Trump-Musk fallout is more than just a personal dispute

EVER notice how certain things that seem off at first gradually fade into the background? Like someone jaywalking across a busy road even though there is a perfectly good pedestrian bridge just a few steps away. Or that small crack in the pavement you just stepped over without a second thought.
It happens all the time, doesn't it? But what if these seemingly 'normal' little compromises are quietly piling up – gradually making things less safe for all of us?
That is something I have been thinking about a lot lately. In fact, I brought up this very idea – what experts call the 'normalisation of deviance' – while speaking at a recent safety seminar hosted by the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers.
Basically, it is when we slowly get used to things that are not quite right – until they start to feel normal. And before we know it, what was once a red flag becomes invisible, allowing real dangers to hide in plain sight.
Just look around us. Take our motorcyclists, for example. We have built dedicated lanes for them on highways – a smart move, especially considering that more than 70% of road accident fatalities in Malaysia sadly involve motorcyclists.
The Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (Miros) have found that these lanes have reduced crashes by a significant 39%. Yet, what is a common sight? Many motorcyclists still prefer riding between cars and lorries, despite having a safer lane available.
Their reasons may be understandable and they deserve our attention: narrow lanes, poor maintenance, poorly lit stretches and even fears of robbery. These are real concerns that must be addressed.
However, here is the unsettling part: when police patrol cars and police on motorcycles are seen riding alongside these motorcyclists on the main roads, it is almost like an unspoken understanding. 'Sure, we know there is a dedicated lane but this is just how things are.'
This subtle message and quiet acceptance make a dangerous choice feel normal. It is a clear reminder that we truly need to look out for each other – right down to the smallest details of our daily habits.
Then there are the garbage trucks – piled high with trash, looking like Jenga towers ready to topple at any moment. This has become a familiar sight that most of us just shrug off.
I have had foreign friends visiting Malaysia who found it so amusing they snapped photos – it has become a peculiar tourist attraction! But let's be honest with ourselves: Is it truly safe?
Yet, when we see police cars cruising past these visibly over-stacked vehicles, seemingly unfazed, it sends a powerful, if unintended, message: 'This is fine.'
And just like that, a risky act becomes part of our everyday landscape – a 'normal' fixture in Malaysia.
These examples from our roads are like a mirror reflecting what might be happening in our workplaces.
We proudly display 'safety first' signs, big and colourful. We talk about safety in meetings. But at certain small construction sites, it is common to see workers high up on structures without helmets or safety harnesses – a sight so frequent it almost feels normal.
Sometimes, workers even joke that safety signs are just for show, meant to satisfy the authorities. This is truly disheartening.
We preach safety but let shortcuts become routine. It is a subtle yet dangerous shift where rules exist only on paper, not in practice.
Let us not forget the recent, painful LRT incidents: just months apart – one involving a visually impaired man in February and another claiming the
life of a Taiwanese visitor in June – which brought these safety issues into sharp focus.
It was reassuring to hear our minister repeatedly emphasise 'safety first'. Yet heartbreakingly, the follow-up discussion focused not on quickly installing critical safety features like platform screen doors but on budget concerns.
As a society, and especially as decision-makers, we should never be debating finances when lives are at stake.
This, too, reveals a troubling 'normal' in our culture, where other priorities quietly push essential safety measures aside.
The normalisation of deviance is a silent threat – a slow poison to our safety culture. It starts small, almost an imperceptible bending of the rules.
But if we stay silent and accept it as 'just the way things are', those small lapses can snowball into serious, undeniable problems.
Once these deviations become widely accepted, correcting them will become incredibly difficult because many may no longer see the difference between right and wrong, let alone support efforts to fix it.
So what can we – as members of the public and as authorities – do? First, we need to open our eyes and challenge this silent acceptance.
It starts with questioning the 'normal' things that do not feel right. If you see something unsafe, speak up. If you are in a position of authority, enforce the standards, do not just issue reminders.
Let us truly commit to a safety culture that is real, not just for show because when it comes to safety, there should be no such thing as 'that is just how we do things'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Sun

