Police Applicants Who Failed Physical Test Still Admitted For Training

Article – RNZ
Police have begun an audit into whether further breaches of the recruitment process had occurred., Political Reporter
Police are investigating after three applicants who failed physical testing were still admitted for training.
In a statement, assistant commissioner Tusha Penny said it was a clear breach of recruitment policy.
'Police recently became aware of three instances where applicants were approved to begin training at the Royal New Zealand Police College (RNZPC) without having met the full requirements for the Physical Appraisal Test (PAT).
'Our process does not allow for exemptions to the PAT, and this is a clear breach of the recruitment policy. Recruitment leaders have been reminded by email that there are no circumstances where discretion can be provided for applicants who do not pass the PAT.'
She said police had begun an audit into whether further breaches of the recruitment process had occurred, covering a six-month period.
The investigation would check whether the application process for recruits to the police college had deviated from the required standards, and the findings would be reported publicly.
Pressure is growing as the November deadline for the government's promise to recruit 500 additional frontline officers nears, but Penny said Commissioner Richard Chambers had been 'very clear publicly and internally that recruitment standards will not be compromised'.
'We have previously acknowledged the target of 500 additional officers by 27 November 2025 is ambitious, but we know this is a great opportunity and we are working hard to achieve the target,' she said.
'Police is looking into these matters and conducting an audit to establish if there have been any further breaches of the recruitment process.'
Police bosses in December told ministers it would be 'very very challenging' to meet the two-year target, noting at the time total office numbers had decreased by more than 50.
Police confirmed to RNZ that as of 21 April they were still 475 officers short of the target, noting that did not include the 334 recruits still at Police College.
'All recruits should be good to go'
Police Association vice president Paul Ormerod said it was pleasing to hear the Commissioner had ordered an audit.
'We wouldn't want to see any softening continuing in being a recruit for college, and any failures of college need to be addressed at college and not put on to districts. All recruits should be good to go when released to district.
'Hopefully this is the case, but we are seeing some fall through the cracks that need extra guidance after they have finished Police College.'
He said they particularly did not want to see further softening of other police college requirements, like psychometric testing 'and that stand down period – if they get that psychometric testing wrong, they have a six month stand down – so that's another aspect of recruiting procedures that we'd like ensure is continued'.
He said as of last month officer numbers were only up by six compared to the 2023 benchmark, and the government should focus on improving pay and conditions if it wanted to meet its target.
'We'd be naive to think that there isn't some kind of political interference. What I'd like to see personally, instead of so much effort put into new staff, pay officers more, improve the conditions that they already have, and retain the staff that we have. That'll go a long way … if we don't have so many leaving.
'I'm sure the Commissioner has had a number of talks with the minister in regarding how they're going to achieve it, but police and government need to invest in their current staff and retain the valuable knowledge that they have instead of recruiting and training for the Australian police forces.'
Ministers respond
Associate Minister Casey Costello, who has the delegated responsibility for the target, said decisions on recruitment and training were an operational matter for the organisation.
'How police recruit and train new constables is an operational issue. Ministers have no involvement in this,' she said. 'What the government has done is made a commitment to recruit an extra 500 frontline officers and we have backed police to do this with $225 million in extra funding.
'As ex-police officers, Minister Mitchell and I are well aware of the very high standards of NZ Police and it's very important that those are maintained.'
Police Minister Mark Mitchell told Midday Report police had taken 'immediate steps' to remedy the problem, and he backed the Commissioner's support for maintaining training standards.
He said the decision-making would have been 'very operational, it'll be out at district levels,' and ruled out there having been any political pressure involved, challenging Labour to come up with evidence of that.
'As a past police officer, I understand and I guard that operational independence strongly, and neither myself or my Associate Minister Casey Costello would ever be involved with instructing police on how to carry out recruitment, what the standards should be, or how they should be going about that.
'That is purely operational for police. We have been very clear as an incoming government and as part of our coalition agreement with New Zealand First that we will fund 500 more police officers, and we've set a target for the police in which to do that. That is as far as we can go as a government.'
In an earlier statement, he also said meeting that commitment was an operational matter for police.
'There has been no political interference with police and its recruiting programme. The coalition government set the police a recruitment target and the funding to increase police numbers by 500. The delivery of that is an operational matter for police,' he said.
He said he and Costello had been clear 'that standards were not to be dropped'.
'Under the previous Labour government police recruiting standards were relaxed for example by dropping the required swim standard and dropping standards around low-level offending.
'In contrast, Minister Costello and I have unequivocally supported the Police Commissioner's public commitment to the maintenance of standards and expect the police to maintain these standards.'
He made that accusation again 'when the police dropped the swimming standard' again.
'Now, I'm not saying that wasn't the right thing to do but I'm highlighting the fact that the dropping of those standards happened under a previous government.
'Under this government not only have we returned the recruit courses from 16 to 20 weeks, we've been very clear that we do not want standards dropped, there will not be any compromise on that.'
He pushed back when host Charlotte Cook pointed out the government had allowed applicants on their restricted licence to join the Police College on the understanding they would have their full licence by the time they got there.
'Again, those are operational decisions for the police, and that's why those decisions were taken. It's not for us to interfere or meddle in those,' he said.
Minister 'trying to excuse his own behaviour' – Labour
Labour's police spokesperson Ginny Andersen said the decision to override recruiting policy would typically be made by someone in the police executive and despite the minister's claims of no interference, questions still needed to be answered.
'We need to understand why, then, did police – and who in police – made the decision for the rules to be bent in order to allow recruits through that hadn't qualified properly. It seems highly unlikely that police would do this of their own accord,' she said.
'It not only compromises public safety, but it also compromises the safety of those officers on the front line right now who rely on recruits being able to have all the skills necessary to be a police officer.'
She said the lowering of swimming requirements when Labour was in government was as a result of a review by police into what training was needed – an operational decision.
'Changes to standards for police recruits do happen over time, and that's in order to better reflect what is needed of an officer on the frontline, but what has happened here is recruits have entered training having not met the current requirements and police are worried enough to do an audit of that.
'It seems like he's trying to excuse his own behavior … it does seem odd that he's bringing things up from years ago when the pressing issue right now is that police recruits have been able to proceed through training without without completing required physical assessment tests.'
The minister should be held responsible for what was a political promise, she said.
'It is completely unfair for New Zealand police to be held accountable for a political promise that they have always said was unattainable by the 27th of November this year.
'The political deal making done by this government is now calling into question the reputation of New Zealand police, and that is not fair on the hard working and excellent police service we have.
She said the six-month investigation should be expanded to cover the whole two years police had been recruiting to try to meet the target.
'I think it would be better for the public's confidence for the whole period to be reviewed, six months doesn't cover the entire time that police have been trying to get the 500 extra and as we've seen that political pressure build on the government, there clearly has been something happened for standards to change.'
However, Ormerod said the time period would cover all those still at Police College, and 'everyone else should have passed and is out on the street and in district, so I think the timing is fair'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Newsroom

