Pivotal project for cutting greenhouse gas emissions looks shaky
By Eloise Gibson of RNZ
A critical part of the government's plan for cutting greenhouse gas emissions over the next five years appears to have fallen over.
A huge chunk of the government's climate success rests on a single project, which the owner now says probably won't happen because it doesn't stack up commercially.
Fully a third of the carbon savings needed to meet the government's legal obligations to cut emissions from 2025-2030 was supposed to come from carbon dioxide being stashed permanently under the ground of Taranaki, at the Kapuni gas field.
Kapuni's owner Todd Energy says the project's future is uncertain unless it gets some kind of extra incentive or subsidy from the government - something the government currently shows no signs of offering.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) condenses carbon dioxide and stores it underground in reservoirs - hopefully forever.
Despite controversy over subsidies being handed to fossil fuel companies for CCS, and accusations of under-delivering, several muti-billion-dollar projects are underway overseas, with mixed success.
Chevron's huge Gorgon facility in Australia badly underdelivered on what was promised, but other projects such as the smaller Moomba project got off to more promising starts.
Kāpuni was expected to be New Zealand's first CCS project, starting around 2027.
Todd Energy hoped to capture carbon dioxide right at the point where it was released as part of the process of extracting gas from the field, condense it and stash it, permanently, in the empty fossil fuel reservoirs that previously held the gas. There was also space at the field to store emissions from other polluters, Todd said, if it could be transported cost-effectively.
Like Moomba, the project would involved reinjecting CO2 back into the same depleted reservoir long used for gas production, which Todd describes as low risk.
Todd Energy told the government that with a January 2027 start-up date, up to 2.7 million tonnes of CO2 could be captured from the Kapuni field over the life of the project.
Government officials were sufficiently convinced that CCS would start at Kapuni around 2027 that they included the project in their calculations underlying the government's Emissions Reduction Plan.
That plan showed the government would just manage to meet its 2025-30 carbon budget, despite having slashed other carbon-saving policies such as clean energy subsidies and stronger emissions standards on car imports. Targets in place
Officials agreed Kapuni could be expected to store a million tonnes of CO2 between 2027 and 2030, and a further almost million tonnes over the five years after that.
That was estimated by taking what Todd said was feasible, and reducing it by five percent for contingencies, the Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment told to RNZ.
But getting any carbon capture at all in the next few years now looks doubtful.
Government documents show Kapuni was the only project of its kind expected to be able to start operating before 2030, the government's next, big deadline for slashing emissions. Payback too small
Currently the government proposes CCS projects would generate carbon credits, the same way forestry owners do for planting trees.
But Todd Energy says carbon prices of around $50 a tonne aren't enough to make the project stack up commercially, particularly now that gas yields from its fossil fuel fields are falling.
It says its studies show the Kapuni field can offer long-term carbon sequestration.
"However, the additional facilities required to capture the CO2 and compress it for injection are very expensive, which makes the commerciality of the project challenging," it says.
"Unfortunately, this is likely to mean that by the time the necessary regulations are in place, the project may not be feasible without additional incentives.
"Had a regulatory framework been in place five years ago, the commercial viability of the project would look quite different to where we are today or will be in three years' time," a spokesperson said by email.
"While CCS is technically feasible and represents an option for reducing New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions, the Kapuni project is not viable under the proposed legislative and regulatory framework."
RNZ asked Energy and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts where that left the government's emissions-cutting plans.
Like Todd Energy, Watts declined to give an interview but answered questions by email.
He said the government remained committed to meeting the next emissions budget but did not answer what else might fill the gap if carbon capture and storage fails.
"Work on developing the Carbon Capture Storage regime is ongoing, and we expect to introduce legislation this year," Watts said.
"In February this year, we confirmed our intention to reward businesses through the ETS. We are also developing ways for a CCS regime to enable the storage of third-party carbon dioxide. This would allow those storing CO2 to source carbon dioxide from other emitting activities and inject it alongside their own carbon dioxide into the storage site. This could allow and incentivise more carbon dioxide to be stored than the operators can currently," he said.
