Europe Delivers 'Final Nail' Into Putin Gas Empire's Coffin
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The latest proposed EU sanctions aimed at punishing Vladimir Putin for his full-scale invasion of Ukraine could deliver the knockout blow for Russian natural gas sales in Europe, according to one energy analyst.
If approved by all EU members, the package "could put the final nail in Nord Stream 2's coffin" Olga Khakova from the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center said, referring to the pipelines between Russia and Germany.
Russia's oil and banking sectors were also targeted by the EU'S 18th sanctions package unveiled Tuesday by European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen who said that "strength is the only language that Russia will understand."
Ivan Hortal Sanchez from Razom We Stand told Newsweek the Ukrainian climate campaign group welcomed the proposal but the EU should also sanction more tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Russia. Newsweek has contacted the Kremlin for comment.
This image from January 8, 2020 shows Russian President Vladimir Putin at the opening ceremony of the Turkstream Gas Pipeline Project, Istanbul, Turkey.
This image from January 8, 2020 shows Russian President Vladimir Putin at the opening ceremony of the Turkstream Gas Pipeline Project, Istanbul, Turkey.Why It Matters
Russia's natural gas exports are critical revenue generators to pay both for the war Putin started and for his plans to expand Moscow's military.
As Europe weans itself off Russian gas which Moscow is struggling to sell elsewhere, the EU's sanctions package could end the prospect of the reopening of the Nord Stream pipelines.
The measures also target Russia's sanctions-busting "shadow fleet" of oil tankers and could impose a $45 price cap on seaborne oil, which if approved by all EU members, would deliver a further blow to Moscow's coffers.
What To Know
European officials announced Tuesday the EU's 18th raft of sanctions aimed at forcing Russia to the negotiating table to end the war in Ukraine.
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the package would sanction firms linked to the Nord Stream pipelines that have been non-operational but are at the center of speculation over whether they could be restarted.
Khakova deputy director for European energy security at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center, said that the package "could put the final nail in Nord Stream 2's coffin."
In comments emailed to Newsweek, Khakova added it would end the "zombie project debate once and for all" and would send a message to LNG producers, which may be hesitant to expand partnerships with the European buyers if reverting to Russian gas dependence was a possibility."
Ivan Hortal Sanchez, European Union campaigner at Razom We Stand, told Newsweek Nordstream symbolized the EU's toxic dependence on Russian gas before the full-scale invasion.
However, Russia's pivot to LNG shipping keeps fueling the Russian war machine and so Brussels should sanction more tankers carrying the Russian fuel, particularly those insured or owned by European companies, he added.
This image from July 11, 2022 shows the receiving station for the Nord Stream 1 natural gas pipeline near Lubmin, Germany.
This image from July 11, 2022 shows the receiving station for the Nord Stream 1 natural gas pipeline near Lubmin, Germany.Razom We Stand has also called for the further listings of Russian shadow fleet tankers, which are being used to circumvent an EU and G7-led oil price cap.
That cap which took effect in February 2023 set at $60 per barrel of seaborne crude but oil prices have decreased a lot since then.
Von der Leyen pitched a new cap of $45 per barrel as well as banning importing refined products made with Russian crude oil and traded under a different label.
The EU sanctions would also aim at limiting the Kremlin's ability to raise funds or carry out financial transactions, with a further 22 Russian banks to be hit with measures.
Also, the assets of more than 20 Russian and foreign companies alleged to be providing support to the Kremlin's war machine would be frozen.
What People Are Saying
Olga Khakova deputy director for European energy security at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center: "This package could put the final nail in Nord Stream 2's coffin, providing a much overdue, decisive vision for the future of Russian pipeline gas flows to Europe."
Ivan Hortal Sanchez, European Union Campaigner at Razom We Stand: "We welcome the European Commission's proposal to sanction Nord Stream 2 once and for all...The European Union should never return to the era of Russian pipeline gas, which has been weaponized by the Kremlin since the start of the war."
What Happens Next
The EU has set a roadmap to fully end EU dependency on Russian energy by 2027 and the sanctions package is a step towards that. However, the latest package will require tight language on sanctions implementation to prevent caveats or exemptions.
