Sydney is racing to build more homes as housing prices soar. But where is the land?
The city of 5.6 million people has a growing population and spiralling property and rental prices that have made it one of the world's least affordable cities. PHOTO: REUTERS
Sydney is racing to build more homes as housing prices soar. But where is the land?
SYDNEY – Australia's most populous and least affordable city Sydney has a problem: It desperately needs more housing but is struggling to find a large parcel of empty land on which to build it.
The city of 5.6 million people has a growing population and spiralling property and rental prices that have made it one of the world's least affordable cities.
But the authorities want to end the urban expansion into undeveloped or greenfield sites in the outer fringes, which has resulted in remote suburbs that are as far as 80km from the city centre and that often lack adequate services.
Instead, local and state governments have been looking for large, open or convertible spaces within existing urban areas.
Like Singapore, which will develop new housing precincts at Bukit Timah Turf City and the former Keppel Golf Course, Sydney planners have been on the lookout for available parcels that could be redeveloped. Turf City is set to have 15,000 to 20,000 public and private homes over the next 20 to 30 years, while the Keppel site will have about 9,000 homes.
But the authorities in Sydney are struggling to find similar sites.
The New South Wales Government proposed converting a racecourse, called Rosehill Gardens, into a 'mini-city' of 25,000 new homes as well as a train station. The 140-year-old racecourse spans 57ha of prime real estate, about 25km west of the city centre.
The government offered A$5 billion (S$4.2 billion) – about 128 times the value of the land – to buy the racecourse from the Australian Turf Club, which owns and operates it. But the club's members voted against the proposal on May 27 in a 56 to 44 per cent vote, due to a sentimental attachment to the racecourse and concerns its loss would damage the city's racing industry.
The government is now searching for a 'Plan B' to try to meet its target of building 75,000 new homes a year, to keep up with population growth and improve affordability. Various proposals have emerged, including the site of the 2000 Olympics, an inner city port, and a dilapidated former main road.
NSW Premier Chris Minns on June 10 warned that Sydney was losing younger residents who could not afford to live in the city.
'Housing persistently is our biggest challenge, not just in the economy but in terms of intergenerational fairness and equity and giving young people an opportunity,' he said in a speech to business leaders.
'A city without young people is a city without a future, and the leading reason for that is we're not building enough houses.'
Sydney has the most 'impossibly unaffordable' housing in the world after Hong Kong, according to the most recent Demographia International Housing Affordability report in 2024. The average prices for houses and apartments in Sydney are A$1.5 million and A$860,000, respectively, while the average rental costs A$775 a week.
Associate Professor Laurence Troy, an expert on urban renewal from Sydney University, told The Straits Times that the government should compulsorily acquire the racecourse, which was one of the few remaining brownfield – underused or abandoned -– sites that could be converted into large-scale housing.
'Clearly we still need to build more housing because the population is still growing,' he said. 'We are basically running out of brownfield sites. If Rosehill is of such strategic importance, why is the government letting the land holders hold them hostage?'
But Mr Minns has so far ruled out compulsorily acquiring the racecourse.
A potential option could be to expand housing at the site of the Sydney Olympics, a 430ha site about 19km west of the city centre. The site currently has a mix of sports and entertainment venues, parklands, commercial developments and housing.
The government is planning to build 13,000 homes on the site by 2050, but is set to fall far short of its target of 10,700 homes by 2030. The lack of development at the site has been blamed on delays due to toxic waste contamination at the site, which was formerly an industrial area, as well as insufficient transport options.
Another option could be to shut the last operating port in Sydney harbour at Glebe Island near the city centre and replace the site with housing. But business groups say the port is crucial for the transport of building materials, and its closure could add to construction costs.
Another proposal is to develop housing along Parramatta Road, a main road that is being superseded by new underground roadways. But experts say an impediment will be pollution from the road traffic, which could pose health problems.
Professor Nicole Gurran, an urban planning expert from Sydney University, said that adding to the housing supply in Sydney did not necessarily depend on findin g a 'sugar hit' such as a racecourse.
'We have abundant zoned sites that are appropriate for housing development,' she said.
However, the authorities largely left it to market forces to instigate construction. In recent years, she said, high interest rates and construction cost s have discouraged developers.
'While prices are stagnant and people are struggling to get loans, and with affordability so poor and banks so cautious to lend, it is hard to get projects off the ground,' she said.
Professor Troy also said the government should focus on the type of housing it wants to build, rather than depending on the creation of a quick-fix 'mini-city'.
