logo
Trump-Backed US Steel Deal with Nippon Finalized, Sparks Job Boom

Trump-Backed US Steel Deal with Nippon Finalized, Sparks Job Boom

The long-awaited partnership between US Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel is now official, with both companies confirming the deal on Wednesday.
The agreement, backed by President Donald Trump, is being called a turning point for the American steel industry and is expected to create over 100,000 jobs across the country.
As part of the agreement, US Steel will retain its name and continue to operate from its headquarters in Pittsburgh.
All steel products will continue to be "mined, melted, and made" in the United States, both companies confirmed, BBC said.
The announcement also outlines over $11 billion in planned investments by 2028, with a new steel plant expected to be built sometime after that year.
"This is a momentous day for our country, our communities, and the American steel industry," said US Steel CEO Dave Burritt. "Thanks to President Trump's bold leadership, American workers secured the best possible deal." US Steel Sale Finalized After Trump Reverses Biden-Era Block
The deal faced earlier pushback from President Joe Biden in 2023, who cited national security concerns.
But President Trump ordered a fresh review and ultimately cleared the sale last week after securing commitments from Nippon to invest heavily in US Steel's American facilities rather than taking full ownership.
To address security concerns, a special National Security Agreement was created. It requires that US Steel remains a US-incorporated company, led by a US citizen CEO, with a majority-US board.
According to CBS News , Nippon will also issue a "golden share" to the US government, giving the president authority over key decisions like shutting down factories or moving jobs overseas.
Nippon Steel's Vice Chairman Takashi Mori will take on the role of chairman of US Steel's board, but the rest of the company's leadership team will stay American.
The company has bases in several countries but is now taking a much larger role in US operations.
Despite the promising outlook, not everyone is fully supportive. The United Steelworkers union pushed back against the companies, accusing them of "downplaying concerns" and promising to keep a close eye on Nippon's future actions.
"We will continue watching, holding Nippon to its commitments," said USW president David McCall.
Originally published on vcpost.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tel Aviv Journalist Reveals Aftermath of Iranian Missile Strike on Her Home: 'I'm Deeply Disturbed'
Tel Aviv Journalist Reveals Aftermath of Iranian Missile Strike on Her Home: 'I'm Deeply Disturbed'

Int'l Business Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Tel Aviv Journalist Reveals Aftermath of Iranian Missile Strike on Her Home: 'I'm Deeply Disturbed'

An American journalist living in Tel Aviv revealed the destruction left behind after an Iranian missile struck her home as conflict between Israel and Iran continues. Shanna Fuld moved to Israel from New York in 2018 to found Israel Daily News, an independent outlet covering news across the country. On Friday, the journalist shared video of the debris left behind after her home, where she also runs the news outlet from, was destroyed by an Iranian missile. In a video shared to Instagram , Fuld walks across uneven debris covering her floor. Chunks of her ceiling can be seen missing and the windows are missing glass. She said her bedroom door and wall were also "blown off" in the attack. "It's devastating to see it like this," she said. "My living room is in tatters, it's in crisis. My kitchen doesn't exist." Fuld described seeing the destruction as "deeply painful." "I feel deeply disturbed. I feel frustrated. I feel angry," she continued. "It takes a lot to build a home, so when it comes crashing down all in two minutes it's really challenging." Despite the devastation, Fuld said she does not regret moving to Israel. She said she plans to continue living in Tel Aviv and vowed to rebuild. Fuld's home was one of several buildings subjected to missile strikes as war between Israel and Iran rages on. The conflict began June 13 when Israel targeted Iranian military and nuclear sites. In turn, Iran fired hundreds of missiles and drones at the country, the Associated Press reported. A week into the fighting, more than 600 Iranians and more than 20 Israelis are believed to have been killed. More than 2,000 people have been wounded in Iran while hundreds have been injured in Israel. As officials seek to put a diplomatic end to the conflict, President Donald Trump announced he would allow for two weeks for the countries to agree to a ceasefire before deciding whether the U.S. will aid Israel's fight. Originally published on Latin Times

Jamie Gull's Perspective on Why Deep Tech Is Where the Next Wave of Innovation Lies
Jamie Gull's Perspective on Why Deep Tech Is Where the Next Wave of Innovation Lies

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Jamie Gull's Perspective on Why Deep Tech Is Where the Next Wave of Innovation Lies

