'Fake Melania Trump' body double speculations resurface after she appears to fall asleep during military parade

In a bizarre incident, US President Donald Trump's military parade has reignited speculations among eagle-eyed viewers, as rumours of Melania Trump being replaced by a body double have surfaced on social media due to her uncanny mannerisms noticed during the event.
Since the video has surfaced on the internet, netizens have been actively speculating about it. Melania's appearance at the event has also sparked heated debate online about whether the person seen at the event was truly the First Lady or an impostor, reported Express UK.
Credit: X | @KUWTTRUMPS
Melania Trump or a body double?
Social media has been buzzing with users questioning if what they saw on the screens was a body double of Melania. According to an X (formerly called Twitter) user, Melania Trump seems nice and warm and older and wider. He questions, "Is that a body double?!"
While another added, "It's not really Melania." I'm a Republican; I voted for Trump every time he ran and would again. But this is a body double and not a very good one."
Amid this, a report by the Irish Star states that it may sound unlikely, but this isn't the first time such a theory has emerged, and it is a widely circulated conspiracy belief that many people continue to support.
Melania fake smiles and quickly looks away in disgust. I hope all is well with her and Donald Trump. pic.twitter.com/ZbH8uc3LwN — Uncle Sbu (@Uncle_Sbu07) June 15, 2025
Melania Trump's disinterested expressions spark rumours
According to Mirror US, despite debunking efforts by fact-checkers like Snopes, these rumours continue to spread. Moreover, there are reports that indicate that Trump's third wife spent only 14 days in the White House during his first 100 days as president.
Amid this, frequent gestures and disinterested expressions of Melania raise the speculations even more. As a result, whenever she appears, usually cheerful, it leaves netizens suspicious that it may be a 'fake Melania' stepping in.
Interestingly, during Trump's recent military parade, Melania caught the public's eye for her smiles and looking different, but later she was seen with her typical disengaged demeanour, with some onlookers claiming she 'fell asleep'.
To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

28 minutes ago

• First Post

US judge orders release of pro-Palestinian Columbia graduate from immigration custody

Khalil was the latest in a string of foreign pro-Palestinian students arrested in the U.S. starting in March who have subsequently been released by a judge. They include Mohsen Mahdawi and Rumeysya Ozturk read more A U.S. judge ordered on Friday that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil be released immediately from immigration custody, a major victory for rights groups that challenged what they called the Trump administration's unlawful targeting of a pro-Palestinian activist. Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war on Gaza, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. President Donald Trump, a Republican, has called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part. Khalil became the first target of this policy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After hearing oral arguments from lawyers for Khalil and for the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz of Newark, New Jersey, ordered DHS to release him from custody at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana by as soon as 6:30 pm (7:30 ET) on Friday. Farbiarz said the government had made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk nor a danger to the public. 'There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner (Khalil),' Farbiarz said as he ruled from the bench, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter was unconstitutional. Khalil was the latest in a string of foreign pro-Palestinian students arrested in the U.S. starting in March who have subsequently been released by a judge. They include Mohsen Mahdawi and Rumeysya Ozturk. Khalil, a legal permanent resident of the U.S., says he is being punished for his political speech in violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Khalil condemned antisemitism and racism in interviews with CNN and other news outlets last year. The Syrian-born activist plans to return to New York to be with his wife Dr. Noor Abdalla and their infant son who was born during Khalil's 104 days in detention. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others," Abdalla said in a statement. 'Today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family and the community that has supported us since the day he was unjustly taken for speaking out for Palestinian freedom." The White House condemned the decision to release Khalil, saying he should be deported for 'conduct detrimental to American foreign policy interests' and fraudulently obtaining a student visa. 'There is no basis for a local federal judge in New Jersey —who lacks jurisdiction — to order Khalil's release from a detention facility in Louisiana,' White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement. 'We expect to be vindicated on appeal." Even though a federal judge ordered Khalil be freed, the immigration proceedings against him continue. The Louisiana immigration judge in his case on Friday denied his asylum request, ruled he could be deported based on the government's allegations of immigration fraud, and denied a bail hearing. Farbiarz's decision rendered the bail request moot. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Like others facing deportation, Khalil has avenues to appeal within the immigration system. Farbiarz is also considering Khalil's challenge of his deportation on constitutional grounds, and has blocked officials from deporting Khalil while that challenge plays out. Earlier this month, Farbiarz ruled the government was violating Khalil's free speech rights by detaining him under a little-used law granting the U.S. secretary of state power to seek deportation of non-citizens whose presence in the country was deemed adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests. On June 13, the judge declined to order Khalil's release from a detention center in Jena, Louisiana, after Trump's administration said Khalil was being held on a separate charge that he withheld information from his application for lawful permanent residency. Khalil's lawyers deny that allegation and say people are rarely detained on such charges. On June 16, they urged Farbiarz to grant a separate request from their client to be released on bail or be transferred to immigration detention in New Jersey to be closer to his family in New York. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At Friday's hearing, Farbiarz said it was 'highly unusual' for the government to jail an immigrant accused of omissions in his application for U.S. permanent residency. Khalil, 30, became a U.S. permanent resident last year, and his wife and newborn son are U.S. citizens. Trump administration lawyers wrote in a June 17 filing that Khalil's request for release should be addressed to the judge overseeing his immigration case, an administrative process over whether he can be deported, rather than to Farbiarz, who is considering whether Khalil's March 8 arrest and subsequent detention were constitutional.