"The second emissions reduction plan outlines an adaptive management approach. This means closely monitoring progress, so we can adjust if necessary to ensure we stay on track to meet our second emissions budget." Why CCS?
Critics says CCS is a fossil fuel industry distraction from urgent efforts to stop emissions from being produced in the first place.
Such projects are not expected to replace the need to radically cut emissions, but some experts say they could be helpful - even critical - to offset some emissions, particularly the final, most stubborn sources of carbon dioxide that needed to be neutralised to meet the planet's climate goals.
The University of Canterbury's David Dempsey is researching a similar but different process of capturing carbon dioxide directly from the air and storing it. He says trialling CCS could come in handy for that kind of project in future.
"In an ideal world you wouldn't have to have a situation where you pulled CO2 out of the atmosphere and put it underground, but it's been clear over the past several decades that efforts to shift emissions have been quite stubborn," he said.
"And there may be certain industries where it makes sense to offset certain emissions with storage.
"You don't want to look at this stuff as a silver bullet for all emissions, rather to exist as part of a portfolio of approaches. It's very important for maybe a few niche applications but it's not going to solve all of your problems," he said.
"One of the reasons I think carbon capture is worth doing is if we're doing to do a lot of carbon dioxide removal in the future, you need some experience with the concept of capturing CO2 and of storing it underground for long periods of time.
"Some good candidates are depleted gas fields because we know these are good at containing fossil fuels for thousands of years."
The government's proposed regime for allowing CCS would let companies such as Todd get paid in carbon credits under the Emissions Trading Scheme, just as forestry owners can earn carbon credits for storing carbon in trees. The credits can currently be sold for around $50 a tonne.
But carbon prices are low by international standards.
Todd Energy says that isn't enough, and capturing and storing the carbon is not economically feasible at today's carbon prices. Not helping matters is dwindling gas yields from fields such as Kapuni.
"The current ETS carbon price is not high enough to justify a CCS project based on CO2 capture from the processing of natural gas at Kapuni," said the company.
"The large capital investment required for CCS is relatively fixed, so the amount of gas processed though the facility will dictate the $/tonne needed to cover the initial investment. As gas reserves decline and there is less and less gas to process, the $/tonne price required is progressively increasing."
Todd and other fossil fuel companies are interested in doing CCS also despite the liability regime for leaks after the project has ended.
Regimes overseas typically make companies liable for any leaks for an initial period, with the government picking up the risk after that.
Dempsey says a crucial element is having a plan so everyone knows who is responsible, when.
"But we do need a plan for failure and any leaks that may occur."
As for offering some other form of incentives, the government discussion documents show no hint of considering any kind of sweetener.
"Overseas you've seen some situations where governments have chosen to invest in CCS projects...because they have seen and recognised that it is unlikely for companies to carry those costs themselves," Dempsey said.
"I haven't seen anything in what the government has indicated here to say it is keen to offer that kind of incentive."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
How Would An Escalation In Conflict In The Middle East Impact New Zealand
Explainer - America jumped into the war between Israel and Iran over the weekend, as US President Donald Trump announced air strikes on Iran's three principal nuclear sites. The intervention of the US in the conflict has raised concerns worldwide about what's next, including how it might affect New Zealand, from citizens overseas to the price of petrol. Here's a look at what you need to know so far. What's NZ's role in the conflict? Are we going to war? New Zealand has maintained a cautious stance politically as the conflict between Iran and Israel has ramped up in recent weeks. That remains the case today, with the prime minister urging that diplomatic talks resume. