As Harry Potter star Tom Felton doubles down on backing JK Rowling, how other stars have been rather less grateful to the woman who made their careers
Tom Felton bucked a persistent trend among Harry Potter 's younger stars this week when he backed its creator JK Rowling as she comes under fire for her views on gender ideology.
The actor, now 37, played Harry's nemesis Draco Malfoy in the movies from 2001 until 2011 and will reprise the role for for the Broadway show Harry Potter and the Cursed Child.
And more than two decades after Rowling helped give him his big break, he doubled down on his support for the franchise's author, insisting he is 'grateful' for what she has done for him.
Asked if the controversy around the writer's views on trans rights affect his work, Felton replied: 'No, I can't say it does. I'm not really that attuned.
'The only thing I always remind myself is that I've been lucky enough to travel the world.
'Here I am in New York. And I have not seen anything bring the world together more than Potter, and she's responsible for that. So I'm incredibly grateful.'
The praise reinforced his comments in 2021 'celebrating' Rowling's books and their influence on people across the world.
But his fellow stars have been less forthcoming in showing their appreciation for Rowling, with some going so far as to distance themselves from the woman who made their careers as she comes under fire for her social stances.
The likes of Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, pictured L-R with Rowling in 2011, have distance themselves from the woman who made their careers
Daniel Radcliffe, who played Harry in the blockbuster films, now no longer speaks with the author after falling out with her about gender ideology.
The actor, 34, initially feuded with the Scottish writer after he penned an article declaring 'transgender women are women' shortly after Rowling criticised the use of the phrase 'people who menstruate' rather than women.
She mocked the piece writing: 'I'm sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?'
Shortly afterwards, Radcliffe penned an article for The Trevor Project - an LGBT+ suicide prevention charity that said 'transgender women are women'.
He added: 'Any statement to the contrary erases the identity and dignity of transgender people and goes against all advice given by professional health care associations who have far more expertise on this subject matter than either Jo or I.'
Radcliffe also apologised to those who he said may feel as though their enjoyment of the Harry Potter series had been 'tarnished or diminished'.
Now three years later, Radcliffe has revealed the pair no longer speak which he said makes him 'really sad'.
He admitted 'nothing in my life' would have happened if it was not for the 58-year-old writer, but added that it did not mean he 'owes' what he 'truly believes' to Rowling for his 'entire life'.
Radcliffe, who played Harry in the blockbuster films, now no longer speaks with the author after falling out with her about gender ideology (pictured, as Harry in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban in 2004)
Watson starred as Hermione Granger, pictured in Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part One in 2010, and said in a tweet following Rowling's initial comments: 'Trans people are who they say they are'
Watson has repeatedly spoken out in favour of trans rights both before (top) and after (bottom) Rowling's comments in June 2020
Co-stars Emma Watson and Rupert Grint, who played the starring trio, have also taken a strong stance against the author instead confirming their continued support to the trans community.
Watson said in a tweet following Rowling's initial comments: 'Trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned or told they aren't who they say they are.'
The 33-year-old, who played school chum Hermione Granger, previously shared an image of herself in a t-shirt reading: 'Trans rights are human rights.'
At the 2022 Baftas she also appeared to make a subtle dig towards Rowling. Host Rebel Wilson had called her onto the stage, adding 'she calls her self a feminist, but we all know she's a witch'.
Watson then replied 'I'm here for all the witches' which many viewers deemed was the actress making a jibe at Rowling.
That same year, Grint, who played Ron in the films, described Rowling as his 'auntie' but added in an article in The Times: 'I don't necessarily agree with everything my auntie says, but she's still my auntie. It's a tricky one.'
Other younger members of the cast have also joined their chorus in recent years including Bonnie Wright (Ginnie Weasley), Chris Rankin (Percy Weasley) and Katie Leung (Cho Chang).
Radcliffe has long been a supporter of the Trevor Project, an LGBTQ suicide-prevention hotline and crisis-intervention resource (pictured with the child stars in 2001)
Wright said simply in a tweet following Rowling's comments: 'Transwomen are women. I see and love you.'
Leung started a thread on Twitter in 2020 that purported to offer her thoughts on Cho Chang's character - before sharing links to a number of organisations supporting transgender people of colour.
