Kate Forbes responds to Keir Starmer ruling out independence vote
Starmer dismissed the idea of an independence vote if the SNP get a majority at next year's Holyrood elections when he spoke to the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme.
He claimed there was a need for Scotland to remain part of the United Kingdom in order to remain safe as he released his defence review.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross slapped down by Holyrood Presiding Officer
Despite how John Swinney has established his strategy as building "demonstrable support" for independence through Government, Starmer said no one had raised the subject with him 'as their first priority'.
It comes after a Norstat poll suggested Scottish independence support was at 54% but would rise further to almost 60% if Farage took power at Westminster.
Deputy First Minister Forbes, who was visiting Blantyre on Tuesday as part of campaigning in the Hamilton by-election this week, was asked by The National if it was a political tactic from Starmer to suggest Swinney was not focused on independence.
She said: 'It's hardly a surprise that Keir Starmer is repeating what we've heard from Tory prime ministers for years, and the day after we saw an increase in support for independence if Nigel Farage becomes prime minister, it seems a bit rich to be telling the people of Scotland what they are saying when their greatest concern is that the change that was promised by Labour hasn't happened at all, opening the door to Nigel Farage.
'The purpose of the SNP is to deliver a better future for the people of Scotland.
'We are speaking to the people of Scotland, we are engaging directly with them, they are increasingly rejecting the empty politics of Westminster, indicating support for a different and better future.
'I think it's a lot more important John Swinney is speaking to the people of Scotland than anyone else.'
The Norstat survey also found that 63% of Scots would back independence if the other option was direct Westminster rule.
The question asked, specifically: 'If there were to be a second independence referendum tomorrow and the ONLY options on the ballot paper were full independence or the permanent closure of the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood and a return to direct Westminster rule, how do you think you would vote?'
READ MORE: SNP ministers throw out Bannockburn race track development
Labour voters during last July's General Election were quite split on the issue – narrowly backing direct rule by 51% to 49%, according to the survey.
Forbes also hit out at Farage saying he would scrap the Scottish Parliament's funding mechanism if he were Prime Minister.
Asked during a rare appearance in Scotland on Monday about whether he would get rid of the Barnett formula, which is used to fund Holyrood, Farage said the mechanism was 'out of date'.
He added: 'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that's able to raise a bit more of its own revenue and a Scottish economy that's actually got genuine growth and I don't believe that can happen without this sector [oil and gas] booming.'
Farage has also been accused by Swinney of "hating the very idea" of Holyrood.
Forbes said: 'The Barnett consequentials is an important route for Scotland to be able to fund public services, and anybody that suggests that they are giving back to Scotland when Scotland pays its fair share in terms of tax, where right now revenues, for example, from one of our key industries, the energy industry, oil and gas, is supporting UK public services, it illustrates the importance of a well-recognised approach to Scotland's public finances.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
26 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Mairi McAllan must end 'political choice of homelessness'
More than 16,000 households live in temporary accommodation, including 10,000 children, with another 5,000 children thought to be homeless. Gordon MacRae, assistant director of Shelter Scotland, accused Scottish ministers of 'maintaining' homelessness by managing the decline in the housing sector. He said the Housing Bill, currently being considered in Holyrood, fails to 'stop anyone becoming homeless'. In a scathing assessment, he said: "We have nothing on the table right now that will reduce the probability of homelessness occurring over the next 12 months. "This is a political choice. We have a programme for managing homelessness and managing decline in the housing sector." He added: 'The seriousness and the energy and relentlessness to drive change, I'm afraid it's not there. 'I don't think it's an unfair challenge to say that the Scottish Government's comfort zone is managing the problem not ending the problem and that is what we hope for with Mairi McAllan.' Read more: He said Ms McAllan must reduce homelessness and increase the number of council and social homes by the end of the parliamentary year. 'This is the opportunity that is available to her but it requires political choice to do things differently and up until now ll of the working groups, all of the meetings – and there has been many of them since the declaration – have really focused on doing better with what we have. 'We need to accept that there is not enough homes, there's not enough good quality services to stop the continued growth in homelessness. 'We also need to accept that if homelessness increases, then the harm increases. More people will die, more people will be on the streets, more children's life opportunities will be reduced because of the experience of homelessness.' Last month, it was revealed that every council except Edinburgh will receive less money for social housing this year compared to four years ago. Scotland declared an official housing emergency in May 2024, following in the footsteps of a dozen councils, including Glasgow and Edinburgh. Ms McAllan's predecessor Paul McLennan informed the First Minister he did not wish to continue in government following a brief period of ill health. Since taking office, Ms McAllan said she will "advocate for the greatest possible funding" for her new portfolio. In response, Ms McAllan said: 'Having a safe, warm and affordable place to call home is critical to a life of dignity and opportunity. Therefore providing this and tackling the housing emergency head on will be my top priority. "It will be essential in ensuring everyone in Scotland, and in particular our children, have the opportunity to thrive and I am focussed on delivering that real change. 