logo
French MP banned from entering the US

French MP banned from entering the US

LeMonde4 days ago

Was it because he was born in Iran? Or because he wanted to build a "progressive international," an alliance to counter "the rise of reactionary neofascism"? On Tuesday, June 17, a French MP, Pouria Amirshahi, learned that he had been banned from entering the United States, where he had planned to go and meet with lawmakers, civil society figures, and intellectuals.
"This is the first time in 240 years of relations between our two countries that a parlementarian has been refused entry to the United States," said Amirshahi, expressing indignation and concern over the reasons behind the decision to ban him. The Green MP had, moreover, previously traveled to the US three times between 2000 and 2013: first as a tourist, then as a cultural director and national secretary of the Parti Socialiste, and finally, during his last term as an MP, when he was still a Socialist.
The situation seemed problematic from the start: First, his application for an Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), the standard online authorization required for entering the US, was denied. He then tried to go through the standard visa application process. At the US embassy, he explained the reason for his trip: To observe what had changed since Donald Trump was elected president, by meeting several local stakeholders.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Turning 80, UN faces fresh storm of doubts
Turning 80, UN faces fresh storm of doubts

France 24

time26 minutes ago

  • France 24

Turning 80, UN faces fresh storm of doubts

The UN's 193 member states will mark Thursday the signing of the organization's foundational treaty, the UN Charter, on June 26, 1945 in San Francisco. After ratification, the United Nations came into being on October 24. The anniversary comes as the world body faces a multi-faceted crisis that has raised questions about its future. "Since the end of the Cold War, we have seen the organization struggle in cases from the Rwandan genocide to the Iraq war," Richard Gowan, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, told AFP. "When each big crisis comes, commentators announce that the UN is finished. And yet it still survives," he added. "That said, this is an especially bad moment," Gowan acknowledged, pointing to numerous countries that are "deeply frustrated" by the UN Security Council's failure to act on major conflicts like those in Ukraine and Gaza. That inaction is largely due to the veto power of the council's five permanent members -- Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- which have competing interests. "The UN system as a whole has a credibility crisis, and it is not clear that the organization's members have the resources or political energy to rescue it," Gowan told AFP. For Romuald Sciora, a research fellow at the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs, the credibility issue can only result in the virtual disappearance of an organization that is already a political "dwarf" on the world stage. "I'm not sure the UN will cease to exist, even by its 100th anniversary," Sciora told AFP. "I see a slow vanishing, and the UN becoming a bit of a ghost," like "these old organizations whose names we have forgotten." But experts say while the UN desperately needs to enact tough reforms, not all of its problems come from within, and it has become an easy scapegoat for its divided membership. 'Worse' without UN Gissou Nia of the Washington-based Atlantic Council think tank says she fears that "the approach of might is right... is what is taking hold, and it brings us further and further away from the ideals" that led to the UN's founding as World War II ended. Nia, a human rights lawyer, says she hopes enough people will remain committed to the set of ideals and values "that will keep the UN alive," but still worries about the constant questioning of those values, notably from US ally Israel. "The constant berating from some very loud voices about the UN either being anti-Semitic, or the UN being a waste of funding, or the UN propping up dictators, actually has an impact," Nia told AFP. In a world devastated by the largest number of ongoing conflicts since 1945, and ravaged by major humanitarian crises, "the United Nations has never been more needed," Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said recently. "Our values have never been more relevant. And the needs have never been greater." Funding has nevertheless grown scarce as donors -- especially the United States under President Donald Trump -- pull back. Given the financial constraints, Guterres launched the UN80 initiative in a bid to streamline operations. Those changes could include thousands of positions being cut. For Gowan, "the UN is a very big organization, and of course it suffers from a variety of bureaucratic problems, just as almost all big organizations do. (...) So of course it deserves scrutiny and criticism." But, he added, "I think we have gotten a bit too accustomed to having this system at our service, and tend to spend too much time grumbling about its flaws and not enough time acknowledging its successes." The United Nations remains a place where arch-rivals and enemies still sit at the same table to air grievances, and where the smallest member state can have its voice heard. The UN also does important work on the ground, from the World Food Programme bringing needed supplies to more than 100 million people in 120 countries last year, to the thousands of peacekeepers protecting civilians in conflict zones. "The UN was a magnificent tool," Sciora said. "Obviously, it would be worse if it were to disappear from one day to the next." © 2025 AFP

The Heritage Foundation sets its sights on Europe
The Heritage Foundation sets its sights on Europe

LeMonde

time12 hours ago

  • LeMonde

The Heritage Foundation sets its sights on Europe

Behind the thick velvet curtains of the Cercle de l'Union Interalliée, a lavish Parisian club on Rue du Faubourg-Saint-Honoré, a high-profile political reception was taking place, just a stone's throw from the Elysée presidential palace. Ties were mandatory for the guests who, on the evening of May 26, gathered to soak up "the future of conservatism in France and in the West," as promised by the invitation card. The host was an American, unknown to the French public, who holds a piece of the United States' destiny in his hands. Kevin Roberts presides over the powerful Heritage Foundation, the most influential conservative think tank in the orbit of Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement. It paved the way for Donald Trump's return to power by providing him with the highly radical Project 2025, the unofficial blueprint for his term in office. Bald, wearing a pin of Heritage's Liberty Bell-inspired logo on his jacket, Roberts, 50, displayed the articulateness of a university professor. Born in southern Louisiana, he has been one of the most zealous ideologues of Trump's second presidency, determined to "burn" everything – he has a penchant for radical metaphors – in order to reshape America into a nationalist and reactionary version of itself. Since 2021, he has led the Heritage Foundation and its 350 employees. The historian by training earns nearly $1 million a year in this role. He is a regular at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's residence, and has developed a genuine friendship with JD Vance, the 40-year-old nationalist-Catholic vice president, who is idolized by the far right on both sides of the Atlantic. Roberts is above all one of the unofficial envoys for a major objective of Trump's second term: weaving a network with "civilizational allies in Europe," as the US State Department put it in a strategic memo published on May 27. The document mentions the Trump team's intent to promote their vision of a "shared cultural heritage," stretching from Paris to Warsaw. At the end of May, Roberts traveled to France for the first time, with that very goal in mind.

Macron urges Iran's president to 'exercise utmost restraint'
Macron urges Iran's president to 'exercise utmost restraint'

LeMonde

time15 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Macron urges Iran's president to 'exercise utmost restraint'

President Emmanuel Macron on Sunday, June 22, urged Tehran to de-escalate and "exercise the utmost restraint" after US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in a call with his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian. "I called for de-escalation and for Iran to exercise the utmost restraint in this dangerous context to allow a return to the diplomatic path," Macron posted on X. He said he also told Iran to "renounce nuclear weapons," warning of "the risk of the worst for the entire region." It is "the only path that leads to peace and security for all," Macron said. On Sunday, Macron also spoke with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Together with European partners, France has advocated a diplomatic solution to end the conflict between Israel and Iran. Macron had said Saturday that France and its European partners planned to step up talks with Iran. Earlier Sunday, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot expressed "concern" over the US air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and urged "restraint." Macron will convene a meeting of France's defence and national security council on Sunday evening, the presidency said. On Friday, British, French, German and EU diplomats held talks in Geneva with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, a week after Israel started its bombardment of Iranian sites. They urged Iran to revive diplomatic efforts with the United States to find a solution in the standoff over its nuclear programme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store