Historic golf club forced to move 18th hole after neighbour complained about stray balls

A golf club has been forced to close its 18th hole after a neighbour complained to the council about balls landing in their garden.
The Holyhead Golf Club has been in Anglesey, South Wales, since 1912 but that didn't stop one neighbour from complaining to the council about the final hole.
After collecting evidence of errant golf balls landing in their garden, they are demanding the 18th hole, described by members as 'the best hole on the Isle of Anglesey', be moved or even dug up.
The alteration is expected to cost Holyhead £75,000 and the club is expected to pay or could face closure - a move deemed a 'crime against golf' by members.
'Nobody wants to play a 17-hole golf course,' a spokesperson for the club told The Times. 'A neighbour said golf balls were leaving the boundary of the course and going onto their property.
'He has evidence balls were going into his garden and he raised the issue with the council.
'Even though the course has been here since 1912, we have golf balls leaving the confines and the council got involved.
'They have issued an improvement notice and we've had to comply with that, leaving us with a £75,000 bill for a new golf green. There's only one person complaining and we have never had any complaints before.'
Colin James expressed his outrage on a crowdfunder, which has been launched to raise money so the 'improvement' work can be completed by the beginning of May. More than £8,000 has been raised so far.
He said: 'Surely if someone decides to move into a property next to the golf course they would appreciate that there may be some implications, such as there being golf shots being hit in the local area.
'It's not like the course is moving closer to the property, it's always been there. Absolute joke of a decision.'
A spokesperson for the Isle of Anglesey County Council said: 'The county council's public protection team has served an improvement notice to Holyhead Golf Club under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
'The council has a statutory duty to ensure the health and safety of golf course users as well as members of the public that may be affected by the golf course.
'Our environmental health officers continue to work closely with the golf club in relation to this matter.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

5 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Taxi drivers buying cars in one city due to 'easy' regulations putting people

Drivers are flogging cars including black cabs on social media with licences already attached from Wolverhampton where it's believed that the rules to obtain a taxi licence are far more easier than other areas Motorists are flocking to social media to snap up vehicles, including black cabs, already registered in the West Midlands city of Wolverhampton, where it's perceived that licensing requirements are more lenient than elsewhere. There are now grave worries that some taxi drivers could be skirting stringent safeguarding checks, particularly in areas previously rocked by child sexual exploitation scandals, according to The Times. ‌ The newspaper initially brought the issue to light back in 2018, revealing that Wolverhampton had become the go-to authority for drivers across England seeking to secure a minicab licence. ‌ And the problem is only escalating. Data from the Greater Manchester Combined Authority reveals that, as of this year, over one in 10 taxi licences in England were issued by Wolverhampton council. Baroness Casey of Blackstock recently highlighted the loopholes allowing private-hire drivers to operate anywhere across the UK as a significant safeguarding risk for youngsters, reports the Express. Has the government agreed new taxi rules? Ministers have agreed to all 12 of her suggestions and vowed to act "at pace" to put an end to this practice. However, campaigners argue that the government needs to do more, demanding stricter licensing checks nationwide. While drivers must pass checks - including a DBS background check - regardless of where they are licensed, some local councils impose much higher standards than others. Rotherham, scarred by the harrowing revelations of the 2014 Jay report which uncovered the grooming of 1,400 girls, often via taxis, has since clamped down with stringent taxi licensing rules. ‌ The borough council's response included making CCTV compulsory in all cabs, setting a clear definition for what makes a "fit and proper person," and requiring a perfect score on a safeguarding test for licence applicants. However, these robust measures are being undermined by a law passed in 2015 under David Cameron's leadership, allowing private hire drivers to operate nationwide, irrespective of where they got their licence. How many taxi drivers are licenced from other areas? Greater Manchester's mayor Andy Burnham has raised the alarm that nearly half the private hire drivers in his jurisdiction hold licences from other areas. ‌ Investigations by the Manchester Evening News last year revealed a staggering 8,952 drivers in the region were licensed by Wolverhampton council, located some 80 miles away, accounting for 35 per cent of its private hire fleet. In a similar vein, the Liverpool Echo disclosed that in 2024, Wolverhampton issued close to 500 licences to drivers residing in Liverpool postcodes. A Facebook advert for a Prius highlighted the issue, with the seller noting: "People like the council in Wolverhampton - it's easier to get a badge. The test there is easy. In Manchester, it's very hard. That's why people go to Wolverhampton." ‌ How much does a taxi licence cost? The cost of a taxi licence varies dramatically across councils, with Rotherham charging £210 for a one-year licence while Wolverhampton charges a mere £49. Social media is rife with cars being sold complete with a Wolverhampton taxi licence, though new owners must still secure a personal licence from the council to drive them legally. This week, Casey issued a stark warning that despite most taxi drivers being law-abiding, "as a key part of the night-time economy, taxis have historically been identified as a way children can be at risk of sexual exploitation." ‌ She further stated: "Local authorities issue taxi licences in line with statutory guidance as a means of combating child sexual exploitation, but they are being hindered by a lack of stringency in other local authorities and legal loopholes which mean drivers can apply for a licence anywhere in the country." What does Wolverhampton say about taxi licences? Meanwhile, a spokeswoman for the City of Wolverhampton council emphasised that safeguarding is their "number one priority in taxi licensing," proudly noting that it is "the only local authority which checks drivers on the Update Service DBS status every day." She explained: "It is illegal for the council to refuse applicants a taxi licence on the basis of where they live. Under the current law, applicants are able to apply to any licensing authority for a licence. It is also illegal for licensing authorities to impose a limit on the number of private hire licences they issue. The council does not gain financially from taxi licensing, as the fees are legally ringfenced for spend only on related activities. "Our early adoption of digital technology has allowed us to offer a simple and efficient online application procedure, with the requirement that drivers attend in person for training and strict assessment before an application can be processed." The Department for Transport was reached out for a response.

