Has Europe Already Lost the AI Arms Race?
Bloomberg Tech: Europe spotlights the biggest names and trends shaping the region's technology ecosystem as the global competition heats up. This monthly, 30-minute 'magazine-style' show features in-depth interviews with top technology leaders, as well as major investors and policymakers - giving you a compelling A to Z of the most consequential innovations, opportunities and challenges. On today's show, the next industrial revolution is here — powered by AI. The US and China may dominate, but is Europe ready to close the gap? We discuss with Plural CEO, Carina Namih, Giant Ventures, Co-Founder & General Partner, Tommy Stadlen, Balderton Principal, Laura McGinnis and Arm CEO Rene Haas. (Source: Bloomberg)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Uber Expands AI Data Platform to Power Next-Gen Enterprise and AI Lab Needs
SAN FRANCISCO, June 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER) today announced a major expansion of its AI data services business, Uber AI Solutions, making its technology platform available to support AI labs and enterprises around the world. The new offerings include customized data solutions for building smarter AI models and agents, global digital task networks, and tools to help companies build and test AI models more efficiently. Over the past decade, Uber has developed deep expertise in collecting, labeling, testing, and localizing data for its own global operations, including optimizing the search of places or menu items, training self-driving car systems, building Gen AI agents for customer support, and translating content in more than 100 languages. Now that same expertise is being made available to other businesses through Uber AI Solutions, the company's dedicated team focused on powering the next generation of artificial intelligence. "We're bringing together Uber's platform, people, and AI systems to help other organizations build smarter AI more quickly," said Megha Yethadka, GM and Head of Uber AI Solutions. "With today's updates, we're scaling our platform globally to meet the growing demand for reliable, real-world AI data." What's New Global digital task platformUber AI Solutions is now available in 30 countries with a platform that connects enterprises to global talent, including experts in coding, finance, law, science, and linguistics. These tasks include annotation, translation, and editing for multi-lingual and multi-modal content. Powered by Uber's foundational platforms for identity, verification, payments and more, this expands Uber's gig work model into the world of AI. A new data foundryA new service that provides ready-to-use and custom-collected datasets—including audio, video, image, and text—to train large AI models. Built with data collected by individuals around the world using Uber technology, the data foundry supports use cases on generative AI, mapping, speech recognition, and others, with built-in privacy and compliance. Agentic AI supportUber AI Solutions is offering the tools and data to help train smart AI agents, including realistic task flows, high-quality annotations, simulations and multilingual support, helping AI agents understand and navigate real-world business processes. Shared infrastructure for AI buildersUber is making its internal platforms available to enterprise clients. These are the same platforms Uber uses to manage large-scale annotation projects and validate AI outputs, and includes AI-powered smart onboarding, quality checks, smart task decomposition and routing, and feedback loops to ensure accuracy and efficiency. Building the human intelligence layer for AI With these advancements, Uber AI Solutions is poised to become the human intelligence layer for AI development worldwide—combining software, operational expertise, and its massive global scale. Looking ahead, Uber is building an AI-powered interface that will allow clients to simply describe their data needs in plain language, letting the platform handle setup, task assignment, workflow optimization, and quality management for scalable AI training. About Uber Uber's mission is to create opportunity through movement. We started in 2010 to solve a simple problem: how do you get access to a ride at the touch of a button? More than 61 billion trips later, we're building products to get people closer to where they want to be. By changing how people, food, and things move through cities, Uber is a platform that opens up the world to new possibilities. View source version on Contacts Uber Press Contact: press@
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Michael Hicks column: The labor demand shocks of artificial intelligence
The most disruptive technology in human history was almost certainly the wheel. That economic shock, and all the others that followed, give us useful insight into labor market effects of artificial intelligence. The invention of the wheel cut transportation costs by 80% or 90%, dramatically reducing demand for workers who carried goods across and between towns. We've had other technology shocks — the use of fossil fuels, steam and then electric power, the internal combustion engine and computers. All these technologies replaced tasks that were part of jobs. The wheel replaced a strong back, the steam loom replaced strong legs. The use of fossil fuels replaced the cutting, splitting and drying of lumber, and electricity replaced the use of steam looms. For us, the computer has been the most disruptive technology. It radically changed the types of work that almost everybody performs. It also changed our ways of communicating, our amusements, our safety and health. It brought us the internet, social media and now AI. AI has been around in some form since the 1950s. I first heard about it in 1992, when a colleague of mine, then an infantry captain, was sent to obtain a master's degree in AI. By 1997, I was learning the use of rudimentary AI in economic modeling. The new, commercial applications of AI are much more advanced — and interesting — than the early AI algorithms of the 1990s. The large language models are superb for writing reports, school papers and summaries of some topics. Generative AI can construct pictures and movies that are almost indistinguishable from the work of actual humans. The potential applications of these new technologies are boundless, to the extent that any one person could predict. I see all types of uses in economics and warfare, the two fields I've been trained and educated in. There are also limitations. I've asked commercial versions of LLMs to provide novel testable hypotheses in economics — the lifeblood of economic analysis. The LLMs are good at naming data sources and, with enough prompts, can even construct the mathematical model to support a hypothesis. But none of the hypotheses were really any more than most middle school kids could have derived. The generative AI models are equally poor right now, delivering