Senate panel proposes tax exemption for annual income up to Rs1.2m
Senate's Standing Committee meeting underway under the chairmanship of Senator Saleem Mandviwala on Wednesday. Photo: Screen grab from video of x.com/SenatePakistan
Listen to article
Senate's Standing Committee on Finance has recommended exempting income tax for individuals earning up to Rs1.2 million per year. In addition, it approved a proposal to increase the limit for property purchases by non-filers from 130 per cent to 500 per cent of their declared assets.
The committee met under the chairmanship of Senator Saleem Mandviwala on Wednesday and conducted a section-wise review of the Finance Bill 2025.
During the meeting, FBR officials informed the committee that a new section has been introduced in the Finance Bill to bring e-commerce businesses and recreational clubs into the tax net.
FBR officials stated that under the new budget, a tax will be levied on the income of online academies and teachers, some of whom are earning up to Rs30 million annually.
The Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue,Chaired by Senator Saleem Mandviwalla, has entered its sixth consecutive session to review and deliberate on the Income Tax provisions of National Budget for FY 2025–26.@Financegovpk pic.twitter.com/c8Hui73nCb — ꜱᴇɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴘᴀᴋɪꜱᴛᴀɴ 🇵🇰 (@SenatePakistan) June 18, 2025
FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial informed the committee that individuals with an annual income of Rs1.2 million would be liable to pay Rs12,500 in annual taxes. He also said the surcharge on income above Rs10 million has been reduced from 10 to 9 per cent.
Langrial further stated that recreational clubs, including the Islamabad Club, would be taxed under the proposed bill. This proposal was opposed by Committee Chairman Mandviwala, who argued against taxing clubs.
However, the FBR chairman contended that these clubs are exclusive to a privileged few and do not serve the general public.
FBR officials also proposed restrictions on non-filers, including limits on property and vehicle purchases. Initially, a 130 per cent limit on property purchases was proposed, but Senator Mohsin Aziz suggested increasing it, arguing that a non-filer with Rs10 million in declared assets should be allowed to buy property worth Rs50 million.
After deliberation, the committee approved raising the property purchase limit for non-filers from 130 per cent to 500 per cent.
Senator Shibli Faraz maintained that no tax should be imposed on salaries up to Rs1.2 million, arguing that a Rs100,000 monthly income equates to just Rs42,000 in today's economic conditions.
The committee rejected the imposition of tax on individuals earning up to Rs1.2 million annually and on small online businesses.
Minister of State for Finance Bilal Azhar Kiyani said taxes would apply when income exceeds expenses and emphasised that this measure targets the privileged class.
Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb added that penalties for non-filers were increased last year and that efforts are ongoing to bring non-filers into the tax net.
A new section, 17C, has been added to the Finance Bill 2025, under which online marketplaces engaged in e-commerce will be taxed. Individuals providing services through the internet and electronic networks—such as music, audio and video streaming platforms, cloud services, online software, telemedicine, and e-learning—will also be subject to taxation.
Additionally, online banking, architectural design, research and consultancy, digital accounting, and other digital services will be taxed. However, the committee rejected a proposal to tax small online businesses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
ICAP says AOB in finance bill may not be appropriate forum
KARACHI: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan (ICAP) has reviewed the discussions held during the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue's session on June 17, 2025, regarding the Finance Bill 2025, relating to proposed insertion of Section 58C into the Sales Tax Act, 1990. ICAP understands the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) efforts to combat financial misstatements, which may be resulting in evasion of sales tax. However, ICAP explains that the Audit Oversight Board (AOB), proposed in the finance bill to conduct inspections of audit firms, may not be the appropriate forum, given its statutory mandate is limited to overseeing audit quality of Public Interest Companies (PICs) only under the SECP Act 1997. ICAP proposes that being national regulators of audit profession and equipped with a robust investigation mechanism under the Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961, be designated to fulfil this oversight role. The Institute further explains that its existing Investigation Committee, constituted under the ICAP Bye-Laws 1983, comprised a reasonable number of independent members and a senior legal professional. ICAP reiterates its openness to including a nominee from FBR, AOB, or SECP on the Investigation Committee to enhance transparency. It is also disclosed that over the past five years, many cases relating to complaints received from various regulatory bodies, including SECP, SBP, AOB, and FBR, have been processed under its investigation framework. ICAP emphasizes the effectiveness of this system and informed that it annually publishes a comprehensive investigation report, the most recent of which was shared with members and public on March 13, 2025. The Institute expresses its continued support for legislative and regulatory reform in the national interest and remains committed to strengthening professional accountability across the financial ecosystem but has a concern on the introduction of alternate inspection mechanisms which may not be productive and in line with international best practices. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Finance bill contains drafting errors: experts
