Circle gets buy rating after Senate passes stablecoin bill
[NEW YORK] Circle Internet Group's shares jumped 20 per cent on Friday (Jun 20) after Seaport Global gave the stablecoin issuer its first buy rating in the wake of the US Senate's move this week to pass legislation setting up regulatory rules for cryptocurrencies pegged to the US dollar.
The company behind USDC, the second-largest stablecoin by market share, has seen its shares rise more than 600 per cent since they started trading earlier this month.
Optimism around stablecoin regulations has driven the strength. Seaport analyst Jeff Cantwell sees the global stablecoin market having the potential to reach US$2 trillion at some point, from about US$260 billion now. That would translate into annual revenue growth of 25 to 30 per cent for Circle, he wrote in a note to clients on Friday.
'We view Circle as a top-tier crypto 'disruptor' with a sizeable future opportunity,' Cantwell wrote.
Seagate assigned a US$235 price target to the stock, not far above its Friday high of US$233.
The Senate move was a win for the crypto industry and for US President Donald Trump, who has called on the House to pass the measure as well. A Trump-affiliated stablecoin with World Liberty Financial already has a roughly US$2 billion market value.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Stablecoin regulations are expected to help drive further adoption and institutional investment for issuers such as Circle. Cantwell sees scope for the company to generate US$3.5 billion in revenue next year, compared with US$1.68 billion for 2024.
Circle said in April that it was launching a payments network to help financial institutions settle cross-border transactions in stablecoins. Cantwell sees this as a potential catalyst for the company, saying that it would add to its momentum and help drive growth.
Also this month, Shopify said it will roll out USDC payments for its merchants and customers globally.
Cantwell sees Circle competing with payment companies such as Visa and Mastercard, which have seen their stocks decline since the Senate passed stablecoin legislation.
Circle now has one buy rating, one hold and no sell calls among analysts tracked by Bloomberg. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Tesla expected to launch long-discussed robotaxi service
The long-awaited launch follows the dramatic meltdown earlier this month in relations between Mr Musk and Mr Trump, which saw a cascade of bitter attacks from both men. PHOTO: REUTERS NEW YORK - Tesla is expected to begin offering robotaxi service on June 22 in Austin, an initial step that Mr Elon Musk's backers believe could lead to the company's next growth wave. The launch – which comes as Mr Musk refocuses on his business ventures following a controversial stint in Mr Donald Trump's administration – will employ the Model Y sport utility vehicle rather than Tesla's much-touted Cybercab, which is still under development. The long-awaited launch follows the dramatic meltdown earlier this month in relations between Mr Musk and Mr Trump, which saw a cascade of bitter attacks from both men. Since then, Mr Musk has publicly expressed regret for some of his statements, while his company's Texas operation has readied the Austin push – part of a major drive on autonomous technology and artificial intelligence that Tesla bulls believe will yield huge profits. This group includes Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who said autonomous technology could be a catalyst for potentially US$1 trillion (S$1.29 trillion) in additional market value or more. 'There are countless skeptics of the Tesla robotaxi vision with many bears thinking this day would never come,' said Mr Ives, who predicted that Trump's administration would clear roadblocks for Tesla and pivot from the recent 'soap opera'. 'The golden era of autonomous for Tesla officially kicks off on Sunday in Austin,' Mr Ives said in a note on June 20 . Business-friendly Texas But the unveiling in the Texas state capital comes amid questions about how Tesla will try to overcome criticism of Mr Musk's activities for Mr Trump. Tesla saw profits plunge 71 per cent in the first quarter following poor sales in several markets. In picking Austin for the debut of the autonomous vehicle (AV) service, Mr Musk is opting for a US state known for its company-friendly approach to regulation. 'Texas law allows for AV testing and operations on Texas roadways as long as they meet the same safety and insurance requirements as every other vehicle on the road,' the Texas Department of Transportation told AFP. An Austin website listed six autonomous vehicle companies at various stages of operation: ADMT (Volkswagen), AVRide, Tesla, Zoox (Amazon), Motional (Hyundai) and Waymo (Alphabet/Google). But the Texas legislature this year enacted a new bill that requires prior authorisation from the state's Department of Motor Vehicles before companies can operate on a public street without human drivers, a group of seven Democratic lawmakers said in a June 18 letter to Tesla. Citing the enhanced system, the lawmakers asked Tesla to delay testing until after the law takes effect September 1. If Tesla proceeds with the launch this weekend, 'we request that you respond to this letter with detailed information demonstrating that Tesla will be compliant with the new law,' the letter said. Starting slow Mr Musk had initially planned the launch for June 12, before pushing back, saying he was being 'super paranoid' about safety. 'We want to deliberately take it slow,' Mr Musk said in a May 20 interview on CNBC, telling the network that Tesla would probably only operate 10 autonomous vehicles the first week. But that number will rise to perhaps 1,000 'within a few months', Mr Musk told CNBC. 