‘This case was not a comedy of errors' – IDAC head on SCA's vindication of Nulane trial
The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has unanimously overturned a Bloemfontein judge's decision to summarily acquit all of the accused in the R24.9-million Nulane 'scam' case.
Lubabalo Lesolle/Gallo Images
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Karen Read faces a civil lawsuit after being acquitted of murder. What's next
Karen Read descended the steps of the Norfolk County Superior Court on Wednesday a free woman, acquitted of murder. Met by a sea of supporters, cheering and firing pink confetti cannons, there were tears and 'I love you' gestures as the crowd — and Read — celebrated a long sought-after legal conclusion even one that came with a conviction on a lesser charge. The future seems bright for the woman who has gone from homicide suspect to cult hero, but her legal battles are not quite over. Following two criminal jury trials over the death of her police officer boyfriend, Read has become something of a celebrity to her supporters, who reveled in her acquittal this week. But the former financial analyst, who has spent more than three years as a murder suspect, still faces a civil lawsuit over John O'Keefe's death. It's not entirely clear what comes next for Read. However, immediately following the verdict, she appeared to be just taking in the moment with her family. Read was seen having a celebratory dinner with her defense team and family members at an upscale restaurant in the Seaport section of Boston Wednesday night, according to CNN affiliate WCVB. 'Happy, I'm happy, thank you,' Read told reporters. 'I fought for John O'Keefe, harder than anyone.' While prosecutors cannot bring criminal charges against her again over O'Keefe's death, Read still has other legal issues to contend with. O'Keefe's family filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in August 2024, alleging Read 'intended the reckless conduct that resulted' in his death. The lawsuit also accuses the two Canton bars — C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall Bar and Grill — saying they 'negligently served alcohol to an intoxicated person.' Both bars have denied that allegation, according to court filings. O'Keefe's family said Read's public comments about what happened that night were a 'false narrative' and caused them 'aggravated emotional distress,' according to the filing. Read has participated in interviews and a documentary series about the case, and has said her public comments are 'her testimony.' The civil suit is not just about the circumstances that led to O'Keefe's death. His family alleges Read also inflicted emotional distress on O'Keefe's niece when she woke the girl up to tell her something had happened to her uncle, according to the lawsuit. Read's lawyers in the civil case declined to comment to CNN on ongoing litigation. CNN has not heard back from the O'Keefe's attorneys. The O'Keefe's are seeking $50,000 in damages, according to filings, and the case could go to trial if a settlement is not reached first. The civil suit was put on hold while the criminal trial played out, court documents show. The docket shows no new court dates have yet been scheduled. While Read was acquitted of murder, the jury found her guilty of drunk driving. She was sentenced to one year probation and will have to complete a driver alcohol education program, the standard sentence for first-time offenders. As a condition of the driver alcohol education program, Read's driver's license will also be suspended for up to 90 days, according to Massachusetts law. Read's acquittal in O'Keefe's murder means no one has yet been held accountable for his death. David Yannetti, one of Read's attorneys, reiterated Thursday that while his client was found not guilty of O'Keefe's killing, there might still be more to be done. 'They charged the wrong person, and they went after an innocent woman for three and a half years and they failed because they charged the wrong person. But somebody's still out there,' he told WCVB outside the restaurant. It is unclear if the homicide investigation into O'Keefe's death will continue. Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey told CNN affiliate WBZ after court 'the jury has spoken.' CNN reached out to his office, but they had no further comment about the verdict or the homicide investigation. John Jackson, an O'Keefe family friend, told CNN affiliate WCVB they will try to move on and keep O'Keefe's memory alive. 'He just deserved much more than this… This circus, it's unacceptable. But you respect the jury's decision. It's what it is,' Jackson said. The FBI initiated a federal investigation into law enforcement after O'Keefe's death, but special prosecutor Hank Brennen announced in court during Read's second trial that it was closed without any charges being filed. Defense attorney Alan Jackson, however, said in an interview Thursday with a local radio program, the Howie Carr Show, he still has questions about that investigation. 'I've never heard of an investigative agency announcing to the target that the investigation is closed. That has never happened,' he told Carr. 'So, I still have questions about that.' Jackson said he thinks there is 'plenty of evidence for them to investigate, and I think they should.' The Massachusetts State Police vowed to take new steps to improve its process following O'Keefe's death and the subsequent investigation. 