Supreme Court decision on compensation over power lines could affect thousands of landowners
A Supreme Court decision that compensation can be awarded for depreciation of the value of lands due to having electricity power lines installed across them could potentially affect thousands of landowners.
The five judge court rejected arguments by the Electricity Supply Board (ESB) that a property arbitrator was not entitled to include compensation for land depreciation – referred to in the relevant 19th century law as 'injurious affection' – in an award of €39,500 statutory compensation to a couple over power lines installed across their farm.
Advertisement
Arbitrator Peter Good, since deceased, had made the award to Peter and Rose O'Reilly concerning lands owned by them at Crubany, Co Cavan.
Compensation for 'injurious affection' formed a substantial part of the award, and its inclusion was successfully appealed by the ESB to the High Court.
The couple appealed the High Court to the Court of Appeal, which decided the matter raised issues of public importance requiring determination by the Supreme Court.
On Friday, Mr Justice Brian Murray, giving the court's main judgment, upheld arguments by Peter Bland SC, with barrister Michael O'Donnell, instructed by solicitor Gabriel Toolan, that the entitlement to compensation includes for 'injurious affection'.
Advertisement
The case arose after the couple entered landowner agreements with the ESB in 2011. In return for unobstructed access to their lands to construct electric lines, they were entitled to compensation under the Electricity Supply Act 1927.
The main issue in the Supreme Court appeal concerned the extent of the right to compensation. Mr Good decided that, as well as compensation for the loss of value of house sites on the land holding across which the lines travel, they were entitled to compensation for injurious affection, or general loss of value of their entire holding.
Among his findings, Mr Justice Murray said none of the legal authorities demand a 'perfect equation' between the compensation mandated by the Constitution for interference with property interests, and the compensation enabled either by developments of the common law or by early Victorian legislation governing the compulsory acquisition of property.
The ESB was correct in saying the exercise of powers conferred by section 53 of the 1927 Act did not give rise to the transfer or creation of interests 'in land', he said. There was therefore no basis on which it could be said that the 'injurious affection' provisions of the 1845 Land Clauses Consolidation Act were automatically incorporated into the procedure for deciding compensation under the 1927 Act.
Advertisement
No significance could be attached to the fact that the 1927 Act did not expressly include or exclude those provisions, he said.
Ireland
'Author' of property fraud scheme faces prison ter...
Read More
He said the High Court had erred if it found the Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act 1919 operated in any way to preclude a claimant seeking compensation for injurious affection or depreciation of the value of their holding caused by the presence of the electric lines, poles and pylons, he said.
In other findings, he held Mr Good erred when he fixed compensation for the anticipated exercise of the power of re-entry onto the lands. He upheld the High Court decision that there was no breach by Mr Good, in his handling of the matter, of the ESB's right to fair procedures.
The precise amount of compensation was referred for decision, in line with the court's findings, by a new arbitrator.
In a separate concurring judgment, Mr Justice Seamus Woulfe agreed with his colleague on all issues other than the constitutional issue and said he was reserving his position on that issue to an appropriate case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
35 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
House price increases could be 'well ahead of last year', auctioneers say
The Institute of Professional Auctioneers and Valuers has said house price increases in 2025 could be "well ahead" of last year. It comes after House Price Report for Q2 2025 showed prices rose by an average of 3 per cent across Ireland during the second quarter of of the year. Advertisement The typical listed price nationwide in the second quarter of the year was €357,851, 12.3 per cent higher than a year previously and 40 per cent higher than at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. The current rate of inflation in the market is the highest seen in the 10 years since mortgage market rules were introduced. Commenting on the report, IPAV chief executive, Pat Davitt, said agents are reporting high prices right across the country, not only in the cities. 'More second-hand stock seems to be coming to the market, especially in Dublin Cork and Galway, even if it's not showing in these figures as yet,' he said. Advertisement 'But the real problem is the lack of new homes, and it's prevalent in all areas of the country. In this regard we cannot see how this is going to change without some kind of emergency planning measures." Davitt said more land needs to be zoned, and it is essential to get smaller builders who have largely been absent from the market for years, back to building again. 'Building finance is a real problem. The €750 million State Home Building Finance Ireland scheme that was intended for such builders and developers had unrealistically high interest rates at a time when the ECB rate was zero. 'This funding went, instead, to large builders/developers, many of whom weren't dependent upon it. SMEs builders were, so they are still out of the market." Davitt said this scheme demonstrates 'how far State decision-making is removed from the realities of the market place". He also said the Government's new housing plan due next month must deliver transformative change. 'It must stimulate supply in a way that no measure has done over the last decade,' he said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Irish mother and two children evacuated from Iran
