As wolf packs grow in California, cattle ranchers face mounting losses

On the California-Oregon border, in the shadow of Mount Shasta, Axel Hunnicutt, state wolf coordinator for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, is on the hunt for the gray wolf.
"Because it is potentially a kill site, we will be, you know, kind of cautious," Hunnicutt told CBS News.
Once nearly extinct in the United States, wolves are making a comeback in California.
Trail cameras show wolf packs in Siskiyou County. They're healthy and well-fed, partly because these wolves have developed a taste for beef. The Department of Fish and Wildlife says there are now 10 packs in the state, with three discovered this year.
Ranchers Jim and Mary Rickert said that in the last year, they've lost 16 cows to confirmed wolf attacks, with 60 suspected kills.
"It really eats into your herd and to your bottom line. It's hard for a lot of us to stay in business," Mary Rickert told CBS News.
The first gray wolf wandered back into California by accident in 2011, according to the state. Wolves in the state soon became the most protected in the country, listed as endangered by both the federal and state governments.
There are consequences for killing wolves, including jail time, the Rickerts said.
"And so, we are really defenseless," Mary Rickert said.
The state's population surged to between 50 to 70 wolves in a decade. California is now helping ranchers with a wolf-tracking map and possibly allowing more aggressive deterrents, such as shooting off bean bag rounds.
"They need a negative lesson in order to have that reinforcement," Hunnicutt said.
Rancher Janna Gliatto said she's lost almost 50 animals, despite trying "every deterrent that has ever been known or suggested." The ranch had to hire a night watchman.
"We're probably paying about $70,000 to $100,000" a year, Gliatto said.
California has already spent more than $3 million compensating ranchers for their losses, according to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The state Legislature in 2021 appropriated the funds to develop a Wolf-Livestock Compensation Pilot Program based on the need to address direct livestock loss, nonlethal deterrents and to pay for presence, according to the department.
But the money has run out; the California Department of Fish and Wildlife said funds were exhausted in March 2024. Now the state says it's only paying for confirmed wolf kills, not deterrents.
"The wolves, they're expensive. And if the state of California wants to sustain these sort of numbers, then it's going to be a costly project," Gliatto said.
"It should not be our job to feed the wolves," she added.
Patrick Griffin agrees. He investigates wolf attacks so ranchers can get paid.
"Wolves need tolerant people to survive. That's the bottom line. If there's no compensation, tolerance goes away over a period of time," Griffin told CBS News.
It's a price California taxpayers may have to pay — for the love of wolves.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

26 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Thieves accused in record $100 million jewelry heist also nabbed Apple AirTags and Samsung electronics, authorities claim

