Russia's contradictory messaging on Pope Francis's death — and the strategy behind it

What should have been an apolitical moment—the death of Pope Francis on April 21—quickly turned into a battleground for Russia's information war.
As conspiracy theories and AI-generated content flooded social media worldwide, Russian state media launched a targeted campaign that both criticised the Pope's perceived progressivism and highlighted his alleged ties to Moscow, according analysis seen exclusively by The Independent.
While routinely monitoring Russian state media and analysing content posted on social media, disinformation advocacy group The American Sunlight Project identified inconsistent messaging across various state-run outlets in the hours and days following the death of Pope Francis.
This apparent contradiction wasn't an accident, according to the group. They claim it may reflect a broader geopolitical strategy: tailoring messaging to appeal to different audiences.
On social media, narratives portraying Francis as 'woke' targeted right-wing, MAGA-affiliated communities. While portrayals of a 'special relationship' between Russia and the Vatican aimed to resonate with the Global South, where large Catholic populations live and where Russia Today (RT) target their programming — such as the Philippines and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Endorsing anti-woke cardinals
Within a day of the Francis's death, RT, Russia's state-controlled news network, flooded X and Telegram with content accusing him of being 'woke' or a 'globalist.' According to The American Sunlight Project analysis, this content often included selectively edited or manipulated quotes from prominent critics of the Pope, framing them as having moral authority.
RT and Pravda, a Russian news outlet once tied to Soviet communism, also amplified the views of Alexander Dugin, a far-right 'philosopher' dubbed Vladimir Putin 's 'brain,' who criticised the Pope and endorsed the conservative Cardinal Robert Sarah.
Pravda also accused French President Emmanuel Macron of interfering with the papal election, despite a lack of evidence to support these claims.
Portraying a special Russia-Vatican relationship
In stark contrast to the negative narratives circulating on social media, TASS, a Russian state-owned news agency, consistently emphasised a close personal connection between Putin and Pope Francis, according to the analysis.
TASS reported that Putin 'held deep respect for Francis,' and highlighted their three in-person meetings and frequent phone calls, claiming that Putin called the Pope every March to mark his ascension to the papacy.
In his official condolence message, Putin described Francis as a 'remarkable man' and claimed he would 'forever keep warm memories' of him, also praising the Pope for fostering 'constructive cooperation' between Russia and the Vatican, something that The American Sunlight Project says falsely suggested an alignment of moral authority between the Kremlin and the Vatican.
Flip-flopping on Ukraine
Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russian state media has consistently downplayed or ignored these tensions. Outlets like TASS and RT excluded Pope Francis's 2022 criticism of a Russian Orthodox bishop Patriarch Kirill—who supported the war—in which Francis warned him not to become 'Putin's altar boy.'
Instead, Russian coverage has tended to frame such disputes as minor, according to the analysis.
RT gave significant attention to Francis's February 2024 remark suggesting Ukraine might need 'the courage of the white flag' to pursue peace negotiations, a comment that sparked backlash in Ukraine.
Russia has a well-documented history of using disinformation campaigns to influence global events. Most notably, during the 2016 US presidential election, Russian interference in favour of Donald Trump was described as "sweeping and systematic" by a special counsel investigation, though it did not establish any conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.
"The Kremlin and its entities have long played 'both sides' of various political issues, attempting to cause as much political division as possible in the democratic world' Benjamin Shultz from The American Sunlight Project told The Independent.
'We saw this in the US in 2016, for example, when they simultaneously created pro-Trump and pro-Clinton Facebook pages. It is, therefore, not surprising to see Russian state media simultaneously maligning and praising Pope Francis. To the Kremlin, his death is yet another opportunity to stir anger online and pit all of us against one another" he added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

an hour ago

• Reuters

Ukrainian forces attack oil depot in Russia's Rostov region

June 23 (Reuters) - Ukrainian forces on Monday attacked and set ablaze an oil depot in Russia's southern Rostov region used to supply Russian forces in occupied parts of Ukraine, the Ukrainian military said. The General Staff of Ukraine's Armed Forces said the military's special operations units, in conjunction with rocket forces and artillery, had hit the Atlas plant in the Rostov region, not far from Ukraine's eastern border. "A strike by our forces in the area of the target has been confirmed," the General Staff said in a statement on Telegram. "A fire has been observed. The results of the strike are being clarified." The statement said the facility was used to provide fuel and lubricants to Russian units operating in Russian-occupied parts of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions on the war's eastern front. Ukrainian forces have been engaged in cross-border attacks, including energy industry targets, which the General Staff said was aimed at curbing Russia's economic potential to proceed with the more than three-year-old war in Ukraine. Ukrainian military bloggers had earlier reported on the raid on the oil depot, saying fuel tanks had been engulfed in a blaze in the incident.

