logo
Hot chips, cool solutions: powering the AI revolution

Hot chips, cool solutions: powering the AI revolution

Techday NZ20-05-2025

Strap yourselves in, fellow travellers, for today we are talking data centre infrastructure. Over at Computex in Taipei, Schneider Electric which makes the physical stuff where AI lives (power, cabinets, UPS, cooling systems) delivered the lowdown on the role and challenges facing what is probably the most fundamental component of the revolution sweeping through, well, everything today. Those challenges largely revolve around increasing compute density and the necessity for appropriate cooling and housing. And in turn, that means out with the bulky finned heatsinks consuming excessive rackspace, and in with liquid cooling.
Now, it is hard to get very excited about data centre infrastructure in much the same way as being enthralled with the foundations of Taipei 101 is an unlikely prospect. But that doesn't make those foundations any less crucial, for without them the tower wouldn't stand.
At a swanky press conference, Schnieder Electric secure power VP Pankaj Sharma contextualised the challenge by noting the astonishingly rapid adoption of AI: 100 million lemmings consigned free thought to be past in just two months, according to his figures. In what may be a case of a false analogy, Sharma noted this sort of adoption took seven years for that other transformative technology we like to call 'the internet' (those of a certain age will remember being puzzled about the utility of email and downloading fuzzy images over the course of half-hours, right up until we tried it).
Since forever, compute has generated heat, and generating heat eats electricity. Sharma noted that demand for AI (and the other now-boring stuff data centres do, like storage or application hosting) has spiked electricity demand, straining power grids and challenging net zero goals.
It is, of course, only going to get worse as that demand keeps ramping up. In much the same way that one's spouse insists that more shopping for stuff on sale delivers greater savings, Sharma said AI itself will cleverly help ameliorate demand. NVIDIA, with which Schneider Electric has forged a partnership, fielded head of data centre product marketing at NVIDIA conceded that this is some potentially Inception-level circular logic, so it really sort of boils down to 'trust me bro'.
Pankaj's colleague and Schneider Electric international secure power VP Nirupa Chander emphasised the unique needs of AI data centres, noting ultra-high power densities and the necessity of future-proof designs. She explained Schneider Electric's collaboration with NVIDIA aims to streamline power integration from grids to data centres, addressing challenges like unstable power supply and high energy costs. There was some insider banter too: from chip to chiller, and if you haven't already, then you heard it here first.
Harris riffed on NVIDIA supremo Jenson Huang's celebrated keynote and noted AI's growth driven by diverse models and use cases, transforming data centres into AI factories capable, one imagines, of Incepting us all. And then, in a highlight of the afternoon, Trent McCarley from Schieder Electric's recently acquired cooling pioneer Motivair went into some detail on the emergence of liquid as a crucial component in creating the infrastructure capable of handling AI-driven heat loads.
For those who are into motorcycles, an easy analogy emerged. Back in the day, most engines were air cooled, with effective 'heat sinks' on the engine evidenced by fins. As compression ratios increased in the search for more power, the heat dissipation of those fins proved inadequate, and so radiators, water pumps, ethylene gycol, and a bit of plumbing became part and parcel of the package. Not that dissimilar from the trajectory on which AI data centres find themselves, but of course, at considerably expanded scale.
Donovan Jackson is attending Computex as the guest of Schneider Electric. AI must live somewhere, and among other things, Schneider Electric makes data centre infrastructure.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Nanogirl' informs South on AI's use
‘Nanogirl' informs South on AI's use