A mother and two children are the three Irish citizens or dependents who have been safely evacuated from Iran after the US joined Israel's bombing campaign on the country. It comes after a separate successful evacuation of 15 Irish citizens or dependents from Israel on Sunday. Ireland's deputy premier Simon Harris said the US attack was an 'extraordinarily dangerous escalation' in an already 'volatile' situation in the Middle East. He is attending a meeting of EU foreign affairs ministers in Brussels, where the growing crisis in the Middle East was high on Monday's agenda. In a statement, Mr Harris said those who had left Iran will now 'travel home'. 'I want to extend our gratitude to our European friends and partners for their excellent support.' He added: 'Throughout this crisis, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and our embassies have remained in regular contact with Irish citizens in the region.' Tensions in the Middle East boiled over 11 days ago when Israel launched strikes on Tehran, targeting the country's nuclear programme. Israel and Iran have been exchanging strikes with one another since, rekindling fears of a full-scale conflict. On Saturday the US joined in, sending planes and submarines to attack Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, areas linked to Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran threatened to retaliate, while US President Donald Trump warned of further action if necessary. Speaking to reporters in Brussels, Mr Harris said there was a real risk of the crisis in Iran and Israel of 'spilling over and broadening', as he reiterated a call for Europe to play a role in de-escalation, diplomacy and dialogue. He said there are international laws in place against strikes on nuclear sites as he described the 'unhelpful intervention' of the US as adding 'a significant level of danger to an already volatile situation'. 'The only way, I believe, to make progress in relation to stopping an already tinderbox-type situation getting worse, is to get back to a negotiated situation.' Mr Harris also said he would also be calling for 'swift and concrete actions' in response to the EU's review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. 'It is clear from that review that Israel is in breach of its human rights obligations under Article Two. 'And it's not good enough just to say somebody's in breach, and it's a consequence free zone. 'If a review finds a breach, consequences must flow from that.' Mr Harris said the Irish position was that agreement should be immediately suspended but added that there would not be consensus across the bloc on that. 'So what we have to do is work on what can be achieved here.' EU ministers are expected to discuss the latest developments, the situation in Gaza and the West Bank, and the review of Israel's compliance with Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Among the other topics to be discussed are the Russian invasion of Ukraine, EU engagement with China, and Georgia. Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha will also attend the summit and provide an update. The discussion on China is expected to prepare for the upcoming EU-China Strategic Dialogue and EU-China Summit. Domestically, Mr Harris said he would be bringing the general scheme of a Bill restricting trade of goods with the Occupied Palestinian Territories to Cabinet on Tuesday. Amid criticism of the scope of the legislation, he said he remained 'very open' to including restrictions on services also but added that he needed to get legal clarity on whether that was possible.
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Bus Éireann recorded €4.2m loss in 2024
Bus Eireann has told the Labour Court that it has made a loss of €4.2 million last year 'and was projecting similar losses for 2025'. That is according to the Labour Court which has recommended a combined pay increase of 6.75 per cent over a two-year period to the end of December 2026, along with a pay voucher of €500, for Bus Eireann's 3,200 workers. Advertisement The pay-row came before the Labour Court after the 3,200 workers represented by the NBRU, SIPTU, UNITE THE UNION, TSSA, CONNECT rejected pay proposals put forward by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) by 64 per cent to 36 per cent. The unions stated that the 3pc pay increase on offer for each year of the pay proposals was not sufficient or adequate to meet their aspirations. The unions were looking for a straight pay increase comparable with other CIE companies and one that would provide pay parity with Dublin Bus. The unions valued pay parity as requiring an increase of 12.7 per cent. Advertisement In response, Bus Éireann stated that the current pay proposal represents the very limit of what can be offered in a pay proposal and is reasonable, if not significant, in the context of what is affordable to the company. Bus Éireann told the Labour Court that they believe that in terms of the marketplace it was a very reasonable offer. Bus Éireann set out the cumulative cost of the proposal that was balloted on 'and stressed that it had made a loss of €4.2 million in 2024 and was projecting similar losses for 2025'. Bus Éireann also submitted that the proposal included other improvements to terms and conditions which were valued at 1pc of pay per year with some groups benefiting from other changes and stated that the percentage increases should not be looked at in isolation. Advertisement In its recommendation, deputy chairwoman at the Labour Court, Louise O'Reilly stated that the pay increase is made up of a 3.5 per cent and a €500 voucher effective from January 1st this year. A further pay increase of 3.25 per cent to be effective from January 1st 2026 and the €500 voucher to be payable to those employed on January 1st 2025 and remaining in employment at the date of acceptance of recommendation. Ms O'Reilly said that the pay deal is to expire on December 31st 2026 and the parties agree to engage no later than four months before the expiry of this deal to secure a successor.
