Airlines weigh Mideast cancellations after US strikes leave many stranded

With Russian and Ukrainian airspace closed due to war, the Middle East route is vital for Europe-Asia flights, but FlightRadar24 showed empty skies over Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel
Reuters
Commercial airlines around the world on Monday were weighing how long to suspend Middle East flights after the US struck Iran.
Singapore Airlines, one of the highest-profile in Asia, had called the situation "fluid" on Sunday as it cancelled flights from Singapore to Dubai following a security assessment.
Air France KLM said on Sunday that it cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Riyadh on Sunday and Monday.
British Airways, owned by IAG ICAG.L, also cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Doha for Sunday. It was still reviewing the situation, it said in a statement on Sunday evening, when asked about later flights.
Missile and drone barrages in a growing number of conflict zones represent a high risk to airline traffic, and an organization that monitors flight risks, Safe Airspace, a website run by OPSGROUP, warned on Sunday that US attacks on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region.
In the days before the US strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar and United Airlines did the same with flights to Dubai.
Airlines are also concerned about a potential spike in oil prices following the US attacks, which will increase the cost of jet fuel.
Israel meanwhile is ramping up flights to help stranded travellers at home and abroad. The country's Airports Authority says that so-called rescue flights to the country would expand on Monday with 24 a day, although each flight would be limited to 50 passengers. Israeli airline El Al on Sunday said it had received applications to leave the country from about 25,000 people in about a day.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

41 minutes ago

• Indian Express

DeepSeek aids China's military and evaded export controls, US official says

AI firm DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior U.S. official told Reuters, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under U.S. rules. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, claiming its artificial intelligence reasoning models were on par with or better than U.S. industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost. 'We understand that DeepSeek has willingly provided and will likely continue to provide support to China's military and intelligence operations,' a senior State Department official told Reuters in an interview. 'This effort goes above and beyond open-source access to DeepSeek's AI models,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak about U.S. government information. The U.S. government's assessment of DeepSeek's activities and links to the Chinese government have not been previously reported and come amid a wide-scale U.S.-China trade war. Among the allegations, the official said DeepSeek is sharing user information and statistics with Beijing's surveillance apparatus. Chinese law requires companies operating in China to provide data to the government when requested. But the suggestion that DeepSeek is already doing so is likely to raise privacy and other concerns for the firm's tens of millions of daily global users. The U.S. also maintains restrictions on companies it believes are linked to China's military-industrial complex. U.S. lawmakers have previously said that DeepSeek, based on its privacy disclosure statements, transmits American users' data to China through 'backend infrastructure' connected to China Mobile, a Chinese state-owned telecommunications giant. DeepSeek did not respond to questions about its privacy practices. The company is also referenced more than 150 times in procurement records for China's People's Liberation Army and other entities affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base, said the official, adding that DeepSeek had provided technology services to PLA research institutions. Reuters could not independently verify the procurement data. The official also said the company was employing workarounds to U.S. export controls to gain access to advanced U.S.-made chips. The U.S. conclusions reflect a growing skepticism in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on U.S. technology. DeepSeek has access to 'large volumes' of U.S. firm Nvidia's high-end H100 chips, said the official. Since 2022 those chips have been under U.S. export restrictions due to Washington's concerns that China could use them to advance its military capabilities or jump ahead in the AI race. 'DeepSeek sought to use shell companies in Southeast Asia to evade export controls, and DeepSeek is seeking to access data centers in Southeast Asia to remotely access U.S. chips,' the official said. The official declined to say if DeepSeek had successfully evaded export controls or offer further details about the shell companies. DeepSeek also did not respond to questions about its acquisition of Nvidia chips or the alleged use of shell companies. When asked if the U.S. would implement further export controls or sanctions against DeepSeek, the official said the department had 'nothing to announce at this time.' China's foreign ministry and commerce ministry did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. 'We do not support parties that have violated U.S. export controls or are on the U.S. entity lists,' an Nvidia spokesman said in a prepared statement, adding that 'with the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data center market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei.' DeepSeek has said two of its AI models that Silicon Valley executives and U.S. tech company engineers have showered with praise – DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 – are on par with OpenAI and Meta's most advanced models. AI experts, however, have expressed skepticism, arguing the true costs of training the models were likely much higher than the $5.58 million the startup said was spent on computing power. Reuters has previously reported that U.S. officials were investigating whether DeepSeek had access to restricted AI chips. DeepSeek has H100 chips that it procured after the U.S. banned Nvidia from selling those chips to China, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, adding that the number was far smaller than the 50,000 H100s that the CEO of another AI startup had claimed DeepSeek possesses in a January interview with CNBC. Reuters was unable to verify the number of H100 chips DeepSeek has. 'Our review indicates that DeepSeek used lawfully acquired H800 products, not H100,' an Nvidia spokesman said, responding to a Reuters query about DeepSeek's alleged usage of H100 chips. In February, Singapore charged three men with fraud in a case domestic media have linked to the movement of Nvidia's advanced chips from the city state to DeepSeek. China has also been suspected of finding ways to use advanced U.S. chips remotely. While importing advanced Nvidia chips into China without a license violates U.S. export rules, Chinese companies are still allowed to access those same chips remotely in data centers in non-restricted countries. The exceptions are when a Chinese company is on a U.S. trade blacklist or the chip exporter has knowledge that the Chinese firm is using its chips to help develop weapons of mass destruction. U.S. officials have not placed DeepSeek on any U.S. trade blacklists yet and have not alleged that Nvidia had any knowledge of DeepSeek's work with the Chinese military. Malaysia's trade ministry said last week that it was investigating whether an unnamed Chinese company in the country was using servers equipped with Nvidia chips for large language model training and that it was examining whether any domestic law or regulation had been breached.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

