Trump's Ukraine envoy to meet Belarus leader Alexander Lukashenko

A senior official of the U.S. President Donald Trump administration is planning to travel to Belarus in the coming days to meet the country's president, according to four sources briefed on the matter, as ceasefire talks between Ukraine and Russia remain deadlocked.
If the official, Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg, meets Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, he would be the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit the authoritarian state in years.
The precise agenda of the meeting is unclear, though Kellogg in private has portrayed the trip as a step that could help jump-start peace talks aimed at ending Russia's war against Ukraine, said two of the sources, who requested anonymity as the trip has not been made public.
The State Department and the Belarusian embassy in Washington declined to comment. Kellogg and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.
Planning for such trips requires careful negotiation, and it is possible the trip could be canceled or modified at the last moment.
In 2020, during Trump's first term, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Belarus in what was then the highest-level U.S. visit to the eastern European country in over 20 years. The trip was part of a campaign under the first Trump administration to improve relations with Belarus at a time when relations between Minsk and Moscow were at a low point.
Trump's successor, Democratic President Joe Biden, shifted course after the 2020 Belarusian election, which international observers condemned as neither free nor fair. Massive street protests followed the election and were met with a brutal crackdown, and Belarus was largely shunned by Western countries.
The U.S. suspended operations at its embassy in 2022 as it became clear to Washington that the country would support Russia in its invasion of Ukraine.
Under Trump's second term, however, the administration has renewed its efforts to establish a working relationship with Belarus.
One U.S. official said the Trump administration had internally discussed ways to pull Minsk out of Moscow's sphere of influence and toward Washington's orbit, if only marginally.
In February, a deputy assistant secretary of state, Christopher Smith, and two other State Department officials traveled to Belarus to retrieve three political prisoners, The New York Times reported at the time. Smith had privately described the trip as the first step of a potential deal that would see scores of political prisoners released in return for an easing of U.S. sanctions, the Times reported.
A separate senior U.S. official pointed to the April 30 release by Belarus of Youras Ziankovich, a 47-year-old naturalized American citizen, as a sign that Lukashenko wanted to improve relations with Washington.
Western diplomats, however, have expressed skepticism about U.S. efforts to court Belarus, which remains firmly aligned and has deep economic links with its neighbor Russia.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Japan Today

2 hours ago

• Japan Today

U.S. lawmakers call for Congress to review Trump's Iran actions

FILE PHOTO: U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) looks on, after President Donald Trump delivered remarks on tariffs, in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo By David Morgan Some Democratic and Republican lawmakers on Sunday called on Congress to rein in President Donald Trump's use of military force in Iran and prevent U.S. involvement in a deepening Middle East conflict. With Republican leaders in the Senate and House of Representatives strongly backing the U.S. attacks on key Iranian nuclear sites, it seemed unlikely any resolution that asserts the power of Congress to declare war and restricts Trump's actions could pass both chambers. U.S. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia said he expects to force the Senate to vote this week on his measure requiring Trump to terminate hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war from Congress. Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California said they want a vote on similar legislation they introduced in the House. "This is the U.S. jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interest for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress," Kaine told CBS' "Face the Nation" program. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the criticism from lawmakers. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune were both notified of the U.S. military action ahead of time, according to sources familiar with the matter. Members of Congress are expected to be briefed on Tuesday. Thune's office declined to comment on Kaine's measure. The attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday divided Trump's populist MAGA movement, with some leaders rallying behind the president and others calling for an end to hostilities after so-called U.S. "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan following the September 11, 2001, attacks on U.S. soil. "I represent part of the coalition that elected President Trump. We were tired of endless wars," Massie told CBS. "We were promised that we would put our veterans, our immigration policies and our infrastructure first." Massie and Kaine each said there was no urgency requiring Trump to act unilaterally. "There was no imminent threat to the United States," Massie said. "We haven't been briefed." Intelligence reports and analysts have reached different conclusions on how close Iran was to building a nuclear bomb. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Friday that the U.S. had intelligence that should Iran decide to do so, it could build a nuclear weapon in weeks or months. U.S. officials say they do not believe Iran had decided to make a bomb. Iran claims its nuclear ambitions are peaceful and focused on energy production and medical research. But its program, which began in the late 1950s with U.S. support, has fallen under suspicion in recent years, with Tehran ramping up enrichment to 60%, just below the weapons-grade of 90%, and restricting the access of international inspectors to its sites. Trump vowed on Sunday to support Massie's primary challenger in the 2026 midterm elections, saying the Kentucky congressman's criticism of the Iran attack and opposition to Trump's legislative efforts proved he was not aligned with the party's new base. "MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," Trump posted to Truth Social. REPUBLICANS VOICE DIFFERING VIEWS Another Trump loyalist, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, also criticized Trump's decision on Sunday, but insisted she was not being disloyal. "I can also support President Trump and his great administration on many of the great things they are doing while disagreeing on bombing Iran and getting involved in a hot war that Israel started," the Georgia Republican wrote on X. Other Trump allies pushed back on claims that his actions against Iran violated the U.S. Constitution and a federal law that restricts unilateral action by a president to conditions involving an attack on the United States. "He had all the authority he needs under the Constitution. They are wrong," said Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally who has long been a leading voice on U.S. foreign policy matters in Congress. "If you don't like what the president does in terms of war, you can cut off the funding," the South Carolina Republican told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. The attacks on Iran generally drew accolades from Republican lawmakers who declared that the operation set back Iran's ability to obtain a nuclear weapon. "The President made the right call, and did what he needed to do," Johnson said in a post on X late Saturday. "The Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act." The U.S. Constitution divides war powers in the federal government by making the president the commander-in-chief of the armed forces but leaving sole authority to declare war to Congress. The balance has shifted, with Congress relinquishing the use of military power to presidents of both parties in recent years. But Democrats said it was too early to tell whether the mission had succeeded, warning that Iran could have moved its nuclear material to other sites far from U.S. targets. "The tragedy in this country is that we keep entering these overseas wars. We triumphantly declare the mission is accomplished the day after, and then we're left with Americans bearing the consequences for decades," Khanna told CBS. © Thomson Reuters 2025.

