Stan Grant launches an explosive attack on the ABC
Stan Grant has revealed his deep 'sadness' over how the ABC failed in its 'duty of care' to him when he and his family were the target of relentless racist abuse and death threats.
The veteran broadcaster and journalist also shared his thoughts on the failure of the Voice referendum, the future of treaties in Australia and the recent boing of the Welcome to Country ceremony at the Melbourne ANZAC Day dawn service in a wide-ranging and nuanced interview with TVNZ's Jack Tame.
Grant, 61, quit his role as host of the ABC's Q+A in May 2023 after being subjected to 'relentless racial filth'.
In a parting shot, he accused the ABC of 'institutional failure' over how he was treated when he was being bombarded with abuse during the Voice referendum.
'I became a target, my family became a target and the level of abuse just grew louder and louder and louder,' he said.
'Being misrepresented, hateful comments made to me, my wife, my children, my parents. And death threats against us. And a person arrested and charged.
'And throughout it all, I have to say with some sadness, a failure on the part of my employer to handle that and to be able to show proper duty of care to someone in my position who was exposed in ways that I couldn't control.'
Grant said his decision to quit was to protect his family and his own sanity.
But he insisted he held no one at the ABC personally responsible.
'I didn't feel protected and supported as I should have done with my employer. I don't necessarily blame them,' he added.
'I think they were swimming in waters that were far too deep for them.'
After leaving the ABC, Grant said he retreated into Yindyamarra, an Aboriginal philosophy encompassing respect and sitting in silence as a way of trying to understand others and the world around you.
The period of deep contemplation allowed him to change how he viewed the failure of the Voice referendum.
'There was something existential about this vote for us as Aboriginal people,' he said.
'It wasn't just a constitutional amendment, it felt like a vote on us. Inevitably, it does.
'We live in a country where we are three percent of the population. We are the most disadvantaged people, we are the most impoverished, we are the most imprisoned.
'We come out of very hard history. And that's almost unknowable to many Australians because Australia is a postcard, and it's beautiful, and it's rich and it's successful, and it's multicultural and it's peaceful. And they're phenomenal achievements.'
He said he now saw the Voice as a a 'political failure, rather than a moral failure'.
Grant also praised New Zealand for its approach to reconciliation with the Maori people.
'It's interesting being in New Zealand and the ease people move in out of the shared space.
'You know that you are in a place that is founded on something that is very vertical, very deep and very shared - contested, yes and not evenly distributed - and I think the treaty goes a long way to that,' he said.
He was referencing the Treaty of Waitangi, the foundational document in New Zealand's history which established a relationship between the Maori and the British Crown.
'Australia doesn't have that. We don't have treaties. We don't have a constitutional recognition,' Grant said.
'There is still the overhang of Terra Nullius (meaning 'nobody's land' in Latin) that it was claimed because we simply weren't there in a legal sense. They are existential wounds that we have no dealt with.'
Grant said that he was faced with a choice between having to 'imagine the Australia that I want or live in the Australia that I have'.
'To imagine a treaty, the likes of which you have here (in New Zealand), in the Australian context is just not possible. We are not made that way.'
'I navigate this now as more of a question of The Voice being a political failure rather than a moral failure.'
Grant was also asked about the ugly scenes during the ANZAC Day dawn service in Melbourne where the air of reverence was broken during Bunurong elder Mark Brown's Welcome to Country, when loud heckles and boos threatened to drown him out.
'The wonderful thing about that is that the people who applauded the welcome and showed respect, far outweighed the small number of neo-Nazis, which is what they are, who had booed that Welcome,' Grant said.
He said his immediate, gut reaction was to think 'Australia hates us' but his considered response allowed him to realise those who opposed the booing far outweighed the minority who were doing it.
But he criticised Peter Dutton for trying to score political points by seizing on the national discussion to say he thought Welcome to Country ceremonies were sometimes 'overdone'.
He accused the former Opposition Leader of a 'moral failure'.
To take that and land that in the midst of a culture war where once again Aboriginal people were a political football and it backfired.'
He added: 'The conservative side of politics sought to inflict a moral injury out of what was a very hateful act from a very small number of people.'
Grant went further, claiming that opposition and criticism of Welcome to Country ceremonies was actually a 'failure of Conservatism'.