ISLAMABAD: Finance Bill (2025-26) contains drafting errors and contradictions amongst taxing statues including Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005. Tax experts told Business Recorder that policymaker has been harmonizing the parallel provisions contained in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Federal Excise Act, 2005 as all these are administered by the same officer of the field formations. But contrary to the established policy and past practice through Finance Bill 2025 certain contradictory amendments are proposed. The tax experts have pointed out that earlier all the three taxing statutes contained a provision that after issuance of show cause notice the assessment order was to be passed within a specified period and this provision was interpreted as mandatory in various judgments of the Supreme Court. Budget FY25-26: Finance bill still being discussed, says FBR However, through Finance Bill the provisions contained in Section 122(9) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 is proposed to be omitted meaning thereby that there would be no time limit for passing the assessment order after issuance of show cause notice and practically the same can be passed within five years of the end of the Financial Year in which the relevant return of total income was filed. Contrary to this, the identical provision contained in Section 11G of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and sections of the Federal Excise Act would be continued. This differential treatment in the taxing statute administered by the same assessing officer does not sound to reason and is contrary to the norms of justice and fair play. When contacted, Shahid Jami, a Lahore based tax lawyer, explained that though Anomalies Committees have been constituted by the Federal Government but such fine points are not likely to be addressed by them as this may not be considered anomaly by them. He pointed out a drafting error according to which sub-section (1) of Section 46 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 pertaining to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal is intended to be substituted and the proposed amendment provide appeal only against the appeal order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and contrary to the earlier provision existing for decades no appeal has been provided against the order passed by the Zonal Commissioner and FBR under the Act or Rules. Jami stated that the wording appears to be erroneous in drafting and not intentional change in policy as the words 'under this Act and Rule made there under' exist in the proposed amendment but the authorities of Zonal Commissioner and FBR are missing. It is imperative that such drafting errors and contradictions are removed from the Finance Bill for uniformity of taxing statues and to protect the rights of the taxpayers. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
‘Pakistan stands with Iran': PM
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed concerns that the US strikes to Iran had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). These attacks constituted a serious violation of international law and the IAEA Statute. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif held a telephone conversation with the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran Masoud Pezeshkian. The Prime Minister conveyed Pakistan's condemnation of the US attacks, which followed Israel's unprovoked and unjustified aggression over the past eight days. He reaffirmed Pakistan's unwavering solidarity with the brotherly people and government of Iran, while expressing heartfelt condolences on the loss of precious lives and prayed for the swift recovery of the injured. Dar tells Senate: Pakistan, other OIC member states slam Israeli aggression against Iran While noting Iran's right to self-defence, as enshrined under Article 51 of the UN Charter, the Prime Minister stressed upon the need to immediately return to dialogue and diplomacy as the only viable path forward. He also called for urgent collective efforts to de-escalate the situation. The Prime Minister reiterated Pakistan's readiness to play a constructive role in this context. President Pezeshkian conveyed his deep appreciation for Pakistan's support to Iran. He thanked the Prime Minister, the government and people of Pakistan, including the military leadership, for standing in solidarity with the people and Government of Iran. The two leaders emphasised on the need and urgency of forging unity among the Ummah at this critical juncture. The two leaders agreed to remain in close contact. In a statement Foreign Office issued on Sunday states Pakistan condemns the US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities which follow the series of attacks by Israel. We are gravely concerned at the possible further escalation of tensions in the region. 'We reiterate that these attacks violate all norms of international law and that Iran has the legitimate right to defend itself under the UN Charter,' it states. The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond. 'We emphasise the imperative need to respect civilian lives and properties and immediately bring the conflict to end. All parties must adhere to international law, particularly International Humanitarian Law. Recourse to dialogue, diplomacy, in line with the principles and purposes of the UN Charter remain the only viable pathway to resolve the crises in the region.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
