Mortgage holders tipped to pay their bank millions in additional payments
Australian mortgage holders will give the major banks $76m in additional payments due to the 10 days it takes for them to pass on a rate cut.
New figures released by Finder shows the big four banks hold approximately $1.13 trillion in household debt, with a 25 basis point cut earning roughly $7.6m a day on the debt.
This means, the 10-day delay on average it takes for the banks to pass on an interest-rate cut will cost households $76m.
Finder home loan expert Richard Whitten said even with the 10-day delay, the major banks were so far passing on the rate cut, something they had not always historically done.
'Of course, the banks aren't setting rates to be generous. They're responding to their own funding costs,' he said.
'That is, their costs for borrowing money to fund customers' loans and other business.'
'And how much profit they think they can get on top of that. The cost and profit calculations of each institution are going to look a little different.'
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) announced on Tuesday, May 20 that it was cutting the official cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85 per cent.
It follows a fall in Australia's headline inflation rate to 2.4 per cent in the March quarter, while the all-important trimmed mean inflation rate – which removes volatile components such as electricity and fuel costs – came in at 2.9 per cent.
Either rate falls within the RBA's inflation target rate of 2 to 3 per cent.
How much will Aussies save?
How much Aussies will save after the rate cut will depend on the size of their mortgages.
Those with a $500,00 debt will save about $76 a month, while those with a $750,000 mortgage are tipped to be $114 better off and Aussies who borrowed $1m will save about $152 a month.
Finder head of consumer research Graham Cooke said more than one in two homeowners didn't even know their own rate.
'Mortgage repayments have a huge effect on the monthly cash flow of Australian households, yet more than half are unaware how much they could be overpaying each month,' he said.
'With two rate cuts in three months, the average homeowner could be saving thousands.'
He said the average borrower stood to save about $213 per month – $2553 annually – thanks to the interest rate cuts in February and May.
Mr Cooke said loyalty to your lender could be expensive.
'Banks rarely reward complacency, so reviewing your mortgage once a year should be as routine as your tax return,' he said.
When will a rate cut be passed through?
Within 24 hours of the RBA announcing a rate cut, 30 lenders said they were passing on the full rate cut.
This included all four major banks that within 30 minutes of the announcement informed customers that the rate cut would be passed on.
NAB confirmed it would decrease its standard variable home loan interest rate by 0.25 per cent, effective from Friday, May 30, with the 10-day delay in line with previous changes to interest rates in the wake of a cash rate change.
ANZ followed, saying it would also be dropping its variable rate by 0.25 per cent, effective on May 30.
Commonwealth Bank of Australia has moved in line with the other majors and will also drop variable interest rates on home loans by 0.25 per cent.
Westpac told customers it too would pass on the rate cut in full to mortgage holders and savers, albeit a touch slower.
Westpac explained to NewsWire it is faster to move on savings rates compared with mortgages due to the complexity of the different products.
Savings rates are applied universally to every customer, while mortgage holders have differing rates depending on their circumstances.
It was the only one of the major banks to make an announcement on savings rates.
From June 3, the bank will decrease its variable interest rates by 0.25 per cent for new and existing customers.
Bendigo Bank says it will reduce the cash rate in line with the majors from June 6.
