Child Q told she ‘may be arrested' if she did not consent to search, panel hears
The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020 after her school wrongly suspected her of carrying cannabis.
This involved the removal of the 15-year-old's clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard.
Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all Pcs at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl.
On Thursday, TDC Linge, who conducted the strip search alongside Pc Wray, told the misconduct panel in London she informed Child Q she 'might be arrested' when the girl asked what could happen if she refused to be searched, but that there had been 'no threat of arrest'.
'Will you accept you were giving Child Q the option of being strip searched or arrested?' Elliot Gold, for the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), asked.
'There were no options given like that,' the officer replied.
'Do you accept that saying that to a 15-year-old might make them feel frightened?' Mr Gold continued.
'Yes,' TDC Linge responded.
'Do you accept that saying that to a 15-year-old might make them feel under duress?' he asked.
'Potentially,' she responded.
The panel heard that when asked previously what the officer had proposed to do if she found cannabis on Child Q, TDC Linge answered: 'As per legislation, a juvenile found in possession must be arrested and brought to custody'.
TDC Linge previously said Child Q had 'consented' to the search, but admitted under cross-examination on Thursday that this was not accurate.
The officer confirmed she had completed equality training, including on unconscious bias and discriminatory stereotypes, and said she was 'aware' of stereotypes relating to black people.
She said she did not 'see the relevance' of the fact Child Q was being questioned by two white police officers.
Mr Gold asked: 'Would you accept that a stereotype of black people is they may more likely to be stopped and searched?'
'No,' TDC Linge replied.
'Would you accept that a stereotype of black people is they are more likely to be in receipt of use of force by police?' he continued.
'No,' she responded.
The 46-year-old denied she 'did not recognise Child Q as a child' and was, in effect, 'treating her as older than she was'.
The former Pc previously admitted a series of failings in her actions during the incident, including not making a record of the search or considering proportionality, and recognised the search should not have happened, accepting it had caused the child 'harm and distress'.
When asked whether she would have done anything differently had the circumstances been 'exactly the same' but Child Q had been white, TDC Linge replied: 'No.'
TDC Linge said she suspected Child Q was carrying a 'small amount' of cannabis, based on what she could smell and information from teachers.
Pc Szmydynski, who stood outside the room while the search took place, told the panel on Thursday that the school's deputy safeguarding lead and headteacher had repeated the phrase that Child Q was a 'danger to herself and others'.
The panel heard Pc Szmydynski requested attendance of another female to 'assist us with searching if need be', before speaking to Child Q to assess whether there were grounds for a search.
Child Q told him she smelled of cannabis as she had been with someone earlier that day who had smoked the drug which, along with information from teachers, formed grounds for the search, the officer said.
He denied that a 'strip search' was discussed in front of him or between himself, the teachers and Pc Linge.
The officer, who joined the Met Police in 2014, described the child as 'very cultured and very polite', adding that she was not rude 'at any point' during their interaction.
The panel heard the child informed the officers who searched her that she was menstruating, but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed.
When no drugs were found, Child Q's hair was also scoured.
According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'.
Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'.
All of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this, it is also alleged.
Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards.
On Wednesday, TDC Linge told the hearing she did not accept accusations of breaches of respect of authority and respecting courtesy.
The girl will not be giving evidence at the tribunal 'because of the psychological effects' the search has had on her, the panel has heard.
Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station.
Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
The hearing continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 days ago
- Daily Record
Lawyer had to ask for trans killer's criminal record FOUR times after name change
Solicitor Paul Lynch demands probe after revealing that he only received notorious killer Alex Stewart's genuine rap sheet after he sent law chiefs a link to a news story detailing grisly crime A lawyer at the centre of a trans row was forced to ask FOUR times for the correct criminal record of a murderer – whose offences 'disappeared' when they changed their name. Paul Lynch has called for an urgent probe into procedures that led to Police Scotland and the Crown Office falsely disclosing killer Alex Stewart had no previous convictions. Alan Baker – now known as Alex Stewart – is serving life for stabbing a man he met online before transitioning. Respected solicitor Lynch said he was flatly told by the Crown Office that Stewart had no previous convictions (PCs) – even after informing them he used to be called Alan Baker. It was only after he sent a link to an online news story about Baker's murder conviction that the error was rectified. Police Scotland insists it was a one-off clerical error and no records were wiped. But Lynch claims a full investigation is needed to make sure criminal records disclosed to the courts are accurate after changes of name or gender. He said: 'I don't accept this can be dismissed as an isolated case involving human error. It shows a systematic failure on the part of Police Scotland to have proper procedures in place, with up-to-date information enabling them to reference a person's criminal record after they have assumed a new name and gender. Otherwise, a murderer's convictions can simply disappear.' The PC disclosures sought by Lynch came in the case of killer Jayney Sutherley, who was eventually cleared of subjecting Stewart and prison lover Nyomi Fee of transphobic and homophobic abuse, including 'misgendering' Stewart. Fee's disclosed record duly showed she killed Liam Fee, four, son of her then partner Rachel Fee, also convicted of Liam's murder in 2014. But Stewart's adoption of a new name while in HMP Greenock appeared to have effectively given them a clean slate with no PCs showing. Lynch was astonished he had to ask four times for the correct PCs. He said: 'The third time, I gave them his former name but the reply still came – 'no PCs'. 