UN: violence against children in war zones hits record high in 2024
From Gaza to the Democratic Republic of Congo, violence against children in conflict zones reached "unprecedented levels" in 2024, a United Nations annual report said Thursday, June 19. "In 2024, violence against children in armed conflict reached unprecedented levels, with a staggering 25% surge in the number of grave violations in comparison with 2023," according to the report from UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.
The report verified 41,370 grave violations against children in 2024 – including 36,221 committed in 2024 and 5,149 committed previously but confirmed in 2024 – the highest number since the monitoring tool was established nearly 30 years ago. The new high beats 2023, another record year, which itself represented a 21% increase over the preceding year.
With more than 4,500 killed and 7,000 injured, children continue to bear "the brunt of relentless hostilities and indiscriminate attacks," the report said. There was also a marked increase in the number of child victims of multiple violations to 22,495.
"The cries of 22,495 innocent children who should be learning to read or play ball – but instead have been forced to learn how to survive gunfire and bombings – should keep all of us awake at night," said Virginia Gamba, special representative of the UN secretary-general for children and armed conflict. "This must serve as a wake-up call. We are at the point of no return."
In its annual report, the UN compiles violations of the rights of children, those aged under 18, in some 20 conflict zones around the world. In its appendix, a "list of shame" calls out those responsible for these violations – a powerful coalition of Haitian gangs was added this year – which include child killings and mutilations, recruitment to violence, kidnappings, denial of humanitarian aid and sexual violence. The Israeli armed forces, which were named last year along with Palestinian militant group Hamas, remain on the list.
Conflict casualties
The Palestinian territories occupy the top spot in the dismal rankings, with more than 8,500 serious violations, the vast majority attributed to Israeli forces, including more than 4,800 in the Gaza Strip. This figure includes confirmation of 1,259 Palestinian children killed in Gaza, and the UN notes it is currently verifying information on an additional 4,470 children killed in 2024 in the war-torn territory.
Violence erupted there following Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. The report also calls out Israel's military operations in Lebanon, where more than 500 children were killed or injured last year.
Following the Palestinian territories, the countries where the UN recorded the most violence against children in 2024 are: the Democratic Republic of the Congo (more than 4,000 grave violations), Somalia (more than 2,500), Nigeria (nearly 2,500), and Haiti (more than 2,200).
"List of shame" inductees include Haitian gang coalition "Viv Ansanm," blamed for a 490% increase in violations, including child recruitment, murders and gang rapes. Another addition to the list is Colombian drug cartel Clan del Golfo, which is accused of child recruitment. Colombia in general recorded a significant increase in cases of forced recruitment, with 450 children in 2024 compared to 262 the previous year.
Remaining on the list are the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, which have been fighting in Sudan for more than two years. Also listed again is the Russian army for its actions in Ukraine, where the report records a 105% increase in serious violations between 2023 and 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
26 minutes ago
- Euronews
Iranian strikes show Israel's aerial defense is not ironclad
Iranian missiles again evaded Israel's sophisticated aerial defence array on Thursday, striking a main hospital in the south as well as residential areas in the country's populous center. Israeli authorities say at least 24 people have been killed by Iranian strikes since the fighting began on June 13, which has reduced homes, buildings and other property in multiple areas of the country to ruins. Israel has developed, with assistance from the United States, a tiered system capable of detecting incoming fire and deploying only if the projectile is headed toward a population centre or sensitive military or civilian infrastructure. The array can shoot down short-range rockets to medium-range missiles to attack drones to ballistic missiles like those Iran has been firing. The Israeli military warns that the system is not foolproof and while interception rates are generally high, enemy missiles can penetrate. Too many projectiles launched at once can overwhelm the system, which relies on a combination of technology and human decision-making to be effective. This system, developed with the US, is designed to intercept long-range missiles, including the types of ballistic missiles Iran launched on Tuesday. The Arrow, which operates outside the atmosphere, has also been used in the current war to intercept long-range missiles launched by Houthi militants in Yemen. Also developed with the US, David's Sling is meant to intercept medium-range missiles, such as those possessed by Hezbollah in Lebanon. It has been deployed on multiple occasions throughout the war. This system, developed by Israel with US backing, specialises in shooting down short-range rockets. It has intercepted thousands of rockets since it was activated early last decade, including thousands of interceptions during the current war against Hamas and Hezbollah. Israel says it has a success rate of over 90 per cent. Israel is developing a new system to intercept incoming threats with laser technology. Israel has said this system will be a game changer because it would be much cheaper to operate than existing systems. According to Israeli media reports, the cost of a single Iron Dome interception is about $50,000 (€43,000), while the other systems can run more than $2 million per missile. Iron Beam interceptions, by contrast, would cost a few dollars apiece, according to Israeli officials. The army says the technology has been tested during the past 20 months of conflict, but the system is not yet operational. As missiles fall on Israel and Iran, civilians face a second battlefield: the online space. Since