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

‘Nanogirl' informs South on AI's use

Even though "Nanogirl", Dr Michelle Dickinson, has worked with world leading tech giants, she prefers to inspire the next generation. About 60 Great South guests were glued to their Kelvin Hotel seats on Thursday evening as the United Kingdom-born New Zealand nanotechnologist shared her knowledge and AI's future impact. Business needed to stay informed about technology so it could future-proof, she said. The days were gone where the traditional five year business plan would be enough to futureproof due to the breakneck speed technology has been advancing. Owners also needed to understand the importance of maintaining a customer-centric business or risk becoming quickly irrelevant. "I care about that we have empty stores." The number of legacy institutions closing was evidence of its model not moving with the customer. "Not being customer-centric is the biggest threat to business." Schools were another sector which needed to adapt to the changing world as it predominantly catered to produce an "average" student. "Nobody wants their kids to be average." Were AI technology to be implemented it could be used to develop personalised learning models while removing the stress-inducing and labour-intensive tasks from teachers' workload. "Now you can be the best teacher you can be and stay in the field you love. "I don't want our teachers to be burnt out, I want them to be excited to be teaching." In 30 seconds, new technology could now produce individualised 12-week teaching plans aligned to the curriculum, in both Ma¯ori and English she said. Agriculture was another sector to benefit from the developing technology. Better crop yields and cost savings could now be achieved through localised soil and crop tracking information which pinpointed what fertiliser needs or moisture levels were required in specific sections of a paddock. While AI was a problem-solving tool which provided outcomes on the information available to it, to work well, it still needed the creative ideas to come from humans, she said. "People are the fundamentals of the future . . . and human side of why we do things should be at the forefront. "We, as humans, make some pretty cool decisions that aren't always based on logic." Personal and commercial security had also become imperative now there was the ability to produce realistic "deep-fake" productions with videos and audio was about to hit us. She urged families and organisations to have "safe words" that would not be present in deep fake recordings and allow family members or staff to identify fake from genuine cries for help. "This is the stuff we need to be talking about with our kids right now." Great South chief executive Chami Abeysinghe said Dr Dickinson's presentation raised some "thought-provoking" questions for Southland's business leaders. She believed there needed to be discussions about how Southland could position itself to be at the forefront of tech-driven innovation. "I think some of the points that she really raised was a good indication that we probably need to get a bit quicker at adopting and adapting. "By the time we get around to thinking about it, it has already changed again." AI was able to process information and data in a fraction of the time humans did, but the technology did not come without risks and it was critical businesses protected their operations. "If we are going to use it, we need to be able to know that it's secure." Information on ChatGPT entered the public realm that everyone could have access to and business policies had not kept up. "You absolutely have to have a [AI security] policy."

Nearly half of developers say over 50% of code is AI-generated
Nearly half of developers say over 50% of code is AI-generated