Responding to the initial backlash from those who benefited from her book series she said it was 'nonsense' to suggest she 'hated' trans people.
'I respect every trans person's right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them,' she wrote in 2020.
'I'd march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans. At the same time, my life has been shaped by being female. I do not believe it's hateful to say so.'
And in April, Rowling insisted she would never forgive the younger stars of the film franchise for speaking out against her views on trans rights.
Responding to a tweet that asked whether the likes of Radcliffe and Watson would apologise to the author, 'safe in the knowledge that you will forgive them', she said: 'Not safe, I'm afraid.'
'Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding women's hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single sex spaces,' the writer added.
Jason Isaacs, pictured in May, who played Lucius Malfoy in the films, told the Telegraph in 2022: 'There's a bunch of stuff about Jo… I don't want to get drawn into the trans issues'
Meanwhile Ralph Fiennes, pictured in May, said in 2021 that he could not understand the 'level of hatred' directed towards the author
Felton has joined a small group of stars supporting Rowling, bucking the trend set by the likes of Radcliffe, Watson and Grint
Most of the criticism for Rowling has come from actors born into the millenial generation, with older actors proving quicker to back the series' creator.
Ralph Fiennes and the late Robbie Coltrane, who were established stars long before landing their roles in the noughties hit, defended the author's right to her own opinion - even expressing sympathy at the sheer amount of hate she had received.
Jason Isaacs, who played Lucius Malfoy in the films, told the Telegraph in 2022: 'There's a bunch of stuff about Jo… I don't want to get drawn into the trans issues, talking about them, because it's such an extraordinary minefield.
'One of the things that people should know about her too - not as a counter-argument - is that she has poured an enormous amount of her fortune into making the world a much better place... through her charity Lumos.
'And that is unequivocally good. Many of us Harry Potter actors have worked for it, and seen on the ground the work that they do.'
Meanwhile Ralph Fiennes, who played Voldemort, said in 2021 that he could not understand the 'level of hatred' directed towards the author, adding that he found it disturbing.
'(The) verbal abuse directed at (Rowling) is disgusting, it's appalling. I mean, I can understand a viewpoint that might be angry at what she says about women,' he told The New York Times.
'But it's not some obscene, uber-right-wing fascist. It's just a woman saying: "I'm a woman and I feel like I'm a woman and I want to be able to say that I'm a woman".'
Rowling has said she is unlikely to forgive Radcliffe and Watson for taking the stance that they have on trans people
The Harry Potter author recently responded on X, formerly known as Twitter, to the publication of the Cass review on gender treatment
The late Robbie Coltrane, who played the half-giant gamekeeper Rubeus Hagrid in the Potter films, also defended Rowling before his death in October 2022.
He told the Radio Times in 2020 that the author's critics 'hang around waiting to be offended', adding: 'They wouldn't have won the war, would they?'
Evanna Lynch, who played Luna Lovegood in the Potter films, initially said Rowling was on 'the wrong side of this debate', but later rowed back on some of her comments in February 2023.
She praised Rowling for amplifying the voices of those who choose to detransition after believing they were trans - but added to the Telegraph that she did not want to add to trans people's 'pain'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Weekly horoscope for June 22 – June 28: What the stars have in store for every zodiac sign revealed
OUR much-loved astrologer Meg sadly died in 2023 but her column will be kept alive by her friend and protégée Maggie Innes. Read on to see what's written in the stars for you today. ARIES MAR 21 - APR 20 12 With Mercury sharpening your creative thinking, you possess the ability to review numerous ideas and instantly identify the best one for you. While barriers may still emerge, they will now seem temporary and beatable. In love, it's tempting to keep planning a grand reveal, but your chart is ready for you to simply go for it. A family new moon favors fresh ways of bonding with someone whose name begins with "D." TAURUS APR 21 - MAY 21 12 Sticking to your convictions on a family issue may not be easy, but you can achieve it by consistently returning to the "why" rather than fretting over the "how." While you generally dislike conflict, healthy debate can be very healing for you this week. In terms of passion, the new moon helps loosen any shyness, allowing partners to relate on a new level of absolute honesty. If you're single, "The One" might get your name wrong at first. GEMINI MAY 22 - JUNE 21 12 Your chart grants you the energy to restart a cash calculation; play your part by applying your firmest focus and keeping negative voices