Mint

2 hours ago

• Mint

Deal, Not Bombs, Seen as Only Way to End Iranian Nuclear Threat

(Bloomberg) -- While President Donald Trump weighs whether to join Israel's assault on Iran, foreign policy veterans and analysts argue that a negotiated settlement, not bombs nor commandos, is the only way to eliminate the threat of Tehran gaining a nuclear weapon. 'I don't believe there's a lasting military solution to the Iranian nuclear problem,' said Caroline Zier, a former senior Pentagon official under both Republican and Democratic administrations. 'You can delay, you can set back, but the long-term solution comes at the negotiating table.' For Trump, a deal would avoid dragging the US into another regional war or driving up inflation-generating oil prices. Israel is determined to eliminate what it sees as an existential threat. And Iran is desperate to remove crippling economic sanctions. Yet such an outcome right now faces a dilemma, as Iran says it won't negotiate if Israel continues its attacks while the US and its allies hold that a ceasefire is only possible if the Iranians make substantial concessions in talks that had been underway until the Israeli air campaign began. Iran, which denies it wants a nuclear arsenal, has also said it won't give up the right to enrich uranium or eliminate its missile programs. The UK has tried to persuade the Trump administration not to give up on negotiations after five rounds of talks between Washington and Tehran. Foreign Secretary David Lammy held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff on Thursday before flying to Geneva to speak with Iran's foreign minister alongside French and German counterparts on Friday. The officials emerged from the meeting sounding hopeful but major gaps remain. Israel's demands go beyond the nuclear program, to include stopping ballistic missile development and no longer funding of regional militias, according to a person familiar with the government's intentions who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. That position, however, is a non-starter for Iran. 'If the aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its crimes, Iran is ready to reconsider the path of diplomacy,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said after the meeting in Geneva, according to state-run IRNA. 'Iran's capabilities — including its missile program — are not up for negotiation.' What Bloomberg Economics Says... 'Enrichment has become a symbol of Iranian prowess and scientific advancement, especially in the context of severe sanctions. They're willing to accept real curbs on the level of enrichment, but they've said some level of enrichment on their soil is a red line.' 'A purely military solution to Iran's nuclear program doesn't exist. The only way to control or curb the program is through diplomacy.' — Dina Esfandiary, Middle East geoeconomics lead Click here to read further research. Trump still appears undecided about what to do but remains open to getting involved militarily. On Friday, he dismissed the European efforts to find a solution but ruled out the involvement of American ground troops. 'I'm giving them a period of time,' he told reporters in New Jersey, after meeting earlier Friday with his national security team. 'I would say two weeks would be the maximum.' A blueprint for a deal exists — the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action that was signed by President Barack Obama and which Trump abandoned 2018. Under that accord, Iran agreed to curbs on its nuclear program in return for sanctions relief. Earlier: Trump Sends Mixed Signals on Iran Strikes With Ceasefire Hint Daniel Kurtzer, a former US ambassador to Israel and Egypt, suggested making any new deal open-ended rather than setting an expiration date on some limits as the JCPOA did. 'A tougher agreement could lead to Iranian compliance and an end to the war, therefore an end to the Iranian nuclear program,' said Kurtzer, who is now a professor at Princeton University. Iran adhered to the JCPOA for three years, Kurtzer said. The question now is whether the Israeli military campaign would persuade Iran to abandon uranium enrichment or make its leaders more determined to retain that ability. 'We don't know whether the debilitation of their military capabilities — their missile programs and nuclear programs — will now make a convincing argument otherwise,' Kurtzer said. Yet the Iranians might be wary of entering into a new nuclear agreement with Trump after he backed out of the last one. While the focus has been on the use of America's so-called bunker buster bombs against the Fordow enrichment facility, the overall program, not to mention the sense of national identity wrapped up in its development, would be harder to eliminate. Iran has developed a heavily fortified network of sites nationwide to pursue its ambitions of uranium enrichment, as well as thousands of scientists and engineers working at dozens of locations. 'Striking Fordow successfully would be devastating but it wouldn't end the program,' Barbara Leaf, former US assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs, said in a Bloomberg Television interview. 'I want to hear a pretty clear full-throated 'yes, we're ready to negotiate,' from the regime, and we're not hearing that yet,' Leaf said. 'There's conditionality.' A key element for any deal would be a trusted interlocutor, which seems no party is currently able to play. Iran recently criticized the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations-backed watchdog, for giving Israel an excuse to strike after it reported late last month that Iran expanded its stockpiles of near weapons-grade uranium. The agency denies the charge. 'A diplomatic solution is within reach if the necessary political will is there,' IAEA Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi told the UN Security Council. 'This opportunity should not be missed.' More stories like this are available on

NDTV

2 hours ago

• NDTV

"She's Wrong": Trump On Spy Chief Tulsi Gabbard's Iran Nuclear Remark

Washington: U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. "She's wrong," Trump said. In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the U.S. intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. "The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," she said. On Friday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." She said the media has taken her March testimony "out of context" and was trying to "manufacture division." The White House has said Trump would weigh involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. On Tuesday, Trump made similar comments to reporters about Gabbard's assessment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment program is only for peaceful purposes. In March, Gabbard described Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and said the government was watching the situation closely. She also said that Iran had started discussing nuclear weapons in public, "emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus." A source with access to U.S. intelligence reports told Reuters that the assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. They said U.S. spy services also judged that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. Some experts, however, believe it could take Iran a much shorter time to build and deliver an untested crude nuclear device, although there would be no guarantee it would work. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of U.S. intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged - without providing proof - are part of a "deep state" cabal of U.S. officials opposed to his presidency. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with U.S. spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favor and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials.