Global Times: Japanese textbooks contain misleading descriptions regarding the causes of WWII, says Japanese civil group
06/11/2025, Beijing, China // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire //
A Japanese civil group said in an exclusive interview with the Global Times on Tuesday that Japanese junior high school history textbooks contain inaccurate descriptions regarding the causes of World War II. The group warned that Japan's current lack of responsibility in addressing historical issues could make it difficult for Japanese young people to understand the true history of the war and to critically examine the essence of contemporary social issues.
Since April, junior high schools across Japan started to use new textbooks. The changes to the way World War II is described have sparked concern and unease among the Children and Textbooks Japan Network 21, a non-governmental organization formed in 1998 that has long been focusing on issues surrounding textbook approval and the presentation of war history in Japan.
'We reviewed junior high school history textbooks published by Tokyo Shoseki, Kyoiku Shuppan, Teikoku-Shoin, Yamakawa Shuppansha, Nihon Bunkyo Shuppan, and Manabisha. Among them, only Manabisha's version explicitly writes that 'Japan started the war,' while most textbooks used descriptions like 'the war began,'' Yoko Kojiya, secretary-general of the organization, told the Global Times on Tuesday via email, noting this expression makes it difficult for students to understand and contemplate why Japan started the war and how it proceeded with colonial rule.
Kojiya pointed out particularly that the descriptions in textbooks about Japan's invasion of China are not sufficiently detailed. Also, the content about why Japan went to war with the US and the UK in 1941 is problematic because it is described as 'Japan had to go to war due to being isolated by the ABCD [America, Britain, China and Dutch] encirclement.'
Kojiya said to better teach history and allow Japanese students to grasp war history more fully and impartially, it's vital to enable discussions on why Japan started the wars and how Japanese people should prevent such conflicts from happening in the future. 'Therefore, it is necessary to provide a large amount of historical material to help understand the nature of war.'
Kojiya also highlighted the changes concerning the 'Nanjing Massacre' and 'comfort women,' slamming Japanese government's textbook screening policy as political interference in educational content.
'The term 'Nanjing Massacre' is used in fewer textbooks nowadays, with many referring to it as the 'Nanjing Incident' instead. And the number of people massacred is accompanied by caveats such as 'there are various opinions' or that the number 'is being researched,'' Kojiya said.
The Nanjing Massacre is one of the darkest chapters of World War II. The atrocities began on December 13, 1937, when Japanese troops captured the then-Chinese capital Nanjing, unleashing six weeks of devastation that claimed the lives of an estimated 300,000 civilians and unarmed soldiers, according to Xinhua.
Regarding 'comfort women,' Kojiya said that the removal of the term 'accompanying the military' in the textbooks aims to hide the fact that these women were forced into sexual servitude by the Japanese military.
'The National History Textbook published by ReiwaShoseki even writes 'There is no evidence of Japanese troops forcibly taking away women.' I consider it a serious problem that this passed the government screening without any objections,' Kojiya said.
The 'comfort women' system was a military sexual slavery regime enforced by the Japanese government and its military during World War II. It resulted in at least 400,000 innocent women worldwide being forced into sexual slavery. Nearly half of them were Chinese, according to Xinhua.
According to Xinhua, in 2021, the Japanese government decided through a cabinet meeting to deem expressions such as 'comfort women accompanying the military' as 'inappropriate textbook terminology.' Japan's education authority subsequently requested modifications to related teaching materials, including those already distributed.
Kojiya told the Global Times that it is a serious problem that the descriptions in Japanese history textbooks can be greatly influenced by the policies of the government at any given time.
'The current textbook screening in Japan is not focusing on pointing out academic errors, but rather on whether the descriptions align with government inclinations,' said Kojiya.
This year marks the 80th anniversary of victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. On May 31, the organization held a seminar in Tokyo to discuss the proper role of Japanese history education eight decades after the war.
According to the seminar material Kojiya sent to the Global Times, during the seminar, Hisao Ishiyama, former chairman of the History Educationalist Conference of Japan, said that since 2014, forces that glorify war and distort history started to utilize the deteriorated textbook system and government power to launch a government-wide effort to distort the entire population's understanding of history.
In response to this challenge, Kojiya told the Global Times that she is especially worried about the rise of conservative forces, such as the 'Tsukurukai,' which attack reflection on the war and the pacifism of the constitution, advocate for a constitutional amendment, and push forward policies aimed at expanding military capabilities to build Japan into a country that can wage war.
'Thus, it is crucial to squarely face the historical facts of aggression on the basis of the reflection that led to the creation of the Japanese Constitution, and to gather the strength of people who wish to stop policies that will make Japan a 'war state',' Kojiya said.