The package also requires the backing of all 27 EU members. Slovakia's populist Prime Minister Robert Fico and Hungary's hard-right leader, Viktor Orbán, who are on good terms with Putin, have threatened to block additional EU sanctions on Russian energy.
The oil price cap is a Group of 7 measure and van der Leyen said this will be discussed at next week's G7 meeting in Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
32 minutes ago
- New York Post
Kremlin warns that other nations ready to give Iran nukes: ‘Dangerous escalation has begun'
Moscow warned Sunday that several nations are prepared to supply Tehran with nuclear weapons, as Russia and China condemned America's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Dmitry Medvedev, who serves as deputy head of Russian President Vladimir Putin's Security Council, claimed Saturday's US airstrike — the first to use 15-ton GBU-57 'bunker-buster' bombs in combat — only caused minimal damage to Tehran's nuclear sites, including the fortified Fordow enrichment plant. Medvedev, who did not specify which countries are ready to arm Tehran, reiterated that the attacks would not stop Russia's ally in the Middle East from acquiring nuclear weapons. 5 Russian President Vladimir Putin's Security Council warned that several nations are ready to arm Iran with nuclear weapons after America's attack on Tehran's nuclear sites. Getty Images 5 Moscow holds the world's largest supply of nuclear missiles. AP The statement comes as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he will be traveling to Moscow to meet with Putin to discuss countermeasures. 'We enjoy a strategic partnership, and we always consult with each other and coordinate our positions,' Araghchi told Russian media. Russia's Foreign Ministry described the American airstrike in Iran as 'a gross violation of international law, the UN Charter, and UN Security Council resolutions. 'It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security,' the ministry said in a statement. 5 Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (center) was expected to meet with Russian officials Sunday to discuss the American attack. AP 5 US heavy bombers attacked Iran's fortified Fordow fuel enrichment plan during Saturday's airstrikes. via REUTERS Beijing echoed the accusations that the US had violated international law by carrying out the airstrikes, with China's foreign ministry warning that the attack will have a ripple effect across the Middle East. But Chinese officials also said their country is committed to keep the fighting from escalating, with Beijing calling for a cease-fire. 'China is willing to work with the international community to pool efforts together and uphold justice, and contribute to the work for restoring peace and stability in the Middle East,' the ministry said in a statement. 5 China is calling on a cease-fire in the Middle East while facing demands from the West to stop Iran from shutting down the Strait of Hormuz shipping route. KAZAKHSTAN'S PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images China is being pressured by the US to stop Iran from closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil shipping route whose closure would impact global prices. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on Beijing to make sure Iran keeps the oil port open, noting that the bulk of China's oil comes from the Strait. 'It will have some impact on us,' Rubio told CBS News' 'Face the Nation' of the possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz. 'It will have a lot more impact on the rest of the world,' he added, calling the move 'economic suicide' for Iran. With Post wires
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran says diplomacy with US only possible if Israeli aggression stops
Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has said that his country is ready for more diplomacy with the US only if Israel's war on his country is brought to an end 'and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes he committed'. After several hours of talks with European foreign ministers in Geneva on Friday, there was no sign of a diplomatic breakthrough – or a resumption of negotiations with the US. Araghchi said: 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again and once the aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed. We support the continuation of discussion with [Britain, France, Germany and the EU] and express our readiness to meet again in the near future.' Late on Friday, Donald Trump said he was unlikely to press Israel to scale back its campaign to allow negotiations to continue. 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now. If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens,' he said. Araghchi said he was willing to continue talks with his European counterparts since they have not supported Israel's attacks directly. But he said Iran was 'seriously concerned over the failure of the three countries to condemn Israel's act of aggression' and would continue to exercise its right to 'legitimate defence'. Related: Israeli strikes have not knocked out Iran's nuclear programme - or its nuclear ambitions He also said Iran's capabilities, including its missile capabilities, are non-negotiable, and could not form part of the talks, a rebuff to the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who in an earlier statement said they should be included in the talks. With Israeli diplomats and military commanders warning of a 'prolonged war', the route to direct talks between the US and Iran remains blocked, leaving the European countries