Techday NZ

time2 days ago

  • Techday NZ

Nearly half of developers say over 50% of code is AI-generated

Cloudsmith's latest report shows that nearly half of all developers using AI in their workflows now have codebases that are at least 50% AI-generated. The 2025 Artifact Management Report from Cloudsmith surveyed 307 software professionals in the US and UK, all working with AI as part of their development, DevOps, or CI/CD processes. Among these respondents, 42% reported that at least half of their current codebase is now produced by AI tools. Despite the large-scale adoption of AI-driven coding, oversight remains inconsistent. Only 67% of developers who use AI review the generated code before every deployment. This means nearly one-third of those working with AI-assisted code are deploying software without always performing a human review, even as new security risks linked to AI-generated code are emerging. Security concerns The report points to a gap between the rapid pace of AI integration in software workflows and the implementation of safety checks and controls. Attacks such as 'slopsquatting'—where malicious actors exploit hallucinated or non-existent dependencies suggested by AI code assistants—highlight the risks when AI-generated code is left unchecked. Cloudsmith's data shows that while 59% of developers say they apply extra scrutiny to AI-generated packages, far fewer have more systematic approaches in place for risk mitigation. Only 34% use tools that enforce policies specific to AI-generated artifacts, and 17% acknowledge they have no controls in place at all for managing AI-written code or dependencies. "Software development teams are shipping faster, with more AI-generated code and AI agent-led updates," said Glenn Weinstein, CEO at Cloudsmith. "AI tools have had a huge impact on developer productivity, which is great. That said, with potentially less human scrutiny on generated code, it's more important that leaders ensure the right automated controls are in place for the software supply chain." Developer perceptions The research reveals a range of attitudes towards AI-generated code among developers. While 59% are cautious and take extra steps to verify the integrity of code created by AI, 20% said they trust AI-generated code "completely." This suggests a marked difference in risk appetite and perception within developer teams, even as the majority acknowledge the need for vigilance. Across the sample, 86% of developers reported an increase in the use of AI-influenced packages or software dependencies in the past year, and 40% described this increase as "significant." Nonetheless, only 29% of those surveyed felt "very confident" in their ability to detect potential vulnerabilities in open-source libraries, from which AI tools frequently pull suggestions. "Controlling the software supply chain is the first step towards securing it," added Weinstein. "Automated checks and use of curated artifact repositories can help developers spot issues early in the development lifecycle." Tooling and controls The report highlights that adoption of automated tools specifically designed for AI-generated code remains limited, despite the stated importance of security among software development teams. While AI technologies accelerate the pace of software delivery and updating, adoption of stricter controls and policy enforcement is not keeping up with the new risks posed by machine-generated code. The findings indicate a potential lag in upgrading security processes or artifact management solutions to match the growing use of AI in coding. Developers from a range of industries—including technology, finance, healthcare, and manufacturing—participated in the survey, with roles spanning development, DevOps management, engineering, and security leadership in enterprises with more than 500 employees. The full Cloudsmith 2025 Artifact Management Report also explores other key issues, including how teams decide which open-source packages to trust, the expanding presence of AI in build pipelines, and the persistent challenges in prioritising tooling upgrades for security benefits.

Home detention for role in defrauding Oranga Tamariki of more than $2m
Home detention for role in defrauding Oranga Tamariki of more than $2m

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Home detention for role in defrauding Oranga Tamariki of more than $2m

The husband of a former Oranga Tamariki employee who helped his wife defraud the agency of more than $2 million has been sentenced to 12 months' home detention. Amandeep Sharma pleaded guilty to obtaining by deception and money laundering in May after he and his wife Neha Sharma kept their marriage secret and funnelled public money through his construction company Divine Connection Ltd. Neha Sharma, who was jailed for three years in May, kept the conflict of interest concealed as she approved the company's invoices, got him jobs that could have been carried out by other companies and even carried out work for the company during office hours. Less than two weeks after the Serious Fraud Office knocked on their front door, the couple booked two one-way business class to India, after transferring just under $800,000 overseas. Justice Eaton said he seriously considered jailing Sharma but sentenced him to home detention in order for him to seek rehabilitation and support his daughter. "The attitude you have displayed is worrying. It is indicative of a lack of accountability and does in my view display a degree of entitlement, perhaps arrogance," he said. Serious Fraud Office (SFO) director Karen Chang said Sharma and his wife took advantage of her position of trust for their own financial gain. "It is critical that we disrupt behaviour of this kind, which damages the integrity of our public institutions and threatens our reputation as a safe place to invest and do business," she said. "Corrupt behaviour by public servants is a key focus for the SFO, and we are currently advancing initiatives that will strengthen the New Zealand public sector's overall resilience to fraud and corruption." The SFO filed charges against the couple in 2023 alleging Neha Sharma had provided false references to secure her role at Oranga Tamariki where she managed aspects of properties in the Canterbury region, including maintenance, upkeep, and modifications. Neha Sharma set up her husband's company as a contractor without declaring a conflict of interest and then assigned work to this company over others suppliers, at a cost of $2.1 million to Oranga Tamariki. She then applied for a role at the transport agency, for which she also provided a false reference. The SFO said police seized the funds the couple had transferred. It said proceedings to return them to New Zealand were underway, while the High Court had issued a restraining order over the couple's properties in New Zealand. Chang thanked the police and Indian authorities for their swift action and the co-operation of Oranga Tamariki and the transport agency in the investigation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store