North Ayrshire Conservative group rail against 20mph zone plans
The group called on the council to suspend the implementation of the new rules.
Angry Tories have 'called in' controversial plans agreed by North Ayrshire Council to implement the controversial 20mph speed limit on urban roads.
They suggest it will dilute police and council resources and adversely affect public transport efficiency.
North Ayrshire Council Cabinet earlier this month noted the Scottish Government's National Strategy for 20mph in Urban areas and agreed the implementation of 20mph speed limits on appropriate roads as detailed in the implementation plans.
A request was received in terms of the call-in procedure set out in the council's Scheme of Administration and Standing Orders, that the Audit and Scrutiny Committee examine the decision taken by the Cabinet at their meeting next Thursday, June 19.
The call-in request, which was signed by Conservative councillors Todd Ferguson, Scott Gallacher and Ronnie Stalker is in the following terms: 'The Scottish Government's National 20mph Strategy is aspirational in tone but experimental in scope. While well-intentioned, its widespread implementation lacks sufficient evidence of efficacy, especially on roads already exhibiting average speeds below 25mph.
'This policy, if adopted without amendment, risks diluting police and Council resources, adversely affecting public transport efficiency, and imposing unjustifiable burdens on the public purse—contrary to the financial prudence owed to North Ayrshire's taxpayers.
'The strategy also raises legitimate legal and democratic concerns regarding adequacy of consultation, particularly among working residents, rural communities, and small business owners who will bear the practical consequences of slower road speeds and delayed logistics.
'As a matter of public administration, the council must guard against overreach in regulatory intervention without evidence-based justification and must uphold the principle of proportionality, particularly when imposing restrictions on public freedoms.
'The Conservative Group respectfully calls upon Cabinet to:
Suspend the blanket implementation of the 20mph speed limit across all roads identified in Appendix 1, pending the outcome of a full review of cost-effectiveness, enforceability, and public consultation.
Commission an independent impact assessment, consistent with principles of Best Value as defined in the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003, before any further capital expenditure is incurred.
Adopt a targeted and proportionate approach, taking into account the feedback from the public consultation referenced above and elected members, with 20mph zones restricted to locations supported by empirical safety data—such as near schools, care facilities, or recorded accident black spots.'
The Elected Members who have submitted the call-in will be invited to address the Committee to explain the respective call-in request.
The appropriate Cabinet Member will then be invited to clarify the reasons for the decision. The relevant senior officer will also be present to provide information on the report presented to Cabinet and on issues raised by the call-in received.
The committee will have an opportunity to ask questions of both parties and of those officers in attendance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
7 minutes ago
- Spectator
Reform's ‘Britannia cards' will cost £34 billion
Speaking today at Church House in Westminster, Nigel Farage announced that Reform will introduce a 'Britannia card' that will let wealthy foreigners pay a £250,000 fee to move to the UK, and live here exempt from all tax on their foreign assets. The move is an attempt to win over 'non-doms' alienated by Labour and Conservative governments and bring their wealth back into the country. Farage may think his policy will attract 'talented people' from around the world, in reality it is more likely to deter them. Farage forgot about the Laffer curve The party says the policy will raise between £1.5 and £2.5 billion annually. Our analysis of the data suggests it is more likely to cost around £34 billion over five years. To understand why the policy will cost so much, it is important to look at the recent history of 'non-doms'. For many years, anyone moving here paid tax on their UK income and assets but were exempt from tax on foreign income and assets (unless they brought them into the country). There were then a number of reforms which introduced a £30,000 fee to keep this benefit – a fee which increased over time. Finally, in 2024 the Tories scrapped the non-dom regime and replaced it with a four-year exemption from tax on foreign earnings. Labour slightly tightened that exemption this year. Reform is proposing to go back to the pre-2017 position for the very wealthy, with a new fee structure. Non-doms will be able to pay a one-off £250,000 for a 'Britannia card' and become tax-exempt on foreign earnings and assets forever. There's then a cute bit of populist politics: the £250,000 payments will be redistributed Robin-Hood style as a cash payment to the approximately 2.5 million workers earning a full-time salary of less than £23,000. The party's 'low end' estimate is that 6,000 people will buy a 'Britannia card' each year – and on that basis the policy will generate £1.6 billion, meaning a £600 payment to each low-paid worker. Farage went further when he introduced the policy, saying 'tens of thousands' would be tempted to move to the UK and the payment would be 'just the tip of the iceberg of what these people will pay if they come back' because of the likes of VAT and Stamp Duty. There are several big problems with this. First, whilst the proposal makes the UK more attractive to the very wealthy who can afford £250,000, it makes the UK much less attractive to the highly skilled and highly paid professionals we want to attract from abroad – such as doctors, coders, senior scientists and entrepreneurs. Many other countries have special tax arrangements to attract these kinds of expats. Under Reform's proposal, the UK would be very uncompetitive by comparison. Those unable or unwilling to pay the £250,000 upfront cost would suddenly have to pay full UK tax, and also any tax in their home country. Often these expats will have savings in their home country which benefit from a favoured tax treatment – much like an ISA. The prospect of those savings suddenly being subject to UK tax will not be appetising for them. Farage may think his policy will attract 'talented people' from around the world, in reality it is more likely to deter them. Farage forgot about the Laffer curve. Second, Reform is planning to hand a windfall to a relatively small number of very wealthy people who were already planning to stay here and pay tax. They will now just have to pay a one-off £250,000, with the rest of their tax revenue disappearing. The