Tax and wage hikes to cost restauranteur '£270,000 per year'
A restaurant owner has said he will have to find an extra £270,000 this year to cover forthcoming tax rises and increased staffing costs. Eamon McCusker employs 116 staff across three sites in Belfast - two Chubby Cherub restaurants and AMPM in Upper Arthur Street. Like most employers in Northern Ireland, he faces a rise in National Insurance bills, a hike in minimum wage levels and an increase in business rates from April. He said the additional costs have left the hospitality industry facing "really tough decisions".
The restauranteur said businesses like his would have to either raise their prices, cut their opening hours, forego investment or a combination of all three. "It equates to us having to find an additional £270,000 a year - just to stay static," he told the Good Morning Ulster programme."That's with the caveat that there are no supplier increases - which of course there will be." Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the National Insurance hike in her last budget, saying the government needed to raise money to secure public finances. National Insurance contributions help to fund the NHS and pay the UK's benefits bill, including the cost of state pensions. The contributions are paid by both employers and their staff, but in April it is only employers' National Insurance contributions that will rise - from 13.8% to 15%.At the same time. the minimum wage for workers aged over 21 will rise from £11.44 to £12.21, with apprentices and 18 to 20-year-olds also seeing an increase.Business organisations have warned the changes could lead to job losses as employers cut back on staff costs in order to manage their bills. Some pharmacies in Northern Ireland have appealed to the government for help covering the costs.
Closed restaurants and a 'soulless city'
Mr McCusker has run AMPM for the past 23 years but said the rising costs of running a restaurant have made it a tough trade in which to make money. "There's kind of an assumption made within our industry that because you're busy, you're profitable. That is actually not true," he said. "Viable businesses are going to have to close if they do not focus on profitability."The restaurateur explained it was a difficult time to consider raising the prices that they charge customers because "the affordability just isn't there".He said venues risk "pricing ourselves out of the market" if they charge too much when people are still struggling with the cost of living. He added the one thing restaurants can control is their opening hours - only operating at profitable times - but this also can have negative consequences. "Industry colleagues are going to close Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays," he said. "So what you'll be left with is a soulless city, a soulless hospitality industry, a reduction in tourism and you will have the inability to grow."He argued that the cost rises were "reductive policies" which stifled progress. "They are policies that are actually going to force people like me to basically hold off on investment, not only just physically on capital spend, but also in training and creating a better product and a better service and investing in your people."
'For some, it could be the final straw'
Analysis by Clodagh Rice, BBC News NI business correspondent: We have known these increases have been coming since last year's Budget, but what is only becoming clearer as we edge closer to April is how employers will react.They face difficult decisions - to cut jobs or staff hours? To put prices up? To put investment plans on hold?While businesses are resilient and will work to find a solution, the impact of pausing or cancelling expansion plans will restrict economic growth.The timing of the increases will also be felt sharply by sectors still facing soaring food and energy costs, higher interest rates, as well as those still recovering from the pandemic.For some, it could be the final straw which makes them decide to close altogether.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion United
2 hours ago
- Fashion United
River Island to close 33 stores, putting hundreds of jobs at risk amid restructuring
British high street stalwart River Island has announced plans to close 33 of its 230 UK stores, a move that puts hundreds of jobs in jeopardy as it seeks to restructure its operations in response to shifting consumer habits and rising costs. As reported by the BBC, the company is also negotiating rent reductions across a further 71 locations. The proposals come ahead of a creditor vote scheduled for 4 August, with a court decision to follow three days later. Chief executive Ben Lewis described the closures as a painful but necessary step in light of a retail environment increasingly shaped by online shopping and inflationary pressures. 'We have a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs,' he said, adding that the brand remains committed to minimising redundancies where possible. River Island reported a 33.2 million pounds loss in 2023 following a 19 percent drop in sales. The restructuring reflects broader pressures on mid-market fashion retailers squeezed by rising operating costs, including changes to employer National Insurance contributions, and fierce competition from digital-first players like Shein, Boohoo, and Temu. With about 5,500 employees, River Island's challenge now lies in reconfiguring a legacy retail footprint to remain competitive in a retail landscape where price, speed and digital reach increasingly define success.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour scraps £950m EV rapid charging fund first announced by Conservatives
Labour ministers have scrapped a promise by the previous government for a £950m fund for installing electric car chargers near motorways, instead setting aside a smaller sum mainly for on-street charging points. The rapid charging fund (RCF) was first announced in 2020 by Rishi Sunak, then Conservative chancellor, with the aim of supporting upgrades to the grid so that more electric vehicles could be rapidly charged at the same time. However, it was mired in delays amid concerns it could unfairly benefit some motorway service companies. The Department for Transport said the RCF had never formally been included in budget plans, so the promise was unfunded. The Guardian revealed in March that ministers were considering directing proposed funding away from motorway services, amid criticisms of the fund's design from industry. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has committed £400m over the next five years 'to support the rollout of charging infrastructure' in this month's spending review, after announcing £200m for charging at the autumn budget. It is understood much of the spending will support on-street charge points in poorer areas, where private-sector investment has lagged behind. However, some people in the charging industry said the government should have honoured the £950m pledge in full, even if the money was redirected towards other incentives for people to switch to EVs. John Lewis, the chief executive at which operates on-street chargers, welcomed the £400m pledge. However, he said: 'The key question now is: couldn't the full amount have been directed towards the EV effort – whether through the continued rollout of on-street charging or other consumer incentives – to give people greater confidence to make the switch to electric?' The number of electric car chargers in the UK is rising rapidly, passing 80,000 in May, according to data company Zap Map. That represented a 29% increase compared with a year earlier, while the number of rapid chargers with power above 50kW rose by a third. Not all chargers are created equal More and more people are buying electric cars, and are having to grapple with charging for the first time. However, not all chargers are created equal, and the profusion of units can cause confusion. Charging speeds are measured by power output in kilowatts (kW), while battery capacity is measured in kilowatt hours (kWh). For example, a Nissan Leaf has 39kWh of battery capacity, while a Tesla Model Y has 60kWh. Recharge times vary depending on battery size: divide the battery size by the power to get a very rough idea of how many hours it will take to charge. (E.g., a 60kWh battery at a 22kW charger would take about three hours.) The quicker the charge, the more it tends to cost. Slow: up to 8kW Common at homes, on-street chargers and places cars hang around like car parks or hotels. Suitable for charging overnight. Plugging in with a UK three-pin plug to the mains at home will deliver about 2.3kW – although it is not recommended. Fast: 8kW to 49kW Found at urban sites like supermarkets, shopping centres or car parks. Capable of charging a smaller battery in a few hours. Rapid: 50kW to 150kW Typically found close to big roads for journey charging, but also increasingly found in locations such as supermarkets or gyms with short dwell times. 50kW could give 80% charge in less than an hour. Ultra-rapid: 150kW and above Most chargers being installed at motorway services or dedicated charging hubs are now at least 150kW. Many newer cars can now handle 150kW, and several can charge at speeds of over 300kW, adding hundreds of miles of range in around 10 minutes. Increasing the number of public chargers is seen as crucial to persuading people to switch to electric cars. However, the focus has shifted from rapid chargers, which can allay 'range anxiety' on longer journeys, to the slower on-street chargers needed for car owners who do not have private parking spaces. Ian Johnston, the chief executive of Osprey Charging, said: 'New funding should be more effectively deployed on projects in prime locations where the grid connection costs render the site unviable – whether A roads, underserved regions or the small number of motorway locations with unviable grid – rather than gifted to all motorway sites regardless of the costs, as was envisaged under the RCF.' Johnston also called for changes to road signage permissions to allow charge points to be easily advertised to drivers. Quentin Willson, the founder of FairCharge, a group campaigning for cheaper charging, said the full £950m should have been spent on accelerating the switch to electric cars. 'Withholding unused RCF funds and not diverting them towards other EV charging initiatives isn't a great look for government,' he said. 'It opens them to the obvious questions about their commitment to the EV transition.' Willson, a former presenter of the Top Gear TV programme, said the government should also cut VAT on public charging to match the lower rates available on home electricity. A Department for Transport spokesperson said: 'The rapid charging fund was designed to support the rollout of charging infrastructure on motorways and major A roads – but the previous government did not set out detailed plans to deliver this. 'Since the fund was announced in 2020, the market has changed significantly, with the number of open-access rapid and ultra-rapid charge points within one mile of the strategic road network almost quadrupling in the last three years alone.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Raising capital gains tax again will backfire, Reeves warned
Another capital gains tax raid in the next Budget would 'backfire' on Rachel Reeves and cost the Treasury money, experts have warned. The Chancellor is under pressure to launch a fresh round of tax hikes after raising the top rate of capital gains by four percentage points last year. However, if capital gains rates rise again, anyone selling assets for a profit may choose to delay crystallising their gains or find ways around the tax, which would lead to a loss of revenue for the Exchequer. Tax advisers have warned that a large proportion of capital gains revenues derive from a small number of taxpayers, meaning a significant increase in the rate could 'distort their behaviour', and reduce tax receipts. HMRC estimates suggest that just 2,000 individuals with gains of £5m or more accounted for 37pc of the capital gains subject to tax in 2022-23. Chris Etherington, of accountancy firm RSM, said: 'Given that a significant amount of annual capital gains derive from such a small tranche of the population, it is far from guaranteed that a significant increase in the rate would translate to a windfall of additional tax receipts. 'The Chancellor will no doubt be mindful of the potential risks presented by a further capital gains tax rate rise and may be wary of tax policy changes that could backfire.' In last year's October Budget, Ms Reeves raised the main rates of capital gains tax from 10pc to 18pc for basic rate taxpayers, and from 20pc to 24pc for higher rate taxpayers. She also stripped back relief offered to those selling companies or shares. In March, the Office for Budget Responsibility, the fiscal watchdog, warned that the decision would leave a £23bn hole in the public purse as investors hold off from crystallising gains. Speculation mounted in the lead-up to the Budget that capital gains would be aligned much more closely with income tax, with rates as high as 39pc being modelled by Treasury officials. Households are bracing for a slew of tax rises after the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) halved the country's growth forecast for this year to 1pc. Low growth and high borrowing costs could force Ms Reeves to raise taxes again in what the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank has warned could be a 'blockbuster Budget'. Capital gains tax receipts fell to £13bn in the year to March 2025, down 10pc from £14.5bn in the same period last year, according to HM Revenue & Customs data. The tax accounts for less than 2pc of all government revenue. Nimesh Shah, of accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, said: 'Capital gains tax revenue comes from a narrow pool of people, so it doesn't take much for that distortion to make an impact – a small change can make a big difference. 'It's an optional tax. You only pay when you dispose of an asset, so people may simply choose to hold on to things like houses, so as not to crystallise the tax bill – or they may simply leave the UK and crystallise the gains abroad. 'Like all taxes, there's a Laffer Curve point with capital gains tax where revenue starts to fall as rates rise.'