Strait of Hormuz closure on the cards: Why India isn't hitting the panic button over oil yet, ET Infra

Advt Why the Strait of Hormuz matters India's exposure—and its evolving strategy In June 2025, Indian refiners imported 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude—the highest in two years and more than combined imports from the Gulf. Imports from the United States rose to 439,000 bpd, up from 280,000 bpd in May. LNG imports from Australia, Russia, and the US are also on the rise—all bypassing Hormuz entirely. Advt Has Iran ever closed the Strait? Why a full blockade Is unlikely Iran's own oil exports rely on the Strait—primarily via Kharg Island, which handles 96 per cent of its volumes. Its largest buyer, China, imports 5.4 million bpd through Hormuz and is unlikely to support such a move. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, and Qatar—countries Iran has been trying to mend ties with—would also be severely impacted. The US Navy and allied forces maintain a heavy presence in the region, further reducing the chances of a prolonged closure. Can India manage a disruption? Strategic petroleum reserves covering 9–10 days of imports. Increased sourcing from Russia, the US, Latin America, and West Africa. Flexible refining infrastructure and wider crude handling capacity. Possible use of fuel subsidies to contain inflationary pressure on diesel and LPG.e By , ETInfra Standing at the lectern in the White House briefing room, Karoline Leavitt, President Donald Trump's press secretary, read aloud a message she said came 'directly from the president.'Citing a 'substantial chance of negotiations' with Iran, the statement said Trump would wait two weeks before deciding whether to launch air strikes in the Middle East. Less than 30 hours later, Trump gave the go-ahead for a sweeping aerial assault on Iran's nuclear facilities—joining Israel in the most significant Western military action against Iran since its 1979 global tensions mount, analysts are closely watching how Tehran might respond. One possibility is the closure of the Strait of Hormuz—a strategic maritime corridor through which more than 20 million barrels of oil and a significant volume of liquefied natural gas (LNG) pass Strait of Hormuz, just 33 km wide at its narrowest point, connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean. With only two-mile-wide shipping lanes in each direction, it is a chokepoint for tankers moving oil and gas from the Gulf to the to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), an average of 20.3 million barrels of oil and 290 million cubic meters of LNG transited the Strait daily in 2024. Most of it comes from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Kuwait, Iran, and disruptions were once a bigger concern for the West, today it's Asia that stands most exposed. More than 80 per cent of the oil passing through the Strait is destined for Asia. India, China, Japan, and South Korea accounted for 67 per cent of these flows in 2022 and early imports 90 per cent of its crude oil, with about 40 per cent sourced from Gulf countries like Iraq, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Kuwait—all dependent on Hormuz. But India's risk profile is changing oil (Urals, ESPO, Sokol) reaches India via the Cape of Good Hope, the Suez Canal, or the Pacific, giving New Delhi important logistical flexibility. Indian refiners, for their part, have invested in processing flexibility to handle a wider variety of yet. Tehran has made multiple threats over the years—most notably in 2012, 2018, and 2019—but has never followed through. Even during the Tanker War of the 1980s, when Iran and Iraq attacked Gulf shipping, the Strait remained most recent flashpoint came in April 2024, when Iranian forces seized a container ship near Hormuz following Israeli strikes on an Iranian consulate in some Iranian leaders have once again raised the prospect of closure, most analysts remain Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly urged China to dissuade Iran from escalating.'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them [Iran] about that,' Rubio told Fox News. 'If they [close the Strait]... it will be economic suicide for them.'China is Iran's largest oil customer, importing 1.8 million bpd in May, according to Vortexa. Any closure would also hit India, Japan, and South Korea, which rely on the same the Strait would be economically and diplomatically self-defeating for far, the government appears confident. Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri said that India has adequate reserves and access to alternate sources. Over the years, the government has also worked on diversification of its sources of crude oil, significantly reducing the dependence on Strait of present, India enjoys a certain degree of cusion. Key buffers include:State-owned retailers like IOC, BPCL, and HPCL also have built-up margins after holding retail prices steady during periods of low global crude Strait of Hormuz remains a geopolitical flashpoint , but India's energy security posture has changed. With a more diversified crude basket, greater sourcing resilience, and improved infrastructure, a short-term disruption would be manageable—though not if the conflict deepens or becomes protracted, oil prices could spike, and shipping patterns may shift rapidly—testing how robust India's backup plans really are.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

