Trump's bid to bar foreign students from Harvard threatens Kennedy School's lifeblood
When 35-year-old Oscar Escobar completed his term as the youngest elected mayor in his Colombian hometown in 2023, he was accepted into a programme at Harvard University's John F Kennedy School of Government tailored to aspiring global leaders like him.
If the Trump administration gets its way, Escobar may be among the last foreign students for the foreseeable future to attend the Kennedy School, widely considered one of the world's best schools for preparing future policymakers.
Last month, the Department of Homeland Security sought to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students and force those who are there to transfer or lose their legal status. It accused the university of "fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party."
In early June, President Donald Trump doubled-down by issuing a proclamation to bar US entry for foreign nationals planning to study at Harvard and directed the State Department to consider revoking visas for those already enrolled. Trump argued that Harvard has tolerated crime on campus and that its relationships with China threatened national security.
Harvard said the orders — which affect thousands of students — were illegal and amounted to retaliation for rejecting government's demands to control its governance and curriculum among other things. It said it was addressing concerns about antisemitism and campus threats.
A federal judge has temporarily blocked both orders while the courts review legal challenges, but if allowed to stand, they would represent a huge blow to Harvard, and the Kennedy School in particular.
Over the past five years, 52% of Kennedy students have come from outside the United States, the school's media office said. With students from more than 100 countries, it is "the most global" school at Harvard.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a response to a Reuters request that the proclamation 'is carefully tailored toward limiting the risks foreign students at Harvard may pose to national security and campus safety'.
The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions for this story and referred Reuters to its previous statements. A spokesperson for the State Department declined to respond to questions about Harvard and the Kennedy School, saying it did not comment on pending litigation.
The large foreign contingent is a big part of why the school has been so successful as a training ground for future leaders, including Americans, said Nicholas Burns, a Kennedy School professor and a former US diplomat.
"It's by design," Burns said in an interview, referring to the number of international students. "It's a decision that the Kennedy School leadership made because it replicates the world as it is."
Kennedy counts an impressive list of foreign leaders among its alumni, including former Mexican President Felipe Calderon and former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau.
Another is Maia Sandu, who was elected president of Moldova in 2020 after she graduated. She has since emerged as an important regional voice against Russian influence, spearheading the country's drive to join the European Union and taking a stand against Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
"At Harvard I met interesting people from all over the world, everyone with his or her own story," Sandu said in a 2022 address to Kennedy School graduates. "And, very quickly, I realised that my country was not the only one which had been struggling for decades. I realised that development takes time."
For the school's defenders, foreign students bring more benefits than risks. They say educating future world leaders means boosting US "soft power," a concept coined in the 1980s by Harvard political scientist Joseph Nye, later a Kennedy School dean, to refer to non-coercive ways to promote US values such as democracy and human rights.
Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, a Kennedy School graduate who must now navigate the rivalry between the United States and China in Southeast Asia, has acknowledged the influence of American culture on him.
He says he decided to study in the US in part because his favourite musicians were Americans. Last year, Wong posted a TikTok video of himself playing Taylor Swift's "Love Song" on acoustic guitar, dedicating the performance to teachers.
To be sure, the Kennedy School has courted its share of controversies - including criticism over who it accepts into its programmes and who it invites to teach and speak to its students.
A notable example came in 2022 when Kennedy's Carr Center for Human Rights Policy offered a fellowship to Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, and then rescinded it. Roth said at the time he believed the school caved to pressure from supporters of Israel who believed HRW had an anti-Israel bias. Kennedy denied that, but eventually reversed course amid widespread criticism that it was limiting debate.
Smiling as he posed for graduation photos with his family in May, Escobar said it was a bittersweet moment to complete his studies at Kennedy.
"If this university cannot receive international students anymore, of course we are missing an opportunity," said Escobar, who has since returned to Colombia to work on the presidential campaign of leftist politician Claudia Lopez, also a former Harvard fellow.
"If what President Donald Trump wants is to make America great again, it will be a mistake."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Iran's Foreign Minister condemns US strikes and threatens retaliation
Abbas Araghchi accuses Washington of 'betraying diplomacy' by giving Israel 'green light' to attack Iran's nuclear sites
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
World reacts to US strikes on Iran
World leaders on Sunday condemned the US decision to launch strikes against three nuclear facilities in Iran. US President Donald Trump on Saturday said the military had bombed Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, bringing to an end days of speculation about whether America would become directly involved in the Iran-Israel conflict. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed' by the US strikes on the sites. "This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security,' he said in a statement on X. "I call on member states to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law.' In the US Congress, Democrats attacked Mr Trump for the decision. Democratic House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries criticised the strike. 'President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorisation for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East,' he said in a statement. Even pro-Trump Republicans had strong words against the decision. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a leading Make America Great Again Republican isolationist congresswoman, wrote in a post on X that "Israel is a nuclear armed nation. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer.' Other Republicans, however, came out strongly in support of Mr Trump's decision, with House Speaker Mike Johnson saying that the President "gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement'. And the head of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicks, said: "Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate – and correct – decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime'. Senator Tom Cotton said Mr Trump "made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans'. In Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Mr Trump for ordering the strikes. "First comes strength, then comes peace,' he said. "And tonight, President Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength.' Yoav Gallant, Israel's former defence minister, said that US President Donald Trump had taken "a bold decision' in attacking Iran. "The world is now a safer place,' he said in a post on X. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the US strikes 'outrageous' and said they will have 'everlasting consequences'. 'The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations,' he said on X. 'Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour.' Hamas condemned the "blatant US aggression'. "The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) condemns in the strongest terms the blatant US aggression against the territory and sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran,' the group said in a statement. "This brutal aggression is a dangerous escalation,' it added, calling the attack "a flagrant violation of international law, and a direct threat to international peace and security'.
Khaleej Times
10 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
US leaders react, call for Trump's impeachment after attack on Iran's nuclear sites
[Editor's Note: Follow our live blog for real-time updates on the latest developments in the Israel-Iran conflict.] Following the announcement of US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a wave of reactions swept through the American political landscape. Prominent lawmakers from across the political spectrum swiftly condemned President Donald Trump's decision, raising alarms about the legality, constitutional overreach, and long-term consequences of the action. While the administration framed the strikes as a strategic success, critics argued it marked a reckless escalation that bypassed congressional authority and endangered global stability. Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen 'Trump promised to bring peace to the Middle East, but he failed to deliver." Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Trump's decision 'disastrous' and 'grounds for impeachment'. The Presidentâ��s disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment. — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 22, 2025 US Representative, Marjorie Taylor Greene also called out Trump's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, saying Netanyahu was the one who bombed the people of Iran first. House Member Nancy Pelosi Nancy Pelosi said the president "ignored the constitution" and urged the administration to provide answers on the deadly move that potentially "endangers American lives".