Australia's fifth largest bank, Macquarie, passed on the rate cut on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
29 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Should not be punished': Queensland decries GST carve up
Cash-strapped state governments are looking west with envy as Western Australia pulls in its large slice of the GST carve up despite the healthiest books in the country. Resource-rich WA posted a $2.5bn operating surplus on Thursday – it's seventh budget surplus in a row. From Friday it is set to receive its share of the GST pool of 75 cents in the dollar, despite its strong revenue stream from its resources sector. State premiers and treasurers have been agitating for changes to the GST distribution, since the final figures were announced in March, and ahead of the funds formally being dished out on Friday. WA is still enjoying the windfalls of a 2018 GST deal struck under previous Coalition government by then-treasurer Scott Morrison and backed in by the Albanese government, where WA is guaranteed 75 cents of every dollar paid in GST. Without this benchmark, WA would have received as little as 18 cents back. The WA Premier and Treasurer credited their economic management for this week's operating surplus and healthy debt forecasts. Iron ore prices are hovering at $US95 while the state government has done its forecasting with an expectation of $US72 a tonne. But every state and territory except WA has been posting deficits since the 75 cent distribution reforms in 2018. The Queensland Treasurer feels short-changed, as strong coal royalties pad the state coffers. Victoria and NSW's slices of the GST pie are set to expand while Queensland's portion gets a trim. 'This money belongs to Queenslanders and we should not be punished because of our support for industries that underpin our national wealth,' state Treasurer David Janetzki said. The impending Queensland state budget, to be delivered on Tuesday, will show the effects of a dip in coal prices after an $8.8bn royalties windfall during the past four years. Despite the Sunshine State's royalty take coming down, Queensland's GST payout this year falls by $1.1bn to $16.5bn. In a speech to the National Press Club on Wednesday, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has historically opposed raising the GST rate, left the door slightly open to raising it from 10 per cent – the amount the excise has remained for the past 25 years. 'I've, for a decade or more, had a view about the GST,' he told The Conversation. 'I repeated that view at the Press Club because I thought that was the honest thing to do, but what I'm going to genuinely try and do, whether it's in this policy area or in other policy areas, is to not limit what people might bring to the table.' This year, Queensland is the only state or territory getting less than previous years, while every other jurisdiction is getting more. Victoria is set to become a net-recipient of the GST pool for the first time as well. 'It used to be the case that our friends in Victoria would help us shoulder the burden in supporting all the other states,' NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said last month. 'Victoria is now a recipient state, to quite a large degree, $1.07 (per dollar taxed) is what they're getting. 'I'm going to continue to speak out, particularly about the fact that NSW is now carrying the federation when it comes to GST distribution.' The Northern Territory receives $5.15 for every dollar it contributes, far and away the largest return. Despite having the second largest population, Victoria receives the largest portion of the total pool, getting 27.5 per cent; with a $3.6bn year-on-year increase this time around.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Unusual way of flying to Europe in business that's often cheaper and quicker than well-worn routes
When travelling to Europe, Australians typically choose from a limited range of options when it comes to airlines and stopover points. It's Qantas via Singapore, or increasingly direct from Perth to London, or one of the major Middle Eastern carriers – Qatar, Emirates and Etihad – via their homebases in Doha, Dubai or Abu Dhabi. But there's another option that has flown under the radar, pardon the pun, which is strange given it's often quicker and cheaper. Thai Airways has a growing presence in Australia and its convenient daily services to Bangkok offer a host of options for getting to popular destinations in Europe. The airline is renowned for its exceptional on-board service and high-end, restaurant-quality cuisine, so the time and cost savings only make it more of an appealing consideration. And those wanting to splash out and fly at the pointy end of the plane in business class can also nab more affordable fares than those travelling via the Middle East on larger carriers. The time and cost comparison is clear when measuring Thai Airways with popular carriers. crunched the numbers looking at a flight to the two most popular destinations for Australians – London and Paris – in early autumn, on the shoulder of peak season. Flying from Sydney to London on Qatar involves 25 hours and 30 minutes of travel, including a 95-minute stopover in Doha, at a cost of $9508 roundtrip in business class. Qantas can deliver you fastest, with a total flying time of 23 hours and 55 minutes, inclusive of a brief 90-minute transit in Perth, but it'll set you back $10,298 return. By comparison, flying Thai Airways to London requires 25 hours and 25 minutes, including the 3 hours and 20 minutes transit time in Bangkok, for $9464 return at the pointy end of the plane. Those heading to the French capital can secure even bigger savings. Flying business class on Etihad to Paris via Abu Dhabi will take 24 hours and 20 minutes, including a 140-minute stopover, and cost $10,536. Qantas can get you there in 24 hours and 35 minutes, with a two-and-half hour stopover in Perth, for $11,344, while a ticket on Qatar sets you back $9288 and takes 25 hours and 40 minutes, with an almost four-hour stop in Doha. But flying Thai Airways from Sydney to Paris takes 24 hours and 20 minutes, with an almost three-hour stop in Bangkok, for $9188. There are periods throughout the year where the cost difference for a business class ticket between Thai Airways and the major carriers is even greater. For example, in August, in the midst of peak season, return business fares to London are $1600 cheaper on Thai Airways, while a trip to Paris in the same period is