Legal win for widow after Outback Wrangler star's death
Australia's aviation regulator has lost its bid to be removed from a lawsuit brought by the widow of Outback Wrangler star Chris "Willow" Wilson over her husband's helicopter death.
Mr Wilson plunged to his death in a remote area of the Northern Territory in February 2022 while dangling from a helicopter owned by his television series co-star Matt Wright as he collected crocodile eggs.
His widow Danielle Wilson filed Federal Court proceedings in 2023 against Mr Wright, his company Helibrook, and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) over the crash.
The mother-of-two is seeking damages for personal injury and from the loss of her husband's income.
But the aviation authority argued on Wednesday it should be struck out of the lawsuit because Ms Wilson couldn't reasonably succeed with the "frivolous" suit.
Its lawyer said Helibrook was to blame for Mr Wilson's death because it had failed to comply with the safety regulations set by CASA.
The helicopter operator was permitted to harvest crocodile eggs using a sling but only when the aircraft was less than five metres from the ground.
"Had Helibrook and the pilot complied with CASA's conditions, the accident wouldn't have occurred and Mr Wilson wouldn't have died," Russell McIlwaine SC, acting for CASA, said.
Mr McIlwaine argued the regulator could not be held responsible for the TV star's death when the helicopter operator did precisely what it was told not to do.
But Ms Wilson's lawyer said the regulator's breach of its duty of care was a "significant cause" of Mr Wilson's death.
David Lloyd SC accused CASA of failing to undertake adequate risk assessment and conduct proper oversight over Helibrook's operation, including its use of a sling for crocodile egg retrieval.
"Mr Wilson should never have been in the air ... and CASA should never have approved activities of that kind," Mr Lloyd said.
Justice Elizabeth Raper agreed the claims against the aviation regulator were not untenable.
She dismissed CASA's application and ordered it to pay the widow's costs.
Outside court, Ms Wilson noted it has been more than three years since she lost her husband "in the most tragic of circumstances".
"I'm pleased that today in court we heard that we do have an arguable case against CASA," she said,
An Australian Transport Safety Bureau report into the accident found the chopper's engine stopped mid-flight because of a lack of fuel.
During the emergency landing, pilot Sebastian Robinson released hooks and the sling line carrying Mr Wilson.
Mr Robinson, who survived the incident but suffered life-long injuries, was found to not have refuelled when necessary and had traces of cocaine in his system.
A former pilot and friend of Wilson who was on the scene soon after the crash, was later convicted and fined $15,000 for destroying the mobile phone of the Netflix series star.
Australia's aviation regulator has lost its bid to be removed from a lawsuit brought by the widow of Outback Wrangler star Chris "Willow" Wilson over her husband's helicopter death.
Mr Wilson plunged to his death in a remote area of the Northern Territory in February 2022 while dangling from a helicopter owned by his television series co-star Matt Wright as he collected crocodile eggs.
His widow Danielle Wilson filed Federal Court proceedings in 2023 against Mr Wright, his company Helibrook, and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) over the crash.
The mother-of-two is seeking damages for personal injury and from the loss of her husband's income.
But the aviation authority argued on Wednesday it should be struck out of the lawsuit because Ms Wilson couldn't reasonably succeed with the "frivolous" suit.
Its lawyer said Helibrook was to blame for Mr Wilson's death because it had failed to comply with the safety regulations set by CASA.
The helicopter operator was permitted to harvest crocodile eggs using a sling but only when the aircraft was less than five metres from the ground.
"Had Helibrook and the pilot complied with CASA's conditions, the accident wouldn't have occurred and Mr Wilson wouldn't have died," Russell McIlwaine SC, acting for CASA, said.
Mr McIlwaine argued the regulator could not be held responsible for the TV star's death when the helicopter operator did precisely what it was told not to do.
But Ms Wilson's lawyer said the regulator's breach of its duty of care was a "significant cause" of Mr Wilson's death.
David Lloyd SC accused CASA of failing to undertake adequate risk assessment and conduct proper oversight over Helibrook's operation, including its use of a sling for crocodile egg retrieval.
"Mr Wilson should never have been in the air ... and CASA should never have approved activities of that kind," Mr Lloyd said.
Justice Elizabeth Raper agreed the claims against the aviation regulator were not untenable.
She dismissed CASA's application and ordered it to pay the widow's costs.
Outside court, Ms Wilson noted it has been more than three years since she lost her husband "in the most tragic of circumstances".
