US judge blocks Trump's refusal to issue passports to transgender citizens
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from refusing to issue passports to transgender and nonbinary Americans nationwide that reflect their gender identities.
U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston expanded a preliminary injunction she issued in April that allowed six transgender and nonbinary individuals who challenged the policy to obtain passports consistent with their gender identities or with an "X" sex designation while the lawsuit moves forward.
Kobick did so after concluding the policy the U.S. Department of State adopted pursuant to an executive order Trump signed likely discriminated on the basis of sex and was rooted in an irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans that violated the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment.
While Kobick's April ruling was limited in its scope, the judge, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, on Tuesday granted the case class action status and halted the policy's enforcement against transgender, nonbinary and intersex passport holders.
Kobick said granting class action status to two categories of passport holders was appropriate given that the administration's actions affected them uniformly "by preventing them from obtaining passports with a sex marker consistent with their gender identity."
Li Nowlin-Sohl, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the American Civil Liberties Union, called the ruling "a critical victory against discrimination and for equal justice under the law."
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly in a statement called the decision "yet another attempt by a rogue judge to thwart President Trump's agenda and push radical gender ideology that defies biological truth."
The case is one of several concerning an executive order Trump signed after returning to office on January 20 directing the government to recognize only two biologically distinct sexes, male and female.
The order also directed the State Department to change its policies to only issue passports that "accurately reflect the holder's sex."
The State Department subsequently changed its passport policy to "request the applicant's biological sex at birth," rather than permit applicants to self-identify their sex, and to only allow them to be listed as male or female.
Prior to Trump, the State Department for more than three decades allowed people to update the sex designation on their passports.
In 2022, the Biden administration allowed passport applicants to choose "X" as a neutral sex marker on their passport applications, as well as being able to self-select "M" or "F" for male or female.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
China Sides With Iran, Greenlights Hormuz BLOCKADE? Beijing's First Response As U.S. Seeks Help
/ Jun 23, 2025, 06:00PM IST United States' airstrike on the Iranian nuclear sites has triggered a massive global oil crisis scare. Tehran's parliament has decided to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil chokepoint. The strait accounts for 1/5th of the movement of oil containers across the world. According to reports, United States had urged China not to led the Ayatollah Khamenei-led regime to shut the strait. Will China heed to Trump's request after a bitter trade tariff war between the two superpowers?
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did the US really wipe out Iran's nuclear sites? Reports say Trump may have been tricked by Tehran
Despite President Trump's declaration of a complete victory, the US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have yielded mixed results. While some sites sustained damage, particularly at Fordow, doubts remain about the extent of destruction to underground facilities. Concerns linger regarding Iran's potential relocation of enriched uranium, potentially hindering but not halting their nuclear ambitions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Did the US really wipe out Iran's nuclear sites? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What do satellite images reveal about the damage? What do experts think about the attack? Has Iran secretly moved its highly enriched Uranium? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How does this impact Iran's nuclear ambitions? FAQs US President Donald Trump announced with confidence that US airstrikes had destroyed Iran's main nuclear sites and called it a complete victory. However, expert opinions and satellite images present a different Saturday night, Donald Trump dispatched seven B-2 stealth bombers from the United States to destroy Tehran's nuclear program by dropping massive bunker-busting bombs on three enrichment facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and underground facilities may have survived, and enriched uranium may have been moved without anyone knowing. The attack may have slowed down Iran's nuclear plans, but it did not stop them, as per reports by CNN and of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday that a US submarine used Tomahawk cruise missiles to strike an Isfahan location where a US official estimates that approximately 60% of Iran's stockpile of already-enriched nuclear material is kept Isfahan facility was not hit by massive "bunker-buster" bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, in contrast to the other two Iranian facilities targeted in the operation, as per a report by the US used 12 bunker busters to destroy