Daughter of human rights lawyer held in Iranian prison in area targeted by Israeli missiles begs for his release

The daughter of a human rights lawyer held in a prison located in an area targeted by Israeli missile strikes has begged for his release.
Mehraveh Khandan's father, 60-year-old Reza Khandan, has been in Evin prison since December, serving a sentence of four years and one month for charges of "assembly and collusion" and "propaganda against the regime" for producing pins opposing the mandatory wearing of the hijab.
The prison is located in Tehran 's district 3, which is subject to an evacuation order issued by Israel on Monday due to its military targeting the area with missile and drone strikes.
After Donald Trump said the city should be evacuated "immediately", Mehraveh, 25, shared a tearful video on Instagram, asking: "How can he leave Tehran, he is in prison?"
This is "one of the most helpless and hopeless times of my life", Mehraveh told Sky News.
She said she was imagining her father sitting in prison and hearing the explosions nearby, without having a reliable source of information to find out what was going on, as he is only allowed access to information via Iranian state media.
Mehraveh, who managed to speak to her father on the phone since, said he told her the explosions "reminded him of the Iran-Iraq war when he was a soldier".
"I can imagine he was [scared]," she added after last talking to him on Wednesday morning.
Mehraveh said she posted her video plea because it was "the only way we could raise our voice above the deafening noise of criminal rulers endlessly hurling taunts at each other".
She hopes that pressure from the international community could force Iranian authorities to release her father, as permitted under Iran's wartime law.
"The Islamic Republic regime has shown in times of crisis, it only resorts to increasing internal repression, but I hope this time they react to international pressure differently," Mehraveh said.
Reza, along with other inmates in Evin prison, also wrote a letter to the authorities to ask for their release, saying that the prison lacked shelters and alarms to protect against missile and drone attacks.
"Not releasing them from prison is putting their lives in danger," Mehraveh said.
Knowing her father is being held in a place so vulnerable to strikes was bringing her "a lot of anxiety, sleep-related issues and trouble eating", she explained.
"Although I live in a safe environment, I feel captured and trapped most of the time," said Mehraveh, who is currently in Amsterdam studying fine arts.
Her mother, Nasrin Sotoudeh, 62, who is also a prominent human rights lawyer, was facing a lot of stress as she was trying to get her husband released.
Their daughter is also "so worried" for her younger brother Nima, 17, who fled Tehran with Nasrin to escape the Israeli attacks.
Neither Mehraveh nor her mother have been able to visit Reza in prison, and the one time Nima was allowed to, the teenager was "traumatised" after being "beaten by guards".
Mehraveh said she doesn't think Iran would "disappear" her father right now, like what allegedly happened to a fellow Evin prisoner this week, but worries that his contact with the outside world, currently via limited calls within Iran, could be cut off by the prison.
Reza had previously gone on hunger strikes to protest the arrests of political prisoners and the conditions at Evin prison, the same jail where British-Iranian mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe was held. Mehraveh said there is a bedbug infestation and a general lack of hygiene.
"My father is also struggling with health issues, and his hospital transfer appointments have been cancelled repeatedly at the last minute because my father refuses to be handcuffed and wear the prison uniform," Mehraveh said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

23 minutes ago

• Sky News

Fordow: What we know about Iran's secretive 'nuclear mountain' - and how Israel might try to destroy it