an hour ago

• Newsroom

Middle East military action ‘extremely worrying', but no call yet on bombing

This story first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission The foreign affairs minister says the Government will gather facts before taking a position on the United States' airstrikes on Iran. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, with President Donald Trump saying the country's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been 'completely and totally obliterated.' Trump said Iran 'must now make peace' or there would be further attacks. In response, Iran has accused the US of launching 'a dangerous war,' and of violating the United Nations Charter and international law. But on Sunday afternoon, shortly after the attack was launched, Foreign Affairs Ministers Winston Peters said the New Zealand government was waiting for the facts. 'Look, this has just happened. These are circumstances in which we will first of all gather the facts, and the circumstances, before we give our opinion.' Peters said the crisis was 'extremely worrying' and New Zealand would continue to call for diplomacy and dialogue. 'Ongoing military action in the Middle East is extremely worrying, and it's critical further escalation is avoided. We strongly support efforts towards diplomacy and urge all parties to return to talks,' he said. 'Iran's nuclear activities have long worried New Zealand. We want Iran to comply with its international obligations. Our concern is that further military action is not going to deliver a sustainable solution to this problem. 'We're a long way from the region, but New Zealand will continue to convey these measures in favour of diplomacy and dialogue directly to Iran, Israel, and the other parties involved in possible talks.' Labour's defence spokesperson Peeni Henare backed Peters' calls for a return to talks, but said the government should acknowledge the US breached international law and be 'perhaps a bit stronger' in the first instance. Henare said Trump's statements had made it 'quite clear' what had happened. 'Countries can't call for peace and de-escalation, only to take the action that's been taken.' Waikato University law professor Alexander Gillespie said the airstrikes were 'clearly' illegal in terms of international law. 'There's nowhere in the UN charter that says you can bomb someone who won't negotiate with you. But whether you get to a point where that is actually condemned is going to be very different,' he said. 'There's the theory of international law, with the UN Charter, and then there's the reality of international politics at the moment, which means that America will not be condemned internationally by the Security Council or even through the International Court of Justice.' The Prime Minister is heading to NATO this week. New Zealand is not a member, but in recent years has been invited as a partner along with fellow Indo-Pacific Four nations Australia, Japan and South Korea. While Christopher Luxon would be 'on the margins,' Gillespie expected he would be watching closely to see what like-minded partners were saying. 'This is an act which is not self-defence, and even if you argued it was pre-emptive self-defence, it wasn't necessary because there were other options of diplomacy still open. It will create difficulties if we speak out and say that, I don't think we're in a position to do that right now, for fear of the reaction that you get from America.' Australia's government has already issued a statement on the airstrikes. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,' the statement said. 'We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy.' Defence Force plane leaves today The Government is sending a C-130J Hercules plane to the Middle East, with Defence Force and Foreign Affairs personnel, to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. Defence minister Judith Collins said the plane was a contingency, and would not be able to aid in evacuation flights until airspace restrictions in the region eased. In the meantime, those who were able to leave via a safe route were urged to do so. Peters said the flights would get people to a safe place. 'We're not bringing them home. We're getting them to where they can make arrangements to get home.' The Government has been warning New Zealanders in the region to leave for a long time, Peters said. The number of New Zealanders registered as being in Iran or Israel had increased in recent days. The decision to send the Hercules was made even before knowledge of the airstrikes had come through. 'Our anxiety was enunciated and formulated into policy, warnings, and collections of views months ago. We've been saying it, and it's a sad circumstance here, but we said 'look this is very dangerous, get out,'' Peters said. Citing security reasons, Collins would not say where the plane and personnel would be based. Both Henare and Gillespie supported the move. 'I think if we're ready and on standby, at the very least, to make sure we can respond to our citizens and their needs, and also those of our diplomatic staff, I think that's a really smart move,' Henare said. Gillespie said sending a plane was prudent in case the situation worsened quickly, and the damage became more indiscriminate.