'The events of the last three years have challenged our Department to thoroughly review our actions and take concrete steps to deliver advanced investigative training, ensure appropriate oversight, and enhance accountability,' Col. Geoffrey Noble said in a statement posted Thursday on Facebook. Legal battles are expensive and Read racked up significant costs while maintaining her innocence, according to reporting from Vanity Fair last year. The publication said Read paid '$1.2 million leading up to and during' her first trial, depleting her savings and other donations. That included the costs of everything from paying bail to accommodations for her lawyers and to experts like private investigators, Vanity Fair reported. Before her second trial even started, Read had $5 million of deferred legal bills, according to the magazine. As of Friday, people were still donating to an online legal fund for Read that has raised more than one million dollars. Speaking to supporters from the courthouse steps after the verdict on Wednesday, Read thanked them for their financial support. Read's health issues may also play a significant role in her future. Read has said she has Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis, and text messages about her health conditions from lead investigator Michael Proctor came up during the first trial, according to court reporting from WCVB. One day of testimony in her second trial was postponed due to a 'health issue,' the court clerk said. CNN affiliate WCVB reported Read was sick, citing a source close to the case. CNN has reached out to Read and her attorneys for comment on this reporting but did not hear back. Three and a half years ago, the murder case against Read divided the tight-knit town of Canton, Massachusetts, and its nearby suburbs. Residents stormed city council meetings, demanding answers. Some accused the local police of a cover-up to protect those at the party on Fairview Road. Others turned to social media forums to discuss the intricacies of that fateful night, turning what began as a local homicide case into a broader national sensation. Many residents in Canton and its surrounding areas picked a side: they either agreed with prosecutors who said Read hit and killed O'Keefe with her car after a night out or sided with the defense, who said she was framed. The allegations of corruption and law enforcement tainting the investigation into O'Keefe's death was a galvanizing force for Read's supporters. The public outpouring of support started as a grassroots movement, according to CNN correspondent Jean Casarez, who has spoken with many of the people in Read's crowds. The movement was based on the belief among many that law enforcement tampering with evidence was rampant in their community — and Read's case became the symbol of that. In a previous statement to CNN, Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty said investigators found 'absolutely no evidence of a cover up in the tragic death of John O'Keefe.' At a town board meeting in August 2023, she acknowledged there's a 'mistrust for the police department' in Canton, but said it's not as widespread as portrayed. 'However, I do acknowledge that it is there, and I hear you,' she said. 'I believe the first step in bridging that trust gap is effective and healthy communication.' She did not respond to further questions from CNN on the root of the mistrust. The town's Select Board Chair John McCourt acknowledged this week the case has 'deeply affected' the community. He said the trial's 'outcome may bring a sense of relief to some and continue to raise questions for others. We encourage members of the community to move forward together, treating one another with respect through civil, constructive dialogue,' according to a statement on the town's website Thursday. The public interest in the case continues. The day of the verdict, Netflix announced a new documentary series that 'will explore what happened in the days leading up to O'Keefe's death,' according to a statement from the streaming company. CNN's Faith Karimi and Jean Casarez contributed reporting.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
A bank, a retailer and a travel agent walk into the naughty corner
A remarkable variety of companies have employees that let customers down. This week, a prominent retailer, internet service provider, bank and travel service are all doing the walk of shame, says Wendy Knowler. I spend a large part of my work life alerting company higher-ups to the fact their employees are failing their customers. Many of the cases are not particularly unusual or shocking but what it does tell me is that their internal escalation processes are woefully lacking, if not non-existent. It seems to me they'd rather have the various ways in which they mistreat their customers laid bare in traditional and social media than apply themselves to creating a system which red flags a serious, unresolved case and gets it to the attention of someone in the organisation who has the will and the clout to fix it, fast. Here are a just a few of this week's cases to illustrate what I'm getting at… In the naughty corner are a bank, a retailer, an internet service provider and an online travel agency. Nedbank Neville [surname withheld] was in quite a state when he approached me for help. A former police officer who was medically boarded after 30 years of service, he receives a government pension on the last day of the month. But that didn't happen last month because Nedbank unilaterally closed his account, and apparently without reason, on 17 May. He visited the bank's Greenstone Mall branch to query that and as a result the account was reinstated on 28 May, but then closed again the following day. Without informing him. 'So I didn't get my pension payment on the 30th,' Neville said. He was told to ask the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) to reissue the payment, something he was battling to do. 