MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales

MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales.
The amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, abolishing the prosecution of women for terminating their pregnancy at any stage, passed by 379 votes to 137.
It represents the biggest shake-up in reproductive rights for almost 60 years.
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who tabled the so-called "New Clause One" (NC1), said it would ensure women do not face investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment in relation to any pregnancies.
She said the current "Victorian" laws had been used against vulnerable women, citing cases such as Nicola Packer, who was prosecuted on suspicion of having an illegal abortion. She was found not guilty in May.
"Nicola's story is deplorable, but there are many others," Ms Antoniazzi said.
Abortion in England and Wales is currently a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider for up to 24 weeks after conception. The procedure is allowed after this time in very limited circumstances.
It is also legal to take prescribed related medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant.
Ms Antoniazzi said NC1 was "a narrow, targeted measure" that would not change how abortion services were provided or the rules under the 1967 Abortion Act.
She said: "The 24 [week] limit remains. Abortions still require the approval of signatures of two doctors, and women would still have to meet the grounds laid out in the Act."
The MP said that meant healthcare professionals "acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now."
She added: "This piece of legislation will only take women out of the criminal justice system because they are vulnerable and they need our help.
"As I have said before, and I will say it again, just what public interest is this serving? This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end."
16:48
The change will not come into effect immediately as the Crime and Policing Bill is still making its way through Parliament.
A separate amendment, put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy, went further with a measure to "lock in" the right of a person to have an abortion while protecting those who help them.
However, her amendment was not voted on because Ms Antoniazzi's passed, as expected.
Conservative MP Sir Edward Leigh, speaking against both amendments, described them as "not pro-woman" and argued they "would introduce sex-selective abortion".
How did MPs vote?
MPs were given a free vote on the amendment, as is typically the case with so-called matters of conscience.
A breakdown of the vote showed it was passed overwhelmingly by Labour and Lib Dem MPs.
Just eight Conservative MPs voted in favour, while all Reform UK MPs opposed the amendment, with the exception of the party's leader Nigel Farage, who abstained.
Sir Keir Starmer was not present for the vote as he is currently in Canada for the G7 summit, but said earlier that his "longstanding in-principle position is that women have the right to a safe and legal abortion".
The issue of women investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions has been in the spotlight due to several recent high-profile cases.
Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine at home when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks.
In the Commons, Ms Antoniazzi cited another case of a young mother who was jailed for two years after she was forced to take illegal abortion medication by her abusive partner. He was never investigated.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

38 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Starmer refuses to say UK would support US if it is attacked