Instead of building high-rise towers, which are less popular with families and property buyers, or large houses in greenfield sites, Sydney should build more medium-density housing – such as terraces and low-rise apartments – which are popular and can increase the city's overall housing density.
'We need to look at the spaces we have and think about how we can do it better,' he said.
Jonathan Pearlman writes about Australia and the Pacific for The Straits Times. Based in Sydney, he explains matters on Australia and the Pacific to readers outside the Oceania region.
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
16 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Tesla to build first grid-scale power plant in China
The project is expected to become the largest grid-side energy storage project in China. PHOTO: REUTERS Tesla to build first grid-scale power plant in China NEW YORK - Tesla announced on June 20 that it signed an agreement to build its first grid-scale energy storage power station project in mainland China. The project will help with the flexible adjustment of grid resources, and 'effectively solve pressures relating to urban power supply,' Tesla said in a post to the Chinese social media platform Weibo. 'After completion, this project is expected to become the largest grid-side energy storage project in China,' Tesla added. Such energy storage systems help to enhance stability in the electricity grid at a time when there are greater supplies of solar and wind power. Chinese media outlet Yicai reported that Tesla Shanghai, Shanghai authorities and China Kangfu International Leasing Co. held a signing ceremony on June 20 for the project. It added that the deal involved investments of 4 billion yuan (S$715 million). The contract comes at a moment of tension between Washington and Beijing, with the two sides yet to hash out a long-term trade agreement following tariffs announced by President Donald Trump. China and the United States negotiated a 'framework' agreement in London earlier this month following two days of marathon talks. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- Straits Times
US navy eyes options if Iran grips Strait of Hormuz choke point
In meetings at the White House, senior US military officials have raised the need to prepare for the possibility of Iran shutting down the Strait of Hormuz. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON – Iran retains the naval assets and other capabilities it would need to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could pin any US Navy ships in the Persian Gulf, US military officials say. In meetings at the White House, senior military officials have raised the need to prepare for that possibility, after Iranian officials threatened to mine the strait if the US joined Israel's attacks on the country. Pentagon officials are considering all the ways Iran could retaliate as President Donald Trump cryptically hints at what he might do, saying on June 19 that he had not made a final decision. In several days of attacks, Israel has targeted Iranian military sites and state-sponsored entities, as well as high-ranking generals. It has destroyed many of Iran's ballistic missiles, though Iran still has hundreds of them, US defence officials said. But Israel has steered clear of Iranian naval assets. So while Iran's ability to respond has been severely damaged, it has a robust navy and maintains operatives across the region, where the US has more than 40,000 troops. Iran also has an array of mines that its navy could lay in the Strait of Hormuz. The narrow 90-mile waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the open ocean is a key shipping route. A quarter of the world's oil and 20 per cent of the world's liquefied natural gas passes through it, so mining the choke point would cause gas prices to soar. It could also isolate US minesweepers in the Persian Gulf on one side of the strait. Two defence officials indicated that the navy was looking to disperse its ships in the gulf so that they would be less vulnerable. A navy official declined to comment, citing operational security. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly. Iran has vowed that if attacked by US forces, it would respond forcefully, potentially setting off a cycle of escalation. 'Think about what happened in January 2020 after Trump killed Soleimani and times that by 100,' said senior fellow at the Middle East Institute Brian Katulis . A powerful Iranian general, Qassem Soleimani, was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad during Mr Trump's first administration. Iran then launched the largest-ever ballistic missile barrage at US bases in Iraq, leaving some 110 troops with traumatic brain injuries and unintentionally hitting a Ukrainian passenger jet, killing all 176 people aboard. 'Iran is strategically weaker but operationally still lethal across the region,' Mr Katulis said, 'and Americans still have troops across that part of the world.' Iran has mined the Strait of Hormuz before, including in 1988 during its war with Iraq, when Iran planted 150 mines in the strait. One of the mines struck a US guided missile frigate, the USS Samuel B. Roberts, nearly sinking it. General Joseph Votel, a former leader of U.S. Central Command, and Vice-Admiral Kevin M. Donegan, a former commander of US naval forces in the Middle East, each said on June 18 that Iran was capable of mining the strait, which they said could bring international pressure on Israel to end its bombing campaign. But such an action would probably invite a major US military response and further damage Iran's already crippled economy, Vice-Admiral Donegan added. 'Mining also hurts Iran; they would lose income from oil they sell to China,' he said. 'Now, though, Iranian leadership is much more concerned with regime survival, which will drive their decisions.' Military officials and analysts said missile and drone attacks remained the biggest retaliatory threat to US bases and facilities in the region. 