This story first appeared in Global Times:
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202506/1335854.shtml.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
A ‘big, beautiful deal', America's aerospace ‘revolution' and other commentary
Iran-Israel war: A 'Big, Beautiful Deal' 'Proponents of an American strike believe that we have no realistic choice other than to help Israel do as thorough a job as possible in setting back Iran's nuclear ambitions,' contends The New York Times' Bret Stephens. True, after Trump drops bunker busters on the Fordow nuclear site, the question is 'what comes afterward.' But the president can follow that up with 'a diplomatic bunker buster on Tehran': lifting economic sanctions and forcing the Israelis to stop the bombings. 'Nobody, perhaps even President Trump himself, knows for sure whether the United States will wind up joining Israel in launching military strikes on Iran.' But 'there's a big, beautiful deal to be struck here. For all sides.' Tech watch: America's Aerospace 'Revolution' Advertisement 'From LAX to coastal San Diego,' dozens of new firms are 'embracing the country's emerging 'hard tech' revolution,' cheers Joel Kotkin at UnHerd. Including around 40 spinoffs of SpaceX, they make everything — largely for aerospace — 'from drones to engines, drilling systems to satellites.' Together, they can 'restore' America's 'blue-collar prosperity.' Given the 'military implications' of these products, these firms embrace a 'Right-wing patriotism' and so threaten to change corporate culture. Yet 'the biggest pool of money' is not from the Defense Department but the 'burgeoning space industry.' And the 'technology looks set to dominate our century. For if those robots and satellites are all impressive enough in theory, they could yet be used as a geopolitical battering ram' — with US innovators as 'riposte to Chinese central planning.' Libertarian: Czechs to the Rescue in Ukraine 'Through online fundraisers organized by community platforms like 'Gift for Putin,' 'Team for Ukraine,' or 'Just Retribution,' Czech citizens have donated millions of dollars toward' arms for Ukraine, marvels Miroslav Hanušniak at Reason. These include much-needed rifle magazines, howitzer shells, a Black Hawk helicopter and 'more than $11.5 million toward the direct purchase of First Person View drones.' Czechs 'show no signs of slowing down. New initiatives continue to emerge, finding creative ways to support the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.' In neighboring Slovakia, citizens defied their Russian-leaning 'government's stance and joined the fundraising efforts, contributing millions.' It's a reminder that 'real power and meaningful change do not always come from parliaments.' Advertisement Defense beat: Space — Aukus' Final Frontier 'It's time for Aukus,' the Australia, US and UK alliance, 'to grow,' argues Scott Morrison at The Wall Street Journal, and Trump 'is the right person for the job.' Aukus 'enables Australia's acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet' and 'facilitates cooperation on advanced military capabilities,' notes the former Australian prime minister. But 'if our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theaters of geopolitical competition' — particularly space. Aukus should be expanded to consolidate 'cooperation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration and industrial innovation.' It must ensure that space 'is secured by free nations, not our enemies. American and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit.' Hispanic pastor: Riots Hurt Protesters' Cause Advertisement 'Once more, the streets of Los Angeles are filled with chaos' because of 'modern-day anarchists,' blasts Samuel Rodriguez for The Hill. Blame it on Team Biden's border 'failure,' which 'permitted millions to enter our country without any real verification process.' Now 'the majority of these riots are being led, organized, and amplified by Antifa factions and ultra-left progressive groups whose mission is not reform but total revolution.' These thugs are 'protesting the deportation of individuals who are violent criminals, rapists, murderers, or pedophiles.' 'There is a legitimate space for expressing concern over the deportation of longstanding immigrants who have lived here peacefully,' but 'these riots hurt and did not help their cause. This lawlessness is antithetical to everything the immigrant rights movement hopes to achieve.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
'Shut up and dribble' crowd has no problem mixing sports, politics now
The very people who insisted athletes need to stick to sports sure are making it hard to do that these days. Masked federal agents were spotted outside Dodger Stadium on Thursday morning, and the team later said it had denied ICE's request to use the parking lots as a staging area for its immigrant roundups. (This in Chavez Ravine, of all places.) Also Thursday, Senegal's women's basketball team scrapped a training camp in the United States after multiple players and staff were denied visas. And on Wednesday, President Donald Trump used Timothy Weah, Weston McKennie and their Juventus teammates as props, inserting politics into what was intended to be a photo op for the FIFA Club World Cup. "I was caught by surprise, honestly. It was a bit weird,' Weah, a starter on the U.S. men's national team, said. 