"I'm pleased that today in court we heard that we do have an arguable case against CASA," she said,
An Australian Transport Safety Bureau report into the accident found the chopper's engine stopped mid-flight because of a lack of fuel.
During the emergency landing, pilot Sebastian Robinson released hooks and the sling line carrying Mr Wilson.
Mr Robinson, who survived the incident but suffered life-long injuries, was found to not have refuelled when necessary and had traces of cocaine in his system.
A former pilot and friend of Wilson who was on the scene soon after the crash, was later convicted and fined $15,000 for destroying the mobile phone of the Netflix series star.
Australia's aviation regulator has lost its bid to be removed from a lawsuit brought by the widow of Outback Wrangler star Chris "Willow" Wilson over her husband's helicopter death.
Mr Wilson plunged to his death in a remote area of the Northern Territory in February 2022 while dangling from a helicopter owned by his television series co-star Matt Wright as he collected crocodile eggs.
His widow Danielle Wilson filed Federal Court proceedings in 2023 against Mr Wright, his company Helibrook, and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) over the crash.
The mother-of-two is seeking damages for personal injury and from the loss of her husband's income.
But the aviation authority argued on Wednesday it should be struck out of the lawsuit because Ms Wilson couldn't reasonably succeed with the "frivolous" suit.
Its lawyer said Helibrook was to blame for Mr Wilson's death because it had failed to comply with the safety regulations set by CASA.
The helicopter operator was permitted to harvest crocodile eggs using a sling but only when the aircraft was less than five metres from the ground.
"Had Helibrook and the pilot complied with CASA's conditions, the accident wouldn't have occurred and Mr Wilson wouldn't have died," Russell McIlwaine SC, acting for CASA, said.
Mr McIlwaine argued the regulator could not be held responsible for the TV star's death when the helicopter operator did precisely what it was told not to do.
But Ms Wilson's lawyer said the regulator's breach of its duty of care was a "significant cause" of Mr Wilson's death.
David Lloyd SC accused CASA of failing to undertake adequate risk assessment and conduct proper oversight over Helibrook's operation, including its use of a sling for crocodile egg retrieval.
"Mr Wilson should never have been in the air ... and CASA should never have approved activities of that kind," Mr Lloyd said.
Justice Elizabeth Raper agreed the claims against the aviation regulator were not untenable.
She dismissed CASA's application and ordered it to pay the widow's costs.
Outside court, Ms Wilson noted it has been more than three years since she lost her husband "in the most tragic of circumstances".
"I'm pleased that today in court we heard that we do have an arguable case against CASA," she said,
An Australian Transport Safety Bureau report into the accident found the chopper's engine stopped mid-flight because of a lack of fuel.
During the emergency landing, pilot Sebastian Robinson released hooks and the sling line carrying Mr Wilson.
Mr Robinson, who survived the incident but suffered life-long injuries, was found to not have refuelled when necessary and had traces of cocaine in his system.
A former pilot and friend of Wilson who was on the scene soon after the crash, was later convicted and fined $15,000 for destroying the mobile phone of the Netflix series star.
Australia's aviation regulator has lost its bid to be removed from a lawsuit brought by the widow of Outback Wrangler star Chris "Willow" Wilson over her husband's helicopter death.
Mr Wilson plunged to his death in a remote area of the Northern Territory in February 2022 while dangling from a helicopter owned by his television series co-star Matt Wright as he collected crocodile eggs.
His widow Danielle Wilson filed Federal Court proceedings in 2023 against Mr Wright, his company Helibrook, and the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) over the crash.
The mother-of-two is seeking damages for personal injury and from the loss of her husband's income.
But the aviation authority argued on Wednesday it should be struck out of the lawsuit because Ms Wilson couldn't reasonably succeed with the "frivolous" suit.
Its lawyer said Helibrook was to blame for Mr Wilson's death because it had failed to comply with the safety regulations set by CASA.
The helicopter operator was permitted to harvest crocodile eggs using a sling but only when the aircraft was less than five metres from the ground.
"Had Helibrook and the pilot complied with CASA's conditions, the accident wouldn't have occurred and Mr Wilson wouldn't have died," Russell McIlwaine SC, acting for CASA, said.
Mr McIlwaine argued the regulator could not be held responsible for the TV star's death when the helicopter operator did precisely what it was told not to do.
But Ms Wilson's lawyer said the regulator's breach of its duty of care was a "significant cause" of Mr Wilson's death.