Seven California men allegedly orchestrated what federal prosecutors say is the largest jewelry theft in U.S. history, with millions in gems and lavish watches stolen from an armored truck following an international jewelry trade show. Two men were arrested last week, and all seven have been charged with conspiracy and theft, according to the Department of Justice. From the dark evening hours until the early morning of July 11, 2022, a crew of California men allegedly stalked a Brinks armored semi truck for 300 miles. The truck made its way south from an international jewelry expo in San Mateo in the San Francisco Bay Area, to rest stops in Buttonwillow and Lebec, California, both north of Los Angeles. The truck was carrying 73 bags of jewelry including pink sapphires in cushion cuts, deep-blue sapphires showing rare six-pointed stars, emeralds with sizable carat weights, and jade green pendants surrounded by diamonds. The seven-man crew allegedly struck in the morning while the truck was in Lebec, after plotting the heist for three days, authorities alleged in an indictment unsealed this month. The group allegedly stole 24 bags of gems including diamonds, rubies, emeralds, and expensive jewelry and Rolex watches from the Brinks truck. Victims later valued the haul at $100 million, making the alleged robbery the largest heist in U.S. history, according to prosecutors. The seven-man crew then allegedly brought the stolen goods to east Hollywood and each proceeded to deactivate their cellphone numbers in the days after the alleged caper. The indictment, returned this week, charged the seven California men with two counts of conspiracy to commit theft, among other theft and robbery charges. Each defendant faces five years in federal prison for theft conspiracy and 10 years for each theft charge. According to authorities, the men charged include Carlos Victor Mestanza Cercado, 31, of Pasadena; Jazael Padilla Resto, 36, of Boyle Heights and currently an inmate in Arizona state prison; Pablo Raul Lugo Larroig, 41, of Rialto; Victor Hugo Valencia Solorzano, 60, of the Rampart Village neighborhood of Los Angeles; Jorge Enrique Alban, 33, of South Los Angeles; Jeson Nelon Presilla Flores, 42, of Upland; and Eduardo Macias Ibarra, 36, of the Westlake neighborhood of Los Angeles. Messages left for Cercado, Lugo Larroig, and Alban were unreturned and attempts to reach Padilla Resto, Valencia Solorzano, Flores, and Ibarra were unsuccessful. In what is considered to be the largest jewelry heist in U.S. history, 7 men were charged for breaking into a Brinks semitruck and stealing approximately $100 million worth of gold, diamonds, rubies, emeralds & watches being transported in 2022. Details: — FBI Los Angeles (@FBILosAngeles) June 18, 2025 Authorities alleged in the indictment that this wasn't the crew's first rodeo. The court documents show the alleged thieves are accused of striking trucks and drivers for months before the massive jewelry heist allegedly took place. Back in March 2022, Mestanza, Lugo Larroig, Valencia Solorzano and other conspirators allegedly hunted a truck hauling electronics from Ontario, California, out for delivery. On March 2, the truck driver stopped at a store in Ontario and while the trio allegedly distracted him inside, others fled with $240,573 worth of Samsung devices, authorities alleged. They allegedly brought the goods to Padilla's place, where he took photos of the stolen electronics. Then on March 11, Lugo Larroig allegedly served as a scout while Mestanza, Padilla, Valencia Solorzano, Alban and others allegedly trailed a box truck carrying Apple AirTags from China to be delivered to a warehouse in Fontana, California. When the driver stopped for food in Fontana, the four served as lookouts around the restaurant, according to court documents. However, authorities say the driver caught the group trying to steal the AirTags and a confrontation ensued. One allegedly yelled at the driver, 'Don't move or I will f—k you up!' while holding a small knife, authorities alleged. The four eventually made off with the stolen Apple gear, valued at $57,377, authorities claim. On May 2, 2022, the group was allegedly at it again and drove to a truck stop in Fontana to target a semi truck. At the rest stop, one of the defendants allegedly used a crowbar to break into a truck. The group later stole Samsung electronics valued at $14,081, authorities alleged. Following the May haul, the group allegedly spent three separate days scouting the jewelry show before following the Brinks truck on the evening of July 10. Authorities said search warrants carried out last week recovered some of the $100 million in jewelry stolen in the heist. In a statement, a Brinks spokesperson told Fortune the company appreciated law enforcement's work in resolving the theft. 'Like everyone, we want to see those responsible brought to justice and the stolen goods returned,' the spokesperson said. Representatives from Apple and Samsung did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This story was originally featured on

New York Post

26 minutes ago

• New York Post

CAT-astrophe: NYC couple claims beloved rescue kitty crushed by self-cleaning litter box