'What deeper conservative tradition could there be than a Welcome to Country that is thousands of years old? That is joined with an ANZAC service that is a solemn acknowledgment of sacrifice for the greater good,' he said.
'And to put those two beautiful traditions together creates a sacred space that we can all share in and any decent conservatism would seek to preserve that as a common good.'
Grant also turned his sights on the media in general, which he claims is responsible for 'generating conflict and polarising debate'.
'I really had to confront what I was doing and what I saw, I thought, in the complicity of media in the conflicts of our age,' he said of his decision to quit the public broadcaster.
'I started to see that the media in many ways was the poison in the bloodstream of our society.'
Since he quit the ABC two years ago, Grant has written a book about the failure of the Voice called Murriyang: Song of Time and has served as the Vice Chancellor's Chair of Australian-Indigenous Belonging at Charles Sturt University.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Government needs to call in this disastrous plan for O2 site
It was also clear to me that some members of the committee could not read the drawings provided. Questions asked included if there would be a separation between the public and student entrances? Where would the bins be emptied? Was it stone and what colour was it? Is that arches at the front on Sauchiehall Street? (To which the DRS leader answered yes, when it is not.) Another stated that despite what was proposed not being the most "edifying" design he would support the application. However, the most bizarre was asking for confirmation that the now-demolished ABC portico and other artifacts would be included within the interior of the proposed food hall. In contrast, Councillor Eva Bolander raised the point that 'dereliction of duty' led to the committee being "bounced" into approving the demolition of the ABC and they were now being "bounced" into approving the student accommodation. Accordingly, Cllr Bolander rightly voted against the plans. It is clear that this approval has to be referred to the First Minister and that there should be a proper hearing to give Historic Environment Scotland, The Glasgow School of Art, and particularly the residents of Garnethill, among the many of the 130 who objected, an opportunity to respond to a development which in the short term will be damaging for them and in the long term a disaster for the School of Art and the city. Professor Alan Dunlop FRIAS, Aberfoyle. Read more letters Scots are not so grumpy We read that a report based on annual life satisfaction data found that 13 per cent of Scots live below a "Happiness Poverty Line" ("Scots 'happier than those in England and Wales but still dissatisfied with life'", The Herald, June 19). We are also advised from that report that more than one in 10 Scots are dissatisfied with life in the UK, but people are happier there than those in England and Wales with regard to staying in the UK. I suspect that there will be many who find that comparison with England and Wales difficult to take on board, particularly those who are of the same mind once expressed by PG Wodehouse, writer and humorist : "It is never difficult to distinguish between a Scotsman with a grievance and a ray of sunshine". Ian W Thomson, Lenzie. Why are folk so lazy? Some years ago my mother's neighbour phoned me to say she was concerned for her safety as my mother, who was in her mid-nineties, was up on a pair of steps cutting her hedge. I was by that time helping her a bit and had obviously not got there quick enough. Recently I passed her house and she would be turning in her grave to see the once-neat hedge sadly left to grow too high and too wide and overhanging and obstructing the pavement. Around our city hedges and trees are often unkempt and a disgrace. Surely some legislation should be passed to ensure owners, landlords and tenants are obliged to keep hedges next to pavements neat and tidy. We need to care more for our dear green city. Where is our pride and respect? Jim Barbour, Glasgow. Literary prophets Now in my ninth decade I decided to re-read the short stories written by Ray Bradbury. When I was in my teens these were plausible fantasies about science fiction and other possibilities. What still gets to me is the way that Bradbury painted with words, making my mind see scenes that were amazing and distressing. I am only a short way into a collection by Bantam Books named "Classic Stories Volume 1" and realise that this writer was a prophet in the truest sense of the word. These stories are from his original collection, The Golden Apples of the Sun, and while they were enjoyable to read as a teenager the two that so far stand out are "I See You Never" about a Mexican immigrant being deported from the USA back to Mexico. This was written in 1947. The other, from 1953, is "The Murderer" and concerns the imposition of mass and social media on society. We are there right now. My other go-to author is Issac Asimov, who predicted hand-held computers, flat-screen televisions and AI among lots of other things that we now have and take for granted. Anyone interested in considering what might happen next should read these authors if they haven't already done so and just enjoy great writing at the very least that stretches the imagination. Ian Gray, Croftamie. Keith Lasley, St Mirren's COO (Image: SNS) A very Scottish coo I can face the day with a smile, imagining St Mirren Football Club's Chief Operating Officer ("Scottish football clubs have to think smarter", Agenda, The Herald, June 20) being asked at party what he does for a living. " I'm a COO". "Upon a hill I saw a coo, if it wis there, it's no there noo" (source uncertain). David Miller, Milngavie.