The Independent

4 days ago

• The Independent

Elon Musk posts urine drug test results showing he tested ‘negative' for narcotics

Elon Musk shared the results of a drug test in an effort to diffuse accusations of drug-taking during President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign. The bombshell New York Times report, which emerged last month, alleged that Musk, Trump's biggest donor, was taking ketamine, ecstasy, and magic mushrooms, people familiar with his activities were quoted as saying. On Tuesday, weeks after the allegations surfaced, Musk posted the alleged results of a lab test conducted on June 11 by 'Fastest Labs of South Austin' in Texas on X. The results, which became available five days after his urine sample was taken, show a negative result for amphetamines, ecstasy, cocaine, ketamine, cannabinoids, and fentanyl. Musk did not test positive for any drugs in his system, according to the results he posted. Prior to posting the results, Musk shared a post from an X user that read: 'If Elon is on any drugs, I want what he's having.' The drug allegations in The Times report relate to his usage in 2024, and a test done in June would not have been able to detect substance abuse over six months ago. The lab results show that Musk only underwent a urine test, which can detect drugs in the body over a shorter time period, compared to a hair follicle test, which can typically detect drugs in the system for up to three months, according to the National Institute of Health. Musk previously defended the allegations, stating: 'I tried *prescription* ketamine a few years ago and said so on X, so this not even news. It helps for getting out of dark mental holes, but haven't taken it since then.' He went on to accuse the newspaper of 'lying.' With ketamine specifically, a hair test can detect the drug in the body for up to three months, whereas a urine sample can only detect whether it was in the system in the past three days, according to the NIH. Blood tests can show the drug in the system in the past day, and a saliva test can detect ketamine in the body up to 10 days. In The Times report, Musk was accused of keeping a trove of narcotics in a daily medication pill box that held about 20 pills, sources told the newspaper. Hisketamine use was described as 'chronic' and so bad that it led to bladder issues. These allegations coincided with the Tesla billionaire's departure from the White House after a 130-day stint as DOGE leader, where he oversaw the slashing of hundreds of thousands of federal jobs. This prompted Trump and Musk to engage in a bitter online spat that erupted after the president unveiled his 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' a proposal that Musk branded 'a disgusting abomination.' Musk then dropped a tweet that claimed that Trump 'is in the Epstein files' and 'the real reason' they have not been released was because of the president's involvement. Trump denied this accusation. In a remorseful post days later, Musk backtracked in his tirade against the president. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week,' Musk wrote on X in the early hours of the morning. 'They went too far.'