Sir Keir Starmer has refused to say whether the UK would offer military support to the US if it was attacked, amid questions over the legal advice given. Britain was not involved in the US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities that saw bunker-buster bombs dropped on the Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow nuclear facilities. The US made no request to use the UK military in the attack, either through RAF support from Typhoon fighter jets at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, or by using the Diego Garcia military base as a staging base for the bombing. It comes after leaked advice from the Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, last week warned that the UK should not join direct strikes by Israel against Iran as it might breach international law. Responding to the overnight attacks by the US, Sir Keir avoided any comment on their legality but said Iran's nuclear programme was a 'grave threat', which the US military action would 'alleviate'. Asked directly by Sky News whether he would offer military support if needed, the Prime Minister said there was a risk of escalation not only within the region but also beyond it. 'We have been moving assets to the region to make sure that we're in a position to protect our own interests, our personnel and our assets, and of course those of our allies,' he said. Asked whether the UK would support the US if it was attacked by Iran as allowed by article five under Nato's principle of collective defence, Sir Keir said: 'I'm not going to speculate about what may happen, because all of my focus is on de-escalation. 'But I do want to reassure the public that we have taken all necessary measures to protect UK interests, UK personnel, and to work with our allies to protect their interests as well. That's what you would expect.' The United Nations Charter says countries can only launch an attack in self-defence, to defend an ally, or if the UN Security Council passes a resolution authorising military action. The advice was drawn up before the US intervened in the conflict. Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, suggested the situation would be 'clear-cut' on acting in self-defence if UK forces came under attack, but would not comment further on the legal advice. He confirmed that Britain had been told in advance by the US 'shortly' before the strikes on Iran, but Government officials refused to say precisely when. Mr Trump's order to attack, however, came despite Sir Keir's appeals for a diplomatic solution. At the G7 summit in Canada last week, the Prime Minister even suggested the US would not intervene after sitting with Mr Trump at a dinner. Lord Wolfson, the shadow attorney general, said that in his view military action against Iran was lawful under conventions allowing collective self-defence, the right to take 'proportionate' action to avert Iranian attacks on UK bases and personnel, and to prevent Iran realising its 'genocidal intentions' against Israel. He accused Sir Keir of welcoming the end results of the attack but prevaricating over the means. In a post on X, Lord Wolfson wrote: 'The US and the UK are in the same legal position; accordingly, if the UK Govt's position (as reported) is that the UK cannot itself take offensive military action to support Israel, the UK Govt must also consider that the US strike on Iran's nuclear reactors was illegal. 'The UK Govt cannot welcome the ends but prevaricate about the means. So: what is our Govt's stance on the legality of the US military action. I support it. Does Keir Starmer?' In an article for The Telegraph, Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, claimed Sir Keir had been sidelined by his 'peripheral and hesitant' response to the Iran-Israel conflict. 'Ministers talk tough on Iran but have spent the past year straining relations with Israel – our key regional ally. We should be helping shape the international response, not reacting late from the sidelines,' she said. 'Commitment to peace and stability' Lord Ricketts, the former UK national security chief, said he believed the US decided it was better not to ask to launch B-2 bombers from the RAF base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean than to be told no. He told the Guardian: 'Either the Americans worked it out or were privately told please don't ask because it would raise fundamental questions about our taking part.' On Sunday, the Prime Minister held talks with Emmanuel Macron, the French president, and Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, after convening a Cobra meeting. In a joint statement the three leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability for all countries in the region'. They added: 'We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program. We stand ready to contribute to that goal in coordination with all parties. 'We urge Iran not to take any further action that could destabilise the region. 'We will continue our joint diplomatic efforts to defuse tensions and ensure the conflict does not intensify and spread further.' The diplomatic discussions come as Sir Keir faces divisions on his back benches, with Left-wing MPs criticising Mr Trump's intervention as unjustified, illegal and potentially catastrophic. 'These are [illegal] acts with no justification,' said Diane Abbott, while Richard Burgon said: 'This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security.' A third MP said: 'I do not support the entry of one nation state into another, and question the legality of this action, let alone the action itself.' Meanwhile, Britons in Israel have been told to book on the first Foreign Office charter flights to leave the region in the wake of the US bombings of Iran's nuclear facilities. The Foreign Office launched a flight registration form for British nationals in Israel and the Palestinian occupied territories to log their details and interest in the flights. It has opened a booking portal and urged all UK nationals to register their presence now. It said those with greatest need would be prioritised for flights. British nationals, plus non-British immediate family members travelling with them, are eligible.

Sky News

an hour ago

• Sky News

UK and NATO allies agree to boost spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035

The UK and its NATO allies have agreed to increase spending on defence and related areas to 5% of GDP by 2035, two diplomatic sources with knowledge of the deal have told Sky News. Ambassadors of all 32 alliance member states signed off on the new spending pledge ahead of a major summit of leaders, including Donald Trump, this week, they said. The boost - up from a current goal of 2% of GDP - is as much about keeping the US president onside as it is about responding to what is regarded by the allies as a growing threat from Vladimir Putin and the challenge posed by China. The target will be formally rubber stamped when the heads of state and government meet in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday. The ambitious spending goal - secured following a huge amount of persuasion by Mark Rutte, the NATO secretary general - is broken down into 3.5% of GDP spent on pure defence and 1.5% of GDP spence on related areas, which can include infrastructure and cyber security. Spain had been the last to agree. The UK had also been slow to sign up but is understood to have been pushing for the 2035 timeframe, which would mean it is pushed beyond the next parliament. Sir Keir Starmer has said he has an ambition to increase UK defence spending to 3% of GDP from 2.3% by 2034. The new 5% spending goal is the kind of level of defence spending invested by NATO allies during the Cold War.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Former minister with links to Qatar's royal family buys 'Eton of the North' private school