2 days ago

• The Sun

APM mulls setting up accident response community in high-risk areas

KOTA BHARU: The Malaysian Civil Defence Force (APM) is studying a proposal to establish an Accident Response Community in high-risk areas to strengthen early response efforts in the event of road incidents. APM Chief Commissioner Datuk Aminurrahim Mohamed said the proposal was mooted following a recent accident involving an express bus carrying 15 students from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris on the East-West Highway near Tasik Banding, Gerik, in Perak on June 9. He said discussions have been held with the Perak and Kelantan APM on the matter, and the agency is ready to enhance its capabilities through a more comprehensive new initiative. 'APM has carried out initiatives such as Op Prihation, which focuses on high-traffic locations prone to vehicle breakdowns, fuel depletion or leakages. However, this operation is not conducted year-round and is not specifically focused on accidents,' he told reporters after the Kelantan APM Loyalty Assembly here today. Aminurrahim said APM has also implemented Op Rahmah, which focuses on potential disasters such as landslides, sinkholes and hazardous material pollution, in collaboration with the Department of Environment. He said the proposed approach would combine current efforts with a targeted focus on identified accident hotspots, guided by data and insights from the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS). 'I've met with the MIROS director-general, and discussions are ongoing on how APM can play a meaningful role in addressing accident-prone areas. MIROS has already identified several high-risk locations and introduced initiatives to reduce such incidents,' he said. Aminurrahim added that APM plans to train local residents in these high-risk areas, similar to its Kampung Siaga initiative for flood preparedness. 'Through the Accident Response Community, locals can quickly relay information to authorities such as the police or Road Transport Department in the event of an accident or traffic violations. Basic training will be provided to these communities,' he said. He also stressed that while APM cannot be permanently stationed in every location, a strong community-based support system is vital in ensuring a swift response before official assistance arrives.

Malaysiakini

5 days ago

• Malaysiakini

Speed limiters: Are we ready for the road ahead, Malaysia?

LETTERING | The transport minister's recent move to mandate speed limiters for heavy vehicles, triggered by the heartbreaking surge in serious road accidents, is a genuinely commendable and quick response. This decisive action truly shows a deep commitment to making our roads safer, and for that, the ministry deserves real credit. We believe this vital effort is backed by thorough thinking and solid research, no doubt benefiting from the invaluable support of experts at the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research. My purpose here isn't to second-guess the good work our authorities are doing. Instead, it's about ensuring the public's call for transparency and engagement is truly heard. This sentiment is widely shared among many Malaysians. This initiative must not be seen as just a knee-jerk reaction or "another show" that quickly fades away. It's a great opportunity to re-prove and regain public confidence – an opportunity we simply cannot miss. Even if these points are discussed behind closed doors, bringing them into the open with regular updates is crucial. This builds deep public trust and ensures this important safety effort is taken seriously. It requires dedicated resources, strict oversight, and clear public verification. To help guide Malaysia's journey toward safer roads, here are seven critical questions for our authorities to really think about and keep reviewing: 1. Beyond tamper-proofing Just putting speed limiters in isn't enough if clever folks can easily get around them after the initial checks. What specific, less-obvious anti-tampering tech will we use? More importantly, how will we put in place real-time, trustworthy data systems that can spot even tiny signs of tampering? How will surprise, forensic-level checks of vehicle data logs back this up, and what laws will quickly punish anyone trying to fake the system? 2. The 'simple' solution's hidden cost Some suggest many modern vehicles already have speed limiting built in, making it a "simple fix" with little cost. Is this true for all heavy vehicles in Malaysia, especially older or modified ones? If not, what's the realistic average cost not just of initial installation, but crucially, of the follow-up maintenance, regular calibration, and the inevitable downtime of productive work? For our small and medium enterprises (SMEs), these cumulative costs can be huge. What specific financial help, tax breaks, or flexible payment plans will ease this burden, showing we care about the human side of this safety rule without letting up on enforcement? 3. More than just certified Mandating limiters means we need a massive network of skilled, trustworthy professionals. Beyond standard certification, what tough, multi-level training programs will deal with the tricky technical details of different systems? How will the ministry set up uncompromising oversight, including anonymous audits and immediate penalties for bad work or fraud, to stop a "black market" for shoddy installations? 4. Fair and square enforcement Any policy's success depends on uniform, clear, and honest enforcement. What proactive strategies will identify and dismantle any groups helping people avoid compliance or offering bribes? How will the Road Transport Department director-general and other agency heads be given clear, legal power to directly intervene and punish cases of inconsistent or corrupt enforcement, rather than just relying on post-facto investigations? 5. Managing the unintended Every major change brings unexpected challenges. With speed limiters, drivers can't operate vehicles as before. What specific training, briefings, or educational campaigns will be rolled out before implementation to prepare them? How will we proactively address the potential for new accident types (e.g., increased tailgating, difficulty with sudden acceleration for evasive manoeuvres, longer overtaking) that could arise from a consistent speed limit, especially in varied Malaysian road conditions? We want to avoid claims that limiters are causing more accidents, particularly in the early phase. 6. A bigger safety picture Speed limiters are powerful, but not the only answer. How will this measure be smoothly integrated into a broader, proactive national road safety strategy that focuses on prevention? What simultaneous, new initiatives will be strengthened – like advanced driver behaviour monitoring, predicting accident hotspots, making black boxes mandatory for heavy vehicles, and comprehensive post-accident data analysis – to ensure we're tackling the problem from every angle? Crucially, how will we ensure this fits into the existing master plan without conflict or deviation, enhancing, not disrupting, our established safety goals? 7. Closing loopholes before they start Learning from other countries and past projects, we know resourceful operators might look for loopholes. What specific "future-proofing" policy adjustments and legal changes are being drafted to anticipate and quickly close any gaps in regulations or technical vulnerabilities? We must avoid repeating the failure of the demerit point system, for instance, which started hot but then fizzled out. How will the government actively work with experts to identify and stop potential bypass methods before they become a problem, ensuring the mandate is solid and hard to get around? This initiative is a chance for truly bold leadership. The minister sets the vision; now, empower the RTD director-general and all agencies to lead this implementation. They must learn from every hurdle and drive continuous improvement, with the DG held fully accountable. Though late to this technology, Malaysia should aim to be best-in-class, setting a new standard for road safety in our region. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