A Bronx woman came home to a grisly cat-astrophe — her beloved feline was fatally crushed by a self-cleaning litter box. Stephanie Gomez knew something was wrong when she stepped off the elevator in her Williamsbridge apartment building and heard one of her two cats, Sebastian, crying from down the hall, she said. The medical assistant opened her door to find Sebastian frantic — and her other cat, Sarabi, dead, partially stuck inside her Autoscooper 11 litter box. 4 Sarabi was a friendly, playful cat, said Gomez, who rescued the furball after finding her crying on the street on a rainy night in the Bronx. 'I turned on the light. . . . I saw my cat being crushed by the machine,' an emotional Gomez, 35, told The Post of the gruesome Jan. 27 incident. 'It was making an awful sound. 'The machine is supposed to automatically stop when there is a body in it. The machine did not stop, it was still trying to close on her.' The tiny domestic shorthair's body was cold to the touch, with its rear and hind legs sticking out of the machine, according to Gomez and a $3 million Bronx Supreme Court lawsuit she and her partner, Frank Gueits, filed. 'It was completely devastating,' she said. 'I collapsed.' 4 Stephanie Gomez insists she'll never trust a similar automated device again. J.C. Rice She immediately called Gueits for help. 'Stephanie was very frantic, very upset and crying,' he said, recalling Sarabi's body was so mutilated by the machine 'she looked like she was in an L shape. It was really heartbreaking to see.' The litter box, which retails for about $200, was a Christmas gift from Gomez' mother and advertised as 'remaining partially open at all times, with no complete enclosure that could entrap a pet,' according to the lawsuit, which names Pet Pivot, the California-based company which makes the Autoscooper 11, and Amazon, which sold the device. 'A catastrophic failure of the product's safety mechanisms' led to Sarabi's 'long, painful death,' Gomez and Gueits said in court papers. 4 The Autoscooper 11 advertises itself as safe and claims sensors prevent cats from being trapped inside. PetPivot/ Amazon The same night, Gueits, 48, found an Amazon review of the Autoscooper 11 from a cat owner who claimed the littler box 'nearly killed their cat,' but the review was later removed, the couple claimed. Gomez' mother got a full refund after Sarabi's death and a handwritten letter from PetPivot CEO Poppy Xie, which lacked company letterhead or an address, offering condolences and $10,000, Gomez said in legal papers. The couple believes 'the $10,000 offer was an effort to quietly settle or suppress claims relating to the product's fatal defect,' they contended. Sarabi, who weighed less than 10 pounds, 'was the sweetest little thing,' Gomez said. 'She was so wonderful, she was the friendliest kitty. She was . . . very talkative, and don't leave your plate of food unattended,' Gomez laughed. 'There's not a day that goes by that I don't mourn her.' 4 Sebastian still sleeps on the spot where Sarabi was killed, Gomez said. She rescued Sarabi more than a year earlier, after she heard the kitty crying on a rainy night outside her local laundromat, and followed the sound until she found the cat hiding under a van. She named the grey striped feline after a character in Disney's 'The Lion King.' Sebastian has been devastated by the loss, with Gomez hand-feeding him for weeks afterward. 'To this day, Sebastian sleeps on the spot where the Autoscooper had killed Sarabi,' according to the lawsuit. 'I will never trust an automated machine again,' Gomez said. 'I don't want this to happen to anyone else.' Amazon and Pet Pivot did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The device is still being sold — and advertised as safe, said Peggy Collen, the attorney representing Gomez and Gueits. 'Sarabi's death was not an accident,' Collen said. 'If this happened to Sarabi, it could happen to any cat.'

CBS News

an hour ago

• CBS News

Driver in Lodi dies in crash while trying to evade police

A 19-year-old in Lodi died Friday night after crashing during a chase with officers, Lodi Police said. Around 11:15 p.m., an officer spotted someone driving recklessly near South Cherokee Lane and East Vine Street, police said. Police said the officer tried to pull him over, but the driver instead led the officer on a chase. The driver soon crashed as they got onto the southbound Highway 99 onramp at Cherokee Lane and Century Boulevard, according to police. The vehicle then rolled over and came to a rest on its roof. Police said there were two people in the vehicle. A passenger was able to get out of the vehicle, and they were taken to the hospital with injuries that were not life-threatening. However, the 19-year-old driver died at the scene, police said. Because the driver died during a chase with police, an investigation by various agencies is being conducted. "In accordance with the San Joaquin County Officer Incident Protocol, the investigation is being conducted by members of the Lodi Police Department, San Joaquin County District Attorney's Office, DOJ, and the San Joaquin County Medical Examiner's Office," Lodi Police said. The crash is being investigated by the California Highway Patrol.