David Lloyd SC accused CASA of failing to undertake adequate risk assessment and conduct proper oversight over Helibrook's operation, including its use of a sling for crocodile egg retrieval.
"Mr Wilson should never have been in the air ... and CASA should never have approved activities of that kind," Mr Lloyd said.
Justice Elizabeth Raper agreed the claims against the aviation regulator were not untenable.
She dismissed CASA's application and ordered it to pay the widow's costs.
Outside court, Ms Wilson noted it has been more than three years since she lost her husband "in the most tragic of circumstances".
"I'm pleased that today in court we heard that we do have an arguable case against CASA," she said,
An Australian Transport Safety Bureau report into the accident found the chopper's engine stopped mid-flight because of a lack of fuel.
During the emergency landing, pilot Sebastian Robinson released hooks and the sling line carrying Mr Wilson.
Mr Robinson, who survived the incident but suffered life-long injuries, was found to not have refuelled when necessary and had traces of cocaine in his system.
A former pilot and friend of Wilson who was on the scene soon after the crash, was later convicted and fined $15,000 for destroying the mobile phone of the Netflix series star.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 days ago
- News.com.au
Ben Roberts-Smith battles for last chance to overturn defamation loss in Australia's highest court
Ben Roberts-Smith has turned to Australia's highest court in a last-ditch effort to sue Nine Newspapers over war crime allegations. Roberts-Smith claims the Federal Court bolstered its murder conclusions on the assumption that because he didn't challenge evidence, he accepted it as fact. Roberts-Smith filed an application for special leave with the High Court of Australia on Wednesday, just a month after he failed to overturn his loss to Nine Newspapers over war crimes allegations made in a series of stories. Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko in June 2023 dismissed Roberts-Smith's multimillion-dollar lawsuit against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and Canberra Times in a landmark judgment. Justice Besanko found that Roberts-Smith was involved in the murder of four unarmed men during his deployment in Afghanistan. The findings were made on the balance of probabilities, which is less than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. His appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court was dismissed by Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett in May The court found that while Justice Besanko made two errors in his judgment, they were described as 'immaterial'. Roberts-Smith's latest bid to overturn his defamation loss hinges on two grounds, including claims the Federal Court made an error by assuming he accepted facts because he didn't contest evidence. 'The Full Court erred by treating the appellant as affirmatively accepting facts that were not recontested, and using that assumed acceptance to bolster its murder conclusions, thus misconceiving the effect of unchallenged findings on appeal,' the special leave application stated. The other ground argued the Federal Court preferred 'delayed, contradictory and memory-impaired' eyewitness accounts over Australian Defence Force (ADF) operational records. This was in relation to Roberts-Smith's involvement in the murder of two prisoners at a compound called Whiskey 108 in 2009, the murder of a handcuffed shepherd Ali Jan at Darwan in 2012, and Roberts-Smith directing members of the Afghan partner forces to shoot a man following the discovery of a cache of weapons during an operation at Chinartu. The application argues the findings of war crimes couldn't be reached to the requisite standard under the Evidence Act as they relied on 'inconsistent and memory-impaired recollections' from more than a decade after the events and despite 'exculpatory' ADF operational records. ADF records document 'lawful engagements and no executions' and would-be engagements 'consistent with the laws of armed conflict', Roberts-Smith claims. Further, the application claims the records were discounted on 'speculative or flawed grounds', including by treating them as 'no more than repetitions of the applicant's account' or rejecting them on 'asserted inconsistencies that arose only at trial and were not evident at the time of reporting' in the cases of Darwan and Chinartu. Finally, it argued that the findings were reached without the 'criminal-trial safeguards of a jury, prosecutorial disclosure and proof beyond reasonable doubt', and the Evidence Act had been misapplied in regard to the satisfaction of 'facts tantamount to criminal guilt'. Roberts-Smith continues to deny the allegations, last month releasing a statement that said: 'Sunlight is said to be the best disinfectant, and I believe one day soon the truth will prevail.'