New Straits Times

13-06-2025

• New Straits Times

Stop treating road fatalities as isolated cases, says Wee [WATCH]

KUALA LUMPUR: Former Transport Minister Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong has called on the government to stop treating road fatalities as isolated incidents and instead hold transport companies accountable for preventable crashes. This, he said, includes following through with the implementation of mandatory GPS tracking and corporate liability enforcement. Wee said many fatal accidents stem from systemic practices, such as pressuring drivers to speed or exceed legal working hours. "Discipline starts from the top. You must punish the company, not just the driver. "If you force drivers to speed or make extra trips, then these are the consequences," he said. He noted that the mandatory GPS tracking for commercial vehicles had been delayed due to industry resistance and was later derailed during the Covid-19 pandemic. "Some companies appealed in the early stages. Then Covid-19 came, and everything stopped — mostly due to the cost of bouncing back from the pandemic. "But we cannot keep delaying. If this is a real threat, then we must act to save lives." Wee also urged authorities to fully enforce corporate liability laws to crack down on companies that incentivise dangerous driving habits in pursuit of profit. "Other countries already do this. If a company pushes a driver beyond limits and something happens, they are held liable." He pointed out that in countries like the United Kingdom, drivers often refuse to exceed legal driving hours — not out of fear, but because corporate policy enforces safety. Blaming drivers alone for deadly road crashes, he said, is a short-sighted approach that ignores systemic failures in regulation and enforcement. He added that a "whole-of-nation" strategy is needed — including better inter-agency coordination, long-term staffing at transport authorities, and a renewed commitment to the proven "3E" model —engineering, enforcement, and education. "You cannot just pick one, like speeding, and ignore the rest. Speed contributes to fatalities. "But what about the roads? What about driver education? What about how we enforce the rules?" he said. On whether the government should reinstate the Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) or strengthen the existing Land Public Transport Agency (APAD), now under the Transport Ministry, Wee noted: "That is the government's prerogative." "What's important is having the proper structure — because as far as I know, it's still operating under a contractual setup. "When your future is uncertain, you don't attract committed professionals. That's the biggest issue." He said regular inter-agency meetings, such as those hosted by the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (Miros), are essential, but follow-through has been lacking. "Miros calls for meetings, they give input. But do we act on it?" He said rebuilding a culture of road safety is not just about punishment. "It's about planning safer roads, educating drivers, and enforcing rules consistently. "That's how we change attitudes." Following two fatal heavy vehicle collisions in recent weeks, Transport Minister Anthony Loke yesterday (June 12) revealed that the bus operator involved in the crash that claimed 15 university students' lives failed all seven mandatory safety requirements under the Road Transport Department's Safety Audit and Inspection Report (JISA). The audit found the company had no appointed safety officer, failed to monitor driver speed via GPS, and did not enforce the eight-hour driving limit. Meanwhile, the ministry also published the preliminary report of a separate incident involving a fatal crash between a lorry and a Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) truck, said the report, was overloaded by more than 70 per cent. The report said the excessive weight increased the vehicle's kinetic energy, heightening both the impact of the collision and the risk of severe injury.