Deep beneath a mountain, hundreds of centrifuges spin, enriching Iran's uranium that Israel suspects is destined for a nuclear weapon. The Fordow plant is protected by tonnes upon tonnes of dirt and rock, far away from prying eyes - and foreign missiles. But as Israeli warplanes fly unchecked above Tehran, with much of the Islamic Republic's air defences turned to smoking ruins on the ground, attention has moved to the secretive facility. Some say only the American B-2 stealth bomber and its massive payload could breach the so-called "nuclear mountain", while others argue troops on the ground might be able to infiltrate its corridors. Or maybe it is simply impossible, short of a nuclear strike. Iran has repeatedly denied that it is seeking a nuclear weapon and the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said in June that it has no proof of a "systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon". What is the Fordow facility? The Fordow enrichment plant is one of three key pieces of nuclear infrastructure in Iran - the others being the Natanz enrichment plant and research facilities in Isfahan. It is thought to be buried around 80m deep into the side of the mountain. It was previously protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems, but these may have wholly or partially knocked out during Israel's recent attacks. Construction is believed to have started in around 2006 and it first became operational in 2009 - the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In November 2020, it was believed there were 1,057 centrifuges at Fordow. These are used to separate isotopes and increase the concentration of uranium-235, needed for nuclear fuel and weapons. In 2023, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) - the nuclear watchdog - found uranium particles enriched to 83.7% purity - near the 90% needed for a bomb - at Fordow, the only Iranian facility where this has been found. In June 2024, the Washington Post reported on a major expansion at Fordow, with nearly 1,400 new centrifuges earmarked for the subterranean facility. 1:51 Will Israel try to destroy Fordow? Israel has made no secret of its desire to cripple or remove Iran's nuclear programme, describing it as an existential threat. There is much that remains elsewhere in Iran that is capable of producing and using nuclear material. "But of course the real big piece remains at Fordow still and this has been in the headlines quite a bit," says Dr Alexander Bollfrass, an expert on nuclear weapons from the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) thinktank. There is also the chance that an increased focus on diplomacy brings the war to an end before the IDF can make a run at Fordow. Could bunker buster bombs be used? There has been a lot of talk about bunker buster bombs. These are munitions that explode twice - once to breach the ground surface and again once the bomb has burrowed down to a certain depth. The Israelis used 60 to 80 of them in the strike that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September last year, according to Martin "Sammy" Sampson, a former air marshal and executive director at the IISS. But Nasrallah was only 10-15m underground, Mr Sampson said, while Fordow is believed to be 80m beneath the surface. "An awful lot of planes would be in the same place for an awful long time" to drop enough bombs to have a chance of getting to the buried facility, he added. There is also the possibility that the US, which operates the much more powerful GBU-57 bomb, could assist with any operation at Fordow. "My sense is that it would still take multiple strikes," Mr Sampson said, putting it in "more and more unknown territory". "It would be pretty disastrous... if you put 400 planes over the top of Fordow, or you put the might of the US over Fordow, and it survived." Israel's 'contingencies' for dealing with Fordow Israel has suggested that it could destroy or cripple Fordow without using bombs dropped from the air. Speaking to Sky's Yalda Hakim earlier this week, former Mossad director of intelligence Zohar Palti said it was "much easier for the Americans to do it", possibly referring to the GBU-57. "But as you see, we know how to run things alone," he added. "And if we need to do some other stuff alone, we will do it." 23:28 Israel's ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, said last weekend that Israel has "a number of contingencies... which will enable us to deal with Fordow". "Not everything is a matter of, you know, taking to the skies and bombing from afar," he told ABC News. There has been talk of using special forces to raid the facility on the ground, but that has its downsides as well. "This would be an incredibly high risk mission if you were to do something on the ground," said Mr Sampson. There is also the possibility Israel could replicate what happened at the Natanz enrichment plant, where the IAEA said 15,000 centrifuges were likely destroyed in the IDF bombardment of Iran. This was possibly due to an Israeli airstrike disrupting the power supply to the centrifuges, rather than actual physical damage to the centrifuge hall, according to the nuclear watchdog.

Telegraph

24 minutes ago

• Telegraph

After the Brize Norton attack, Britain should be placed on a war footing

Many were astonished recently at Russia's inability to defend its military aircraft when Ukraine carried out drone strikes against them deep inside Russian territory. Well now the inadequacy of our own air base security has been exposed, although thankfully in a far less serious way. For now. RAF Brize Norton was attacked not by external forces but the enemy within. This was not a protest; it was a deliberate act of sabotage against military assets used to defend our country. What is shocking is that these saboteurs were able to access a highly defended base, put two air to air refuelling tankers out of action, and leave without being detected. That should not have happened at any time. But right now military bases should have been on a substantially heightened state of alert. Whether or not we are providing any assistance to Israel in its defensive operations against Iran, Tehran certainly believes we are. They see us as a key ally of Israel and also attribute to Britain a disproportionate level of influence over US actions. We are therefore a high priority target for Iranian terrorism. Don't forget only weeks ago seven Iranians were arrested here on allegations of preparing terrorist attacks and other security offences. And in 2015 our security service disrupted an Iranian-backed bomb plot on the outskirts of London. The threat from Tehran has significantly increased since the latest arrests, with Iran under attack and the ayatollahs desperate to find effective ways of hitting back at Israel and its allies. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has long positioned sleeper cells in European countries including the UK for precisely the situation they find themselves in now. This was a known specific threat back in the early 2000s, when I was working for the UK Joint Intelligence Committee. We don't know exactly their capabilities but it would be irresponsible not to assume that terrorist attacks in Britain could be initiated from Tehran at any time. The fact that the British Government has repeatedly refused to proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist organisation suggests a dangerous degree of complacency. That should have happened a long time ago and certainly should happen now. Beyond the very real and immediate threat from Iran there is Russia. Putin has identified Britain as its number one enemy in Europe. We have led the way in supporting Ukraine both economically and militarily. British intelligence and surveillance have been a critical element of Kyiv's operations against Russia. Donated British tanks and other armoured vehicles are in Ukraine now and our long range missiles have been used to attack Russian forces both inside Ukraine and on Russian sovereign territory. Furthermore, like Iran, Putin has previously ordered terrorist strikes on UK soil, including a nerve agent attack in Salisbury in 2018. Since then suspected Russian sabotage has been suspected here and cyber attacks carried out against government and private sector targets. Security, even of military bases, can never be 100 per cent; but this penetration of RAF Brize Norton by the Palestine Action activists, brazen enough to cross the airfield on electric scooters, shows the most serious shortcomings. What if they had been armed not with paint but explosives? Those planes could have been destroyed, not temporarily disabled, and airmen could have been killed. What we have seen amounts to an open invitation to even more serious saboteurs and terrorists to attack. The threat is going to get worse, not only from Iran and Russia, but also from people here who hate our country and want to cause us harm. The thousands of illegal immigrants pouring in on small boats, with no way to screen, document or control them, adds yet another dimension. All of Britain's military bases, as well as other critical targets, should immediately be placed on a war footing, where they should have been at least since we started supporting Ukraine and even more so since Iran came under attack.

The Independent

24 minutes ago

• The Independent

Multiple children injured and school evacuated after Berlin ‘tear gas incident'

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.