Australia politics live: Chalmers prepares to deliver budget as economist says it won't ‘shift the dial' on interest rates
Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Good morning and welcome to our live politics blog, and happy budget day! I'm Martin Farrer with the top overnight stories and then it'll be Emily Wind with the main action.
Jim Chalmers will deliver his budget today with the message that although the debt burden has continued to grow and 'there's more to do', Labor are on the right track with lower unemployment and interest rates buoying the country's economic fortunes. We have the initial reaction from Westpac's chief economist coming up, plus loads more reaction as the news day kicks off.
We have an exclusive story this morning on how Liberal backbenchers are urging the Coalition not to cut foreign aid to pay for a potential $15bn increase in defence spending and other big-ticket election promises.
Back to Labor, and the party says it is planning to establish a federal environment protection agency if it wins the election, just weeks after the 2022 election promise was controversially shelved in what appeared to be a backing down in face of a political and industry backlash in Western Australia. The renewal of the idea looks calculated to help Labor MPs facing a strong challenge from the Greens at the upcoming federal election.
The public commitment will help placate Labor MPs anxious about the party's green credentials after the government pushed ahead with laws to protect Tasmania's salmon industry from legal challenge over its impact on the endangered Maugean skate. The bill is expected to go before parliament as early as today. Share
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
17 hours ago
- NBC News
In a scathing dissent, Justice Jackson says the Supreme Court gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests'
WASHINGTON — Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized her colleagues on Friday in a scathing dissent on a case involving vehicle emissions regulations. In her dissenting opinion, she argued that the court's opinion gives the impression it favors 'moneyed interests' in the way they decide which cases to hear and how they rule in them. The court had ruled 7-2 in favor of fuel producers seeking to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency's approval of California clean vehicle emissions regulations. She also said she was concerned that the ruling could have "a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests." With the Trump administration reversing course on many of Biden's environmental policies, including on California's electric vehicle mandates, the case is likely moot, or soon to be, Jackson wrote, making her wonder why the court felt the need to decide it. "This case gives fodder to the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this court than ordinary citizens," Jackson wrote. The case said that the producers had legal standing to bring their claims, resting on a theory "that the court has refused to apply in cases brought by less powerful plaintiffs," she added. The decision has little practical importance now, but in future, "will no doubt aid future attempts by the fuel industry to attack the Clean Air Act," she said. "Also, I worry that the fuel industry's gain comes at a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests," she added. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has often faced claims that it is particularly receptive to arguments made by big business. The conservative justices have been especially skeptical of broad government regulations and they have consistently made it harder for consumers and workers to bring class action lawsuits. Last year, the court overturned a 40-year precedent much loathed by business interests that empowered federal agencies in the regulatory process. Some legal experts have pushed back, saying such allegations are misleading. Jackson concluded her dissent by noting the court's "simultaneous aversion to hearing cases involving the potential vindication of less powerful litigants — workers, criminal defendants, and the condemned, among others." Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who authored the majority opinion, responded to her claims, saying that a review of standing cases "disproves that suggestion." He mentioned several recent rulings in which liberal justices were in the majority, including one last year finding that anti-abortion doctors who challenged the abortion pill mifepristone did not have standing to sue. The bottom line, he added, is that the government "may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected bystanders." The underlying case stems from the EPA's authority to issue national vehicle emissions standards under the federal Clean Air Act. In recognition of California's historic role in regulating emissions, the law allows the EPA to give the state a waiver from the nationwide standards so that it can adopt its own. The case focused on a request made by California in 2012 that EPA approve new regulations, not the state's 2024 plan to eliminate gasoline-powered cars by 2035 for which it also sought a waiver.
Powys County Times
18 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Powys MPs support assisted dying bill as vote passes
Mid Wales MPs voted in favour of the bill to legalise assisted dying in England and Wales as the law cleared its initial stages in the House of Commons. As the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill reached its final stage in Parliament on June 20, the bill passed through the House of Commons by a narrow margin of 23 votes, ending with 314 votes in favour and 291 against. Among the MPs who voted in favour of the legislation were Mid Wales representatives, David Chadwick of the Liberal Democrats who is MP for Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe, and Steve Witherden of Labour, MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr. Following the vote, Mr Chadwick said: 'After carefully considering the arguments on both sides, I voted in favour of the Assisted Dying Bill because I believe people with terminal illnesses deserve the right to die with dignity and control and that the legislation has the necessary safeguards to do this in a safe way. 'This was not a decision I came to lightly, and I'd like to thank all the constituents who contacted me to let me know their views on the issue, whatever side of the debate you were on. 'I have heard too many stories of families forced to watch loved ones suffer unnecessarily, and as a Liberal and someone driven by compassion, I feel the law should allow for someone to make a clear, informed, and voluntary choice at the end of their life in a dignified and humane manner. 'Throughout this process, I have been struck by the thoughtful and respectful debate on both sides, driven by compassion and deep personal conviction, and while people may disagree, we have done so and continue to do so civilly and with empathy.' Mr Witherden had already expressed support for the bill before the final vote, saying in November 2024: 'At a pre-election hustings, I made it clear that I supported changes to the law to legalise assisted dying, provided I was satisfied that safeguards against any abuse would be enshrined in the new law. 'I am aware of the opposition to the legislation and understand fears, especially from some disabled people, those with mental health conditions and groups suffering from specific diseases. "However, I believe the proposed legislation enshrines sufficient protections for such groups, ensuring their voices will not be marginalised.'
Metro
19 hours ago
- Metro
Hundreds of jobs at risk with 33 River Island shops closing next year
River Island is closing 33 of its shops next year – but another 71 branches are also at risk. The clothing brand is undergoing a major restructure to try to save the business after suffering heavy financial losses. It made a £33.2million loss in 2023 after sales dropped by 19%, according to River Island's most recent set of accounts. Hundreds of jobs are at risk as it plans to close 33 of its 230 shops by January 2026. But there are another 71 branches at risk if the brand is unable to renegotiate rents with its landlords. River Island has not yet confirmed which of its shops will close and which will be at risk during renegotiations. The brand says it will consult with employees at all affected branches, and attempt to redeploy as many people as possible elsewhere in the business, to reduce the number of redundancies. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ben Lewis, CEO of River Island said: 'River Island is a much-loved retailer, with a decades-long history on the British high street. 'However the well-documented migration of shoppers from the high street to online has left the business with a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs. 'The sharp rise in the cost of doing business over the last few years has only added to the financial burden. 'We have a clear strategy to transform the business to ensure its long-term viability. 'Recent improvements in our fashion offer and in-store shopping experience are already showing very positive results, but it is only with a restructuring plan that we will be able to see this strategy through and secure River Island's future as a profitable retail business. More Trending 'We regret any job losses as a result of store closures, and we will try to keep these to a minimum.' River Island was founded in 1948, and originally operated under the Lewis and Chelsea Girl brands before being renamed in the 1980s. It has brought in advisers from PwC to oversee the restructure, which will be voted on by those who are owed money by the retailer in August. View More » The deal will lead to fresh funding being invested into the business to help it turn its fortunes around. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Linen trousers are a summer essential and here are the best designs to live in MORE: The best-selling butter yellow midi dress from Nobody's Child is finally back in stock MORE: Abbott Lyon's top-rated Fidget Ring is the chic accessory to soothe anxiety Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