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

Zelensky welcomed to No 10 for meeting with Starmer ahead of Nato summit

Volodymyr Zelensky has met Sir Keir Starmer and the King during his visit to the UK ahead of a crunch Nato summit. The Ukrainian president arrived in Downing Street where he was expected to discuss Britain's ongoing support for his war-torn nation on Monday afternoon, after being welcomed to Windsor Castle for lunch with Charles. Mr Zelensky, who is usually seen wearing military fatigues, wore a black blazer and trousers throughout his Monday visits. He and Sir Keir embraced on the doorstep of No 10, where a red carpet had been rolled out for the Ukrainian leader. Charles and Mr Zelensky were earlier pictured chatting as they made their way through Windsor Castle, and smiling as they shook hands in the Grand Corridor. During his visit to London, the Ukrainian leader was also welcomed to the Palace of Westminster and met Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords counterpart, Lord McFall of Alcluith. His arrival in the UK follows reports that Russia fired 352 drones and 16 missiles at Ukraine overnight, killing at least 10 civilians including seven in Kyiv. Mr Zelensky said preliminary reports indicated Russia had used North Korean missiles to attack Kyiv and described those two countries, and Iran, as a 'coalition of murderers'. His visit to London takes place the day before Nato leaders are set to meet in The Hague for a two-day summit, with increased defence spending top of the agenda. Mr Zelensky has been invited to the summit but will not take part in its main discussions, and it is still unclear whether he will attend at all. Ahead of the visit, a Downing Street spokesman said Sir Keir would 'reiterate our steadfast support for Ukraine' during his meeting with Mr Zelensky.

Telegraph

an hour ago

• Telegraph

Trump comes, not to bury Nato, but to save it

This week Nato will mark its first 76 years at its summit in The Hague. All eyes will be on Donald Trump and his robust 'America First' approach on the world stage, which has already involved the use of decisive military force against Iran's nuclear facilities. The US president has been a firm critic of Nato, but has also been responsible for a dramatic revival of the alliance. Trump has made it clear that Nato's survival depends on America's fellow members stepping up to fully participate in burden sharing with the US. The Russians have clearly viewed Nato as weak and divided and are increasingly willing to test its resolve. The US presidency must apply concerted pressure on America's allies to do far more to foster partnership rather than dependency, especially as the United States must increasingly focus on the immense threat in the Indo-Pacific presented by Communist China. In 2024, only 22 Nato members spent the 2 per cent of GDP on defence agreed to by the alliance in 2014. This is unacceptable. It leaves the alliance dangerously vulnerable when it should be projecting strength and resolve. Countries that spent less than 2 per cent of real GDP on defence last year included Italy (1.5 per cent), Canada (1.4 per cent), Spain (1.3 per cent), and Belgium (1.3 per cent). In contrast, Poland (4.1 per cent), Estonia (3.4 per cent), Latvia (3.2 per cent), and Greece (3.1 per cent) all spent above 3 per cent of GDP. Justin Trudeau's now departed Canadian government was among the very worst Nato slackers, consistently underinvesting in Canada's military with shockingly low figures for a nation with the 10 th largest GDP in the world. His successor as prime minister, Mark Carney, has vowed to raise Canadian defence spending to 2 per cent, but this is simply not enough. Ottawa needs to be serious about Nato's mission, and playing a full part in the alliance in the coming decades. As Heritage Foundation research has shown, 'European Nato members have collectively underfunded their own defence by $827.91 billion since 2014 – nearly equal to the entire annual US defence budget.' This is a staggering figure – a damning indictment of a culture of complacency and dependency in many Nato allies over the past decade. Not only should every Nato member immediately invest the minimum agreed level of spending on their own defence, they should also commit to matching the current US level of 3.5 per cent of GDP, and pledge to reach 5 per cent of GDP, which is expected to be the new benchmark set at the forthcoming Nato summit according to Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. President Trump's pressure on Nato partners to spend more on defence is already having a major impact. After decades of reckless underinvestment, Germany, the world's fourth-largest economy and the biggest in Europe, has announced plans for a dramatic increase in defence spending, and has accepted in principle that German spending must eventually rise to 5 per cent of GDP if it is serious about defending its own borders from a potential attack by Russia. France, which has barely reached the agreed minimum 2 per cent of GDP on defence in recent years, has announced that it will push European defence spending levels to 3-3.5 per cent of GDP ahead of the Hague summit. Even Belgium, one of Nato's most lacklustre members, has declared it will boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. The UK has just announced a $20 billion investment in its nuclear warhead programme, and the construction of 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines, as part of its new Strategic Defence Review, released this month. The Baltic States and Poland are already building on their robust records by pledging significant further increases in the years ahead. Poland will spend 4.7 per cent of GDP on defence this year, while Estonia has committed to spending 5.4 per cent through until 2029. Lithuania will spend 5-6 per cent on defence from 2026 to 2030, and Latvia will spend 5 per cent by 2026. The positive developments in Europe should be warmly welcomed in Washington. In just the first few months of his presidency, Donald Trump has already significantly strengthened Nato. President Trump is not the alliance's destroyer, as his critics have alleged, but is in fact its saviour. Previous US presidents had urged European allies to do more, but their entreaties fell on deaf ears. It took the no-nonsense straight talk of Donald Trump to make European leaders sit up and take notice. In many ways the Trump presidency has been the antithesis of the weak-kneed Biden presidency. The humiliating debacle of Biden's reckless Afghanistan withdrawal would not have happened under Donald Trump, and nor would Russia's reckless invasion of Ukraine. With bold US leadership at the helm, Nato still has the vision, capacity and energy to thrive and prosper for another 76 years. American exceptionalism is the most powerful force for liberty in the world today. It is greatly strengthened by America's alliances with key partners, and Nato is at the very heart of the transatlantic partnership.