India–US trade deal hits rough patch days before 26% tariff deadline

India's proposed trade deal with the US has run into rough weather with Indian authorities resisting the insistence of their counterparts to allow lower-duty import of American agricultural products such as maize and soybean, fearing adverse impact on farmers and health concerns related to genetically modified food , according to ToI. Sources told ToI that the talks have hit a hurdle. In the absence of a limited deal ahead of the July 9 deadline, domestic industry will have to brace for a 26% levy, especially with a view within the government that what the Trump administration is offering in the form of a 10% baseline tariff, applicable to all countries, is not good enough. At the start of the negotiations, the government was hoping to get zero duty access for several products of India's interests, including textiles, leather goods, pharmaceuticals as well as some engineering goods and auto parts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Costco Shoppers Say This Wrinkle Cream Is "Actually Worth It" The Skincare Magazine American negotiators, who are keen that the deal be finalised, have indicated to their Indian counterparts that the Trump administration cannot go down to zero tariffs immediately. In any case, India has sought immunity from future tariff actions once a deal is in place. Unhappiness in India over US President Donald Trump 's claim—since rejected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi—of having brokered the ceasefire in Operation Sindoor , has also not helped in creating a conducive atmosphere for resolution of trade-related issues, ToI noted. Live Events You Might Also Like: PM Modi misses chance to push for US trade deal as Trump leaves G-7 Earlier this month, Bloomberg had also reported citing people familiar with the matter that trade officials from India and the US have hardened their stance on some key issues as they race to conclude an interim deal before higher US tariffs take effect in July. Negotiators from both sides, who met in New Delhi this month, wrangled over issues including a US demand that India open up its market to genetically modified crops, officials in New Delhi had said, asking not to be identified as the discussions are private. The US also wants India to eliminate tariffs and ease price controls on medical devices, and relax rules on data localization policy, which mandates storage of data on local servers, they added. US President Donald Trump has launched investigations in the pharmaceuticals sector under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a precursor to higher tariffs. He had used the Section 232 probes, which looks at the national-security implications of imports in critical sectors, to impose tariffs on steel, aluminium and automobiles and its components. You Might Also Like: India builds 4-lane FTA roadmap: US and EU in sight, minerals and neighbours next A US trade team led by Brendan Lynch, assistant US Trade Representative, met officials in New Delhi on June 5–10, with both sides agreeing to expedite talks to conclude an agreement that includes 'early wins,' Indian officials said earlier this week. You Might Also Like: Trump to launch new round of tariffs, targeting pharma, chips and minerals