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, who is overseas for a NATO summit, told RNZ's Morning Report that New Zealand wanted to see a peaceful stable and secure Middle East. "The way to get there is a political solution rather than military action, it's actually through dialogue and diplomacy." As a small country that is thousands of miles away from the conflict, all New Zealand could do was to advocate for what it thought should happen, he said. "What we don't need is more military action, we need a political solution to all of these issues in the Middle East." On Sunday, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said ongoing military action in the Middle East was "extremely worrying". Peters previously said before the weekend escalation that the provocative behaviour by both Israel and Iran was to be criticised, and New Zealand would not take sides in a conflict of this nature. "There are no innocent parties in this conflict," he said. Will this latest Middle East conflict affect the price of petrol - and everything else? The escalation poses a major threat to New Zealand's economy, RNZ's Susan Edmunds reports. Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen said if there were attacks on US shipping, or attempts to limit access through the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices could spike. Iran's parliament reportedly voted on Monday morning (NZ time) to close the Strait of Hormuz, which around 20 percent of the world's oil travels through. "If [Iran] do ratchet up the tension further, if this starts to broaden out into shipping attacks, I think market expectations and worries about oil supply will increase substantially. The question is, just to what degree do you price this and how do markets look at that?" Koura KiwiSaver founder Rupert Carlyon said the biggest risk was to inflation. "If it does turn into a broader Middle East war and potentially shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, then we are likely to see higher oil prices, which will flow through to everything and shipping delays making it harder and more expensive to import things here in New Zealand." What about Kiwis who are in Iran or Israel? Nearly 250 New Zealanders are now registered as being in Iran and Israel as a Defence Force Hercules makes its way to the region to help. New figures provided to RNZ and recorded on SafeTravel show 119 New Zealanders in Iran and 117 in Israel. RNZ understands some of those people may have managed to flee somewhere safer, but have not yet updated their status with SafeTravel. The Defence Force announced on Sunday it is sending a plane to the Middle East to assist any New Zealanders stranded in Iran or Israel. The plane is not part of any military combat operations. The C-130J Hercules, along with government personnel, left Auckland on Monday morning. It will take several days for it to arrive. Peters said New Zealanders should do everything they can to leave now, if they can find a safe route. "We know it will not be safe for everyone to leave Iran or Israel, and many people may not have access to transport or fuel supplies," he said. "If you are in this situation, you should shelter in place, follow appropriate advice from local authorities and stay in touch with family and friends where possible." Peters earlier said the number of New Zealanders registered in Iran had jumped since the escalation of the crisis. "We thought, at a certain time, we had them all counted out at 46," he said. "It's far more closer to 80 now, because they're coming out of the woodwork, despite the fact that, for months, we said, 'look, this is a danger zone', and for a number of days we've said, 'get out if you possibly can'." There were 101 New Zealanders registered in Israel. Again, Peters said the figure had risen recently. New Zealanders in Iran and Israel needing urgent consular assistance should call the Ministry's Emergency Consular Call Centre on +64 99 20 20 20. How are New Zealanders with ties to the region coping? Elham Salari, an Iranian in New Zealand told RNZ on Sunday she was deeply worried for her family members back home. "I'm so scared. I'm so stressed... all I'm thinking is 'What's going to happen next?' Trump said he wants peace... but Iran's regime will not let it go easily. There will be a bigger war. It's going to destroy our country and our people are going to die." Salari said she had woken up to messages from her family on Sunday who confirmed they were safe, but she had not been able to get back in contact with them since. Meanwhile, New Zealand Jewish Council spokesperson Ben Kepes said people should not conflate the actions of the Israeli government and the Israeli military with Jews worldwide. Iran has said multiple times that it does not believe Israel has a right to exist, he said. "Most New Zealanders when they understand the issues would say that regardless of whether they support the actions of the Israeli government, that Israel has a right to exist as a sovereign nation." Kepes said he was a Jew in New Zealand and did not hold an Israeli passport, nor vote for the government in Israel. "I have zero control over Israel, so holding me responsible of the actions of the government is not only absurd, but it's a stereotype that is really dangerous." According to the 2023 Census, about 2700 people living in New Zealand are of Israeli or Jewish background, while about 5600 identify with the Iranian ethnic group.
