B-SMILE all set to call tenders for North-South twin tunnels
Bengaluru Smart Infrastructure Limited (B-SMILE), the recently formed special purpose vehicle, is all set to call global tenders for the North-South twin tunnel corridor between Hebbal and Silk Board. This follows the approval for a Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) model with 40% Viability Gap Funding (VGF) from the government to be adopted to build tunnel roads in the city on June 5.
If everything goes according to plan, the twin tunnel roads will be open to the public by 2029-30 and the toll on these roads is estimated to cost ₹19/km and will be tolled by the companies that invest and build these roads for the next 30 years.
This corridor will be 16.74 km long and is expected to cost ₹17,780 crore. The VGF for this corridor will be ₹9,303 crore. The State Cabinet has already agreed to stand as a guarantor for a loan of ₹19,000 crore towards VGF for North-South and East-West tunnel roads. B-SMILE is in talks with lending agencies including Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO), a Government of India undertaking, which is also funding the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR).
Work to be split into two packages
With the past experience of PRR estimated to cost ₹27,000 crore not attracting any bidders in multiple global tenders, B-SMILE has decided to split the North-South twin tunnel corridor into two packages of roughly around 8.4 km each - North package from Hebbal to Race Course Road and South package from Race Course Road to Silk Board.
Two companies will bid and start building these tunnels at two ends simultaneously, which will also ensure the tunnels are ready faster. The tender, likely to be called soon after the government's approval, will fix a 50 month (four years two months) deadline for the completion of the project, said B.S. Prahlad, Technical Director, B-SMILE.
Toll estimated at ₹19/km
A commuter will pay toll in two stages and toll collection will be completely automated through number plate recognition software, said Mr. Prahlad. 'As per current estimates, the toll will be around ₹19 per km. Since this will be collected after five years, this is not high, and factoring in inflation, it will be comparable to other tolls elsewhere at that date,' he argued.
Twin Tunnels
The project involves building two unconnected tunnels for each direction of traffic next to each other, each three lanes wide. This essentially means the total length of earth to be tunnelled for the North-South corridor is 33.48 km. Sources said at least eight tunnel boring machines will be deployed simultaneously to speed up work. Each machine is capable of tunnelling 2 km per year, sources said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
12 hours ago
- Mint
How to give diplomacy a chance with Iran
Next Story Business News/ Opinion / Views/ How to give diplomacy a chance with Iran Wesley Clark , The Wall Street Journal Trump can use the threat of military action to defang the regime and avoid creating a failed state. A U.S. aircraft carrier, May 28. Photo: edward jacome/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images Gift this article The world is waiting anxiously to see whether the U.S. will strike Iran. President Trump is considering two tracks for approaching the conflict: military action or diplomacy. If he plays his cards right, he can accomplish both, crippling the regime for good. The world is waiting anxiously to see whether the U.S. will strike Iran. President Trump is considering two tracks for approaching the conflict: military action or diplomacy. If he plays his cards right, he can accomplish both, crippling the regime for good. America can engage militarily at any time. No doubt the Pentagon has proposed several courses of action, ranging from B-2 strikes on Iran's Fordow enrichment site using 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs to a full-fledged joint military campaign with Israel to take out Iran's potential retaliatory tools, disable its defenses, and send in special forces to confirm nuclear sites have been destroyed. These variations are part of the track-one option. Mr. Trump, however, has the leverage to achieve a track-two approach: a diplomatic solution that would defang the regime. Mr. Trump could require Iran to stop all its nuclear efforts and give up uranium enrichment permanently, renounce its aims to destroy Israel and the U.S., end its hegemonic aspirations, and cease supporting terrorism. In return, the U.S. wouldn't destroy Iran with military force. The U.S., in conjunction with the International Atomic Energy Agency, would inspect and decommission all existing Iranian nuclear sites and implement regular inspections to prevent Iran from ever again seeking nuclear weapons. When Iran wants nuclear power for civilian infrastructure, it can purchase U.S. reactors and externally enriched uranium with appropriate safeguards. Mr. Trump need not rush to decide whether to strike Iran. With each passing day, Tehran expends its arsenal and is weakened by Israel's air attacks. This gives Mr. Trump strong footing and rare bargaining power. If the U.S. joins Israel in attacking Iran, then the leverage against the ayatollah and his government will be even greater. Engaging militarily—pursuing some range of track-one tactics—would not end the opportunity for a track-two diplomatic