New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions

BRUSSELS, June 6 (Reuters) - The European Union and Ukraine are negotiating a new deal that will set import quotas on agricultural goods from Ukraine somewhere "in between" current levels and the temporary exemptions granted after Russia's 2022 invasion, the EU's agriculture commissioner told Reuters.
The EU temporarily waived duties and quotas on agricultural products in June 2022 after Russia's full-scale invasion to help Ukraine compensate for the higher costs of its exports, after Russia threatened its traditional Black Sea shipping lanes.
Those tariff suspensions expired on Thursday. The EU and Ukraine reverted to the pre-war regime of trade quotas on Friday, while the two sides negotiate a new longer-term deal - in which Brussels is seeking to strike a balance between supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia, and heeding European farmers' concerns about cheaper Ukrainian imports.
"What will be negotiated will be something in between the quotas under the existing DCFTA and the autonomous trade measures, the volumes that have been exported there," EU agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen said in an interview with Reuters on Thursday.
The DCFTA refers to Ukraine and the EU's pre-war trade deal. The EU's "autonomous trade measures" temporarily suspended quotas on Ukrainian imports from 2022.
Ukraine's farm minister Vitaliy Koval told Reuters this week that Kyiv was pushing for an agreement on higher quotas than it had before the war.
EU farmers have complained that large shipments of cheaper Ukrainian sugar imports under the wartime tariff exemptions have undercut local supplies. The EU triggered "emergency brakes" to re-impose quotas on products including sugar and eggs in the past year, in response to surging imports.
The EU's Ukrainian sugar imports soared to 400,000 tons in the 2022/23 season and over 500,000 tons in 2023/24, far exceeding the pre-war quota of 20,000 tons.
Hansen said the new quotas on sugar would be "significantly higher" than those under the pre-war arrangements.
"I think we can absorb a certain amount of those products," he said, while noting sensitivities around sugar, poultry and eggs.
Negotiations on the new EU-Ukraine deal started on June 2. Hansen said it was feasible a deal could be reached by summer.
"It depends now on both sides, I think technically that could be feasible," he said.
Agricultural goods accounted for about 60% of Ukraine's total exports last year, with the EU buying around 60% of those goods, worth about $15 billion.
A senior Ukrainian lawmaker said last month the loss of tariff-free access to the EU market could cost the country 3.5 billion euros ($3.99 billion) in annual revenue.
"Our solidarity with Ukraine is as firm as ever, and therefore we are very committed to deliver this agreement as quickly as possible," Hansen said.
The pre-war quota regime, which applies as of Friday, also includes lighter rules on import licenses for some goods like poultry and eggs, where instead of requiring licenses, quotas will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis.
($1 = 0.8763 euros)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

22 minutes ago

• Sky News

Former Centrica chief Laidlaw in frame to chair embattled BP

Sam Laidlaw, the former boss of Centrica, is among the candidates being considered as the next chairman of BP, Britain's besieged oil and gas exploration giant. Sky News has learnt that Mr Laidlaw is being considered by BP board members as a potential successor to Helge Lund, who announced in April that he would step down. BP's chair search comes with the £62bn oil major in a state of crisis, as industry predators circle and the pace of its strategic transformation being interrogated by shareholders. Elliott Management, the activist investor, snapped up a multibillion pound stake in BP earlier this year and is pushing its chief executive, Murray Auchincloss, to accelerate spending cuts and ditch a string of renewable energy commitments. Mr Lund's departure will come after nearly a quarter of BP's shareholders opposed his re-election at its annual meeting in April - an unusually large protest given that his intention to step down had already been announced. BP's senior independent director - the Aviva chief executive Amanda Blanc - is said to be moving "at pace" to complete the recruitment process. A number of prominent candidates are understood to be in discussions with headhunters advising BP on the search. Mr Laidlaw would be a logical choice to take the role, having transformed Centrica, the owner of British Gas, during his tenure, which ended in 2014. Since then, he has had a long stint - which recently concluded - on the board of miner Rio Tinto, which has been fending off activist calls to abandon its London listing. He also established, and then sold, Neptune Energy, an oil company which was acquired by Italy's Eni for nearly £4bn in 2023. Last December, Mr Laidlaw was appointed chairman of AWE, the government-owned body which oversees Britain's nuclear weapons capability. He also has strong family connections to BP, with his father, Christopher Laidlaw, having served as its deputy chairman during a long business career. One person close to BP said the younger Mr Laidlaw had been approached about chairing the company during its previous recruitment process but had ruled himself out because of his Neptune Energy role. The status of his engagement with BP's search was unclear on Saturday. Another person said to have been approached is Ken MacKenzie, who recently retired as chairman of the mining giant BHP. Mr MacKenzie headed BHP during a period when Elliott held a stake in the company, and is said to have a good working relationship with the investor. Shares in BP have continued their downward trajectory over the last year, having fallen by nearly a fifth during that period. The company's valuation slump is reported to have drawn renewed interest in a possible takeover bid, with rivals Shell and ExxonMobil among those said to have "run the numbers" in recent months. Reports of such interest have not elicited any formal response, suggesting that any deal is conceptual at this stage. BP is racing to sell assets including Castrol, its lubricants division, which could command a price of about $8bn.

