Earth's core holds a vast reservoir of gold - and it's leaking towards the surface

You might think the Earth's largest gold reserves are locked up at Fort Knox.
But Earth's core is rich with the precious metal – and it's slowly making its way up towards us, according to a new study.
Ultra-high precision analysis of volcanic rocks show Earth's core is 'leaking' into rocks above.
And it's bringing gold and other precious metals with it.
Dr Nils Messling, at Göttingen University's Department of Geochemistry, said: 'When the first results came in, we realised that we had literally struck gold!
'Our data confirmed that material from the core, including gold and other precious metals, is leaking into the Earth's mantle above.'
More than 99.999 per cent of Earth's stores of gold lie buried under 2,900km (1,800 miles) of solid rock, locked away within the Earth's metallic core and far beyond the reaches of humankind.
The team analysed rocks on the island of Hawaii, specifically looking at traces of the precious metal ruthenium (Ru).
Compared to the Earth's rocky mantle, the metallic core contains a slightly higher abundance of a particular isotope called 100Ru.
That's because this ruthenium, which was locked in the Earth's core together with gold and other precious metals when it formed 4.5 billion years ago, came from a different source than the scarce amount that is contained in the mantle today.
These differences are so small it was impossible to detect them in the past.
Now, new procedures developed by the research team made it possible to analyse them.
The unusually high 100Ru levels they found in lava on the Earth's surface can only mean that these rocks ultimately originated from the boundary between the Earth's core and mantle.
Professor Matthias Willbold, who also worked on the study, said: 'Our findings not only show that the Earth's core is not as isolated as previously assumed.
'We can now also prove that huge volumes of super-heated mantle material – several hundreds of quadrillion metric tonnes of rock – originate at the core-mantle boundary and rise to the Earth's surface to form ocean islands like Hawaii.'
The findings mean that at least some of the precarious supplies of gold and other precious metals that we currently have access to may have come from the Earth's core.
It's believed that when the Earth was forming, gold and other heavier elements sank down into its interior.
As a result, the majority of gold we currently have access to on the Earth's surface was delivered here by meteors bombarding our planet.
Other elements that could currently be 'leaking' out of the core include palladium, rhodium and platinum.
Despite the findings it's unlikely these precious metals are emerging at a particularly fast rate.
It would also be impossible to drill down to where the Earth's core begins – approximately 2,900km (1,800 miles) - to access the gold contained down there.
The findings were published in the journal Nature.
Earth has an unusually high proportion of precious metals near the surface, which is surprising, as they would usually be expected to settle down near the core of the planet.
Until now, this has been explained by the 'late veneer' theory, which suggests that foreign objects hit Earth, and in the process deposited the precious metals near the surface.
New computer simulations from the Tokyo Institute of Technology took into account the metal concentrations on Earth, the moon and Mars, and suggests that a huge collision could have brought all the precious metals to Earth at once.
The researchers believe that this happened before the Earth's crust formed – around 4.45 billion years ago.
The findings suggest that Earth's history could have been less violent than previously thought.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

7 hours ago

• The Independent

Cannabis users more likely to die of heart disease, study reveals

Marijuana users are up to twice as likely to have a stroke, heart attack, or die from heart disease, research has revealed. University of California scientists found there was a 29 per cent higher risk of conditions like heart attack, a 20 per cent higher risk for stroke and double the risk of dying from heart disease among cannabis users. The study, published in Heart, reviewed 24 studies involving 200 million people to investigate the relationship between the drug and the diseases. The researchers warned that the study 'raises serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk'. The reviewed studies, which ranged from 2016 to 2023, included people aged between 19 and 59 years old. The research did not specify if the marijuana exposure was from smoking the drug or other forms of consumption. In 2023, the American College of Cardiology revealed that people who smoke marijuana or eat weed-laced edibles daily are a third more likely to develop coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is the most common form of heart disease – cholesterol narrows the arteries supplying blood to the organ, causing chest pain, shortness of breath and fatigue. The significant link remained regardless of whether users smoked tobacco, drank alcohol, had major cardiovascular risk factors, and no matter their age or sex. Whether users took cannabis by smoking the drug, eating edibles, or other methods also made no difference. The American College of Cardiology researchers said people should let their doctors know if they use the drug, so clinicians can start monitoring heart health. Dr Ishan Paranjpe, resident physician at Stanford University and the study's lead author, said: 'We found that cannabis use is linked to CAD, and there seems to be a dose-response relationship in that more frequent cannabis use is associated with a higher risk of CAD. 'In terms of the public health message, it shows that there are probably certain harms of cannabis use that weren't recognised before, and people should take that into account. 'From a scientific standpoint, these findings are exciting because they suggest there might be new drug targets and mechanisms we can explore to take control of this pathway going forward.'

