely what the American people voted for when they elected President Trump,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields said. 'The president is committed to upending the entrenched bureaucracy.'
In his first term from 2017-2021, Trump was hamstrung by a variety of factors: a federal probe into Russian interference, his aides' lack of experience and greater Democratic opposition in Congress. With those roadblocks gone, an emboldened Trump has demonstrated at the start of his second term that he has learned how to use the resources available to him more fully to get what he wants.
'He really does know how to pull the levers of power this time, more so than last time,' said Rina Shah, a Republican strategist.
Claire Wofford, a political science professor at the College of Charleston, said Trump has used executive orders not only to push forward a policy agenda, but also to send messages to his political base, as in his attempt to scale back birthright citizenship, and to test the limits of his power, as with his invocation of an 18th-century law to designate some migrants as 'alien enemies.'
'What strikes me most at this point is how strategic Trump is — but in new ways,' Wofford said.
In cases such as with Columbia University, Trump has used the federal purse as a cudgel, concluding his targets have financial interests that make them vulnerable to coercion.
In other cases, he has used the courts, forcing companies such as Disney and Meta into favorable settlements after Trump filed lawsuits against them. CBS News, another Trump lawsuit target, is under pressure to settle its suit because its parent, Paramount, is eager to have its proposed merger with Skydance Media approved by Trump administration regulators.
But not every institution has bent the knee.
Many of Trump's actions, particularly those regarding his cuts in government, remain tied up in federal court. In the last two weeks alone, judges have ruled against Trump in matters challenging his deportation policies, attacks against law firms and plans to eliminate government agencies. In response, Trump and his allies have called for judges who rule against the administration to be impeached and drawn a rare rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts. Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the libertarian CATO Institute, said Trump's attacks on law firms and judges are without precedent and are reminiscent of other nations with authoritarian regimes. 'Clipping the wings of law firms and the courts,' Olson said, 'is the behavior of an autocrat.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Germany urges diplomacy as Merz backs Israel after US strikes on Iran
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called for an urgent return to diplomacy after the United States carried out air strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, his spokesman said on Sunday. 'Iran must immediately enter into negotiations with the US and Israel and to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict,' Merz was quoted as saying by spokesperson Stefan Kornelius. The German government believes the overnight raids caused significant damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, Kornelius added. The strikes followed Israel's wide-ranging assault on Iranian missile and nuclear facilities on 13 June, which also targeted senior military and security figures. Iran has long denied Western and Israeli claims that its uranium enrichment programme is aimed at producing nuclear weapons. Speaking to ARD, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said Berlin remains committed to restoring talks. 'No one thinks it's a good thing to keep fighting,' he said. 'Everyone knows there has to be a negotiated solution.' Defence Minister Boris Pistorius described Washington's actions as a response to a 'concrete threat', and welcomed the outcome. 'A major threat has been eliminated … this is good news for the Middle East, but also for Europe,' he said. Merz, who last week voiced strong backing for Israel, called its strikes 'the dirty work Israel is doing for all of us'.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Iran's Khamenei vows to continue Israel attacks as Trump hails 'monumental' strikes
Iran's supreme leader delivers first remarks since US bombings Trump says damage to Iran nuclear sites 'monumental' US urges China to deter Iran closing Strait of Hormuz UN Secretary General warns against 'rat hole of retaliation' US State Department issues 'worldwide caution' travel alert Iran says US bases could be legitimate target
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
'Dangerous escalation': World reacts to US strikes on Iran
World leaders on Sunday voiced concerns over the US decision to launch strikes against three nuclear facilities in Iran. US President Donald Trump on Saturday said the military had bombed Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, bringing to an end days of speculation about whether America would become directly involved in the Iran-Israel conflict. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the US strikes 'outrageous' and said they will have 'everlasting consequences'. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT [Non-Proliferation Treaty] by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations,' he said on X. 'Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour.' Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation called the US attacks "a barbaric act that violates international law", adding that it would not allow "the path of development of this national industry ... be stopped". The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps also responded to the US strikes with a vow that attacks on infrastructure, strategic sites and interests in Israel would continue. The UAE has expressed deep concern and called for an immediate halt to the escalation to prevent the region from sliding into "new levels" of instability. In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs stressed the need to "prioritise diplomacy and dialogue to resolve disputes, within comprehensive approaches that achieve stability, prosperity and justice". The UAE also urged the UN Security Council to "shoulder their responsibilities by actively working to resolve the region's chronic issues, which are now at a critical juncture and pose an increasing threat to" regional and international security. The UAE emphasised the importance of "learning from the