as intermediaries. After Friday's talks between Araghchi and his British, French and German counterparts, the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, said: 'This is a perilous moment, and it is hugely important that we don't see regional escalation of this conflict.' The French foreign minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, said there 'can be no definitive solution through military means to the Iran nuclear problem. Military operations can delay it but they cannot eliminate it'. The talks are being held against the backdrop of Trump's threat that the US could launch its own military assault on Iran within a fortnight – a step that would probably turn the already bloody war into a full-scale regional conflagration. European diplomats said they came to talks to deliver a tough message from the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, and special envoy, Steve Witkoff: that the threat of US military action is real but that a 'diplomatic pathway remains open'. But without direct talks between the US and Iran it is hard to see how an agreement can be reached to curtail Iran's nuclear programme in a way that satisfies the US headline demand that Iran must never have a nuclear bomb. Trump suggested that European efforts would not be enough to bring any resolution. He said: 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this.' The European ministers said they had expressed their longstanding concerns about Iran's expansion of its nuclear programme, 'which has no credible civilian purpose and is in violation of almost all provisions in the nuclear deal agreed in 2015'. The EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said: 'Today the regional escalation benefits no one. We must keep the discussions open.' Earlier on Friday, Macron said the European offer to end Israel's war would include an Iranian move to zero uranium enrichment, restrictions on its ballistic missile programme and an end to Tehran's funding of terrorist groups. The proposals were surprisingly broad, spanning a range of complex issues beyond Iran's disputed nuclear programme, and appeared likely to complicate any solution unless an interim agreement can be agreed. One proposal recently aired is for Iran to suspend uranium enrichment for the duration of Trump's presidency. The concept of uranium enrichment being overseen by a consortium of Middle East countries – including Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates – remains on the table. Macron, already accused by Trump of publicity seeking this week, set out a daunting agenda. 'It's absolutely essential to prioritise a return to substantial negotiations, including nuclear negotiations to move towards zero [uranium] enrichment, ballistic negotiations to limit Iran's activities and capabilities, and the financing of all terrorist groups and destabilisation of the region that Iran has been carrying out for several years,' he said. In the previous five rounds of talks, the US insisted that Iran end its entire domestic uranium enrichment programme, but said it would allow Iran to retain a civil nuclear programme, including by importing enriched uranium from a multinational consortium. Iran claims that as a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, it has an absolute legal right to enrich uranium, a position neither the European nor American powers have endorsed. In the past, European negotiators have proved more adept than their US partners in finding compromises, including the temporary suspension of domestic enrichment, a principle Tehran reluctantly endorsed between 2003 and 2004.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Israel Unsure Iran Nuke Program 'Annihilated' After US Strikes: Official
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. During a Sunday morning press conference, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that "many presidents have dreamed of delivering the final blow to Iran's nuclear program, and none could until President Trump." The defense secretary then said to the world's cameras: "We devastated the Iranian nuclear program." In Israel, though, there's less certainty about whether Iran's nuclear development has been smashed to pieces by U.S. strikes on three of Iran's major nuclear facilities overnight, and whether the country's nuclear program is permanently out of the game. "Is it fully, fully annihilated? We don't know yet," a senior Israeli official told Newsweek. "Nobody knows yet," added the source, who was granted anonymity to speak freely. "It requires a lot of intelligence work." Israel and the U.S. both say they are still conducting assessments of the impact of American aircraft, massive "bunker-buster" bombs and submarine-launched cruise missiles on the central Iranian facilities of Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow. Initial takes suggest "all three sites sustained extremely severe damage," General Dan Caine, the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Sunday. Trump late on Saturday described Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities as "completely and totally obliterated." Yet analysts say it is very hard to judge whether the Iranian nuclear program, shrouded in mystery, has centrifuges squirreled away, or where exactly it is keeping many kilograms of unaccounted-for, highly enriched uranium. There may even still be entire sites no one knows about, experts add, on top of the difficulties working out the extent of destruction to areas so deep underground. Satellite imagery published on Sunday indicated several large craters at an ash-covered Fordow, damage to buildings at Isfahan and a 5.5-meter diameter crater directly over part of the underground facility at Natanz, according to imagery provider Maxar. Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon in Washington on June 22 after the U.S. military struck three sites in Iran, directly joining Israel's effort to destroy the... Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon in Washington on June 22 after the U.S. military struck three sites in Iran, directly joining Israel's effort to destroy the country's nuclear program. More AP Photo/Alex Brandon Caine, speaking to the media alongside Hegseth on Sunday, painted a picture of an intricate, highly classified American operation, rife with decoys and absolutely minimal communications while en route to Iran. A U.S. submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles against the aboveground facilities at Isfahan around 5 p.m. ET on Saturday, just before U.S. aircraft entered Iranian airspace, he said. Washington used deception tactics and a host of fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft traveling ahead of B-2 heavy bombers to sweep for Iranian fighter jets and air defenses, Caine added. At 6:40 p.m. ET, the first B-2 dropped two "bunker buster" GBU-57/B bombs at Fordow, the top general said. The rest of the munitions were dropped in the following 25 minutes, and Iran did not fire at U.S. aircraft traveling in or out of Iran, Caine added. The B-2s and their 30,000-pound GBU-57/B bombs were widely deemed the only aircraft-and-bomb combination to be able to take out a deeply buried site like Fordow, the underground complex built into a mountain roughly 60 miles south of Tehran. Israel, while not pursuing Fordow, has for over a week carried out extensive airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites, including Isfahan and Natanz, and killed a litany of senior nuclear scientists and generals. 'Ambitions Cannot Be Obliterated by Fire' "Military attacks can degrade a program to varying degrees, but there is no military solution for a decisive and inclusive elimination of the program," Darya Dolzikova, a senior research fellow for proliferation and nuclear policy with the influential British think tank, the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said. Attacks have certainly hit critical sites, Dolzikova told Newsweek. But even if the physical facilities sustain the maximum possible damage, "if Iran decides in the future that it wants to actually rebuild or even expand its program, the expertise remains for them to be able to do that." "Ambitions cannot be obliterated by fire," Eran Lerman, a former Israeli deputy national security adviser who's currently the vice president of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security, an Israeli think tank, said. But Israeli intelligence has reached the core of Iran's nuclear efforts, meaning it would be very difficult for Tehran to trust anyone it brings into the fold to rebuild, Lerman told Newsweek. Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful, but its officials have openly floated discussions on whether Tehran needs nuclear weapons. Experts say highly enriched uranium, far beyond that needed for non-weaponized nuclear development, has been found in Iran and it would not be hard for Tehran to make the leap toward a nuclear weapon. Israel said as it launched its strikes on Iran earlier this month that Tehran "could take steps to produce a weapon in a very short time" if not stopped. U.S. intelligence believes Iran hasn't decided whether it take that step towards weaponization, The New York Times reported on Thursday, citing officials. However, Iran's top leadership is likely to move towards producing a bomb if the U.S. attacked Fordow, senior intelligence officials told the newspaper at the time. How Iran's most senior players currently assess the playing field, after U.S. strikes on Fordow, is not clear. Trump once again pushed for Iran to negotiate on a deal late Saturday, threatening Tehran with "far greater" attacks if it did not negotiate. The country's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, warned of "everlasting consequences" for what he termed "outrageous" U.S. attacks, and has said Tehran will not negotiate while under Israeli attack. Iran's nuclear program cannot be taken out without negotiations, William Alberque, a senior adjunct fellow with the Pacific Forum and a former director of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Arms Control, Disarmament and WMD [Weapons of Mass Destruction] Non-Proliferation Center, said. "They've developed the most advanced centrifuges," he told Newsweek. "Those designs can't be eliminated." For international watchers to be sure they have a grip on Iran's nuclear development, Tehran would need to be under an enrichment ban and the United Nations' (U.N.) nuclear watchdog would need access to undeclared Iranian nuclear sites, Alberque said. Iranian state media reported key nuclear sites had been evacuated ahead of U.S. attacks, with enriched uranium moved "to a safe location." Satellite imagery provided by Maxar showed "unusual truck and vehicular activity" close to the entrance of Fordow on Thursday and Friday. Iran was producing considerable amounts of highly enriched uranium at Fordow, but it is not immediately apparent how much was still at the site in recent days, Alberque told Newsweek earlier on Sunday. The U.N.'s' nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said on Sunday it had not detected an increase in off-site radiation levels but called an "emergency meeting" for Monday.