The Sun

10 hours ago

• The Sun

Mummified creature with human-like hands found next to severed head is linked to legend of blood-sucking beast

A MUMMIFIED creature with human-like hands was found, leaving scientists gobsmacked as they find out what it is. The creature, called the "Capacabra," was found at Michigan State University while Cook-Seevers Hall was being renovated in 2018. 5 5 Since then, it's become a spooky mascot for the school's Campus Archaeology Program, with some of them working to solve the mystery. "It is roughly the size of a small cat, and it's got a very long, skinny tail, which goes hand in hand with cat-like features," Jerielle Cartales, a PHD student, told the Daily Mail. "But it has very, like, almost human hands. There's five fingers, and nails, and everything – it looks almost humanoid." The creature is covered with a thin layer of tissue that Cartales said felt like "old parchment paper." "It has its nose and its ear still, but they're very dried out." Comparisons have been made to the chupacabra, a mythical, bloodsucking beast from American folklore, hence the nickname the "capacabra." Like its namesake, there's so much about the creature that's unknown, including its age, however, it can't predate 1889, which is when the building the constructed. "So the interesting thing is that it could have been there for a month, it could have been there for 50 years, we don't really know," said Cartales. "Theoretically, I guess we could try radiocarbon dating it, but the building itself isn't old enough for it to be worth it." THEORIES RUNNING AMOK Since the creature's discovery, there have been many theories on what it could possibly be, including one expert suggesting it could be an opossum However, Cartales doesn't agree. "And so we were throwing out a bunch of ideas about what it could be," she said. "We were throwing out like 'maybe it's a dog, maybe it's a cat,' but raccoon didn't even make the list. "And now, that's my very strong hunch." The mummy was X-rayed to compare its skeleton with other known species, providing a clearer picture of what it could be. So far, a dog, a cat, and a rat were quickly ruled out as possible theories. At first, a raccoon seemed like a possibility; however, it's hard to be sure without a dental comparison, said Cartales. "A raccoon has the same general cranium shape, and the same with the snout shape," she said. "But the osteology text doesn't have any good images of dentition for the raccoon because their example was edentulous. "So I'm trying to find an example of a raccoon I can use for dentition. That's the next step." How the creature ended up in the building is also a mystery, with Cartales thinking it may have gone inside an air duct and got trapped. Mummification can happen in dry environments, which is likely how the creature met its fate. "If it was found next to an air duct, which seems to me like the most accessible point for an animal to get in from the outside, then that would be a pretty regular supply of warm, dry air, especially in the colder months." She added that it gets very humid in the area, but the building offered the perfect environment for mummification to take place. For now, Cartales believes the creature is a raccoon, "I'm a scientist, I'm never going to say 100% on anything." 5

The Guardian

18 hours ago

• The Guardian

Trump's plan to ban US states from AI regulation will ‘hold us back', says Microsoft science chief

Microsoft's chief scientist has warned that Donald Trump's proposed ban on state-level guardrails on artificial intelligence will slow the development of the frontier technology rather than accelerate it. Dr Eric Horvitz, a former technology adviser to Joe Biden, said bans on regulation will 'hold us back' and 'could be at odds with making good progress on not just advancing the science, but in translating it into practice'. The Trump administration has proposed a 10-year ban on US states creating 'any law or regulation limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems'. It is driven in part by White House fears China could otherwise win the race to human-level AI, but also pressure from tech investors, such as Andreessen Horowitz, an early investor in Facebook, which argues consumer uses should be regulated rather than research efforts. Its co-founder, the Trump donor Marc Andreessen, said earlier this month that the US was in a two horse race for AI supremacy with China. The US vice-president, JD Vance, recently said: 'If we take a pause, does [China] not take a pause? Then we find ourselves … enslaved to [China]-mediated AI.' Horvitz said he was already concerned about 'AI being leveraged for misinformation and inappropriate persuasion' and for its use 'for malevolent activities, for example, in the biology biological hazard space'. Horvitz's pro-regulation comments came despite reports that Microsoft is part of a Silicon Valley lobbying push with Google, Meta and Amazon, to support the ban on individual US states regulating AI for the next decade which is included in Trump's budget bill which is passing through Congress. Microsoft is part of a lobbying drive to urge the US Senate to enact a decade-long moratorium on individual states introducing their own efforts to legislate, the Financial Times reported last week. The ban has been written into Trump's 'big beautiful bill' that he wants passed by Independence Day on 4 July. Horvitz was speaking at a meeting of the the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence on Monday when he said: 'It's up to us as scientists to communicate to government agencies, especially those right now who might be making statements about no regulation, [that] this is going to hold us back. 'Guidance, regulation … reliability controls are part of advancing the field, making the field go faster in many ways.' Speaking at the same seminar, Stuart Russell, the professor of computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, said: 'Why would we deliberately allow the release of a technology which even its creators say has a 10% to 30% chance … of causing human extinction? We would never accept anything close to that level of risk for any other technology.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The apparent contradiction between Microsoft's chief scientist and reports of the company's lobbying effort comes amid rising fears that unregulated AI development could pose catastrophic risks to humanity and is being driven by companies prioritising short-term profit. Microsoft has invested $14bn (£10bn) in OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, whose chief executive Sam Altman who this week predicted that: 'In five or 10 years we will have great human robots and they will just walk down the street doing stuff … I think that would be one of the moments that … will feel the strangest.' Predictions of when human-level artificial general intelligence (AGI) will be reached vary from a couple of years to decades. The Meta chief scientist, Yann LeCun, has said AGI could be decades away, while last week his boss, Mark Zuckerberg, announced a $15bn investment in a bid to achieve 'superintelligence'. Microsoft declined to comment.