14-year-old wants to become world's strongest teen
A Christchurch 14-year-old is vying to prove she is the strongest teenager in the world at the global teenage CrossFit Games.
Tahlia Vosaki will fly to Ohio in the United States in August for the competition, which is reserved for the top 30 fittest teenagers in her age group.
CrossFit involves high intensity interval training, which builds strength and conditioning through weightlifting, gymnastics and cardio.
The 14-year-old said she had a rigorous training schedule, and switched to homeschooling last year to help her achieve her goal.
"I train five days a week, and I have two rest days and on one of them I swim and do a recovery," she told RNZ's Afternoons.
"On my training days I train once in the morning which would be about one-and-a-half to two hours, then I go home and do my schoolwork, and then in the afternoon I would go back to the gym and have a two to two-and-a-half-hour session."
Tahlia Vosaki, 14, will represent New Zealand at the global teenage CrossFit Games. Photo:Tahlia Vosaki
Vosaki's personal bests included lifting 160kg in the deadlift and 85kg in the snatch lift (lifting a barbell from the ground to overhead in one smooth motion).
She said she got into CrossFit through her parents.
"They would take me and my sister with them to the gym and I remember watching them do their CrossFit classes and wanting to do them," she said.
Competing at the world games had been a long-held goal, she said.
"There were two different steps to qualify for the games. The first one was the CrossFit open where a bunch of teams sign up and it was one workout a week for three weeks, then the top 200 move on to the semi-finals which was over a weekend, we had five workouts, and whoever qualified from that the top 30 goes to CrossFit Games," Vosaki said.
"I hope to keep doing this and make it to the adult games when I'm older."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
19 hours ago
- Scoop
Cowbell-Gate And Toxic Crusaders Push Super Rugby Pacific In The Right Direction
Super Rugby Pacific Grand Final Crusaders v Chiefs Kick-off: 7:05pm Saturday 21 June Apollo Projects Stadium, Christchurch Live blog updates on RNZ Analysis: Are we finally getting there as a rugby fanbase? This week's big rugby story wasn't about injuries, selections or even the impending All Black squad announcement. No, it was about the banning of an either beloved or despised noisemaker - depending on where you're from - for Saturday night's Super Rugby Pacific grand final. The news that the Crusaders have forbidden cowbells for the game came out of nowhere on Wednesday. Well, almost nowhere, as that's the best way to describe LinkedIn. The last time the headquarters of humble bragging made rugby news was during the fallout of Ian Foster infamously ducking a press conference, but this time it was the platform Crusaders chief executive Colin Mansbridge used to pass his heavy-handed edict on the use of cowbells at Apollo Projects Stadium. Was it a total work from the start? Given the Chiefs response was to encourage travelling fans to use a recently launched cowbell app, it certainly seems so, but it doesn't matter if Mansbridge and Chiefs counterpart Simon Graafhuis cooked this all up over a beer, because it's this sort of outside-the-box thinking rugby needs. The Blues have made a concerted effort to use their social media platforms to show a bit of attitude, while Rieko Ioane is happy enough to simply do it himself. The current environment is one that's catching up with the way things are done overseas, but also shows that things can head into that sweet spot of suspended disbelief and still generate legitimate interest. To put things in perspective, an RNZ Facebook post about the cowbell ban on Wednesday pulled in more than 10 times the number of comments than any other story that day. Why? Because it was an easy outlet to vent frustration. You didn't need to know anything about the Crusaders and Chiefs final, or even rugby, but the door was opened to have a view on a much more black-and-white issue. Because really, this was the Crusaders finally embracing the very powerful 'you might hate us, but we hate you even more' attitude, one they've unfortunately earned full right to make use of, thanks to their now extensive trophy collection. Teams don't owe each other anything on the field, so why would they off it? Admittedly, due to the wider issue of hooliganism, football's restriction makes away trips all the more intimidating nonetheless. In many countries, you have to sit in one specific part of the stadium, alcohol is prohibited, and fans aren't even allowed in certain parts of the city before and after the match. There's nothing wrong with making another team's fans feel uncomfortable. If anything, it'll force them to adapt and support their team even louder, which is what happens when you pen everyone in an away section. For far too long, rugby has used the British crutch of being a sport for the landed gentry to preclude itself from any forward-thinking marketing strategies. The irony is the cloyingly class-based restrictions being presented with a straight face, like the laughable 'respect the kicker' tradition in UK stadiums. The best part of Cowbell-gate is how it should hopefully start some serious feudalism going forward. Win or lose, the Chiefs now have the entire off season to think of a way of getting back at the Crusaders and their fans, perhaps making each one entering FMG Stadium Waikato pass an eye test or proving their family's genealogy doesn't overlap too much. If the Chiefs can pull off a win, there will be absolutely no surprises at all, if the first thing they do is pull a cowbell out and give the home fans something to listen to when they're trudging home.