BBC News

24 minutes ago

• BBC News

How di security palava Nigeria dey face fit affect food supply and price

As kasala dey increase for Nigeria, especially for northern part of di kontri, wia unknown gunmen, Boko Haram/ISWAP, bandits, herders and farmers dey clash, di place wey dem also sabi for big farming don dey face serious palava. As rainy season dey try reach im peak, farmers dey fear to go farm becos dem no wan risk dia life or make bandits kidnap dem. For recent weeks, kasala wey happun for North east, North west and North central don claim many lives and properties. Dis areas na places wey dey produce plenty food for Nigeria. Recently, Ministry of Agriculture for Nigeria release one internal memo wey tok say make dia staff fast for three days sake of food wahala for di kontri. Dis move show how serious di mata be. For 2024 alone, World Food Program report say kasala, insecurity, inflation and climate wahala go make hunger worse for Nigeria, and say 26.5 million pipo go face serious hunger. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) tok say food inflation rate for October 2024 na 39.16% compared to 31.52% for October 2023. Experts believe say insecurity na one of di major reasons wey cause dis kain inflation. Experts still tok say goment need to do more to fight insurgency or find modern farming ways becos farmers for north dey fear to go farm. How security wahala fit affect food security and price dis year? Secretary of All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN), Dr Yunusa Halidu, tell BBC Pidgin say insecurity na one of di reasons wey dey cause food wahala and food inflation. "Before dis insecurity wahala, many states for north dey farm plenty food, and food dey cheap for market," oga Halidu tok. "If no be for insecurity, Zamfara alone fit feed di whole kontri afta harvest." E believe say na insecurity cause di food inflation wey Nigeria dey face. "Lack of food na one of di reasons why food price rise for recent years, and na insecurity cause am. You know say di more pipo dey need sometin, di more di price go up," e tok. E mention say some northern states dey produce rice, wey Nigerians dey chop well-well, but rice and oda food production don reduce. "States like Borno, Yobe, Katsina, Zamfara, Sokoto and Kebbi sabi farm rice, but sake of insecurity, dem dey produce small rice now." Halidu add say "Na only Jigawa for all di northern states dey farm witout security wahala, sake say bandits no too dey dia." E still tok say if federal goment fit solve insecurity and provide farming support, Nigeria no go get food wahala and food go cheap for evribodi. Wetin be di solution? Dr Angarawai Ijantiku Ignatius wey sabi farming well-well and be Country Representative for International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) for Kano, tell BBC Pidgin say federal goment need to embraced and invest for modern farming. "But no mata di modern innovation, we still need land. But for small scale, we get wetin we dey call homegrown food. Pipo fit use bucket or cement bag put soil and plant yam, pepper or onion for house. E fit feed family of two or three." E tok say anoda modern way na make goment provide community-based place wey farmers fit plant and harvest. "We get new technology wey we dey call community-based farming programme, wia we go give farmers free training on di new method. How dem fit farm and harvest quick and distribute am for community," Dr Ignatius tok. "But for dis one, we need community vigilante to protect farmers." E also tok say dem suppose dey help farmers get fertiliser by using compost, since some places bandits no dey allow dem go outside village. But e still tok say homegrown food na just support, e no fit reach evriwia. On di oda hand, anoda expert wey sabi security mata for Kano, Dr Auwal Abdullahi, tok say Nigerian goment suppose try anoda way to fight insurgency. E tell BBC Pidgin say for over 10 years, goment dey use force fight insurgents, but e suggest say make dem try dialogue. "Make goment understand and work wit security pipo, community and gada intelligence. For farming season, goment need to work wit community and if possible, negotiate wit bandits" im tok. E say dis method work for Birnin Gwari local goment for Kaduna State. Dr Abdullahi also tok say if dem use peaceful method to tok to bandits make dem drop arms and stop banditry, kidnapping and cattle rustling, farmers go fit go farm and e go help Nigeria economy grow.