the beginning of Israel's offensive, communication tools have come under increasing control - both for spying on the enemy and for suppressing dissent. New restrictions have been imposed on the population in Israel. Meanwhile, in Iran, long accustomed to censorship, repression has reached new heights. During the 7 October Hamas attack on Israel, one of the targets was the Nahal Oz military base. An investigation published in March revealed that the assault was made possible in part by public social media posts from soldiers themselves, which allowed Hamas to map the layout of the facility. Since then, Israeli soldiers have been banned from taking photographs inside IDF facilities or using platforms like Facebook. The aim is to prevent enemies from building intelligence profiles. Even documenting events such as ceremonies or gatherings with civilians is now prohibited. A Stanford University article explains how social media can offer a tactical advantage to adversaries: 'The phenomenon of 'geotagging' – the process of adding geographical identification metadata to various media – is particularly sensitive as it can reveal specific locations of military units or vulnerable civilian populations.' It adds that social media is a double-edged sword in modern warfare: 'While it can offer a lifeline and a platform to some, it also presents a significant intelligence resource for others.' On Wednesday, Israel's military censor, Brigadier General Kobi Mandelblit, warned that anyone sharing details about the location of strikes — including via social media, blogs, or chat apps — must submit the content for prior review or face prosecution. Iran is also acutely aware of these risks. On Saturday, the Revolutionary Guard issued a statement warning that any 'exchange of information' perceived as aiding Israel would be met with the harshest punishment — which could include social media posts or images. Babak Kamiar, the head of Euronews' Persian desk, said that the maximum punishment indicated in the sentence is 'the death penalty for sure'. State television went so far as to urge Iranians to delete WhatsApp from their phones, claiming the app shares user data with Israel. WhatsApp denied the accusation, stating that it does not track users' locations and that its end-to-end encryption ensures message privacy. In 2022, Iran blocked access to WhatsApp and Google Play during nationwide protests sparked by the death of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini while in police custody. The apps remained unavailable for over two years, until access was restored in December 2024. Social media isn't just a tool for spying, it also serves as a real-time political barometer. 'Being able to track social media content is a very important strategic asset. It's an instant polling device, really,' Philip Seib, Professor Emeritus of Journalism and Public Diplomacy at the USC Annenberg School, told Euronews. 'The public's social media can provide some hints about the intent of the population. Are they rallying around their government?' Authorities are closely monitoring these signs. On Saturday, Israeli police arrested a man at his home after he posted an image of the Iranian flag, a salute emoji, and a message of support. By Monday, Israel's National Security Minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, vowed a zero-tolerance approach toward any 'expressions of joy' over Iranian attacks on Israel. Seib also explained how foreign governments could be watching these signs closely. 'If I were Donald Trump, I'd want to monitor that situation closely. For instance, Netanyahu [the Israeli Prime Minister] might soon request more weapons resupply. But how much public support does he actually have in Israel?' Disinformation is rife online, and this conflict is no exception. Speaking to Euronews, Dr Sahar Khamis, Associate Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Maryland, said dynamics seen during the war in Gaza are playing out again – with people getting informed more on social media than by mainstream media and so being subjected to misinformation or disinformation. 'Truth is the first casualty of war,' she said. Khamis noted the use of deliberate mistranslations of Israeli leaders' speeches, AI-generated images of missile strikes, and misleading out-of-context footage. 'Controlling the narrative is a crucial part of this conflict. Winning the information war matters almost as much as winning on the battlefield.' During previous escalations in Gaza, Israel demonstrated its digital warfare capabilities. In 2023, its foreign ministry paid for ads using graphic content, emotive language and even AI-generated video. These campaigns blurred the line between official messaging and psychological operations. Some were removed by Google after violating rules on violent imagery. Euronews' Arabic team uncovered several fake narratives online — from claims of a Mossad building being bombed, to an Iranian strike on Haifa's Bazan oil refinery, or Iranian defences downing two aircraft — all of which turned out to be video game simulations. Iran's government has a long-standing habit of restricting internet access during periods of unrest. In 2019, it imposed a six-day nationwide blackout during mass protests, during which authorities launched a brutal crackdown that reportedly left over 100 people dead. Since hostilities with Israel began, Iran has throttled internet speeds, leading to intermittent blackouts. On Wednesday, the country experienced a total outage lasting more than 12 hours, according to NetBlocks, a UK-based internet monitoring group. 'The government officially announced that they slowed down the internet because they want to be able to have cyber defence,' said Amir Rashidi, Director of Internet Security and Digital Rights at the Miaan Group. But he told Euronews the explanation doesn't hold up - cyberattacks have continued regardless. The timing is also worrying as it comes at a critical time, he added: 'For exemple, people trying to find alternative routes when they want to escape look at Google Maps — but it's not working properly. There are a lot of people lost in the middle of nowhere with no fuel or water.' In response to the outages, Elon Musk announced on his platform X over the weekend that he had activated Starlink, his satellite internet service, in Iran to help restore connectivity.