Japan Today

3 hours ago

• Japan Today

Bombing Iran, Trump gambles on force over diplomacy

By Shaun TANDON US President Donald Trump addresses the nation on strikes on Iran with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth behind him For nearly a half-century the United States has squabbled with Iran's Islamic Republic but the conflict has largely been left in the shadows, with U.S. policymakers believing, often reluctantly, that diplomacy was preferable. With President Donald Trump's order of strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, the United States -- like Israel, which encouraged him -- has brought the conflict into the open, and the consequences may not be clear for some time to come. "We will only know if it succeeded if we can get through the next three to five years without the Iranian regime acquiring nuclear weapons, which they now have compelling reasons to want," said Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst and supporter of the 2003 Iraq war who is now vice president for policy at the Middle East Institute. U.S. intelligence had not concluded that Iran was building a nuclear bomb, with Tehran's sensitive atomic work largely seen as a means of leverage, and Iran can be presumed to have taken precautions in anticipation of strikes. Trita Parsi, an outspoken critic of military action, said Trump "has now made it more likely that Iran will be a nuclear weapons state in the next five to 10 years." "We should be careful not to confuse tactical success with strategic success," said Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. "The Iraq war was also successful in the first few weeks but President Bush's declaration of 'Mission Accomplished' did not age well," he said. Weak point for Iran Yet Trump's attack -- a week after Israel began a major military campaign -- came as the cleric-run state is at one of its weakest points since the 1979 Islamic revolution toppled the pro-Western shah. Since the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas, which enjoys Iran's support, Israel -- besides obliterating much of Gaza -- has decimated Lebanon's Hezbollah, a militant group that would once reliably strike Israel as Tehran's proxy. Iran's main ally among Arab leaders, Syria's Bashar al-Assad, was also toppled in December. Supporters of Trump's strike argued that diplomacy was not working, with Iran standing firm on its right to enrich uranium. "Contrary to what some will say in the days to come, the U.S. administration did not rush to war. In fact, it gave diplomacy a real chance," said Ted Deutch, a former Democratic congressman who now heads the American Jewish Committee. "The murderous Iranian regime refused to make a deal," he said. Top Senate Republican John Thune pointed to Tehran's threats to Israel and language against the United States and said that the state had "rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace." Abrupt halt to diplomacy Trump's attack comes almost exactly a decade after former President Barack Obama sealed a deal in which Iran drastically scaled back its nuclear work -- which Trump pulled out of in 2018 after coming into office for his first term. Most of Trump's Republican Party and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long seen Iran as an existential threat, attacked Obama's deal because it allowed Tehran to enrich uranium at levels well beneath weapons grade and the key clauses had an end date. But Trump, billing himself a peacemaker, just a month ago said on a visit to Gulf Arab monarchies that he was hopeful for a new deal with Iran, and his administration was preparing new talks when Netanyahu attacked Iran. This prompted an abrupt U-turn from Trump. "Trump's decision to cut short his own efforts for diplomacy will also make it much harder to get a deal in the medium and long runs," said Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which advocates restraint. "Iran now has no incentive to trust Trump's word or to believe that striking a compromise will advance Iran's interests." Iran's religious rulers also face opposition internally. Major protests erupted in 2022 after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, who was detained for defying the regime's rules on covering hair. Karim Sadjadpour, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote on social media that Trump's strikes could either entrench the Islamic Republic or hasten its downfall. "The U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities is an unprecedented event that may prove to be transformational for Iran, the Middle East, U.S. foreign policy, global non-proliferation and potentially even the global order," he said. "Its impact will be measured for decades to come." © 2025 AFP

NHK

3 hours ago

• NHK

Iran is defiant after Trump calls US attacks 'success'

Israeli military officials say Iran has fired multiple missiles toward their country. This is believed to be Tehran's first military response since the United States struck three Iranian nuclear sites early Sunday local time. Iran's Tasnim News Agency linked to the country's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps reports Iran has launched 40 missiles toward Israel. The agency says targets included an airport near Tel Aviv. Israel's local media say at least 86 people have been injured. CNN says the strikes damaged a building in Tel Aviv. Earlier, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan, and called them successful. The attacks were the first ever carried out by the United States on Iranian soil. Trump said "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater." Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified the US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, which he said were carried out in full coordination between the US and Israel. In a video message to the Israeli people, Netanyahu said Iran's nuclear program "threatened our very existence and also endangered the peace of the entire world." The prime minister thanked US President Donald Trump and praised him. Netanyahu said: "President Trump is leading the free world with strength. He is a great friend of Israel." On the strikes targeting Iranian sites, he said that "from the beginning of the operation, I promised you that Iran's nuclear facilities would be destroyed, one way or another." He added, "That promise was kept."