Times

4 days ago

• Times

‘Whitehall tried to block Rotherham grooming scandal exposé'

Whitehall officials attempted to convince Michael Gove to go to court to stop The Times from exposing the Rotherham grooming scandal, Dominic Cummings has said. Gove, then the education secretary and who is now Lord Gove, is said to have been asked by officials to help Rotherham council stop the publication of a story about the sexual abuse and trafficking of children in the town in 2011. Cummings, who worked as an adviser to Gove during his tenure in the education department, told Sky News that officials wanted 'a total cover-up and were on the side of the council'. He said they contacted him after the council was approached by Andrew Norfolk, then the chief reporter of The Times. He said: 'Officials came to me in the Department of Education and said: 'There's this Times journalist who wants to write the story about these gangs. The local authority wants to judicially review it and stop The Times publishing the story'. 'So I went to Michael Gove and said: 'This council is trying to actually stop this and they're going to use judicial review. You should tell the council that far from siding with the council to stop The Times you will write to the judge and hand over a whole bunch of documents and actually blow up the council's JR [judicial review].'' Cummings added: 'Some officials wanted a total cover-up and were on the side of the council… They wanted to help the local council do the cover-up and stop The Times' reporting, but other officials, including in the DfE private office, said this is completely outrageous and we should blow it up. Gove did, the judicial review got blown up, Norfolk's stories ran.' • In June 2012 The Times revealed that an official report into the way care agencies dealt with a murdered girl concealed key information about adults suspected of grooming and using her for sex from the age of 12. Laura Wilson, 17, was repeatedly stabbed then thrown into a South Yorkshire canal in 2010, six years after concerns were raised that she was at risk of being sexually exploited by men. A safeguarding board redacted information identifying Laura as one of several girls in Rotherham who were suspected of falling victim to sexual abuse by Asian men. Also kept hidden were details of care professionals' involvement with Laura from the age of 11 to 15, including meetings that discussed concerns about child sexual exploitation. The board's application for a High Court injunction to gag The Times was dropped after Gove accused the board of withholding 'relevant and important material'. Laura, identified in the report as 'Child S', was murdered in Rotherham by Ashtiaq Asghar, 17. Ishaq Hussain, 21, a married man who impregnated her a month after her 16th birthday, was found not guilty of murder. The report, published by Rotherham's safeguarding children board, found that 15 agencies had had dealings with Laura. It identified 'numerous missed opportunities' to protect a vulnerable child who became 'almost invisible' to some care professionals. Redactions were made to 61 of the report's 144 pages, ostensibly to protect 'the privacy and welfare' of the dead girl's baby. Hidden from view was the fact that Laura 'was mentioned' during a 2009 police inquiry that led to the conviction of five British Pakistanis, aged from 20 to 30, for sex offences against three girls aged 13 to 16. A spokesman for Rotherham council said: 'There were clear failings at that time in Rotherham in relation to child sexual exploitation as fully covered in the reports by Alexis Jay and Louise Casey. 'Since then, Rotherham council's children's services have been transformed and as Baroness Casey reports Rotherham today is a completely different council . We will never again be complacent and we will continue to pursue the highest standards of protection and support for our children and young people.' A government spokesman said: 'The grooming scandal is one of the most appalling failures in our country's history and this government is taking the action needed for vulnerable people who were let down time and time again. That includes setting up a new national inquiry that will end the blame shifting apathy towards victims and a nationwide police operation to target predators to ensure we are tackling this vile crime while supporting survivors.'