Perth Now
3 days ago
- Perth Now
Roberts-Smith's last throw of the dice
Ben Roberts-Smith has turned to Australia's highest court in a last-ditch effort to sue Nine Newspapers over war crime allegations. Roberts-Smith claims the Federal Court bolstered its murder conclusions on the assumption that because he didn't challenge evidence, he accepted it as fact. Roberts-Smith filed an application for special leave with the High Court of Australia on Wednesday, just a month after he failed to overturn his loss to Nine Newspapers over war crimes allegations made in a series of stories. Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko in June 2023 dismissed Roberts-Smith's multimillion-dollar lawsuit against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and Canberra Times in a landmark judgment. Justice Besanko found that Roberts-Smith was involved in the murder of four unarmed men during his deployment in Afghanistan. The findings were made on the balance of probabilities, which is less than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. His appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court was dismissed by Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett in May The court found that while Justice Besanko made two errors in his judgment, they were described as 'immaterial'. Ben Roberts-Smith was found, on the balance of probabilities, to be involved in the murder of four unarmed men during his deployment in Afghanistan. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia Roberts-Smith's latest bid to overturn his defamation loss hinges on two grounds, including claims the Federal Court made an error by assuming he accepted facts because he didn't contest evidence. 'The Full Court erred by treating the appellant as affirmatively accepting facts that were not recontested, and using that assumed acceptance to bolster its murder conclusions, thus misconceiving the effect of unchallenged findings on appeal,' the special leave application stated. The other ground argued the Federal Court preferred 'delayed, contradictory and memory-impaired' eyewitness accounts over Australian Defence Force (ADF) operational records. This was in relation to Roberts-Smith's involvement in the murder of two prisoners at a compound called Whiskey 108 in 2009, the murder of a handcuffed shepherd Ali Jan at Darwan in 2012, and Roberts-Smith directing members of the Afghan partner forces to shoot a man following the discovery of a cache of weapons during an operation at Chinartu. The application argues the findings of war crimes couldn't be reached to the requisite standard under the Evidence Act as they relied on 'inconsistent and memory-impaired recollections' from more than a decade after the events and despite 'exculpatory' ADF operational records. Roberts-Smith was Australia's most decorated soldier. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia He has applied for special leave to appeal in the High Court. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia ADF records document 'lawful engagements and no executions' and would-be engagements 'consistent with the laws of armed conflict', Roberts-Smith claims. Further, the application claims the records were discounted on 'speculative or flawed grounds', including by treating them as 'no more than repetitions of the applicant's account' or rejecting them on 'asserted inconsistencies that arose only at trial and were not evident at the time of reporting' in the cases of Darwan and Chinartu. Finally, it argued that the findings were reached without the 'criminal-trial safeguards of a jury, prosecutorial disclosure and proof beyond reasonable doubt', and the Evidence Act had been misapplied in regard to the satisfaction of 'facts tantamount to criminal guilt'. Roberts-Smith continues to deny the allegations, last month releasing a statement that said: 'Sunlight is said to be the best disinfectant, and I believe one day soon the truth will prevail.'
Sydney Morning Herald
3 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
What to stream this week: Taron Egerton's fiery thriller and five more shows to catch
This week's picks include an arson thriller, an investigation of the OceanGate submersible disaster, season two of British crime drama The Gold and a revisit of Hannibal Lector. Smoke ★★★★ (Apple TV+) Few movie stars have come to streaming with more subversive purpose than Taron Egerton. The British actor, empowered by the Kingsman action-comedies and the Elton John biopic Rocketman, has used the 2022 Apple TV+ crime drama Black Bird and now this twisty, unconventional investigative thriller to play flawed men who want to believe they're the hero of their story. Egerton has become the great pretender of leading men, undercutting viewer expectations – especially here – and serving as a skeleton key for harsh revelations. The story of a hunt for a pair of serial arsonists in America's Pacific Northwest, Smoke starts giving off uneasy but intriguing vibes within the first episode. The dynamic between arson investigator Dave Gudsen (Egerton) and his new partner, police detective Michelle Calderon (Jurnee Smollett) is askew. The familiar, hard-nosed procedural stances feel forced – he's playing some kind of self-ordained role, she's carrying too much trauma. Dave and Michelle tell themselves truths that the story casts doubt on. And they don't trust each other. Like Black Bird, Smoke was created by the American crime novelist Dennis Lehane, whose books