RNZ News

2 hours ago

• RNZ News

Urban Issues: The case for keeping the Gordon Wilson flats

The Gordon Wilson flats in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / Krystal Gibbens Urban issues correspondent Bill McKay discusses the government's decision to introduce a bill to demolish Wellington's Gordon Wilson Flats and why he believes it's a new low in the story of our architectural heritage. Bill McKay is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Architecture and Planning at the University of Auckland.

Otago Daily Times

7 hours ago

• Otago Daily Times

What US attacks on Iran mean for KiwiSaver, petrol prices

By Susan Edmunds of RNZ Escalation of the conflict in the Middle East poses a major threat to New Zealand's economy, commentators say - as well as households' KiwiSaver balances and petrol prices. There were earlier warnings that the conflict was having a noticeable but contained effect on oil prices - but that there could be a much more significant economic impact if the conflict broadened. Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen said the US attacks at the weekend were that scenario. "It does obviously ratchet up tensions enormously. But the question now is how the Iranian side respond and if they respond as some of their advisers have been talking about and how they've responded sometimes in the past." He said if there were attacks on US shipping, or attempts to limit access through the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices could spike. "There's a question come Monday as the markets open how everyone will digest this. I don't think anyone is thinking that there's an easy ability to de-escalate, but I think it will hinge on the Iranian response. "If they do ratchet up the tension further, if this starts to broaden out into shipping attacks, I think market expectations and worries about oil supply will increase substantially. The question is, just to what degree do you price this and how do markets look at that?" He said shares in companies in defence-based industries could increase in value. "Everyone will think the war's on and certainly so far there's nothing that would stop you thinking the same." People might also shift to defensive assets, he said, such as utilities. The fact New Zealand was sending a defence force aircraft and foreign affairs personnel into the region proved how concerned the government was, he said. Shamubeel Eaqub, chief economist at KiwiSaver provider Simplicity, said there could be bumpiness ahead for households. "So far market pricing is unexpectedly calm. Oil prices haven't increased very much, equity prices haven't changed much even though we had already seen the beginning of that escalation before the weekend started. "But with the US involvement now the uncertainty is even higher than before." He said the experience of the Gulf War in the 1990s showed the potential impacts. "The channels were two-fold... the first was around the price of oil and the second was really around the uncertainty in financial markets in general. "Now, compared to the Iraq wars, the world is a lot less dependent on oil than it used to be, which is also true for New Zealand, so the oil intensity of the economy is less. It doesn't mean we are immune it just means we are less exposed." He said it was not yet clear how sensitive financial markets would be but the bigger issue was the fear and uncertainty that would be created. "That's what we tend to see when there is a risk-off, equity markets tend to fall … the New Zealand dollar tends to get more volatile. Quite often it weakens when people are more risk averse, which means it's generally speaking a net positive for exporters but a net negative for the rest of us because we tend to consume a lot of imported products." He said it could take 12-18 months for the full effects of big geopolitical events to flow through. "But the initial effect quite often tends to be very much fear-driven, financial markets-driven commodity price-driven things." He said for most New Zealanders, the message was to "hang in there". "The oil price - you have no control over it. We are price takers, so whatever you can do in your own control to be able to manage your transport [might help]." He said when it came to financial markets, that was also generally out of an investor's hands. But if they were worried about their KiwiSaver accounts, they should remember that it was time in the market that would make the difference over the long term rather than short-term movements. Koura KiwiSaver founder Rupert Carlyon said the biggest risk was to inflation. "If it does turn into a broader Middle East war and potentially shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, they we are likely to see higher oil prices, which will flow through to everything and shipping delays making it harder and more expensive to import things here in New Zealand. The Reserve Bank will be watching this very carefully as anything that has the potential to skew inflation to the upside will mean a halt to further interest rate cuts. "I suspect markets will open down in anticipation of the conflict, though as we have seen over the past few years, markets fear more about the prospect of conflict rather than the reality of it. We have already seen this playbook with Ukraine and Russia and Gaza and Israel. Definitely no need to worry or panic."