Newsroom
7 hours ago
- Newsroom
Middle East military action ‘extremely worrying', but no call yet on bombing
This story first appeared on RNZ and is republished with permission The foreign affairs minister says the Government will gather facts before taking a position on the United States' airstrikes on Iran. The US attacked three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, with President Donald Trump saying the country's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been 'completely and totally obliterated.' Trump said Iran 'must now make peace' or there would be further attacks. In response, Iran has accused the US of launching 'a dangerous war,' and of violating the United Nations Charter and international law. But on Sunday afternoon, shortly after the attack was launched, Foreign Affairs Ministers Winston Peters said the New Zealand government was waiting for the facts. 'Look, this has just happened. These are circumstances in which we will first of all gather the facts, and the circumstances, before we give our opinion.' Peters said the crisis was 'extremely worrying' and New Zealand would continue to call for diplomacy and dialogue. 'Ongoing military action in the Middle East is extremely worrying, and it's critical further escalation is avoided. We strongly support efforts towards diplomacy and urge all parties to return to talks,' he said. 'Iran's nuclear activities have long worried New Zealand. We want Iran to comply with its international obligations. Our concern is that further military action is not going to deliver a sustainable solution to this problem. 'We're a long way from the region, but New Zealand will continue to convey these measures in favour of diplomacy and dialogue directly to Iran, Israel, and the other parties involved in possible talks.' Labour's defence spokesperson Peeni Henare backed Peters' calls for a return to talks, but said the government should acknowledge the US breached international law and be 'perhaps a bit stronger' in the first instance. Henare said Trump's statements had made it 'quite clear' what had happened. 'Countries can't call for peace and de-escalation, only to take the action that's been taken.' Waikato University law professor Alexander Gillespie said the airstrikes were 'clearly' illegal in terms of international law. 'There's nowhere in the UN charter that says you can bomb someone who won't negotiate with you. But whether you get to a point where that is actually condemned is going to be very different,' he said. 'There's the theory of international law, with the UN Charter, and then there's the reality of international politics at the moment, which means that America will not be condemned internationally by the Security Council or even through the International Court of Justice.' The Prime Minister is heading to NATO this week. New Zealand is not a member, but in recent years has been invited as a partner along with fellow Indo-Pacific Four nations Australia, Japan and South Korea. While Christopher Luxon would be 'on the margins,' Gillespie expected he would be watching closely to see what like-minded partners were saying. 'This is an act which is not self-defence, and even if you argued it was pre-emptive self-defence, it wasn't necessary because there were other options of diplomacy still open. It will create difficulties if we speak out and say that, I don't think we're in a position to do that right now, for fear of the reaction that you get from America.' Australia's government has already issued a statement on the airstrikes. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,' the statement said. 'We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy.' Defence Force plane leaves today The Government is sending a C-130J Hercules plane to the Middle East, with Defence Force and Foreign Affairs personnel, to assist New Zealanders stranded in Iran and Israel. Defence minister Judith Collins said the plane was a contingency, and would not be able to aid in evacuation flights until airspace restrictions in the region eased. In the meantime, those who were able to leave via a safe route were urged to do so. Peters said the flights would get people to a safe place. 'We're not bringing them home. We're getting them to where they can make arrangements to get home.' The Government has been warning New Zealanders in the region to leave for a long time, Peters said. The number of New Zealanders registered as being in Iran or Israel had increased in recent days. The decision to send the Hercules was made even before knowledge of the airstrikes had come through. 'Our anxiety was enunciated and formulated into policy, warnings, and collections of views months ago. We've been saying it, and it's a sad circumstance here, but we said 'look this is very dangerous, get out,'' Peters said. Citing security reasons, Collins would not say where the plane and personnel would be based. Both Henare and Gillespie supported the move. 'I think if we're ready and on standby, at the very least, to make sure we can respond to our citizens and their needs, and also those of our diplomatic staff, I think that's a really smart move,' Henare said. Gillespie said sending a plane was prudent in case the situation worsened quickly, and the damage became more indiscriminate.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Urban Issues: The case for keeping the Gordon Wilson flats
The Gordon Wilson flats in Wellington. Photo: RNZ / Krystal Gibbens Urban issues correspondent Bill McKay discusses the government's decision to introduce a bill to demolish Wellington's Gordon Wilson Flats and why he believes it's a new low in the story of our architectural heritage. Bill McKay is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Architecture and Planning at the University of Auckland.