'A major key to tackling the housing emergency is delivering affordable homes - and fast. We have a good track record in this, but we must now step up our efforts. "To that end, we will invest £768 million this financial year in the affordable housing programme, including £40m targeted towards acquisitions to support the local authorities to tackle the most sustained homelessness and temporary accommodation pressures. 'I am also focussed on preventing homelessness in the first place. Local authorities will be provided with £15 billion this financial year for a range of services, including in homelessness services. "There is also an additional £4 million invested in the Ending Homelessness Together budget for 2025-26 to help local authorities, frontline services and relevant partners prepare for the new measures in the Housing Bill - measures which will help to prevent homelessness before it occurs. 'I am squarely focussed on the task in hand, am open minded about how to approach matters and look forward to working with Shelter Scotland and others in this vital task.' Ms McAllan faced criticism last week after she was unable to say how many people in Scotland were on a social housing waiting list. She told STV News: 'It's not that I don't know it, I don't have the figure with me today.'
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
Free it from England's yoke and Scotland is laden with opportunity
Time and again, he, like many others in the SNP leadership, fails to provide an argument for why Scotland should be independent. In addition, and vitally, he fails to provide an explanation of the benefits of Scotland being independent. I am not going to pretend that control of Scotland's economy is the biggest reason for Scotland being independent. I genuinely do not think it is. However, to pretend that economics is not a matter of significance in this debate would be entirely incorrect. Having an independent Scotland with an economic policy designed to achieve the best outcomes for the people of Scotland is fundamental to the delivery of the best benefits for the people of the country and John Swinney didn't even scratch the surface of this issue. Let me touch on three reasons why Scotland does need control of its economy and can only get this by being independent. I will also mention a necessary condition for success. READ MORE: John Swinney calls for 'diplomatic solution' after US bombs Iran Firstly, Scotland does need to decide for itself what its economic priorities are. They are not the same as those of the rest of the UK. Scotland will not, for example, ever want to promote financial services in the way that the Westminster Parliament does, given that the latter lives in fear of the City of London. Scotland can see through all the problems that has created. In addition, Scotland not only believes in renewable energy, it also has the power to deliver it. In addition, it has ample water, and England does not. What is more, Scotland has great universities. With its own economic policy, aligned to these strengths, and to the social priorities of its people Scotland could be managed to deliver economic outcomes that could certainly be as good as, if not better than, those that are achieved now. They could also be much better than those England might achieve in the future, oppressed as it is by the dominance of the culture of the City. The burdens of wealth and inequality that it creates prevent any chance of real economic development in England and always will now. Secondly, to achieve this, Scotland does need control of its own tax policies. Scotland has always believed in progressive taxation in pursuit of greater equality. While it is integrated into the tax system of the UK, which is designed to promote inequality, achieving that goal is not possible. As my work has shown, this might not require a wealth tax in Scotland. Radical transformation of existing taxes –such as Capital Gains Tax, National Insurance, Inheritance Tax, the higher rates of Income Tax, Corporation Tax and VAT –could deliver substantial increases in tax revenue in Scotland without requiring the vast majority of the Scottish population to pay more. Additional burdens would fall on the wealthiest, large companies and tax cheats, and I assure you that there are still far too many of them. And Scotland need not be worried that the wealthy will leave if it does these things. If progressive taxation is linked to investment in the economy and the people of the country, then the evidence from Scandinavia and elsewhere is that wealth wants to come into a country, not leave it, because they want a part of the success. Thirdly, Scotland needs more control over its public services. Westminster-focused political parties appear, without exception, to now hate both government and government services, even though they claim to be desperate to control them, whilst wanting to destroy both. Scotland is fortunate in having some politicians who actually believe that the job of a Scottish government is to partner with the people of the country to provide the essential safety net required to help all those who need it, while supporting those suffering temporary misfortune, and providing opportunity for those who wish to learn, innovate and develop Scotland as a whole. A Scottish government that genuinely adds value to the country, which that of the UK does not, could be created and deliver something that has not been seen in the UK since 1979. The transformational possibilities are staggering, and yet John Swinney never made any reference to this. Finally, and I cannot avoid the issue, none of this would be possible if Scotland had a currency tied to the English pound and the fortunes of the City of London. It is that City which has dragged down the UK, imposing what is best described as a finance curse on everyone in the rest of the economy as they are forced to work to meet the rapacious demands of bankers and the finance industry. Leaving the City in charge of Scottish money and interest rates would, as a consequence, be ruinous for the newly independent Scotland's fortunes. As a result, a commitment to a Scottish currency from day one of independence will be essential. But if that were done and the above-noted policies were put in place, I suspect the currency in question would, within a short period of time, be worth more than the English pound. Scotland is a country laden with opportunity if only it could be rid of the yoke that England imposes upon it but SNP politicians appear to lack the courage to say so. I have no idea why, because the opportunity is glaringly apparent to me. But if they will not, it is time for others to lead the call for independence, because that is what Scotland requires if it is to ever realise its potential.