about $1500 cheaper. The airline has invested heavily in expanding its international services over recent years, adding dozens of new routes, with several in Europe. In addition to London and Paris, Australians transiting via Bangkok can now fly directly onto Copenhagen, Milan, Brussels, Oslo, Stockholm, Zurich, Munich, Frankfurt and Istanbul. A stack of new aircraft are on the way in coming years. It also recently announced plans to roll out a new business class and premium economy offering across its entire long-haul fleet of Airbus A350s, Boeing 787s and Boeing 777s. In particular, the 'state-of-the-art' business suites are set to impress, with privacy doors and a host of tech features, like huge screens, Bluetooth audio and wireless battery charging. It has also bolstered its presence in Australia, now offering twice-daily flights from Sydney and Melbourne to Bangkok, as well as recently relaunching its direct service from Perth to the Thai capital. Thai Airways operates twice-daily services from Sydney and Melbourne to Bangkok, and once a day from Perth to Bangkok.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Workforce shortages the key roadblock to state government's 'Made in WA' future
Economic experts have endorsed the WA government's future-focused budget, but warned a tight labour market could be its biggest roadblock. Thursday's state budget represented a shift in the government's focus, from transport projects and cost-of-living relief to infrastructure spending to kick-start diversification of the state's economy. About 40 per cent of government infrastructure investment over the next four years is earmarked for so-called enabling infrastructure, like electricity transmission and ports. "There's global economic turmoil," Treasurer Rita Saffioti said of the shift in focus. "We need to make sure we protect Western Australia and help Western Australia grow into the future. "We don't want WA to be collateral damage in global economic chaos." Raymond Da Silva Rosa studies what drives corporate investment at the University of Western Australia and backed the government's plans to try and increase productivity across the state. "We have a budget that's in surplus, we have an economy that's booming, we have a state government that has pretty much total control of the political agenda," he said. "So all the pieces are in place for the government to take some considerable risks that other governments can't afford to." One missing piece though, he said, is likely to be workforce — largely because the mining industry remaining successful leaves few workers for other industries. Chief economist for the Committee for the Economic Development of Australia, Cassanda Winzar, agreed. "There's a real argument to be had there for spreading some of the spend out and looking at what the biggest priorities are," she said. "So looking at some of that infrastructure around the energy transition, but also really looking at our housing situation. "If people can't get houses here there's not really going to be much investment and much desire for new industries to grow and develop here in WA." That backing from the private sector will be critical to making the government's vision a reality — because without businesses changing where and how they spend money, the shape of the economy won't change. Saffioti used an address to a business breakfast yesterday to encourage them to back the government's plans. "We're here, ready to work with industry, making sure we can deliver on our commitments," she said. Asked later in the day what would happen if businesses didn't change their spending, the treasurer said the combination of providing initial infrastructure and capital with long-term government purchase agreements was attractive to industry. "I think there's a lot of excitement, and just speaking to a few people today, I think that there's a real willingness," she said. Despite the broad support, Ms Winzar and Professor da Silva Rossa questioned the government's focus on manufacturing as a priority area, beyond a few niche industries. "We're a very high-cost state, labour-wise, in a high-cost country," Ms Winzar said. "Manufacturing across Australia is always going to be challenging. "It's particularly challenging in WA when we've got competing demands for labour from industries such as mining." Professor da Silva Rosa said there were strengths the government should try to leverage, which could be enhanced by boosting the quality of primary and secondary education. "The services sector is the one that dominates, so it's more about high-end services, like medical services, computers and the like, engineering services," he said. For its part, the opposition continues to argue payroll tax is an unnecessary roadblock to economic growth. Payroll tax is paid to the state government by all businesses whose wage bill exceeds $1 million each year, and is expected to bring in $6.2 billion next financial year. "WA businesses face a disincentive when they hire people," Shadow Treasurer Sandra Brewer said. "Our payroll tax, particularly for small businesses, are the highest in the country." She made the case alongside Jay Sidhu, who owns a land surveying business and said the tax had influenced his thinking as demand for his services grew. "Me and my business partners have to consider it before we even think of growing," he said. Ms Brewer said those costs were often passed directly on to customers. "So what we're saying is, the government could help housing affordability by looking at all of the taxes on business, and seeing where they can reform," she said. Asked at the business breakfast if a Labor government was ever likely to consider changes to payroll tax, Ms Saffioti said: "Every budget we consider everything." "But also it's about the approvals process," she said. "So we're working across the breadth of the economy to [see] what we can do in relation to supporting industry and business." Ms Winzar said that was another area which needed to be looked at closely to attract investment to the state. "What often happens in WA is we have really good small businesses and they're looking to expand, and they feel like they can't do it in WA because they don't have access to the right resources, to get the right labour," she said. "The tax and regulation settings don't encourage them to grow here, so they leave either for interstate or overseas. "We really want to encourage all those businesses to stay, to grow here, and other businesses to come setup here."