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Gone Girl' kidnap hoaxer Sherri Papini now claims she really WAS abducted by ex & didn't tell cops truth for key reason
SHERRI Papini went for her usual morning jog after dropping the kids at school, but when her husband came home from work to find that she still wasn't home, panic set in. Keith Papini quickly took measures to find the 34-year-old mum of two, tracing her phone to her last location and driving straight there, but his panic soon turned to horror when he found her phone lying on the side of the road. 7 Sherri Papini was kidnapped while ona run in 2016 7 Local residents and church groups came out in their hundreds to bring her home Credit: Social Media - Refer to Source 7 Her husband begged for the mum to come home and apologised for not being able to find her Credit: AP It was November 2nd, 2016, in California, and Keith, who was the prime suspect in her disappearance at the time for police, was doing the media rounds begging for his wife's return to him and their two children. 'If she is listening, I want to say, 'We are trying. We are trying the best we can, and I am sorry I'm not there,' he said in a tearful interview. 'I'm doing everything I can, and I love you.' News of the disappearance dominated the news across the world, as hundreds of local residents took time out of their lives to find the mum and bring her home. Three weeks later, on Thanksgiving, Sherri was miraculously discovered 150 miles away from her home running across a church car park with a chain around her waist. Her hands were zip-tied together, her body was bruised and burned, her nose was broken, and she had been branded with a hot iron. Sherri spent weeks with police going over the details of her kidnapping, claiming two Hispanic women had taken her and put her in a small dark room, beating her and starving her until the abductors had an argument and one decided to release Sherri. Her memory was foggy, and the trauma she endured seemed severe, as she recounted the incident to police, her husband stood by her every step of the way. Sherri claimed to have overheard a conversation about a 'buyer', implying the two women intended to sell her into sex trafficking. It seemed like a miracle that Sherri was let go, considering the extent of the abuse she endured, and law enforcement was quick to hunt for the perpetrators as they feared it was part of a larger pattern of human trafficking. 7 Sherri was eventually found in a car park with a broken nose and letters branded into her skin Credit: Facebook Sherri Papini admits she's 'embarrassed' she staged kidnapping during tearful police interrogation 7 She spend two years telling the police of her abduction, but it all turned out to be a lie Credit: ABC Web of lies But after years of dead ends, the two women were never caught, in fact, they never even existed. Now, 42, Sherri has been dubbed the real life 'Gone Girl' after faking her own kidnapping to run away with her ex-partner. In 2020 police found DNA on her clothes that matched with her ex James Reyes. She knew what she was doing in that moment. And to this day, I remember that time, and it hurts. I'll forever remember that. Keith Papini When they tracked him down, he was quick to reveal that Sherri had asked him to pick her up at a staged abduction site, then to take her back to his home in Costa Mesa, hundreds of miles down the coast. She'd even asked him to help her injure herself to bolster her kidnapping claims by branding her and holding a hockey stick up so she could run into it and break her nose. Sherri's 'Gone Girl' Timeline 2 November 2016: Sherri Papini was reported missing after failing to return from a jog near her home in Mountain Gate, California. She also missed picking up her children from daycare. Sherri Papini was reported missing after failing to return from a jog near her home in Mountain Gate, California. She also missed picking up her children from daycare. 24 November 2016 (Thanksgiving Day): Papini was found around 146 miles away in Yolo County, near Woodland, California. She was discovered with injuries and restraints, claiming she had been abducted by two Hispanic women. Papini was found around 146 miles away in Yolo County, near Woodland, California. She was discovered with injuries and restraints, claiming she had been abducted by two Hispanic women. August 2020: Papini was interviewed by a federal agent and a Shasta County Sheriff's detective, where she continued to maintain her story of being kidnapped by two Hispanic women. Papini was interviewed by a federal agent and a Shasta County Sheriff's detective, where she continued to maintain her story of being kidnapped by two Hispanic women. 3 March 2022: Sherri Papini was arrested on charges of making false statements to federal law enforcement and mail fraud. Authorities revealed she had been staying with a former boyfriend in Costa Mesa, California, and had inflicted injuries on herself. Sherri Papini was arrested on charges of making false statements to federal law enforcement and mail fraud. Authorities revealed she had been staying with a former boyfriend in Costa Mesa, California, and had inflicted injuries on herself. April 2022: Papini signed a plea agreement. Papini signed a plea agreement. 