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Co-ed principals fight 'unethical' boys school-only rugby competition
A group of South Island principals is rallying against what it claims are "discriminatory and unlawful" plans for a breakaway first XV rugby competition played exclusively among boys' schools. A collective of South Island boys' schools last month confirmed talks were underway to launch a new first XV competition as part of wider collaborative efforts to improve educational outcomes for young men. The new competition would include up to eight boys' schools across Canterbury and Tasman, and five schools in Otago and Southland. The move has been met with widespread concern from leaders of co-educational schools in those regions, who fear the "devastating" impact on their school communities if top-flight rugby were restricted to a select group of schools. A highly organised resistance began in earnest on Wednesday, when a letter signed by principals of more than 40 schools was sent to the South Island provincial rugby unions and NZ Rugby urging the sport's leaders to act. RNZ understands a separate, individual complaint has also been laid with the Sport Integrity Commission. The letter to the rugby bodies called on officials to step in and "help intervene in what would become a highly destructive competition" for both the sport, the wider education system and young people. "Excluding boys in co-educational schools from top-level rugby against boys-only schools would undermine the inclusivity, competitiveness, and health of school rugby, harming the sport's future and the well-being of its players," the letter states. The letter also raised concerns that the proposal "is driven by the desire to attract the best athletes to the boys' schools for their own success", creating an "arms race where schools aggressively recruit top players". The morning's headlines in 90 seconds including what will happen to food after supermarket blaze, Trump's dithering over the Middle East, and winter car care tips. (Source: 1News) One of the signatories to the letter, Darfield High School principal Andy England, said he believed the proposal was "unjustified and discriminatory". "I think this move, if it was to happen, would be deeply unethical, potentially in breach of human rights, and the education and training act. Which are strong words to say, and I get that. But I'm saying them," England told RNZ. Asked if the schools would consider laying a complaint with the Human Rights Commission or the Ministry of Education, England responded: "Yes." "At the end of the day, it just seems deeply unfair that boys who go to school with girls are excluded from playing the sport at the level that suits them. How can that be right under the Human Rights Act or under the Education and Training Act?" The Education and Training Act 2020 requires schools to ensure a safe and inclusive environment and to eliminate discrimination, which extends to sports participation. England said his main frustration was that there had been "very limited communication from the boys' schools" about why they wanted to form a breakaway competition and how it would work. Rugby officials needed to show leadership and get all the schools around the table "in a reasonably assertive way", so they can work on a solution together. "I think we're all looking for some guidance from [the] rugby union. My speciality isn't rugby at all, but I can't see how this could be good for rugby. It's inevitable that some rugby talent will be lost through this if this goes ahead," he said. "It also puts rugby development at the top level into the hands of the boys schools only, and how can that be healthy?" The letter claims the collective of boys' schools plan to launch the new competition for 2026 on August 1. However, two principals involved told RNZ there are no firm plans or commitments in place. Steve Hart, principal of St Thomas of Canterbury College, said he was aware of opposition to the proposed new competition, but he did not think it was appropriate to address those criticisms through the media. "Until there is something concrete to discuss, I don't know how healthy the back and forward actually is," he said. "Probably for me I think there's been an over-focus on rugby here, that's actually a tiny bit of what we're trying to do. It probably sums up New Zealand a wee bit in that we focus too much on rugby and people are missing the point on what the actual vision here is." Hart referred RNZ to the statement provided to media at the time the plans for the breakaway competition were first raised, which noted the collective's aims of "exploring initiatives that include the arts, culture, sport and professional learning - designed to foster connection, belonging and pride among our young men". Canterbury Rugby chief executive Tony Smail said his organisation shared some of the concerns of the co-ed schools about the proposed competition. "The unintended and intended consequences of a standalone competition among boys' schools needs to be talked about. There is genuine concern that pathways are being closed for other rugby playing participants out there," he said. "You'll have player movement out of the schools that aren't in the competition into the schools that are, and the flow on effect of that is huge. If you have one or two strong players from one school decide to leave, the risk is that their peers that are left at that school will give up, because they were staying in the game to play with their mates." While the union sits on the governance group of the current first XV competition, which involves schools in the Crusaders' catchment area, it is not in charge of running schoolboy rugby. However, Smail acknowledged Canterbury Rugby has a duty to work through the issues with all schools. He said he hopes to get the principals together in the coming weeks. "We'd obviously love to find a way to break through and understand what those problem areas are that require the boys' schools to head off and see if there's another alternative that we can explore together," said