have become Clint Eastwood's Mystic River and Martin Scorsese's Shutter Island. Lehane isn't doubling down on the grim realities, he's looking at them anew. Early on, Dave explains arsonists often act from a place of powerlessness, and the show digs into how that creates a hidden fury that must be satisfied. The story gives time, and explanatory scenes, not just to cops but also criminals. The nine-part series stages several fires, whether as an apocalyptic conflagration or a sudden nightmare that leaves skin literally peeling off a victim, but flames are seen as a kind of abyss. There's nothing there. It's interested in the people drawn to the abyss. Loading The tone is always sharp, the stakes genuine, but the mechanics hint at the absurd. Dave, who is writing a novel about an arson investigator, imagines himself playing the tough guy hero in his everyday life, and you see this. Delusions can become dominant. It's as if Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman, circa Adaptation, have snuck into the writers' room. Smoke suggests that wrenching outcomes can have absurd seeds, and then it contrasts that with brutal bursts of corrupted reality. The show has hints of brilliance that can only appear with an idiosyncratic mindset, but it's also smart enough to staff the supporting cast with impressive actors, including Rafe Spall and Greg Kinnear, who can catch you out. Every episode from the second onwards ends with an unforeseen turn. That should be valued. From June 27. Titan: The OceanGate Submersible Disaster ★★★★ (Netflix) Sadly, but not unexpectedly, the explicit causes and systemic failings that led to the June 2023 implosion of the tourist submersible Titan, killing all five people on board during a dive to the wreck of the Titanic, are familiar and predictable: OceanGate co-founder and CEO, Stockton Rush, who was piloting the undersea vehicle, was a narcissist who disdained safety regulations. He believed, like the Titanic, that the Titan was 'invulnerable'. The immense pressure at 3000 metres depth in the Atlantic Ocean proved otherwise. Loading What this feature-length documentary from director Mark Monroe provides is a level of detail and testimony that is damning. The narrative's thoroughness stands in contrast to Rush, who was obsessed with using an experimental carbon fibre hull to mark himself as a visionary. Rush had Bezos envy. He wanted to be acclaimed as a pioneer and brought start-up shortcuts to a technically demanding industry. Cutting between former employees, including one who was fired within 24 hours for raising serious safety concerns, and official investigators, the documentary makes clear it was only a matter of time before the hull of the Titan gave way. Monroe is circumspect with the four paying passengers, who lost their lives to Rush's hubris, but there's no deference to the latest instance of the CEO psychopath. 'He wanted fame,' a former staffer notes. 'And he's got it.' The Gold (season 2) ★★★½ (Stan) The first season of this British crime drama, which uses the real-life robbery in 1983 of a fortune in gold bullion as the starting point for an incisive and deeply entertaining take on ambition and order, was one of 2023's best shows. Creator Neil Forsyth returns for the new instalment, but it takes an episode or two to acquire a genuine rhythm, while the plot requires a lot more speculation. Nonetheless, with Hugh Bonneville exemplary as the chief investigator, there's still a muscular desperation and some mighty monologues. Mr Loverman ★★★½ (Binge and Foxtel) British actor Lennie James (Line of Duty) rightfully won the best actor category at the recent British Academy Television Awards for his portrayal of Barrington 'Barry' Walker, a London charmer of Antiguan birth whose ebullient life spans dual marriages: officially to his wife Carmel (Sharon D Clarke), and unofficially to his boyhood friend and soul mate, Morris De La Roux (Ariyon Bakare). This painfully nuanced series, adapted from Bernardine Evaristo's novel of the same name, captures Barry's belated attempt to finally deal with his deception after a lifetime of cultural exclusion and unacknowledged selfishness. Call Her Alex ★★½ (Disney+) This two-part documentary, directed by filmmaker Ry Russo-Young (Before I Fall), offers powerhouse podcaster Alex Cooper, who has taken Call Her Daddy from raunchy confession to chart-topping celebrity hub, the ultimate 21st century media compliment: an authorised portrait that celebrates her ascendance to mogul status. Framed around a live tour, Call Her Alex finds plenty to recount from Cooper's narrative, including a university sports career marked by sexual harassment and business difficulties when Call Her Daddy blew up, but it doesn't want to ask questions about who she is now, even as adulation furthers her ambition. Hannibal ★★★★ (Binge, Foxtel and Stan) Rewatch alert. It's 10 years since the third and final season of Bryan Fuller's exquisitely twisted reappraisal of author Thomas Harris's Silence of the Lambs characters concluded. Few shows since have come close to matching its vivid mix of baroque tableaus and psychological horror. With Hugh Dancy as FBI profiler Will Graham and Mads Mikkelsen as then leading psychiatrist (and surreptitious serial killer) Hannibal Lecter, this is a truly twisted take on the buddy (bloody) cop procedural. It's a show about empathy's cost and the need for transformation, told with an ambition that would worry today's streaming giants.