'Next time I told them the witness was in custody serving a life sentence. I sent a link to a news story, suggesting it might assist. They took that information to police and the correct PCs finally arrived.' He said the situation was ludicrous given that a cop interviewed witnesses inside a high security jail about a complaint. He said: 'The witness has been identified as a murderer yet police systems somehow do not have on record Alex Stewart and Alan Baker are one and the same. It is seriously alarming. It stands to reason it could happen in any case where a trans prisoner has changed their name. 'It's not as if Alex Stewart has been under the radar. Anyone reading the Daily Record or following the media would have had more information than Police Scotland about the previous convictions of Alan Baker or Alex Stewart.' Lynch said criminals who escape their past through an administrative bungle could pose a threat. He said: 'Think of all those cases where men who have served their sentences, then changed their names and are self-identifying as women. This has to be thoroughly investigated. If this could happen in Jayney Sutherley's case, it could happen in any case.' Police Scotland last night insisted the error in disclosing previous convictions of Alex Stewart had been rectified. A spokesperson said: 'We are aware of an issue relating to the previous convictions of a victim, which were omitted from a report submitted ahead of a case heard at Greenock Sheriff Court. The issue has been rectified. Work is ongoing to prevent something similar taking place. 'Officers are liaising with the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. The criminal records referred to in this case have not been wiped, they remain in place. It is inaccurate to suggest otherwise.' At Holyrood this week, Justice Secretary Angela Constance told MSPs: 'I have received assurances this was an isolated incident but I have asked Police Scotland to review their procedures.' A COPFS spokesperson said: 'The conviction record for this witness was shared quickly once the error was identified. 'We are supporting Police Scotland's review of their systems.' Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Sky News
3 days ago
- Sky News
Police officers face gross misconduct hearing after Taser aimed at 90-year-old woman
Two serving Metropolitan Police officers and one former officer are set to face a gross misconduct hearing after a 90-year-old woman with dementia was targeted with a Taser, the police watchdog said. The incident occurred after a carer at an address in Peckham, south London, called the police in May 2023 to report a disturbance. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said an officer arrived at the scene to find a black woman, aged 90, holding utensils. After she did not comply with the officer's instructions to drop the objects, she was "red-dotted" with a Taser - which means the device was aimed and partially activated so a laser dot appears on the target. It was not discharged. More officers then arrived and restrained the woman with handcuffs. A spit hood was placed over her head after she spat at the officers, the IOPC said. The woman was not arrested. She was taken to hospital, where both items were removed. The IOPC launched an investigation in June 2023 after a voluntary referral from the Met and a complaint from the family over the use of force, along with a claim from them that she was discriminated against due to her age, race, sex and disability. The police watchdog determined one officer should answer a gross misconduct case over their treatment of the woman. Another serving officer and a former officer, who left the Met in August last year, will answer cases over the time she was restrained and a possible failure to take into account her age and disability. The IOPC found no evidence the woman was discriminated against based on race or sex. Both serving officers are currently on restricted duties, the Met confirmed. Three others will undergo a reflective practice review process following their behaviour during the incident. The Crown Prosecution Service decided in November 2023 that none of the officers should face criminal charges over the incident after receiving evidence from the IOPC. IOPC director Amanda Rowe said: "This was a concerning incident particularly given the woman's vulnerabilities." The Met Police will now organise the proceedings. A date has not been set.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Three Met officers facing misconduct hearing after woman, 90, marked with Taser
Two serving Metropolitan Police officers and one former officer will face a gross misconduct hearing after a 90-year-old woman with dementia was 'red-dotted' with a Taser, the police watchdog said. The woman was also handcuffed and put in a spit hood during the incident in Peckham, south London, on May 9 2023, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said. One officer initially responded to a disturbance at an address in the area after a call from the woman's carer. The officer found the woman holding kitchen utensils and she was subsequently red-dotted, or targeted, with the Taser when she refused to drop them. The Taser was not discharged. More officers then attended the property and the woman was handcuffed, before the spit hood was applied after she spat at the officers, the IOPC said. She was not arrested and was taken to hospital where both items were removed. It was determined there was a gross misconduct case to answer for one officer over their treatment of the woman, including their use of force regarding the Taser and their communication towards the woman, following an investigation by the watchdog. Another serving officer and former officer, who left the force in August last year, will also answer their own cases over the time the woman was kept in the handcuffs and spit hood and failing to take into account her age and disability during the incident. The IOPC investigation was launched in June 2023 after a voluntary referral from the Met and a complaint from the family over use of force and alleging discrimination due to her age, race, sex and disability. While the three misconduct cases were brought, the watchdog found no evidence the woman was discriminated against based on race or sex. The Crown Prosecution Service decided in November 2023 that none of the officers should face criminal charges over the incident after receiving evidence from the IOPC. It confirmed its original decision would stand following a review in June last year. The IOPC investigation concluded in January. Both serving officers are currently on restricted duties, the Met confirmed. Three further officers will undergo a reflective practice review process following their behaviour during the incident. IOPC director Amanda Rowe said: 'This was a concerning incident particularly given the woman's vulnerabilities. 'It was important that we investigated the full circumstances surrounding this incident to determine exactly what occurred. 'As a result we have decided that three officers who attended the incident should face a police disciplinary hearing which will ultimately determine whether the gross misconduct allegations are proven.' The watchdog said the Metropolitan Police would now organise the proceedings in due course, with no date yet set.