'I demand that Nedbank resolve this problem which was created by them,' he said. 'I am currently too sick to go to the GEPF offices and wait in a queue.' Meanwhile he'd had to borrow money to pay his municipal bill, 'but I have no money for food, and Nedbank won't loan me any.' He later discovered that it could take up to eight weeks for the GEPF to reissue his May pension payment. On taking up his case with Nedbank's media office, I was told that Neville's account was closed by mistake. 'Unfortunately, this resulted in the rejection of the pension payment, which could not be processed as the account was no longer active at the time of the attempted deposit. 'Subsequently, certain debit orders that were still active were processed against the account, leading to an overdraft balance.' I was told that the bank would reverse any debit interest incurred as a result of that mistake, give Neville a formal apology for the distress it had caused him and offer him a 'goodwill payment' of R1 500 to make up for it. 'We take full accountability for the error and we are reviewing our internal processes to prevent a recurrence of such incidents in the future,' the bank said. That includes exploring a bridging finance facility to support clients in such 'unique and exceptional circumstances'. Nice save, but days later, Neville still didn't know about any of that, and nor did the bank manager he was dealing with, who, he said, continued to be 'unsympathetic'. So back I went to Nedbank to report that. Finally Neville got that 'sorry' call. Game Samantha Mewa put a R3 800 hi-fi on lay-by at Game Pinetown (outside Durban) in late December, paying a R1 000 deposit. According to the contract, she had until next month to settle the balance. But when she called the store earlier this month about making final payment and collecting the hi-fi, she was told it had been sold to make space in their storeroom. What? First she was assured by head office, when she complained, that they did have stock of the hi-fi in their warehouse, and then the store contradicted that. 'I have not heard back since,' she said. 'What are my rights?' In such cases – a retailer breaching a lay-by agreement for reasons within their control – they are required by the Consumer Protection Act to double what the customer had paid as compensation. Was Game – part of the Massmart group – willing to do that? I asked. That prospect appeared to enhance the retailer's attempts to find Mewa another hi-fi. 'We have located stock of the exact model the customer originally put on lay-by and the store manager has secured the unit, which is clearly marked for her. 'The customer still has an outstanding balance and it will be released once it has been settled in full,' a spokesperson said. 'I am so sorry that this action was not implemented proactively when the customer raised her concern at the store.' As is Mewa. Webafrica Caitlin da Silva of Milnerton, Cape Town cancelled her contract with Webafrica after being let down for weeks by the internet service provider. It was when she was charged a R1 000 cancellation fee for doing so – instead of being given the apology she deserved - that she felt compelled to share her experience with me. In March she submitted a home move request with Webafrica, which was acknowledged and confirmed. But despite multiple follow-ups, the move was never done and she was left without internet connectivity for weeks at her new address as a result. 'It was an untenable situation as I work remotely,' she said. That's when she cancelled and signed up with another provider. Then came that adding-insult-to-injury cancellation fee. 'They tried to make it my fault, saying I failed to submit sufficient proof of address,' she said, 'but at no point was I informed that the documentation I had provided was insufficient'. 'They refuse to take responsibility, continue to reference their 'terms' and have now closed my support ticket without resolving the issue. Multiple attempts to escalate the matter have been ignored.' Like many other Webafrica clients, Da Silva complained that the company had no direct customer service line – 'only an email system and a poorly monitored WhatsApp chat, leaving customers without real-time support'. 'This is not just about a fee,' she said. 'It's about a company refusing to own up to its own failures, while leaving customers stranded. Responding, WebAfrica CEO Sean Nourse said the company 'takes a lot of pride' in its customer service, 'but we are aware that we are not perfect and occasionally get it horribly wrong'. He called Da Silva's experience 'highly irregular'. While her move request had been captured, an invoice had not been generated – an 'anomaly' which would be addressed, Nourse said. When that problem was identified, he said, Webafrica initiated the order with the network provider, which responded by saying that a service for the same customer and address was already active under a different internet provider. As a result, Da Silva's request was wrongly treated as a provider switch. She was then asked for proof of address and a photograph of the equipment installed at her premises, and on receipt of that, the network updated its records, 'but incorrectly concluded that no installation existed at the address'. 'We are addressing how their information was incorrect,' Nourse said. But by that stage, Da Silva had opted to cancel her service. As for the communication issues, Nourse said the company's systems were designed to route queries based on the status of a customer's service. 'Because the invoice was not generated as expected, her queries were directed to a department not equipped to resolve this specific issue, contributing to the delay,' Nourse said. 'All areas we aim to improve on.' 