Telegraph

43 minutes ago

• Telegraph

EU fantasies of toppling the dollar are totally delusional

It's a nice problem to have amid the Trump-inspired madness that grips today's foreign exchange markets. But it's a problem none the less. The Swiss franc keeps on appreciating, and there seems to be almost nothing the authorities can do to stop it. Increasingly alarmed by its trajectory, the Swiss National Bank last week cut its official policy rate back down to zero, and there is now talk of rates going negative again by summer's end. But to little effect. Switzerland's safe haven attributes have rarely been in such high demand. Rising geopolitical tensions have combined with growing loss of trust in the dollar as the bedrock of the global economy to send the franc soaring, almost regardless of whatever rate of interest it carries. Lest it be gold, there are few repositories of wealth thought more secure than Switzerland. Contrast that with the UK, where Bank Rate is still firmly stuck at 4.25pc with stubbornly persistent inflation to match. Thanks substantially to the lower import prices that the surging franc brings about, prices as a whole are going down not up; there is little or no cost of living crisis. This is great for consumers, not so much for Swiss industry, which has to match these deflating prices at home and abroad. But thus far at least, it's coped remarkably well. I've never bought the idea that a competitive economy needs a weak currency. Persistent devaluation has been the British way for decades now, and little good has it done either. At best, it's only smoothed the decline – a tranquiliser to avoid having to face up to the hard yards of painful structural adjustment. While the UK has grown poorer, the Swiss grow ever richer – living proof that a strong currency goes hand in hand with a competitive economy. The one is a reflection of the other. Bad, uncompetitive companies are quickly weeded out and dispensed with, while the disciplines of having to compete with cheaper foreign goods and services forces the survivors into imaginative innovation and productivity gain. You can, however, have too much of a good thing, and this is the unfortunate position that Switzerland now finds itself in. Broadly speaking, Switzerland produces in appreciating francs, but sells in equally fast depreciating dollars. There is only so far countervailing productivity improvement can take you. Theoretically, Donald Trump's tariff policies should make the dollar stronger, in that all other things being equal, they ought to reduce the size of the deficit. But it hasn't worked out that way. In practice, they've only further undermined international confidence in US economic management more widely. To most observers, it looks as if the White House is deliberately trying to tank the dollar. And on one level, it is; a depreciating dollar temporarily helps domestic producers by making imports more expensive. When combined with tariffs – effectively a sales tax on foreign producers – US industry gets a double boost. Trump wants the best of both worlds; he wants a weak dollar, but he also very much likes the dollar's commanding position in the global economy for the geopolitical power it bestows. Sadly for him, it's not clear he can have both. To support a weak dollar, he needs to make dollar assets less attractive to foreign investors. As Stephen Miran, the head of Trump's council of economic advisers, has suggested, this might be achieved by imposing a withholding tax on income generated by US assets, or by converting foreign holdings of US Treasuries into 100-year bonds. Trump's problem is that the less attractive the US makes itself to foreign investors, the less likely it is that the dollar can sustain its dominant reserve currency position. Use of the dollar for sanctions against countries the US has got a problem with has further undermined trust in the currency as both a store of value and reliable means of exchange. International trust relies crucially on the idea of a global order based on agreed rules, the very thing Trump wants to dispense with. So the dollar turns weaker, and together with the Trump tariff shock, it drives up domestic US inflation. Despite almost daily berating from Trump, Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, is sitting on his hands and refusing to reduce interest rates in the precipitous way the president demands. The more Trump complains, the more Powell digs in. Determination not to give way has become a matter of principle, almost regardless of its economic merits. Powell's stance is totemic in the wider struggle to protect institutional integrity from presidential diktat. Once Federal Reserve independence goes, the whole fragile structure of dollar hegemony begins to crumble. Even Trump must know that. Meanwhile, Europe is cutting fast – with the notable exception of the UK, where inflation remains a problem. Normally, America's higher interest rates relative to Europe would cause the dollar to strengthen, but the trust issue has provoked a very different response – a weaker dollar despite a widening interest rate gap. Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, sees Trump's antics as an opportunity for a 'global euro moment'. It has long been the ambition of European policymakers to look the mighty dollar in the face, and eventually usurp its position in the international monetary system. This has always seemed fanciful. For all its grandstanding, the EU remains a disjointed confederation of fiscally sovereign and often deeply divided nations, with no centralised Treasury function to speak of, no banking union and no unified sovereign debt market. This makes its monetary union acutely vulnerable to existential crisis. Lagarde might think of herself as queen bee, but her powers and reach are remarkably limited. As long as this remains the case – and there is little sign of it changing – Lagarde's musings are just delusional nonsense. Where reserve managers have been diversifying away from the dollar, it has, moreover, tended to be into gold, not the euro. Indeed, gold recently overtook the euro as the biggest central bank reserve asset after the dollar. A rather more potent long term threat comes from China, whose central bank digital currency and the infrastructure being built around it are deliberately designed to provide an alternative to the dollar for trade and investment. Those who take umbrage at Trump's America can try China instead. Who's to say it's less reliable than a country that slaps record tariffs on some of its closest allies? Regrettably, Switzerland is just too small to act as a global reserve currency. As it is, it struggles to manage the inflows of international capital looking for safety amid the bedlam of today's world. Already, the Swiss National Bank balance sheet is swollen by its various currency interventions to a size considerably bigger than that of Switzerland's entire economy. It can surely go no further in printing Swiss francs to buy foreign assets. But as I say, it's a nice problem to have.