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
SNP must woo voters to turn our indy hopes into reality
As we approach next year's election, polls suggest the notion has never been more popular – and yet the formation of a Unionist administration at Holyrood is more on the cards than at any time since 2007. We need serious action to prevent this outcome. And we don't have long. On Saturday, we made a start. The SNP's National Council meeting in Perth rightly was not open to the press or public. It provided a safe space for party activists to have a candid debate with its leadership, away from our opponents and detractors. READ MORE: US enters war with Iran after Donald Trump orders bombing of key nuclear sites I for one feel heartened at the tenor and content of the discussion. We haven't yet got the answers, but at least we are now asking the right questions. Over the months ahead, party members need to devise and unite behind a strategy to win a majority at next May's Scottish Parliament election. First things first. Political independence for our country will be central to the party's message. How could it be anything other than that? There is no point to the SNP if the party does not represent the ambition of self-government, now shared by a majority of our citizens. Frustration and fatigue have eaten away at our capacity in this movement. It has made us question the motivation and integrity of comrades. Repeated comments on social media – and indeed in the columns of this paper – suggest that the SNP has deprioritised independence. The party's leader is accused of shying away from the arguments. But no-one present in Perth on Saturday could have left with that impression. I saw a party leader there who not only demonstrated commitment to the political objective of an independent Scotland but who also offered a serious strategic assessment of how to achieve it. The internal chaos that consumed the party a year ago has dissipated; the haemorrhaging of support stemmed; the party in government stabilised. These were not ends in themselves but necessary steps to regroup and redeploy in the fight for our country's future. Now we need to get back to business: being the political leadership of the movement for national autonomy. It's time for phase two. The SNP need to convince people who want Scotland to be independent to vote for a party that will fight for their right to make that choice. That means confronting the yawning gap between support for independence and for the party. Awareness is growing that this needs a sophisticated approach – different people don't vote SNP for different reasons. So, we need to talk to them differently. Being performative isn't good enough. Just repeating the word doesn't make it happen. Two major groups of people matter in this. Firstly, those who tell pollsters that they think Scotland should be independent, but intend to vote for parties that are against it. It is not that their support for independence is weak, more that they don't see how independence is relevant right now. They are worried about paying this month's bills, about getting a health appointment, about their kids going to war. So, we need to talk about the why of independence. We need to make it relevant. We need to show how making our own decisions means we can make better ones. Our manifesto must spell out how control of our own resources affects key aspects of people's lives. It is about getting power for a purpose. The second group are those who want Scotland to be independent but do not vote. Some have never voted; some have given up because they no longer see how voting will achieve what they want. They have been ground down by the intransigence and denial of the UK state. For this group we need to talk about the how of independence. We need to make next year's vote an assertion of the Claim of Right. People have been denied the opportunity to consider this country's constitutional future not by the SNP government but by serial UK administrations, whose actions have been underwritten by the UK Supreme Court. This is unacceptable. It must change. And next May we need to invite people to demand that change. If they do, then we need explain our plans for executing their mandate. No more pretending that it will just happen because we vote for it. It will require a massive campaign to mobilise the political will of the people behind their government. This will be the time for civic conventions, for mass public information, for cross-party alliances, for legal and diplomatic effort at home and abroad. To do any of this we need to win the election. That is why the SNP must ask all those who want Scotland to be independent to give, indeed ,or lend, the party their vote. We need to do that with humility and without illusion. And those independence supporters who are thinking of not voting need to think again. Not because one vote changes the world, but because it creates the conditions where their hopes are more likely to become reality.