region's historical conflicts and wars and the hard lessons they offer". Saudi Arabia also expressed concern after the strikes, reiterating its condemnation of what it said was an attack on Iranian sovereignty. The Foreign Ministry called in a statement for restraint and avoidance of escalation. It urged the international community to increase efforts in these "highly sensitive circumstances" to reach a political solution to end the crisis. Countries in the Organisation of Islamic Co-operation were holding a meeting in Istanbul on Sunday, where foreign ministers said they would set up a group to "stop aggression against Iran". They did not mention the US directly. Iraq also condemned the US attacks and called "for the urgent opening of diplomatic channels to contain the situation and defuse the crisis". It warned that continuation of such attacks will 'lead to a serious escalation with consequences that will exceed the borders of the any state and affect the stability of the region and the world'. In Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said his country would seek to avoid involvement in the conflict. "In the face of the dangerous escalation in military operations and the risks of their repercussions for the entire region, it is increasingly important for us to adhere strictly to the supreme national interest, which requires avoiding Lebanon's involvement or being drawn into the ongoing regional confrontation in any way," he said on X. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said the US bombing raises fears of an escalation of tensions that could threaten security and stability in more than one region and country. Mr Aoun called for restraint and the launch of constructive and serious negotiations to restore stability to the countries of the region and avoid further killing and destruction. A source told The National that Hezbollah has not changed its position and will not intervene in the conflict. 'There is no change. The Iranians are the ones defending themselves,' the source said. Once considered Iran's most powerful proxy and a formidable militia, Hezbollah was significantly weakened by more than 14 months of conflict with Israel. That war ended in November. Lebanese officials told The National that country's army had been in direct contact with Hezbollah, urging the group to avoid being drawn into the war alongside Iran. Elsewhere in the region, Egypt called for de-escalation, warning that the conflict poses a major threat to the security of the Middle East and the wider world. The Foreign Ministry said it was watching the developments in Iran with 'significant anxiety' and reiterated its rejection of any breaches of the UN charter. Oman also expressed "deep concern and condemnation" after the latest escalation. In Gaza, Hamas condemned what it called "blatant US aggression'. "The Islamic Resistance Movement [Hamas] condemns in the strongest terms the blatant US aggression against the territory and sovereignty of the Islamic republic of Iran,' the group said in a statement. "This brutal aggression is a dangerous escalation,' it added, calling the attack "a flagrant violation of international law, and a direct threat to international peace and security'. Yemen's Houthi rebel government said on Sunday that it supported an earlier vow by its armed wing to attack US ships in the Red Sea should Washington launch strikes on Iran. The Houthis are also backed by Tehran. In Iraq, an Iran-backed armed faction said it would enter the war, in the first reaction from Iraqi militant groups. 'America has left us no other option other than the war,' Mohammed Al Tamimi, leader of the True Promise Corps, told The National. 'In the coming hours, there will be a response that will heal the hearts with God's help,' Mr Al Tamimi said without elaborating. 'From now on, American and Israeli interests everywhere are targets for us." Further afield, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed' by the US strikes. "This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security,' he said in a statement on X. "I call on member states to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law.' The director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, called for an emergency meeting on Monday. In the US Congress, Democrats attacked Mr Trump for the decision. Democratic House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries criticised the strike. 'President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorisation for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East,' he said in a statement. Even pro-Trump Republicans had strong words against the decision. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a leading Make America Great Again Republican isolationist congresswoman, wrote in a post on X that "Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer.' Other Republicans, however, came out strongly in support of Mr Trump's decision, with House Speaker Mike Johnson saying that the President "gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement'. And the head of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicks, said: "Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. Senator Tom Cotton said Mr Trump "made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans'. In Europe, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called on Iran to "return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution" to end the crisis. "Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat," Mr Starmer said on X, adding that "stability in the region is a priority". EU foreign affairs minister Kaja Kallas also called for de-escalation and a return to negotiations. "I urge all sides to step back, return to the negotiating table and prevent further escalation," she wrote on X, adding that Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and that European foreign ministers would discuss the situation on Monday. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, meanwhile, urged Tehran to hold talks with the US and Israel immediately to find a diplomatic solution to the conflict. In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Mr Trump for ordering the strikes. "First comes strength, then comes peace,' he said. "And tonight, President Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength.' Yoav Gallant, Israel's former defence minister, said Mr Trump had taken "a bold decision' in attacking Iran. "The world is now a safer place,' he said on X.