path but would only enhance it. The critical question the Trump administration must ask: What is our desired end goal? If it is to end the threat of a theocratic, nuclear-armed terrorist state that is determined to destroy other nations, then we must consider how that could be best achieved. We must also be realistic and consider which is more likely to produce another failed state—a diplomatic solution or a military campaign. We have seen the end results of four major U.S. military campaigns since 1999. Three were military successes but resulted in costly failures in the aftermath because of a lack of forethought and planning. After the Taliban's collapse in 2001, the U.S. attempted to help Afghanistan establish a new government. Efforts to stabilize the country failed, and the Taliban rules again. In 2003, after capturing Saddam Hussein, the U.S. failed to plan seriously for Iraq's future. As a result, Iraq has become a magnet for terrorism and a major source of migrants. And while the U.S. fought a long campaign against ISIS in Syria and Iraq, the potential for a resurgence of terrorism remains. Only in 1999, when U.S. and North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces engaged in a 78-day air campaign to end ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, was the end state successful. There are a few reasons for this: The country already had a democratically organized and popular political party, led by Ibrahim Rugova, as well as an armed resistance army. NATO had already planned and agreed to secure the country and help end the fighting. A combination of NATO's air campaign and diplomatic pressure from Finnish and Russian leaders led Slobodan Milosevic, then president of Yugoslavia, to realize that he had no alternative but to accept NATO's terms and end the ethnic cleansing. Iran today is also clearly losing, so the U.S. shouldn't take Iran's threats and angry bluster to mean the door on diplomacy is closed. Israel has the momentum to sustain its air campaign for weeks while Iran exhausts its inventory of missiles, depletes its military and industrial base and loses more of its command and control. Time isn't on Iran's side; the ayatollah and his remaining leadership know this. Air power alone, however, can't guarantee the end of Iran's nuclear ambitions. To rid Iran of its nuclear capabilities through military action would require a level of in-country military engagement that Americans have come to abhor. History shows us that successful diplomacy starts with an achievable endgame. 'Regime change" is a whispered goal. But absent a thoughtful, well-planned effort led by Israel and the U.S., Iran could end up as another failed state—a hotbed for further terrorism, insurgency and migrant outflows. If the West acts as a bystander, it's possible that the Iranian people would overthrow the government. But then what? What guarantee do we have that a successor regime won't relaunch Iran's nuclear ambitions? The most rational endgame is to give the mullahs a choice: Give up uranium enrichment and the nuclear ambitions it enables. Give up the proxy terror war against Israel and its supporters. In return, escape more-severe military attacks and the crippling sanctions that have decimated the Iranian economy. The U.S. should allow the mullahs to survive but should leave government to the Iranian people. Enable Iranians to engage in open and internationally supervised elections, with the hope of Persia's return to peace and prosperity. The U.S. has a rare opportunity to combine the leverage of a military campaign with strategic diplomacy to force Iran's remaining leadership to confront their real choice: likely being overthrown and killed by their own people, or giving up their aggressive ambitions and renouncing their hold on government. If they choose wrongly, they will reap the consequences. The power is in our hands. Do we have the wisdom, gained by painful experience, to achieve a more peaceful Middle East? Mr. Clark, a retired U.S. Army general, served as NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, 1997-2000. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
India kicks off much-needed review of arms procurement procedures
Review of its cumbersome defence acquisition procedure (DAP) of 2020. NEW DELHI: India has kicked off the much-needed comprehensive review of its cumbersome defence acquisition procedure (DAP) of 2020, with the aim to slash timelines in procurement of weapon systems and platforms as well as promote self-reliance in design, development and production with greater private sector participation. The defence ministry on Thursday said a committee headed by additional secretary and director general (acquisition) Dipti Mohil Chawla, which includes senior officers and representatives from the industry and academia, has already begun consultations with all stakeholders. Former health and I&B secretary Apurva Chandra, who had a stint as the DG (acquisition) in MoD, is the principal advisor to the committee. 'The panel has invited suggestions from stakeholders on various fronts, including procedural changes to streamline the acquisition processes, by July 5,' an official said. The aim of the DAP review is to meet the operational requirements and modernisation of the armed forces 'in a timely manner to ensure national security' and align acquisition procedures with govt policies to achieve 'atmanirbharta' (self-reliance) by promoting technology infusion through indigenously designed and developed systems. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025: Steel Suppliers From Mexico At Lowest Prices (Take A Peek) Steel Suppliers | search ads Search Now Undo 'The 'Make in India' policy also needs to be enabled by promoting defence manufacturing in India through facilitation of JVs and transfer of technology for the private sector, encouraging foreign arms manufacturers via FDI alignment, and establishing a global defence manufacturing and MRO hub here,' he said. 'The idea is also to promote design and development in both public and private sectors, with a focus on start-ups, innovators, and the private defence industry for indigenous technology infusion,' he added. At present, it often takes several years after a case gets the initial `acceptance of necessity' (AoN), which is followed by the floating of the initial tender or the RFP (request for proposal), field trials, commercial evaluation and the like, before the final contract is anywhere close to being inked. Defence secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh recently said that the timelines for some of the processes in the procurement cycle have already been slashed, which would save around 69 weeks overall. 'There is a need to shift away from the traditional nomination based cost-plus procurement focused mostly on the public sector to a more competitive pricing model where both the public and private sector can compete for orders. This approach is already being implemented for ship-building and recently for the AMCA (advanced medium combat aircraft or the fifth-generation fighter) project,' he said. The MoD in the 2024-25 fiscal completely utilised the defence modernisation budget for the first time in the last five years. Moreover, contracts worth Rs 2 lakh crores were inked, which is the highest ever and double that of the figures in 2023-24, he added. The AMCA project, for one, certainly needs to be majorly fast-tracked after the defence ministry last month finally approved a new 'programme execution model' for prototype development, with greater private sector participation. Pakistan is on course to acquire at least 40 J-35A fifth-generation jets from China, which is now even flaunting sixth-generation prototypes with tailless airframes like Chengdu J-36 and Shenyang J-50, as reported by TOI earlier. The long meandering developmental history of the fourth-generation Tejas, which began way back in 1983, cannot be repeated. The IAF is still waiting to get the first Tejas Mark-1A `improved' fighter. Similarly, indigenous development of 110 Kilonewton engines, with or without foreign collaboration, to power the AMCA is critical. The IAF is currently grappling with just 30 fighter squadrons (each has 16-18 jets) when 42.5 are authorised.
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Nissan Evaluating Hybrid And EVs For Indian Market; CEO Ivan Espinosa
For the longest time Nissan in India has been a one car OEM, with the Magnite holding fort. Rivals like Tata, Mahindra, Maruti and Hyundai and others have moved forward with a plethora of options across segments and powertrains. Nissan already confirmed that it is looking to launch three ICE cars in the next 18-24 months. But when asked about its EV and Hybrid plans in an exclusive interaction, Nissan CEO Ivan Espinosa said that they are observing the hybrid and EV market in India closely and will decide on launching an electrified vehicle in the future. Nissan Leaf is one of the EVs that the company has in its global portfolio "We are revisiting our portfolio in the long term to see how we bring some exciting electrified vehicles to the Indian market later on. We have very good products in the global portfolio, but we could also be exploring what we could do with our partners in India (Renault) or by ourselves. So, we have several options that we could explore and consider. We are observing the market trends and there are several options, hybrid is one of the things we are observing very closely together with potentially battery electric vehicles, so we are looking at both", Nissan CEO Ivan Espinosa said. Nissan's short-term focus will be on the three new cars that will be launched in the next two years. The first will be a 7-seater B-segment MPV, a model that will be similar in positioning to the Renault Triber, a mass-market people mover. It is expected to hit the roads in early 2026. Next will be a C-segment SUV, that is based on the CMF-B platform, which is also expected to go on sale in India. The new C-SUV from Nissan will be launched in the middle of 2026 and there will be a 7-seater version of the same, going on sale in early 2027. "For the moment, our focus is to launch these three cars in India, this is the focus that we have now, making sure we reinvigorate, revitalise our partners, our dealers and we make sure that we have a sustainable restart, rebrand of the Nissan brand in India. This is what we are dedicated to at the moment", Nissan CEO Ivan Espinosa added. Nissan also confirmed that despite its divestment in Renault Nissan Alliance plant in Chennai, the company's production plans and future capacity are all secured, thanks to a strong agreement between Renault and Nissan. The company aims to sell over 100,000 units in India and export 100,000 units from India by FY2027.
