TD Cowen Remains a Hold on Pfizer (PFE)
TD Cowen analyst Steve Scala maintained a Hold rating on Pfizer (PFE – Research Report) today and set a price target of $32.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at $22.12.
Stay Ahead of the Market:
Discover outperforming stocks and invest smarter with Top Smart Score Stocks.
Filter, analyze, and streamline your search for investment opportunities using Tipranks' Stock Screener.
Scala covers the Healthcare sector, focusing on stocks such as Merck & Company, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. According to TipRanks, Scala has an average return of 4.2% and a 55.62% success rate on recommended stocks.
In addition to TD Cowen, Pfizer also received a Hold from Citi's Geoff Meacham in a report issued today. However, yesterday, Jefferies maintained a Buy rating on Pfizer (NYSE: PFE).
Based on Pfizer's latest earnings release for the quarter ending December 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of $17.76 billion and a net profit of $410 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of $14.25 billion and had a GAAP net loss of $3.34 billion
Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 27 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is neutral on the stock. Last month, JENNIFER B. DAMICO, the SVP & Controller of PFE sold 3,249.00 shares for a total of $84,373.90.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Better Cybersecurity Stock: CrowdStrike or SentinelOne?
Artificial intelligence (AI) may have many benefits, but it's also making it easier for hackers, online criminals, and other digital malefactors to threaten businesses, and those threats are getting more potent. Keeping them at bay requires a lot of funds to be devoted to cybersecurity, making companies like CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) and SentinelOne (NYSE: S) excellent investment opportunities. But is there an advantage to buying one over the other now? How do these two approach cybersecurity? Both companies' base products are AI-powered protection platforms that analyze digital activity and learn to spot the threats among the normal activity. They deploy their software to network endpoints -- in other words, laptops, smartphones, and other devices that can access a client's internal network. By protecting these devices, companies make it harder for cyberattackers to gain access to their internal networks, where they might steal sensitive information, delete files, interfere with systems, or even lock them down with ransomware to extort payments from their victims. While endpoint protection is how both companies land clients, each bolsters its offerings with an array of other cybersecurity products that clients can use to create a protection suite tailored to their unique situations. Since these two direct competitors offer highly similar product types, it's hard to declare either a winner on this front from an investor perspective. Winner: Tie. CrowdStrike is much larger than SentinelOne From a sheer size perspective, CrowdStrike is the clear winner. During its fiscal 2026 first quarter, which ended April 30, CrowdStrike's annual recurring revenue (ARR) rose to $4.4 billion. SentinelOne's ARR of $948 million in its fiscal Q1 was less than a quarter of that. While size doesn't always matter, in this case, it does. Because so many more companies use CrowdStrike's platform, it's more likely that any given IT professional will have at least one contact already on its client list. If CrowdStrike is doing a great job with those clients, word will spread, and it will likely receive more serious consideration in future cybersecurity bidding processes. This advantage cannot be understated. Indeed, it's one of the reasons why CrowdStrike's growth has remained strong despite its size. Winner: CrowdStrike SentinelOne is growing more quickly than CrowdStrike, but just barely In terms of growth rates, SentinelOne is slightly outperforming CrowdStrike in this category. However, this should be no surprise because SentinelOne is a much smaller company. In fiscal Q1, SentinelOne's ARR rose 24% year over year, while CrowdStrike's increased 22% year over year. While I will give the point to SentinelOne, it's important to understand that CrowdStrike is growing from a much larger base than SentinelOne, making this close call all the more impressive for CrowdStrike. Winner: SentinelOne Neither company is massively profitable Due to its smaller size and focus on top-line growth, SentinelOne is far from profitable, while CrowdStrike has achieved intermittent profitability (although it reverted to a negative operating margin and a loss in its most recent quarter). S Operating Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts. SentinelOne is far from breaking even, but CrowdStrike was in this same position about five years ago. There's no reason not to expect SentinelOne to follow a similar path to profitability, but it will take