out of your head. This is a week of communication ease, thanks to Mercury, as even words you assumed were lost in translation could begin to yield rewards. So, do be patient a little longer. Passion brings back a fantasy face. CANCER JUNE 22 - JULY 22 12 With Mars now established in your connections sector, you have the courage to contact anyone, even when unsure of the response. So, use this while it's hot. If you're in love, a personal new moon is your "try-anything" trump card—ask again, and a partner may have changed their mind. If you're single, no one is out of your league; remember that around someone whose name begins with "K." LEO JULY 23 - AUG 23 12 The logic and mental sparkle of Mercury are all yours for the next few weeks, so how will you use it? From writing effective reports to putting difficult feelings into words, you can persuade and promote in your own unique way. Your words could even feature on a stage or screen. A secret that is starting to bother you needs some attention; the new moon can help. VIRGO AUG 24 - SEPT 22 12 Your focus is on the friendship world, and who may need more from you at this time. This could be the least likely person to ask, yet your moon instinct is strong, so do listen to it. If you're in a relationship, Venus keeps a door open while you decide, but this may not be forever. If you're single, your dream date has so many travel stories to tell. Luck circles someone whose name begins with "F." LIBRA SEPT 23 - OCT 23 12 Choosing the right goal at the right time is your big decision this week, and the light of the new moon is your best guide. Even if an ambition isn't the biggest or most impressive, if it feels right, it is right. But you must promise yourself not to keep looking back—only forward. Love that asks more questions than it answers can be a challenge, but an irresistible one. SCORPIO OCT 24 - NOV 22 New destinations and a fresh sense of pushing boundaries make your chart dance this week—there's nothing you can't take on when you set your heart on it. But beware of using this strength to slip over some love-lines, perhaps linked to someone not completely free. A better option can be right there when you truly look. Mercury boosts quick-reaction time for prizes. SAGITTARIUS NOV 23 - DEC 21 12 As your learning ability increases almost overnight, this can be your moment to get back to a study or practical experience course. Previous blocks can be gone, and the road to your future feels wide open. You've also taken lessons on board in love, and even against the odds, you should be safe from repeating a recent mistake. So, do trust your heart again, totally. CAPRICORN DEC 22 - JAN 20 12 So many aspects of yourself may have puzzled you lately, but now Mercury brings some understanding, plus the ability to push forward again. You can deal with doubts and cope with uncertainty, setting a new standard for everyone else in your life. A moon of reconciliation gets two sides talking again, and a team can be back together. Love is lighter, with a two-way sense of fun. AQUARIUS JAN 21 - FEB 18 12 Sticking to a health track, even when it no longer feels like a great fit, is not the Aquarius answer. This week, you can read or hear about something that could be so much better, and you will recognize it straight away. If you're in love, Mercury adds forward-planning to Venus's security, and some big plans can be made. If you're single, a dull date can hide such a hot prospect. PISCES FEB 19 - MAR 20 12 With the heat of the sun and the insight of the new moon both lighting up your creative chart, ideas flow thick and fast, and at least one can be well underway by the weekend. The key is starting strong, even when the plan isn't quite perfect, as you have the initiative to alter it along the way. Passion links to voices, and the way you simply can't ignore one special one.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
In the Arena: Serena Williams review – there is just no one in the world that matches up to her (and her sister)
Serena Williams, holder of 39 grand slam titles and four Olympic gold medals, who spent 319 weeks as tennis's world No 1 and became the highest-earning female athlete in history, never thought she was that good when she was a young player. That was because she was always training against her older sister, Venus ('she was the prodigy of prodigies'), the only person in the world who could really challenge her. A year younger, Serena remembers being shorter and weaker and resorting to cheating on line calls at practice so she could occasionally beat her. In the Arena: Serena Williams (the title comes from President Roosevelt's 1910 speech to the Sorbonne – 'It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena' so, yes, consider me told) is an eight-part docuseries that covers Serena's rise and rise over her 27-year tennis career before she retired three years ago. Since then, incidentally, she has been busy with her venture capital firm, production company, body care and pain relief startup, beauty line and raising two children. Honestly, it's like looking in a mirror, is it not? In the Arena was executive produced by Serena and is clearly meant to be the definitive version of events. It would be too strong to call it hagiographic, but it is a full-blooded celebration of her achievements. It is not the place to come if you want, for example, an interrogation of the techniques used by the sisters' astonishing father and coach, Richard Williams, to mould two champions. 