19 September 2022: Sherri Papini was sentenced to 18 months in prison, followed by 36 months of supervised release. She was also ordered to pay $309,902 in restitution. Sherri Papini was sentenced to 18 months in prison, followed by 36 months of supervised release. She was also ordered to pay $309,902 in restitution. 8 November 2022: Papini reported to federal prison at the Victorville Federal Correctional Complex in Adelanto, California, to begin serving her 18-month sentence. James was never tried for a connection to the crime and three weeks after he 'kidnapped' Sherri, she wanted to return home as she missed her kids. Before dropping her off, Sherri asked him to brand her with the word 'EXODUS' using a wood burning tool. Looking back, Keith reveals the heartbreak he felt when his wife Sherri came home, telling him, 'I have to live with the fact that you never found me.' 'I remember I was pleading with her,' Keith says now. 'Like, 'I did everything I could, I'm so sorry you had to go through that.'' 'She knew what she was doing in that moment. And to this day, I remember that time, and it hurts. I'll forever remember that.' Sherri was ultimately charged with 34 counts of mail fraud and one count of making false statements in 2022, and spent ten months in jail. Her husband, Keith, divorced her soon after she was sentenced and has custody of the children. 7 This is the moment police told Sherri they knew she had lied about the entire ordeal Credit: The Mega Agency Bold new claims Now, Sherri has claimed all is not as it seems in a new Investigation Discovery's docuseries, Sherri Papini: Caught in the Lie. "Haven't you ever lied? And then, has the lie been blown up?" Sherri said in the trailer. "I went missing in 2016, was gone for 22 days. I was tortured; I was branded; I was chained to a wall. All that is true. I did keep some secrets from you, though." Now, the mum-of-two claims she was in fact kidnapped by her lover James Reyes but made up the two Hispanic women as she was terrified about what her husband would do if he found out about the affair. "I was concealing an affair from my husband, who (was) threatening to take everything from me if he found out that I was having any involvement with another man," she said. Now she claims she went to meet James to break things off, but alleges he soon turned violent. "I remember waking up briefly in the back of the vehicle and not being able to even keep my eyes open," she said. She claims the next thing she knew it was dark and she was being carried out of the car into a house. "I just remember thinking, 'This is not where I'm supposed to be. I'm supposed to be picking my kids up from day care. I am not supposed to be here,'" she adds. "The injuries that occurred… the bites on my thigh, the footprint on my back, the brand, the melting of my skin — I am telling you there was no consent." Sherri alleges that James then had her chained up to a pole inside his home so she could not escape. 'I wanted to leave,' Sherri claimed. 'So I tried to pull one of the boards off the window and James came in and hit me in the face. And that's the first bruise that I got ... And after being knocked out and waking up, that's when the chain was around my waist, secured with a padlock attached to a cable that was attached to a pole in the closet.' Every injury, every incident, the description of the room down to every last bit of fragment, was not a lie. Sherri Papini Just before she 'escaped,' Sherri says she had a conversation with James, who agreed to let her go on the condition she lied about what really happened and blamed two Hispanic women for the abduction. Her claims continued: 'James had let me off the chain. "I said, my husband's going to find me. He's never going to stop looking for you ... You need to let me go. He was like, 'Well, there's too much has happened.' "So it all came down to me. It all came down to my cover-up, and that's [when] I agreed to ... make up that someone else did it.' "I lied about James' identity. I lied about the man who abducted me to keep him a secret," she said in the docuseries. James denies these claims. "It wasn't the right choice and I know that... I wish I would've told the truth from the day I was in the hospital — that it was James," she continued. 7 Now, she shares her side of the story and says it's not all as it seems Credit: YouTube/investigationdiscovery "I wasn't thinking about my neighbor that was searching for me. I wasn't thinking about the churches that were lighting candlelit vigils," she continued. "I was thinking about myself." "Every injury, every incident, the description of the room down to every last bit of fragment, was not a lie," she adds. Mother knows best? Keith, who has full custody of the children they share, was accused by Sherri throughout the show of being abusive; he heavily denies these claims. And it seems even Sherri's own mum doesn't believe her new story. Speaking to the filmmakers, Loretta Graeff said: "No, it wasn't a kidnapping." "My daughter was very, very unhappy in her marriage. She wanted some kind of happiness. "When he showed up and Sherri went with him, it wasn't a kidnapping, it was more 'I want to have a little bit of happiness in my life because it's been very, very hard.'" "She needed to get away from him and she didn't abandon her children," Graeff told People. Where is Sherri now? Sherri was released from prison in August 2023 and transferred to a residential reentry facility in Sacramento County, California. She left the home that October — eight months early — and will remain on supervised release until late 2026.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