pictures of people with seven fingers or grilling burgers with lettuce, tomatoes and buns. They'll get better, of course, but what is AI likely to do to the demand for labor? I think the easy answer is that it will increase the demand for labor, in much the same way as the wheel, the steam loom, the automobile and the computer. That is, in a very nuanced way. Technology doesn't replace jobs; it replaces tasks. Almost always, the tasks replaced are the most mundane, routine and trainable ones. In so doing, the technology makes the uniquely human part of the job more valuable. The best long-form description of this comes in an accessible paper by David Autor who described Polanyi's Paradox, that 'we can know more (about our jobs) than we can tell.' The point of Polyani, which Autor fleshed out in superb contemporary detail, is that the unseen part of technology is how humans adapt it to complement their innate skills. Since the end of World War II, technology has replaced more than 80% of the work done by the average American. Throughout the longest and most impactful technology shock, the U.S. boosted wages, production and employment. AI may be different than any technology before it, but the adaptation was not technological — it was human. We humans are much as we've always been, and the economic incentive to match complementary human and technology skills remains robust. The most likely outcome of AI adoption will be positive, like all the other technology adoptions before it. But that doesn't mean there won't be challenges. The most dramatically unpleasant periods of technology adoption occurred in the places, and among the people, that could not adapt. James Whitcomb Riley's The Raggedy Man of 1888 described a type of itinerant worker that existed until at least the 1960s in U.S. agriculture. The Raggedy Man is gone now, because the skills he brought to a farm are no longer sufficient to earn him three meals and a simple room. Even then, one is tempted by this poem to conclude that he was employed for reasons beyond labor productivity. Technology eliminates the less skilled tasks a worker does, pushing them to more skilled — and more uniquely human — tasks. AI is likely to impact skills held by more educated workers than the robotics of the 1980s and later, or the digitization of the 2000s. AI will write simple research summaries, press releases and perform straightforward design work. This will lead to increased demand for more detailed and complex research summaries, more insightful press releases and more innovative designs than AI can produce. AI will also open demand for employment totally divorced from the direct complementarity to technology. As easily replicable human skills become inexpensive, the relative value of scarcer, purely human skills will rise. What does AI portend for education and regions? The one common thread of all previous technologies is that they complemented human-specific intellectual and social skills. So, job losses were clustered among those who were armed with skills that were more readily replaced. Thus, AI is likely to boost demand for workers with a lengthier, broader and more complex education. That education accesses more latent human skills. This used to be called a liberal education, but a better moniker is a classical education. Of course, such an education is not trendy today, in part because it is costly. It is much cheaper and faster to prepare for the last technological shock than the next one.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI is more likely to create a generation of ‘yes-men on servers' than any scientific breakthroughs, Hugging Face co-founder says
Hugging Face's co-founder, Thomas Wolf, is pouring cold water on the hopes that current AI systems could revolutionize scientific progress. Speaking to Fortune at VivaTech in Paris, Wolf argued that today's large language models excel at producing plausible answers but lack the creativity to ask original scientific questions. Rather than building the next Einstein, Wolf says we may be creating a generation of digital 'yes-men.' Hugging Face's top scientist, Thomas Wolf, says current AI systems are unlikely to make the scientific discoveries some leading labs are hoping for. Speaking to Fortune at Viva Technology in Paris, the Hugging Face co-founder said that while large language models (LLMs) have shown an impressive ability to find answers to questions, they fall short when trying to ask the right ones—something Wolf sees as the more complex part of true scientific progress. 'In science, asking the question is the hard part, it's not finding the answer,' Wolf said. 'Once the question is asked, often the answer is quite obvious, but the tough part is really asking the question, and models are very bad at asking great questions.' Wolf said he came to the conclusion after reading a widely circulated blog post by Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called Machines of Loving Grace. In it, Amodei argues the world is about to see the 21st century 'compressed' into a few years as AI accelerates science drastically. Wolf said he initially found the piece inspiring but started to doubt Amodei's idealistic vision of the future after the second read. 'It was saying AI is going to solve cancer and it's going to solve mental health problems — it's going to even bring peace into the world, but then I read it again and realized there's something that sounds very wrong about it, and I don't believe that,' he said. For Wolf, the problem isn't that AI lacks knowledge but that it lacks the ability to challenge our existing frame of knowledge. AI models are trained to predict likely continuations, for example, the next word in a sentence, and while today's models excel at mimicking human reasoning, they fall short of any real original thinking. 'Models are just trying to predict the most likely thing,' Wolf explained. 'But in almost all big cases of discovery or art, it's not really the most likely art piece you want to see, but it's the most interesting one.' Using the example of the game of Go, a board game that became a milestone in AI history when DeepMind's AlphaGo defeated world champions in 2016, Wolf argued that while mastering the rules of Go is impressive, the bigger challenge lies in inventing such a complex game in the first place. In science, he said, the equivalent of inventing the game is asking these truly original questions. Wolf first suggested this idea in a blog post titled The Einstein AI Model, published earlier this year. In it, he wrote: 'To create an Einstein in a data center, we don't just need a system that knows all the answers, but rather one that can ask questions nobody else has thought of or dared to ask.' He argues that what we have instead are models that behave like 'yes-men on servers'—endlessly agreeable, but unlikely to challenge assumptions or rethink foundational ideas. This story was originally featured on