'My dad was a marketing genius,' says Serena of his marshalling of press attention round his children in the early years, regardless, some might say and have said, of the psychological impact. 'There's a very thin line between parent and coach … But I would say at the end it was all worth it,' is as far as Serena goes here in acknowledging the criticism Richard has faced for his intense focus on their professional success. Then it's on to the good stuff. The sisters turning pro – Venus flying from the start, Serena stumbling slightly before she too took off. The beating of rivals and established stars ('I was determined, determined to take her down … I'm coming for you. I'm coming for everyone') and their swift domination of a game that had hitherto been almost solely the preserve of a white, moneyed elite. 'Little sisters from Compton. Can't really take that too seriously, right?' Inevitably, of course, they begin to meet in grand slam finals. The footage – the grace, the power of them – is astonishing. Almost as astonishing, if in a gradually emerging way, is the grace with which they handle the competition between them, the wins and the losses. Serena talks about benefiting from Venus going first in everything, from turning pro, to handling good and bad press, to playing individuals Serena will later face in tournaments. They talk with sincerity about being pleased for each other's wins even as they mourn and analyse their own losses. And they talk about the bifurcation between life as sisters and life as absolutely dedicated competitors and not letting either one infect the other. They warmed up together before their first joint grand slam final, the 2001 US Open. Venus won. 'I can't say I enjoyed it. I did what I had to do.' 'I wasn't happy,' adds Serena. 'But I was OK. She was the phenom. It was never me.' Her turn would come. She learned to pretend she was playing someone else when it was Venus on the other side of the net. By the time Wimbledon rolled round a year later, she was ready to be No 1. 'I gotta have it,' Serena grins, remembering. 'That's what I need in my life. Because it's just an extension of who I was. As Thanos says: I was inevitable. I couldn't stop the roll.' Nor could anyone – including the haters behind the racial and misogynist abuse she dealt with – or anything, including the difficult birth of her first child, in 2017, which nearly killed her. She retired in 2022, and plunged straight into what is already a highly successful and lucrative second act. It would be fascinating to compare and contrast another pair of sisters or – perhaps even more fascinatingly – a pair of brothers who followed the same trajectory. Would they have stayed so close, maintained the same boundaries between love and work, or would they have disappeared under the pressure of competition? Would they have spurred each other on to greater heights in the same way, or destroyed each other? Would they remain such generous supporters of each other, or have combusted by now? What makes the mind not just of a champion – but of a champion who survives the ride intact? Maybe one day we'll find out. But there is as yet nothing to compare to Serena or to Venus separately, let alone together. In the Arena: Serena Williams airs on BBC One and is on iPlayer now
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE The reason Brooklyn Beckham has decided to set up home in LA with wife Nicola Peltz is revealed as couple's £11m Hollywood mansion exposes new twist in family feud
The real reason behind Brooklyn Beckham 's decision to give up his life in London and buy an £11 million mansion in LA has been revealed, exposing a shocking new twist in the family feud. The aspiring chef, 26, and his actress wife Nicola Peltz are in the midst of a heart-breaking rift with his parents, which led to them shunning David's epic 50th birthday celebrations. It has been claimed that Brooklyn's decision to purchase a new home in LA and put down roots in the American city was tied to him wanting to create permanent distance from his parents and their base in London and the Cotswolds. However, an insider has revealed to MailOnline that the decision was made because Brooklyn simply feels more at-home in LA after spending much of his childhood living in the US, and it has always been home to his American wife. The source shared: 'This house has nothing to do with family dynamics. David and Victoria also own property in the US, this is no different. 'Both Nicola and Brooklyn's careers are based in Los Angeles, and Brooklyn spent part of his childhood there while his father played for LA Galaxy. 