NSW upper house president seeks advice from Bret Walker over possible political staffer arrests
The president of the New South Wales upper house has sought advice from high-profile barrister Bret Walker SC over whether he can seek arrest warrants for government staffers who failed to give evidence to an inquiry examining the Sydney caravan 'fake terrorism plot', Guardian Australia understands. Ben Franklin is expected to reveal on Tuesday whether he intends to seek arrest warrants from the NSW supreme court for five staffers who were summoned to appear before the inquiry on Friday, but did not attend. Three are from the office of the premier, Chris Minns, and two work for the police minister, Yasmin Catley. According to sources with knowledge of the situation, Franklin has sought advice from leading senior counsel Walker, who represented George Pell in his appeal to the high court and former attorney general Christian Porter in his defamation case against the ABC. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Under the Parliamentary Evidence Act, if the president is satisfied that the five staffers failed to appear without just cause or reasonable excuse, the matter will be referred to a judge of the supreme court. If the judge agrees, then warrants would be issued, the staffers arrested and brought before the committee to give evidence. The standoff between the premier's office and an upper house inquiry into Minns' handling of the Dural caravan incident has inflamed simmering tensions between the premier and the upper house. There is a long-standing precedent that members of the legislative assembly cannot be compelled to appear before the upper house and vice versa, but the question of whether staff from a minister's office can be compelled is heavily contested. 'They are staff employed by the executive. If the legislative council can't scrutinise employees of executive government, of a minister's office, we might as well go to the beach,' independent upper house MP, Mark Latham, said. Constitutional law expert Prof Anne Twomey, from Sydney University, suggested that the right to refuse to appear may also extend to ministerial staff. Twomey pointed to the principle that members can't be compelled by the other house and the well-established principle of ministerial responsibility, with questions in parliament providing an avenue for other MPs to seek information of ministers. The inquiry – launched with the support of the Coalition, the Greens and crossbench MLCs – is examining the handling of information about the caravan plot amid concerns whether parliament was 'misled' before controversial laws aimed at curbing antisemitism were rushed through parliament. In January, after it was announced that the caravan had been found in Dural laden with explosives, Minns said it had the potential to be a 'mass casualty event'. But in March, the Australian federal police revealed they believed it was a 'con job' by organised crime figures seeking to divert police resources and influence prosecutions. The inquiry was told that the briefings on the matter were 'pens down' meetings and no notes were taken. They have since sought to summons staff to determine who knew what and when. More staff from the NSW premier's office are facing summonses and the threat of arrest if they do not agree to appear at a second upper house inquiry, intensifying the standoff between the NSW upper house and the Minns government. A second committee is currently considering responses to requests that premier's staff appear to answer questions about the $37.6m Local Small Community Allocations program. Minns' chief of staff, James Cullen, has agreed to appear, but others more intimately involved with the grants program are believed to have raised concerns about appearing. The little-known grants program has come under scrutiny. Although it gave equal allocations of $400,000 to each of the 93 NSW electorates, its detractors allege Labor candidates were asked to nominate how it would be spent, effectively turning it into a pork barrelling exercise to benefit Labor. The upper house has already expressed its anger about the slow pace of the government in producing documents about this program to the upper house. It took the rare step in late May of censuring the leader of the government in the upper house, Penny Sharpe, over the tardy production of documents.