AFP
35 minutes ago
- AFP
Footage of parking lot fire in China falsely linked to Iran-Israel conflict
"Iran's fifth attack destroyed Israel's major military base," reads the Burmese-language post shared on June 14, 2025. It shares a video with more than 25,000 views and shows people running away from a massive fire near a square. Image Screenshot of the false post taken on June 18, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The posts emerged after Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military facilities with a barrage of missiles on June 13, killing several top officials and prompting a counter-attack by Iran (archived here and here). The arch rivals have since exchanged attacks in their historical confrontation, fuelling fears of a drawn-out war that could engulf the Middle East. The Israeli prime minister's office said on June 16 that at least 24 people have been killed and hundreds wounded by Iran's retaliatory strikes (archived link). Iran said a day earlier that the Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. The video has been shared with the same claim in Burmese, English, Thai, and Hindi. But a combination of reverse image and keyword searches on Google found a video showing the same scene was published on the Chinese platform Xiaohongshu, known as RedNote in English, on June 12 (archived link). "Electric scooters on fire in Jiulongpo in Chongqing," the clip's caption in simplified Chinese reads. "Electrical safety in the summer heat is really important." Text on the video largely repeats the caption. Image Screenshot comparison of the false video (left) and the clip as seen on RedNote Subsequent searches found that Chinese state outlet CGTN used the clip in a video report published on the same day about the fire (archived link). Images of skyscrapers in the area published by Chinese search engine Baidu also match those seen in the false clip (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of the frame from CGTN video (L) to the image from Baidu Maps of the surround area with similarities highlighted by AFP The local government said in a press release that the fire was extinguished after 20 minutes with no casualties (archived link). AFP have previously debunked misinformation related to the Iran-Israel war here.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Why do Europeans still believe a nuclear deal with Iran is possible?
Europe hopes to use diplomacy to avoid the threat of all-out war in the Middle East, amid fears that the conflict between Israel and Iran could engulf the wider region. On Friday, the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom, together with the EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, will hold talks with representatives of the Tehran regime in Geneva. The meeting aims to de-escalate the fighting between the two Middle Eastern powers, which began when Israel launched airstrikes against Iran and killed some of its top military commanders last Friday. The Europeans seek to initiate a form of shuttle diplomacy between Israel, Iran, Washington and the main European capitals. They would like to reestablish a security dialogue with Tehran, similar to the one interrupted in 2018 when the first Trump administration unilaterally withdrew from the Iranian nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The JCPA, which was signed by Iran along with China, the EU, France, Germany, Russia and the UK in 2015, stipulated an easing of Western sanctions against the Middle Eastern country in exchange for Tehran's commitment to a drastic reduction of Uranium stockpiles and centrifuges at its nuclear facilities. Such sites are now being targeted by Israeli missile attacks, including those at Natanz and Isfahan. In 2018, despite the UN nuclear agency saying that Tehran was progressively adopting the restrictions required by the agreement, Trump's administration withdrew from the JCPOA, effectively rendering it null and void. By walking back on the JCPOA, the US put an end to one of the main achievements of European foreign policy. David Rigoulet-Roze, an author and associate research fellow at IRIS, a French foreign policy institute, said the cancellation of the Iranian nuclear deal of 2015 was a hasty act. "The agreement had the merit, despite all its imperfections, of existing, of serving as a basis, including for the possible subsequent renegotiation of something more binding', said Rigoulet-Roze. 'Even though, the Europeans were not in control of the process'. The accord represented an opportunity for the EU to reopen trade relations with Iran after decades of US and Western sanctions against the Islamic Republic. However, after the JCPOA's demise, the regime in Tehran stigmatised the EU for the failure of the agreement. 'Somewhat wrongly, because we obviously didn't provoke the cancellation of the accord and we have also suffered the consequences of what is known as the extraterritoriality of American law', Rigoulet-Roze said. He noted the capacity of the US to impose sanctions on a global scale, particularly secondary sanctions, 'which are formidable and which have obviously curbed Europe's desire to develop trade relations that were authorised after 2015'. Iran has been a party to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty since the time of Shah Reza Pahlavi, who was the original founder of Iran's nuclear programme. Therefore, Tehran has been obliged to open up its sites for inspection by UN agencies. This motivated Brussels to treat Iran as a potentially rational actor despite its puzzling decisions and smoke and mirrors regarding its nuclear programme. Years ago, Tehran ended its highly enriched uranium production, yet it continued developing its military conventional ballistic capabilities and financing Middle Eastern proxies, including Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. "This was a kind of matter of national pride as far as the Iranians were concerned. So I don't think that they, and this is in retrospect, ever planned to negotiate it away,' senior British diplomat and adviser Robert Cooper told Euronews. A strategic nuclear force, Cooper explained, "was going to mark them out as one of the most important powers in the Middle East. And as an international power beyond the Middle East as well." The Iranian nuclear programme and the existence of uranium enrichment equipment and heavy water facilities were officially made public by then-president Mohammad Khatami, a reformist who persuaded France, Germany and the UK to reach a deal that was meant to oblige Tehran to stop the uranium enrichment. Javier Solana, the EU foreign and security policy chief at the time, attended the negotiations in Tehran. The Spanish diplomat was one of the deal's key architects, who believed that a deal is better than any conflict, and that the EU is best poised to broker it. "Solana was fascinated by Iran, and you know, we had a certain admiration for it. Our aim at the time was to persuade the Iranians that a military nuclear programme would make them a target,' Cooper recalled.