'We have since issued a credit to bring her account balance to zero, and we extend our sincere apologies to Ms da Silva.' She was grateful for the writing off of that cancelation fee, but not placated by the response. 'Before reaching out to you, I endured weeks of exhausting back-and-forth communication with their complaints department,' she said. 'Despite providing clear evidence and repeatedly requesting escalation to senior management, I received only dismissive and unhelpful replies - often implying that I, as the customer, was at fault. 'It was only after your intervention that Webafrica finally acknowledged its own failings.' Travelstart On 26 March, Dirk Crafford made a booking for Johannesburg to Durban return flights. But when he arrived at ORT International on 20 April for his Durban flight, FlySafair said there had been a payment delay by Travelstart and thus he was forced to buy another ticket. Travelstart promised refund, he told me, but two months on, that had not happened. Instead, Travelstart emailed him to advise him to approach FlySafair for his refund. Travelstart's recently appointed group head of customer operations, Roland Straub, said a technical issue had prevented the first leg of Crafford's trip from being recognised on FlySafair's system. [The airline confirmed to me that it could see a failed attempt by Travelstart to pay for that ticket.] Straub has since received an apology and a refund. 'Please be assured that we are conducting a thorough review of our interactions to identify areas for service improvement,' Straub told me. So why was Crafford unable to secure the refund without my help? 'I have identified an element of refresher training being required,' Straub said. 'The technical issue that occurred 'masked' what the actual issue was, as the ticket appeared paid on our side but wasn't synchronised to the FlySafair system. 'But there were some flags that could have alerted the agent to this that were missed, so we are using this incident as an opportunity to do some refresher training on how to spot this type of incident if it occurs again.' That sounds promising. Oh, that companies would find the will and the way to treat their customers better.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Karen Read faces a civil lawsuit after being acquitted of murder. What's next
CrimeFacebookTweetLink Follow Karen Read descended the steps of the Norfolk County Superior Court on Wednesday a free woman, acquitted of murder. Met by a sea of supporters, cheering and firing pink confetti cannons, there were tears and 'I love you' gestures as the crowd — and Read — celebrated a long sought-after legal conclusion even one that came with a conviction on a lesser charge. The future seems bright for the woman who has gone from homicide suspect to cult hero, but her legal battles are not quite over. Following two criminal jury trials over the death of her police officer boyfriend, Read has become something of a celebrity to her supporters, who reveled in her acquittal this week. But the former financial analyst, who has spent more than three years as a murder suspect, still faces a civil lawsuit over John O'Keefe's death. It's not entirely clear what comes next for Read. However, immediately following the verdict, she appeared to be just taking in the moment with her family. Read was seen having a celebratory dinner with her defense team and family members at an upscale restaurant in the Seaport section of Boston Wednesday night, according to CNN affiliate WCVB. 'Happy, I'm happy, thank you,' Read told reporters. 'I fought for John O'Keefe, harder than anyone.' While prosecutors cannot bring criminal charges against her again over O'Keefe's death, Read still has other legal issues to contend with. O'Keefe's family filed a wrongful death civil lawsuit in August 2024, alleging Read 'intended the reckless conduct that resulted' in his death. The lawsuit also accuses the two Canton bars — C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall Bar and Grill — saying they 'negligently served alcohol to an intoxicated person.' Both bars have denied that allegation, according to court filings. O'Keefe's family said Read's public comments about what happened that night were a 'false narrative' and caused them 'aggravated emotional distress,' according to the filing. Read has participated in interviews and a documentary series about the case, and has said her public comments are 'her testimony.' The civil suit is not just about the circumstances that led to O'Keefe's death. His family alleges Read also inflicted emotional distress on O'Keefe's niece when she woke the girl up to tell her something had happened to her uncle, according to the lawsuit. Read's lawyers in the civil case declined to comment to CNN on ongoing litigation. CNN has not heard back from the O'Keefe's attorneys. The O'Keefe's are seeking $50,000 in damages, according to filings, and the case could go to trial if a settlement is not reached first. The civil suit was put on hold while the criminal trial played out, court documents show. The docket shows no new court dates have yet been scheduled. While Read was acquitted of murder, the jury found her guilty of drunk driving. She was sentenced to one year probation and will have to complete a driver alcohol education program, the standard sentence for first-time offenders. As a condition of the driver alcohol education program, Read's driver's license will also be suspended for up to 90 days, according to Massachusetts law. Read's acquittal in O'Keefe's murder means no one has yet been held accountable for his death. David Yannetti, one of Read's attorneys, reiterated Thursday that while his client was found not guilty of O'Keefe's killing, there might still be more to be done. 