'These would be shorter-range variants, not what they were launching against Israel,' Vice-Admiral Donegan said. 'That Iranian capability remains intact.' Vice-Admiral Donegan also expressed concerns about the possibility that the Quds Force, a shadowy arm of Iran's military, could attack US troops. 'Our Arab partners have done well over the years to root most of that out of their countries; however, that Quds Force and militia threat still remains in Iraq and to some extent in Syria and Jordan,' he said. Iranian officials are seeking to remind Mr Trump that, weakened or not, they still can still find ways to hurt US troops and interests in the region, said Iran expert and a professor at Johns Hopkins University Vali Nasr . Striking Iran, he said, 'gets into such big unknowns.' He added, 'There are a lot of things that could go wrong.' Much is at stake for Iran if it decides to retaliate. 'Many of Iran's options are the strategic equivalent of a suicide bombing,' said Mr Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran policy expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'They can do enormous damage to others if they mine the Strait of Hormuz, destroy regional oil facilities and rain a missile barrage against Israel, but they may not survive the blowback.' But Iran can make it hugely expensive and dangerous for the US Navy to have to conduct what would most likely be a weeks-long mine-clearing operation in the Strait of Hormuz, according to one former naval officer who was stationed on a minesweeper in the Persian Gulf. He and other navy officers said that clearing the strait could also put American sailors directly in harm's way. Iran is believed to maintain a variety of naval mines. They include small limpet mines containing just a few pounds of explosives that swimmers place directly on a ship's hull and typically detonate after a set amount of time. Iran also has larger moored mines that float just under the water's surface, releasing 100 pounds of explosive force or more when they come in contact with an unsuspecting ship. More advanced 'bottom' mines sit on the seafloor. They use a combination of sensors – such as magnetic, acoustic, pressure and seismic – to determine when a ship is nearby and explode with hundreds of pounds of explosive force. The Navy has four minesweepers in the Persian Gulf, each with 100 sailors aboard who have been based in Bahrain and are trained to deal with underwater hazards. Should Iran place mines in the Strait of Hormuz or other parts of the Persian Gulf, a small navy contingent in Bahrain called Task Force 56 would respond. Usually led by a senior explosive ordnance disposal officer, the task force would take advantage of technologies like autonomous underwater vehicles that can scan the seafloor with sonar much more quickly than the last time Iranian mines threatened the strait. And while the navy has been experimenting with underwater robots to destroy mines, the task force will still need to deploy small teams of explosive ordnance disposal divers for the time-consuming and dangerous task of approaching each mine underwater and carefully placing charges to destroy it. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Under pressure, officials in Western India move against abuse in sugar fields
Workers harvest sugarcane in a field in Kolhapur district in the western state of Maharashtra, India, on Nov 30, 2023. PHOTO: REUTERS Authorities in western India are taking steps to improve labor conditions for sugar cane cutters after a court ruling and an investigation by The New York Times and The Fuller Project highlighted serious abuses of workers. Journalists revealed in 2024 that women in the Indian state of Maharashtra were pushed to get unnecessary hysterectomies as a way to keep them working in sweltering sugar fields, unencumbered by menstruation or gynecological ailments. The sugar cane-cutting system also has used child labor, pushes young girls into marriage and locks families into debt bondage. The sugar industry is overwhelmingly controlled by the state's political leadership. And major Western brands like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have profited from the system. Government officials, regulators and companies have for years done little or nothing to address these abuses. Politicians say that changing the labor system would cut into sugar profits and make it impossible for factories to compete. The Bombay High Court ruled in March that government must address these problems. And though the court has no direct enforcement power in this case, labor-rights groups say the ruling is important because it is the first official acknowledgment that the system in Maharashtra must change. The court ruled that migrant workers and the middleman contractors who hire them must be registered as a standard employee-employer relationship. That would close a loophole that has allowed sugar companies to deny any responsibility for the workers who cut their cane. The court also called for the abolition of a system known as koyta, in which husband-and-wife teams cut sugar cane, with the men frequently receiving and controlling all the pay for each family unit. If implemented, the changes could make sugar cane cutters eligible for a minimum wage, time off and other protections under Indian labor laws. Currently, the workers receive a loan at the beginning of each season, which they pay off through work. They have no days off and must pay a fee to leave work to see a doctor. For women, seeking routine gynecological care can mean falling deeper into debt to their contractors. Many postpone doctor visits or get hysterectomies as a drastic form of preventive care. The court also said that workers should have access to clean drinking water, electricity, cooking gas and sanitation facilities. Pepsi declined to comment, and Coca-Cola did not respond to a request for comment. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