A leading private school once nicknamed the 'Eton of the North' has been bought by a company co-owned by the former deputy prime minister of Qatar. Glenalmond College in Perthshire, where fees are up to £54,375 a year for senior boarders, is now in the hands of 35 Education, a company that styles itself as 'a philanthropic education enterprise'. Fees have been frozen while the school has launched up to 40 awards for subjects such as academic studies, art and design and technology, offering a discount on fees of up to 100 per cent. The new owner is a joint venture between Professor Basak Akdemir, a Turkish academic and businesswoman, and Khalid bin Mohammed al-Attiyah, who served as deputy prime minister and foreign affairs minister and has links to Qatar's royal family. Former pupils of the college, a Presbyterian boarding school founded in 1847 by William Gladstone, include the late actor Robbie Coltrane, golfer Carly Booth, and former Scotland rugby player Rob Wainwright. The move comes as the private sector faces financial turmoil caused by Labour's decision to impose VAT on fees, forcing some closures and leading to fears that state schools will have to accommodate an influx of pupils from fee-paying institutions. Last night Scottish Tory education spokesman Miles Briggs said the news showed the pressures caused by Labour's 'misguided' economic policies that are 'failing to bring in the predicted revenue, costing jobs, letting down pupils and placing extra strain on state schools'. Professor Akdemir, who will 'closely involved' with the school's curriclum, said a generous investment would bring Glenalmond 'up to standard' over the next two to three years - and there are plans to open a chain of Glenalmond Colleges across the world. The Sunday Times reported the takeover has prompted concern from some people close to the school who take issue with Qatar's human rights record towards women and the LGBT community. Falling roll numbers and the financial difficulties common in the private school sector had made the sudden takeover a 'necessary step', insiders claimed. But Lucy Elphinstone, who has been appointed executive principal of the Glenalmond Schools Group, told the Sunday Times: 'Absolutely no parents or staff or anybody has raised any issues whatsoever. 'And there is no association with his excellency, except that he has given incredibly generously and is president of Glenalmond. 'We have on our governing body the primus of the Episcopalian Church and a second bishop, and they have looked into this very carefully and feel there's going to be no influence.' Mr Al-Attiyah has been appointed president of the schools group but will not be involved day-to-day. Ms Elphinstone said that the move might prove to be a model for other fee-paying British schools and she expected more money from the Middle East to be invested in the private system. She said other schools 'would give anything to be in the position we are in', adding: 'I've had other heads phone me to ask if the professor has a brother or sister who might like to invest in my school, and can you introduce me.' A statement from the school said a new board had been appointed as part of a 'change in personnel'. The school's constitution dictates that a descendant of Mr Gladstone and the primus of the Scottish Presbyterian Church must sit on the board. Professor Akdemir said she had been looking for a school to invest in 'for some time' and chose Glenalmond for its history and 'glorious campus'. Ms Elphinstone said: 'The raw material, the canvas of the college, is so wonderful, so glorious, and has such potential. 'But, as with all schools, over the past decade it's been harder to attract students. Pressure has come upon our ability to be able to develop and expand in the way that all schools are wanting to in terms of their facilities and their provision.' Ms Elphinstone, who was headmistress of a school in London where Professor Akdemir sent her daughter, described the takeover's provenance as an 'extraordinary quirk of fate'. She said: 'I didn't realise that her parents felt they owe this great debt of gratitude to my school, and perhaps to me.' Professor Akdemir had spent a year looking for the right school to buy and saw Ms Elphinstone's name on the list of governors of Glenalmond. Ms Elphinstone said: 'It is utterly miraculous. I am a Christian and I do believe this was an act of God ... The staff live on campus and with the pupil numbers going down, they were thinking, 'Is it going to be OK?''