'And then we will expand to other cities.... San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Antonio.' The service will be offered from 6am until midnight and will be available to 'early access' users on an invitation-only basis in a geo-fenced area, Tesla owner Sawyer Merritt said on June 20 on Mr Musk's X platform, adding that Tesla had given him permission to release the information. Mr Musk last fall unveiled the Cybercab, which has no steering wheel or pedals. But production is not expected to begin on the vehicle until 2026. Tesla's robotaxi launch comes well after Waymo's offering of commercial robotaxi service, with more US cities gradually added. The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in October 2024 opened a probe into Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after receiving four reports of crashes. The NHTSA on May 8 asked Tesla for additional information on its technology in light of the Austin launch. But the NHTSA does not 'pre-approve' new technologies, the agency told AFP. 'Rather, manufacturers certify that each vehicle meets NHTSA's rigorous safety standards, and the agency investigates incidents involving potential safety defects,' the NHTSA said. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
World Bank and IMF climate snub ‘worrying', says COP29 presidency
[BONN] The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) from focusing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated US$1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to US$300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of 'significant' contributions from international lenders. But so far only two – the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank – have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. 'We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns,' he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. 'We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap,' he added. A 'worrisome trend' His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings, hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instea,d they found institutions 'very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all', said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a 'worrisome trend', he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. 'They are very much needed,' he said. The World Bank is directing 45 per cent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that split 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on 'dependable technologies' rather than 'distortionary climate finance targets'. This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries – those most responsible for global warming to date – are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. Money matters Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide US$120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle-income countries, and mobilise another US$65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high-income countries was US$50 billion, with another US$65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. 'Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change,' he said. The World Bank, in particular, has done 'a huge amount of work' to align its lending with global climate goals. 'If they choose to step back, this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future,' he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record. AFP
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Cambodians rush to stockpile Thai fuel and bottled water after Hun Sen's announcement
Hun Sen has challenged Thailand to send Cambodian workers back and criticised the Thai opposition's proposal to cut oil exports to Cambodia. PHOTO: REUTERS PHNOM PENH - Several Cambodian nationals continue to smuggle Thai products into Cambodia, including bottled water and energy drinks, following former Senate President Hun Sen's recent Facebook post. According to Khmer Times, Hun Sen has challenged Thailand to send Cambodian workers back and criticised the Thai opposition's proposal to cut oil exports to Cambodia, claiming it could lead to self-destruction. He also threatened to suspend the import of all canned goods from Thailand, including alcoholic beverages and energy drinks, as well as all types of canned fish and meat. A Cambodian national told Nation TV that Thai bottled water tastes better than the one available in Poipet, with many trying to smuggle water by hiding it, as Cambodian police only allow two packs to be imported per day. According to a Thai vendor, the reason for buying water from Thailand is because it is cleaner and cheaper. Bottled water in Poipet is more expensive, selling at 20 baht (S$0.78) per bottle due to the lack of local production facilities, the vendor explained. Regarding fuel, a Thai worker in Cambodia revealed that the country currently requires large amounts of fuel to generate electricity, both in government offices and hotels, which has driven up fuel prices. In Poipet, petrol stations are owned by Cambodians who purchase fuel from PTT in Thailand. Therefore, if Thailand halts fuel exports, it would significantly affect Cambodia, the worker said. Furthermore, after electricity was cut from the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, Poipet now experiences frequent power outages, damaging electrical appliances, and people in Poipet have resorted to using generators instead. Due to rising fuel prices, Cambodians are driving to Thailand to fill their tanks and transport fuel back in 200-litre drums daily. In Thailand, 95-octane petrol costs 41.54 baht per litre, while in Poipet, it is 50 baht. Diesel in Thailand costs 31.94 baht, compared to 40 baht in Cambodia. A source from the immigration office confirmed that if the border is closed, it would impact over 30,000 Cambodian workers who are employed at Rong Kluea Market in Sa Kaeo. THE NATION/ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