Iran's facility at Fordow, another underground location that contained centrifuges needed to enrich uranium, the facility's evident survival has prompted doubts about whether Trump's declared objective was even to commercial satellite imagery, the U.S. attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant seriously damaged, if not completely destroyed, the deeply buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it contained, but experts said on Sunday that there was no proof of it. However, it is unknown how much damage has been done because the facility has layers of Technologies' satellite imagery from Thursday and Friday revealed "unusual activity" at Fordow, including a lengthy line of cars waiting outside one of the facility's Lewis, a weapons expert and professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, has closely examined commercial satellite images of the strike sites and said the damage to the facility seems limited to aboveground structures.'They just punched through with these MOPs,' said David Albright, the head of the Institute for Science and International Security and a former U.N. nuclear inspector, in reference to the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bombs that the United States claimed it Eveleth, a satellite images specialist and associate researcher with the CNA Corporation, pointed out that it was impossible to confirm the destruction below ground. The hall that houses hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery," he stated to Iran, prior to US attacks on its nuclear bases, the majority of its highly enriched uranium was smuggled to a hidden location. Iran claimed that it had moved its 400 kg stockpile, much of which was kept at Isfahan, and satellite photos showed convoys departing all three locations in recent days, as per a report by think that the majority of Fordow's 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium was transferred prior to Operation Midnight Hammer, as per a report by The of 16 trucks snaking down a road near the entrance of the Fordow plant, obscured by rubble and dirt, was released by US defense contractor Maxar Technologies on June defense company TS2 Space reports that trucks, bulldozers, and security convoys swarm Fordow, where analysts observed a "frantic effort" to move shielding materials or intelligence analyst Ronen Solomon stated that transferring Iran's uranium would be "like having fuel without a car" and that they are unable to do much with it unless they develop a small-scale project that we are unaware of, as per The also warned that Iran might be concealing this and other nuclear components in places that Israel, the United States, and the U.N. nuclear inspectors are unaware would take years and rely on Tehran's capacity to restore essential equipment before Iran could produce a nuclear weapon, even though it might have the entirely; experts believe some deep underground facilities and uranium stockpiles were has the potential to rebuild, as key equipment and uranium may have been secretly relocated.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan in political turmoil over Donald Trump's nobel bid after US and Israel bomb Iran's Fordow, Isfahan, Natanz facilities
Multiple political leaders and civil society voices in Pakistan have criticised the government's decision to nominate U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The criticism grew louder after the U.S., alongside Israel, carried out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. The nomination letter had already been submitted by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar. It praised Trump's role in de-escalating tensions during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. However, opposition leaders now argue that the developments in Iran completely contradict the principles of peace. Political leaders strongly oppose government move Veteran JUI-F leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman openly condemned the nomination, calling Trump's actions the opposite of peaceful. Speaking at a gathering in Murree, he criticised the government's quick decision following Trump's lunch meeting with Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir. 'How can support for Israeli attacks be seen as a mark of peace?' he questioned. Former Senator Mushahid Hussain echoed this, accusing Trump of being influenced by Israeli leadership and labelling the Iran strike 'an illegal war.' He demanded that the nomination be 'reviewed, rescinded, and revoked.' PTI lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan also responded with a direct call to 'reconsider,' highlighting U.S. complicity in Gaza. Statements continued to pour in from other political parties and public figures. PTI's think-tank head Raoof Hasan described the nomination as 'a source of shame,' while Afrasiab Khattak criticised what he called 'sycophancy' in diplomacy. Jamaat-i-Islami's Naeemur Rehman said the move hurt Pakistan's 'national dignity.' Public figures join chorus of disapproval Former diplomat Maleeha Lodhi stated that the nomination did not reflect public sentiment, while journalist Mariana Baabar remarked that the country's image had taken a hit. Author Fatima Bhutto questioned whether the nomination would now be withdrawn, summing up the mood on social media. With mounting criticism across political and public spheres, pressure is building on Pakistan's government to formally withdraw Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination.