The world of venture capital is undergoing a structural realignment, one that rewards depth over speed, hardware over code, and defensible engineering over flashy repetition. At the center of this shift stands Jamie Gull, founder of Wave Function Ventures, a fund dedicated to pre-seed and seed investments in deep tech sectors like aerospace, energy, and robotics. With an experience that spans building reentry hardware at a renowned aerospace manufacturer, designing aircraft for an American aerospace company, and founding deep tech startups himself, Gull brings an insider's clarity to a rapidly evolving investment landscape. "Deep tech was long seen as too risky, too expensive, and too slow," Gull explains. "But the data and outcomes over the past decade tell a different story." Indeed, many early-stage investors have historically favored software startups for their low upfront capital needs and quick time to market. But Gull argues that the advantage is evaporating. "Back in the early 2000s, you could spend a few million, build a team of engineers, and get to market quickly," he says. "Now, IPO timelines for software have stretched to seven to 10 years. Software companies are spending huge amounts on customer acquisition and defending turf from competitors who can replicate products overnight, especially in the AI era." The old assumption that software scales cheaply and defensibly is proving false. "Your moat in software today is often just capital," he says. "In deep tech, it's the opposite. The upfront costs are higher, sure, but once you have built it, it is extremely hard to replicate." Gull's own investment track record underscores this conviction. His fund, Wave Function Ventures, has deployed capital into companies building humanoid robots for heavy industry, airships for transoceanic cargo, and advanced nuclear reactors. Many of these deals were oversubscribed, and Gull attributes his access to his founder-engineer background. "Founders want someone on the cap table who understands what it takes to build and scale real technology," he says. "That's where I come in." But Wave Function is not investing indiscriminately. Gull is openly cautious about sectors like space. He looks for niche, underexplored opportunities in space, not pie-in-the-sky ideas, and not overhyped data plays. His skepticism is not negativity; it's strategy. "You have to thread the needle between too speculative and too saturated," he explains. This nuanced view is shaped not just by sector analysis but also by career experience. After five years at a renowned aerospace manufacturer, where he worked on the aft thermal shield for the Falcon 9, a key part of the rocket's reusability, Gull co-founded a satellite antenna company and later, a startup focused on electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. He says, "I learned how to raise capital, win defense contracts, and build complex hardware at speed." It also gave him empathy for the founders. "Early-stage deep tech founders often face challenges that software peers don't understand, technical risk, regulatory hurdles, and long timelines. But they are also building something truly defensible. Something that matters," Gull shares. Part of what makes now the ideal moment to lean into deep tech is a confluence of positive forces. First, the talent pipeline. "Industry giants created a flywheel. They inspired a generation of engineers to build ambitious hardware," Gull says. "There are now enough experienced founders, and they are pulling in younger talent who want to do more than push pixels." Second, support from governing bodies has meaningfully improved. "Traditional programs used to be inefficient. Now, early-stage companies can get millions in non-dilutive funding early and scale to tens of millions in contracts without becoming a program of record. That's game-changing," Gull states. All of this means the traditional arguments against deep tech, capital intensity, long timelines, and uncertain exits are no longer persuasive. In fact, they're outdated. "Some of the most successful deep tech companies are taking lower capital at higher valuations in later rounds. It flips the old narrative on its head," Gull says. The opportunity is clear. "If you want to be a part of generational companies, not just another SaaS dashboard, deep tech is where you need to be looking," he says. "There's still pricing arbitrage in the early days because not enough people believe in this yet." Wave Function Ventures is already proving the thesis. With six investments completed that are showing strong momentum, Wave Function is off to a strong start. "But it's not just about the returns," Gull says. "It's about backing people who are building the future, real things with real impact." In a world flooded with momentary apps and algorithmic churn, backing deep tech means investing in the infrastructure of tomorrow. "Find the founders who treat it like a life mission," Gull says.

Iran's Nuclear Programme: From Its Origins To Today's Dispute
Iran's Nuclear Programme: From Its Origins To Today's Dispute

Int'l Business Times

time2 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Iran's Nuclear Programme: From Its Origins To Today's Dispute

A week ago, Israel launched an unprecedented attack against Iran, saying the country was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon, a claim Tehran has always denied. Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the rapid expansion of Iran's nuclear programme, questioning in particular the country's accelerated uranium enrichment. The following is a recap of the main developments regarding Iran's nuclear programme, as European foreign ministers are holding nuclear talks with their Iranian counterpart in Switzerland on Friday. Iran laid the foundation for its nuclear programme in the late 1950s with technical assistance from the United States, when Iran's ruling shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, signed a civilian nuclear cooperation agreement with the US. In 1970, Iran ratified the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), committing it to declare its nuclear material to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). But revelations in the early 2000s about undeclared nuclear sites raised concerns. An 2011 IAEA report, collating "broadly credible" intelligence, said that at least until 2003 Iran "carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device". After suspending enrichment activities, Iran began talks with European and then international powers that would later culminate in a historic deal. On July 14, 2015, Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- plus Germany reached an accord in Vienna. The deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), placed significant restrictions on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief after 12 years of crisis and 21 months of protracted negotiations. But the hard-won deal began to unravel when the US under President Donald Trump walked away from it on May 8, 2018, and reimposed sanctions on Iran. Following the US withdrawal, Iran retaliated by stepping up its nuclear activities as if "a red cape had been waved in front of a bull," said Clement Therme, associate researcher at the Rasanah International Institute for Iranian Studies. According to Therme, Iran "embarked on a strategy of escalation" in a bid to up pressure and obtain help to circumvent sanctions. But Tehran's moves were unsuccessful and came at an "exorbitant economic cost". Iran first began enriching uranium to five percent -- breaching the limit of 3.67 percent imposed by the deal -- before it raised the enrichment levels to 20 and then to 60 percent in 2021, which is a short step from the 90 percent required for use in a weapon. Iran has also increased its stockpiles of enriched uranium, which was set at 202.8 kilogrammes under the deal. Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile is currently believed to be more than 45 times that limit. And Tehran has since exceeded the number of centrifuges -- the machines used to enrich uranium -- it is allowed to have while beginning to produce more material faster by using advanced models at its plants. Efforts to revive the deal have been fruitless so far, with European-led talks on hold since summer 2022. After Trump's return to the White House, talks between Washington and Iran and mediated by Oman resumed in April. While the US president has voiced confidence that Iran would eventually sign a nuclear deal, Tehran has said that Israeli strikes that targeted a slew of military and nuclear sites "dealt a blow" to diplomacy. Faced with Iran's rapidly expanding nuclear programme, the IAEA expressed "serious concern" in its latest quarterly report at the end of May. According to the UN agency, Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon state to enrich uranium to 60 percent. It theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for more than nine bombs. However, the manufacturing and delivering of a nuclear bomb requires many other steps, including mastering both ballistics and the miniaturisation of the nuclear charge. The IAEA has said it currently has "no indication" of the existence of a "systematic programme" in Iran to produce a nuclear weapon. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to a Senate committee in March that Iran was not actively building a nuclear bomb. Iran has always denied having such ambitions, regularly referring to a long-standing fatwa, or religious edict, by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei prohibiting atomic weapons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store