'They charged the wrong person, and they went after an innocent woman for three and a half years and they failed because they charged the wrong person. But somebody's still out there,' he told WCVB outside the restaurant. It is unclear if the homicide investigation into O'Keefe's death will continue. Norfolk District Attorney Michael Morrissey told CNN affiliate WBZ after court 'the jury has spoken.' CNN reached out to his office, but they had no further comment about the verdict or the homicide investigation. John Jackson, an O'Keefe family friend, told CNN affiliate WCVB they will try to move on and keep O'Keefe's memory alive. 'He just deserved much more than this… This circus, it's unacceptable. But you respect the jury's decision. It's what it is,' Jackson said. The FBI initiated a federal investigation into law enforcement after O'Keefe's death, but special prosecutor Hank Brennen announced in court during Read's second trial that it was closed without any charges being filed. Defense attorney Alan Jackson, however, said in an interview Thursday with a local radio program, the Howie Carr Show, he still has questions about that investigation. 'I've never heard of an investigative agency announcing to the target that the investigation is closed. That has never happened,' he told Carr. 'So, I still have questions about that.' Jackson said he thinks there is 'plenty of evidence for them to investigate, and I think they should.' The Massachusetts State Police vowed to take new steps to improve its process following O'Keefe's death and the subsequent investigation. 'The events of the last three years have challenged our Department to thoroughly review our actions and take concrete steps to deliver advanced investigative training, ensure appropriate oversight, and enhance accountability,' Col. Geoffrey Noble said in a statement posted Thursday on Facebook. Legal battles are expensive and Read racked up significant costs while maintaining her innocence, according to reporting from Vanity Fair last year. The publication said Read paid '$1.2 million leading up to and during' her first trial, depleting her savings and other donations. That included the costs of everything from paying bail to accommodations for her lawyers and to experts like private investigators, Vanity Fair reported. Before her second trial even started, Read had $5 million of deferred legal bills, according to the magazine. As of Friday, people were still donating to an online legal fund for Read that has raised more than one million dollars. Speaking to supporters from the courthouse steps after the verdict on Wednesday, Read thanked them for their financial support. Read's health issues may also play a significant role in her future. Read has said she has Crohn's disease and multiple sclerosis, and text messages about her health conditions from lead investigator Michael Proctor came up during the first trial, according to court reporting from WCVB. One day of testimony in her second trial was postponed due to a 'health issue,' the court clerk said. CNN affiliate WCVB reported Read was sick, citing a source close to the case. CNN has reached out to Read and her attorneys for comment on this reporting but did not hear back. Three and a half years ago, the murder case against Read divided the tight-knit town of Canton, Massachusetts, and its nearby suburbs. Residents stormed city council meetings, demanding answers. Some accused the local police of a cover-up to protect those at the party on Fairview Road. Others turned to social media forums to discuss the intricacies of that fateful night, turning what began as a local homicide case into a broader national sensation. Many residents in Canton and its surrounding areas picked a side: they either agreed with prosecutors who said Read hit and killed O'Keefe with her car after a night out or sided with the defense, who said she was framed. The allegations of corruption and law enforcement tainting the investigation into O'Keefe's death was a galvanizing force for Read's supporters. The public outpouring of support started as a grassroots movement, according to CNN correspondent Jean Casarez, who has spoken with many of the people in Read's crowds. The movement was based on the belief among many that law enforcement tampering with evidence was rampant in their community — and Read's case became the symbol of that. In a previous statement to CNN, Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty said investigators found 'absolutely no evidence of a cover up in the tragic death of John O'Keefe.' At a town board meeting in August 2023, she acknowledged there's a 'mistrust for the police department' in Canton, but said it's not as widespread as portrayed. 'However, I do acknowledge that it is there, and I hear you,' she said. 'I believe the first step in bridging that trust gap is effective and healthy communication.' She did not respond to further questions from CNN on the root of the mistrust. The town's Select Board Chair John McCourt acknowledged this week the case has 'deeply affected' the community. He said the trial's 'outcome may bring a sense of relief to some and continue to raise questions for others. We encourage members of the community to move forward together, treating one another with respect through civil, constructive dialogue,' according to a statement on the town's website Thursday. The public interest in the case continues. The day of the verdict, Netflix announced a new documentary series that 'will explore what happened in the days leading up to O'Keefe's death,' according to a statement from the streaming company. CNN's Faith Karimi and Jean Casarez contributed reporting.