amounts involved are very large. The Office for Budget Responsibility suggests recent Conservative and Labour non-dom reforms will raise £33.9 billion from 2026-30, with most of this revenue coming from the Conservative's 2024 reforms. When wealthy individuals stop paying tax after they buy a Britannia card, this money will be lost – and will have to be funded by tax cuts or spending rises, especially as any Britannia card revenue will be given directly to those on low incomes. The OBR figure takes 'behavioural response' into account, and the OBR's record of tax projections is solid (their 2023 projection was just 4 per cent out). Could this cost be overcome by attracting lots of very wealthy people to the UK? That seems pretty unlikely. When the £30,000 annual non-dom fee was first introduced in 2008, only 5,000 people were willing to pay it. The idea that more than 6,000 people will pay £250,000 upfront is very optimistic. The idea that 6,000 will pay every year is almost inconceivable. There's another problem here for Reform. Because the rules around non-doms have changed so much in recent years, few billionaires will truly believe they will be forever exempt from tax if they purchase a Britannia card. After all, no parliament can bind its successors. Unless you think Reform are going to win two or more elections in a row, you're unlikely to move here to benefit from the tax regime. That's particular the case after other countries have rescinded their previously generous tax offers for expats. Spain lured highly paid foreigners with its 'Beckham's law', but in the 2020s began to aggressively target people who'd used it. Portugal recently restricted its generous non-habitual residence regime. High-net-worth individuals crave stability and predictability when making long-term decisions about where they are going to live. It's unlikely many will be attracted by a 'Britannia card' that could be cancelled in a few years anyway.
Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Spectator
Badenoch: Tories are ‘the adults in the room'
It is a year of two major anniversaries for the Tories. The first is the centenary of Margaret Thatcher's birth; the second is the half-centenary since she was elected leader. To mark the occasion, the think-tank Policy Exchange is laying on a series of events to commemorate the Iron Lady. Today's was a sit down interview between Thatcher's biographer, Charles Moore, and Kemi Badenoch, one of Thatcher's successors. The conversation between the pair was an engaging one, aimed at highlighting Badenoch's ability to grasp the major issues of our time. Some of her remarks were punchy: like her suggestion that the UK 'is being cut out of intelligence' on the Iran crisis 'because we cannot be trusted'. Others were familiar: her insistence that Reform is 'not serious… somebody has to be the adult in the room. We are the adults in the room, and sometimes it is not popular to be the adults in the room.' There was a hint of policy too. Badenoch confirmed she 'had looked at' Denmark's so-called 'ghetto laws', under which social housing areas with high levels of deprivation and a 'non-Western' population above 50 per cent are declared 'parallel societies'. She said she wanted something 'along the lines' of this policy, noting the disparities in population 'and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.' Much of it was good, sensible stuff for the various attendees nodding along in the think-tank's headquarters. But the question is: was anyone listening? The room might have been crammed been full of dozens of the great-and-the-good of the British right. Yet online, the likes of GB News, Daily Express and Policy Exchange struggled to get more than 40 viewers on their respective live streams. Lord Moore made a good point when comparing Badenoch's leadership to the early days of her predecessor. Back then, in 1978, Thatcher only had to say one word on migration – 'swamped' – and the polls began to move in her favour. Now, with Reform on the right, the bar for cut-through has risen much higher. Given the current pace of politics, it will be interesting tomorrow to compare the coverage of this event to that afforded to Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick's speeches today. Badenoch and her team believe that, ultimately, their patience will be rewarded. They point to her record in being proved right on self-ID and Kneecap's funding in government; her victories in opposition by forcing Labour to U-turn on winter fuel and an inquiry into grooming gangs inquiry. Yet to seize back power after a record defeat, she will need to not merely show that the Tories are not merely the adults in the room – but ones worth listening to as well.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Badenoch ‘looking at Danish ghetto laws' in push for ‘active integration'
Under Danish law, social housing areas with high levels of deprivation and a 'non-Western' population above 50% are declared 'parallel societies'. Such a declaration can trigger requirements to reduce the amount of social housing in an area, including through evicting residents and demolishing or turning their homes into private housing, and restrictions on who can move there. Asked whether she would consider a similar policy for the UK, Mrs Badenoch told an audience at the Policy Exchange think tank on Monday she had 'looked at it' and would be talking about it more. She said: 'I think integration is not enough. I say assimilate, I think assimilation should be the target, and if people don't assimilate, then they integrate. 'But we've had so many, so many people, so high numbers, people from lots of different places, which is not what immigration used to look like, and I think we need to move from passive to active integration.' Saying this was 'along the lines' of the Danish policy, she added: 'We need to do what works for the UK, it's not exactly the same situation, we have a much bigger population, and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.' The Danish law is currently being challenged at the European Court of Justice by human rights groups, who argue it discriminates against people based on their ethnicity. During her appearance at the Policy Exchange event, the Conservative leader went on to say she wanted to see the state doing less, saying she did not want to see an 'active state' in areas outside policing and defence. She also argued for society to do more to prevent 'unstable' families from being formed. Asked about the role of personal responsibility in family policy, she said: 'I think that we need to start looking more at the prevention side of it. 'How do we make sure people don't start families that are unstable in the first place? I don't think that government needs to get overly involved in that. 'Society, and there is such a thing as society, needs to have some form of supporting families as well.'