'During that time, he attended school in LA for several years and built a life and friendships in the city. LA has always felt like home to him.' These revelations came as it's reported that the financial aspect of Brooklyn's new home that has sparked some tensions between his parents, and Nicola's father, billionaire Nelson Peltz. The Sun are reporting that Brooklyn does not entirely own the five-bedroom mansion, with a majority of the property owned by Nicola. Sources are now claiming that David and Victoria now feel their son is 'trapped,' especially after he signed an iron-clad prenup before he and Nicola married in 2022. However, the Peltzs have accused the Beckhams of being 'tight' and failing to support their son. It's thought that Brooklyn and Nicola's new home was largely paid for using her trust fund money, but as the creator of the fund, Nelson had to sign off releasing the funds, and the couple also contributed work savings when buying the property. Referencing David and Victoria, a source said: 'When it came to buying this house, of course they weren't just going to hand their son millions of pounds — what sort of message does that send? 'Nelson Peltz, on the other hand, is a billionaire investor and he and his wife Claudia regard Nicola, their little girl, as the apple of their eye. 'Understandably, they want to indulge her and ensure she never struggles — they expected the Beckhams, worth half a billion themselves, might match them penny for penny. Or, at least, chip in with financials as and when. 'That hasn't always happened, so they are annoyed and telling people it's a bit tight, which would utterly enrage David and Vic if they knew.' A source close to David and Victoria has disputed this, branding it 'nonsense.' And another close to Brooklyn has also hit back at claims by his parents that his 'trapped' by the arrangement They told MailOnline: 'It's disappointing—and frankly absurd—that anyone would try to twist Nicola and Brooklyn's marriage, and this meaningful milestone of home ownership, into something toxic. 'Their relationship is grounded in love, respect, and commitment. 'The suggestion that Brooklyn is 'trapped' isn't just false—it's a deliberately cruel and baseless narrative aimed at undermining a strong, loving marriage.' MailOnline has contacted representatives for Brooklyn Beckham, and David and Victoria Beckham for further comment. It comes after Brooklyn appeared to fail to publicly acknowledge Father's Day, despite his parents publicly reaching out. David had told his children: 'I will always be there, no matter what' in an emotional Father's Day Instagram post. He shared pictures of Victoria and their four children Brooklyn, 26, Romeo, 22, Cruz, 20, and Harper, 13, laughing and looking cheery in happier times. Subtly reaching out to his eldest son, David insisted he will always be around to support all his children, even if times get tough. He wrote: 'My most important & favourite job in life is being a dad... I'm so proud of all of you and like daddy ( sorry boys ) tells you every single day I will always be here for you no matter what... 'Mummy thank you for doing the most important part and making me a father there is no greater gift in life than making me a dad... Happy Father's Day... I love you kiddies more than you could imagine.. @victoriabeckham @brooklynpeltzbeckham @romeobeckham @cruzbeckham #HarperSeven @tedbeckhamdavid.' David continued marking the day by sharing throwback snaps of his children to his Instagram stories, including Brooklyn, and tagged him in each individual capture. Brooklyn's brother Romeo's ex-girlfriend Kim Turnbull had been at the centre of the row after Nicola reportedly claimed that she felt uncomfortable around her, with sources close to the US heiress saying that Kim had dated Brooklyn when they were teenagers, which she has now denied in a statement. Sharing a statement on her Instagram page on Monday, Kim said: 'I've avoided speaking on this topic to prevent adding fuel to the fire, however it's come to a point where I feel the need to address it so I can move on. 'I will not continue to receive harassment or be embarrassed on the basis of lies, to fit a certain narrative. 'I have never been romantically involved in ANY capacity at ANY point with the person in question. David and Victoria reportedly feel their son is 'trapped,' but Nelson has reportedly accused Brooklyn's parents of being 'tight' (Nicola pictured with her father and mother Claudia) 'Nothing between us has occurred further than a school friendship at age 16. I would like to remove myself from the ongoing conversation & set the record straight for the sake of everyone involved.' Things came to a head when Brooklyn and Nicola were no shows at any of David's 50th birthday celebrations last month, with The Mail revealing that Kim has been made the 'scapegoat' in the feud. They failed to attend any of football legend David's five celebrations to mark his milestone birthday, including celebrations in Miami, London, Paris the Cotswolds and a boys fishing trip to Scotland. Brooklyn then seemed to fail to publicly acknowledge his father's Knighthood for his services to sport and charity as part of the King's Birthday Honours list. David, 50, said over the weekend: 'It's been an emotional week I must admit. For me and for my family. It's obviously very special. 'It's a huge honour, but one that has been shared with myself and my family and so, it's been emotional.'
