US Supreme Court boosts Catholic challenge to NY abortion insurance coverage
June 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court gave a boost on Monday to a challenge by the Catholic Diocese of Albany to a 2017 New York state regulation that generally requires employer-sponsored health insurance plans to cover abortions.
The justices threw out a 2024 New York Court of Appeals decision that the state regulation did not violate the rights of religious employers under the U.S. Constitution's protections for free exercise of religion.
The Supreme Court directed the lower court to reconsider the matter in light of its June 5 ruling that revived a bid by an arm of a Catholic diocese in Wisconsin for a religious exemption from that state's unemployment insurance tax. Both the Wisconsin and New York regulations allow exemptions for religious employers who primarily employ and serve people of their own faith.
The Albany Diocese has said New York's exemption is too narrow because it does not include organizations that have a broader purpose such as serving the poor or that employ or serve a large number of people who did not share their religion.
The rule adopted by New York's Department of Financial Services exempts non-profit entities whose primary purpose is the "inculcation of religious values" and serving co-religionists. The rule was made into law by the state legislature in 2022, though the law was not challenged in the lawsuit.
The diocese filed suit to challenge the regulation. The state Court of Appeals previously ruled against the diocese in 2020, citing an earlier case before the same court upholding a New York contraception coverage requirement with a similar religious exemption.
In 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that the city of Philadelphia could not refuse to place foster children with a Catholic agency that turned away same-sex couples as would-be foster parents, and then ordered the New York court to reconsider the abortion coverage case in light of that ruling.
The state Court of Appeals last year said the Supreme Court's ruling did not change the outcome because it was narrowly focused on the facts of that case and did not overturn the longstanding precedent that neutral, generally applicable laws can sometimes restrict religious expression.
The Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has taken an expansive view of religious rights in a series of rulings in recent years. That includes the June 5 decision, which said that courts must subject laws or regulations demonstrating a preference for certain religions over others to the most stringent constitutional test, known as strict scrutiny.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ex-Ajax star Quincy Promes extradited to Netherlands to serve jail sentence for drug trafficking
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Michelle Obama ‘glad' she didn't have a son: ‘He would've been a Barack Obama'
Former First Lady Michelle Obama says she's 'so glad' none of her children was a boy because that hypothetical child would've carried a heavy burden — his famous father's name. Speaking on her 'IMO' podcast alongside radio host Angie Martinez and her brother, Craig Robinson, the ex-first lady was discussing the challenges of raising boys in today's society when she exclaimed: 'I'm so glad I didn't have a boy.' When Martinez asked why she and her husband, former President Barack Obama, didn't try for a son to complement their two daughters, Sasha and Malia, Obama replied: 'Because he would've been a Barack Obama!' Martinez said a 'baby Barack' would've been 'amazing,' at which point the former First Lady said she 'would've felt for him,' referring to the hypothetical son under discussion. Robinson, the current executive director of the National Association of Basketball Coaches, jumped in by stating that his sister and her husband 'just borrowed our boys,' referring to the children he has had from his two marriages over the years. The former first lady's relief at not having had a male child stems from the fact that her husband, whose full name is Barack Hussein Obama II, would have likely elected to name him Barack Obama III. The 44th president, who was the first Black person to serve as America's chief executive, was named for his father, Barack Hussein Obama. The elder Obama was a Kenyan economist and government official who met the future president's mother, anthropologist Stanley Ann Dunham, while they were both studying at the University of Hawaii at Manoa in the 1960s.
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Trump's four key advisers on bombing Iran
President Donald Trump has been coached through the Iran and Israel war by four crucial confidants, but they are surprisingly not all top military brass. Though Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has played a public role in the Trump administration's defense strategy, he is not among the advisors closest to the president on the Iran matter, current and former White House sources say. Neither is Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, the sources told the Washington Post. Though sources close to the intelligence director push back, saying she's been in regular contact with the president this week and at important meetings. The most influential figures in Trump's orbit as he weighs a U.S. strikes to take out Iran's nuclear technology are Vice President J.D. Vance , Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, an outside White House advisor told the outlet. The group of four is referred to as the 'Tier one' group of decision makers, the advisor shared. These are the men making critical decisions on whether to get involved in the war. These sour advisors are now helping the president sort through contingency plans for U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities that are buried deep under mountains. Israeli military officials have called on the U.S. to use GB-57 'bunker buster' bombs on the nuclear sites - a weapon that can only be delivered by U.S.-made planes that are captained by American pilots - a move that risks escalating the conflict further. The Pentagon pushed back on the Post report, telling the Daily Mail that Hegseth has not been sidelined amid Caine's rising influence. 'This claim is completely false,' Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement. 'The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week. The DNI has been in critical meetings with the president on Iran this week, a senior intelligence official told the Daily Mail on Thursday, saying she's taking part in National Security Council meetings and impromptu White House sessions. The Gorilla vs. The Gram Trump has also been consulting with General Michael Erik Kurilla, the four-star head of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) who has earned the imposing nickname 'The Gorilla.' Multiple U.S. officials have said Kurilla has been a more influential voice than the defense secretary and he routinely gets his requests for additional resources approved, making CENTCOM one of the most fortified commands. Meanwhile, at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), several longtime staffers expressed concern over Gabbard's priorities. Sources inside the ODNI accuse Trump's spy chief of focusing on her appearance rather than her intelligence work, CNN reports. These staffers pointed to her polished Instagram making her appear more like a fitness influencer than a Cabinet member.