Smail. "What we've had among the schools are some pretty brave conversations at times, and I think this is another example where we have to get together, hear out all sides and see if there's another way through." NZ Rugby's general manager of community rugby Steve Lancaster said while the national body does not control the governance or delivery of the secondary school competitions, it does have an interest in the potential implications the proposed breakaway competition may have on "participation, equity and the schools that are excluded". "We know many stakeholders look to NZR for resolution of such issues; however, we do not have authority over school competitions that are organised outside of Provincial Union administration. That said, we remain committed to advocating for inclusive, competitive, and accessible rugby pathways for all young people, regardless of the type of school they attend." A spokesperson for the Sport Integrity Commission said the organisation could not confirm the existence or otherwise of any complaints before the organisation.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Motivation aplenty for Super Rugby finalists as title decider looms
Photo: RNZ Crusaders v Chiefs Kick-off: 7:05pm Saturday, 21 June Apollo Projects Stadium, Christchurch Live blog updates on RNZ The Super Rugby final is here and the Crusaders and Chiefs are seeking to carve out their own slice of history on Saturday night in Christchurch. The Crusaders' unbeaten home playoff record will be on the line as they host a record eighth final and vie for a record 13th title, while the Chiefs, beaten in the last two finals, are chasing their first title since 2013. Scott Barrett scores a try during the Crusaders v Chiefs, Super Rugby Pacific match, Apollo Projects Stadium, Christchurch. Photo: Martin Hunter/ActionPress The Crusaders have never lost a playoff at home, winning 31 consecutive finals matches, including last week's come-from-behind victory over the defending champion Blues. However, the Chiefs insist they won't be overawed by the prospect of facing the Canterbury-based side in their Christchurch stronghold. The Chiefs have won recently in Ōtautahi, beating the Crusaders 35-19 in their regular season clash last month. Coach Clayton McMillan said they were not scared . "We don't have any fear about going down to Christchurch and playing the Crusaders," McMillan said. "We're one team that has had our fair share of success down there, but we know it's not going to be easy." Chiefs coach Clayton McMillan. Photo: Andrew Cornaga/ The Chiefs have been beaten finalists the last two seasons, including a loss to the Crusaders in Hamilton in 2023. First-five Damian McKenzie is hoping it will be third time lucky in this weekend's title decider, which will be the last game as Chiefs coach for McMillan, nicknamed 'Donk', before he heads to Ireland to take charge of Munster. "Do it for Donk (McMillan). Do it for the region. Do it for our fans and our families," McKenzie said. "The support we've had throughout the year has been amazing. We've been disappointed in the last few years where we haven't quite been able to to win a final. So, it's not only just doing it for guys who are leaving, it's also for guys who have been here in the past. "We've got a lot to play for and a lot of motivation." Damian McKenzie of the Chiefs. Photo: Andrew Cornaga/ McKenzie believes McMillan will leave a lasting legacy after five years in charge. "We're going to miss his presence around the place," McKenzie said. "He's held in high regard and well respected. The job he's done since he's came into the Chiefs (has been great) and he's really built our culture. "You know he's the boss. When he talks, you listen. He's a guy you would definitely follow into battle. "He's going be sorely missed, so hopefully we can send him off in a good way." It will be the Crusaders' last big game at Christchurch's "temporary" stadium in Addington, which they've been at for 14 seasons following the 2011 earthquake, with the team set to move to the new roofed Te Kaha Stadium in April next year. Crusaders fullback Will Jordan celebrates a try. Photo: Brett Phibbs / Covered in scaffolding and seating just 17,000 people the Addington ground isn't the most glamorous, but vice-captain Will Jordan said the Crusaders have grown quite fond of it. He said they're determined to send the stadium off by winning the franchise a record 13th Super Rugby title. "Protecting our home patch has been a huge thing for us throughout the whole year," Jordan said. "It's the last year for this stadium which has given us a lot of joy. I've personally been coming here for 15 years and she's not perfect, but it's home for us and it's been a bit of a fortress for us. "We get one more week to try and protect that again." The Chiefs have had the wood over the Crusaders so far this season, winning both games between the sides. Crusaders coach Rob Penney isn't concerned by those results and he's confident the hosts can get the job done on Saturday night. "Got full faith in our group. We've got a group capable of winning," Penney said. "As I said before, the past is the past. This is a one-off occasion. We're at home in front of our people. Last time we're at Orangetheory (Apollo Projects Stadium) and that's just going to be such an a magic occasion." The match is set to be a sellout with a final release of tickets going out Thursday morning and while there should be plenty of Chiefs supporters in attendance, there won't be any cowbells . Fans have been banned from bringing the noise makers, used by Waikato rugby supporters for more than 70 years, into the ground. Crusaders chief executive Colin Mansbridge said the Addington stadium was too cramped and it would present a health and safety issue. "There's also the fact that it's tight. It's not FMG (Farmers Mutual Group) Stadium or Eden Park, New Zealand. It's tight. It's compact and there's just enough room to wave a really thin flag. There ain't no room to swing a bloody big cowbell and take out the person sitting in the seat beside you."