'When he started talking about the politics with Iran and everything, it's kind of like, I just want to play football, man.' There was a time when Trump and his faithful claimed that's what they wanted, too. Trump suggested NFL owners fire players who protested police brutality of people of color. Conservative commentators told LeBron James to 'shut up and dribble.' Then-U.S. Senator and Atlanta Dream owner Kelly Loeffler disparaged the WNBA's social justice efforts. And yet, here we are now, politics and sports mixing as if they're the most natural of bedfellows. More: Dodger Stadium becomes flashpoint after team denied entry to masked feds More: 'Immigrant City Football Club' - Angel City sends message amid ICE raids To be clear, it is impossible to separate politics and sports. Always has been. Sports is a prism through which we view society, our thoughts on thorny issues filtered and shaped through the lens of athletes and games. There is a direct link between Jackie Robinson breaking Major League Baseball's color barrier and the civil rights movement. Billie Jean King was, and still is, instrumental in the fight for equal rights for women. Magic Johnson's announcement that he was HIV positive prompted a seismic shift in attitudes about AIDS and, by extension, the LGBTQ community. And on and on. But whether you think that's a good thing has often depended on how you feel about the politics in question. Military flyovers and singing the national anthem before games? That's either patriotic or jingoistic. Politicians affiliating themselves with sporting events or athletes? It's either what every American does or a shameless co-opt. Team owners donating to politicians and causes that might run counter to the interest of their fans? That's either their own business or a slap in the face to the people who are helping fatten their wallets! Players, particularly Black, brown and LGBTQ ones, protesting or speaking out about injustice? That's either a hell no, athletes ought to know their lane and stay in it, or using their platform to make sure our country is living up to its promises is the ultimate expression of being an American. All of which is fine. One of the greatest things about this country is we're allowed to have different opinions, to see the same thing from different angles. What is not fine is the hypocrisy, the "OK for me but not for thee" attitude that permeates so much of our discourse these days. You cannot howl that athletes need to "shut up and dribble" then turn around and cheer a president who uses sports to burnish his image. You cannot say you just want to enjoy the game and then be OK with politicians inserting themselves into them. And you absolutely cannot cheer individual athletes while at the same time celebrating the harassment, abuse and discrimination of millions of others who look and love like them. You want to keep politics out of sports? Fine. You go first. Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Shut up and dribble' crowd has no problem mixing sports, politics now
The very people who insisted athletes need to stick to sports sure are making it hard to do that these days. Masked federal agents were spotted outside Dodger Stadium on Thursday morning, and the team later said it had denied ICE's request to use the parking lots as a staging area for its immigrant roundups. (This in Chavez Ravine, of all places.) Also Thursday, Senegal's women's basketball team scrapped a training camp in the United States after multiple players and staff were denied visas. Advertisement And on Wednesday, President Donald Trump used Timothy Weah, Weston McKennie and their Juventus teammates as props, inserting politics into what was intended to be a photo op for the FIFA Club World Cup. "I was caught by surprise, honestly. It was a bit weird,' Weah, a starter on the U.S. men's national team, said. 'When he started talking about the politics with Iran and everything, it's kind of like, I just want to play football, man.' There was a time when Trump and his faithful claimed that's what they wanted, too. Trump suggested NFL owners fire players who protested police brutality of people of color. Conservative commentators told LeBron James to 'shut up and dribble.' Then-U.S. Senator and Atlanta Dream owner Kelly Loeffler disparaged the WNBA's social justice efforts. And yet, here we are now, politics and sports mixing as if they're the most natural of bedfellows. Advertisement More: Dodger Stadium becomes flashpoint after team denied entry to masked feds More: 'Immigrant City Football Club' - Angel City sends message amid ICE raids To be clear, it is impossible to separate politics and sports. Always has been. Sports is a prism through which we view society, our thoughts on thorny issues filtered and shaped through the lens of athletes and games. There is a direct link between Jackie Robinson breaking Major League Baseball's color barrier and the civil rights movement. Billie Jean King was, and still is, instrumental in the fight for equal rights for women. Magic Johnson's announcement that he was HIV positive prompted a seismic shift in attitudes about AIDS and, by extension, the LGBTQ community. Advertisement And on and on. But whether you think that's a good thing has often depended on how you feel about the politics in question. Military flyovers and singing the national anthem before games? That's either patriotic or jingoistic. Politicians affiliating themselves with sporting events or athletes? It's either what every American does or a shameless co-opt. Team owners donating to politicians and causes that might run counter to the interest of their fans? That's either their own business or a slap in the face to the people who are helping fatten their wallets! Players, particularly Black, brown and LGBTQ ones, protesting or speaking out about injustice? That's either a hell no, athletes ought to know their lane and stay in it, or using their platform to make sure our country is living up to its promises is the ultimate expression of being an American. Advertisement All of which is fine. One of the greatest things about this country is we're allowed to have different opinions, to see the same thing from different angles. What is not fine is the hypocrisy, the "OK for me but not for thee" attitude that permeates so much of our discourse these days. You cannot howl that athletes need to "shut up and dribble" then turn around and cheer a president who uses sports to burnish his image. You cannot say you just want to enjoy the game and then be OK with politicians inserting themselves into them. And you absolutely cannot cheer individual athletes while at the same time celebrating the harassment, abuse and discrimination of millions of others who look and love like them. You want to keep politics out of sports? Fine. You go first. Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump, Dodgers incidents show hypocrisy in mixing sports and politics