some time. Meanwhile, CrowdStrike should eventually turn a profit again, as it has proven that it can do that. Winner: CrowdStrike SentinelOne looks like a bargain CrowdStrike is leading this battle of the stocks so far, but SentinelOne is about to change the narrative with one jaw-dropping metric. CrowdStrike is the most popular cybersecurity stock in the market, and as a result, it has been bid up to expensive levels. From a price-to-sales (P/S) standpoint (the best metric to use to compare these companies since CrowdStrike flips between profitable and unprofitable, while SentinelOne is years away from profits), CrowdStrike has gotten far more expensive than SentinelOne over the past few years. S PS Ratio data by YCharts. CrowdStrike stock is now five times more expensive than SentinelOne, which is hard to believe, considering they compete in the same industry and are growing at nearly identical rates. This leads me to believe that CrowdStrike's stock has been overly hyped up while SentinelOne has been forgotten. While I'm OK with valuing CrowdStrike at a premium due to its market leadership position, this is far too great a premium to pay. SentinelOne is a dirt-cheap stock, and CrowdStrike is almost too expensive to consider. While I have been a long-term CrowdStrike bull, I'd be a bit cautious about buying the stock at its current lofty valuation. As a result, I think SentinelOne is the better cybersecurity investment right now. Should you invest $1,000 in CrowdStrike right now? Before you buy stock in CrowdStrike, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and CrowdStrike wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
12 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Is Enterprise Products Partners Stock a Buy Now?
Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) operates in the most reliable segment of the energy industry. It is financially strong, has reliable cash flows, and a large yield. But there's one little problem that may cause investors to pause. Enterprise Products Partners' unit price has rallied roughly 60% over the past five years. Is it still worth buying this master limited partnership (MLP)? The answer is yes, and here's why. What does Enterprise Products Partners do? To simplify things a lot, Enterprise is a toll taker. It owns energy infrastructure, like pipelines, that move oil and natural gas around the world. It doesn't care all that much about the price of the commodities it is moving through its system. It cares that it moves as much volume as possible through its systems, collecting fees for every unit of product it moves. Oil and natural gas, and the products into which they get turned, are vital to modern life. So even when energy prices are weak and when economic activity is slow, demand for Enterprise's services tends to be fairly strong. The reliable cash flows it generates are used to support the MLP's lofty 6.8% distribution yield. That distribution has been increased every year for 26 consecutive years. Supporting that hefty yield is an investment grade balance sheet. Adding to the security of the payment is the fact that distributable cash flow covers the distribution 1.7 times over, leaving plenty of room for adversity before a distribution cut would be in the cards. There's just one small problem: Enterprise is a slow-growth business, and the stock has risen a huge 60% or so in just the past five years. But don't let that put you off. EPD data by YCharts Enterprise is still an attractive income investment The rise over the past five years comes after a deep decline during the economic shutdowns that were used to slow the spread of the coronavirus in 2020. That was likely an overreaction, noting that the world has quickly gotten used to living with COVID. That said, it is also important to remember the regular distribution increases that have taken place. The last time Enterprise's units were trading hands at the current levels, its yield was a far less generous 4% or so. Today, despite the energy business' unit price rally, the yield is 6.8% thanks to its reliable distribution increases. The rise in price not only represented a recovery from an unusual exogenous shock, but also the increase in the distribution. The key that has driven both of these facts is the slow and steady performance of Enterprise. It has continued to execute well as it builds out its business via modest capital investments, regular fee increases, and the occasional acquisition. All three are likely to continue in the future, as well. So the business continues to increase in value, which will be shared with unitholders via distribution increases, and likely reflected in the units by a continued upward bias in the price. Slow and reliable growth is what you get with Enterprise Enterprise Products Partners is not, and likely never will be, a particularly exciting investment. It is built from the ground up to be a boring high-yield investment. If that is what you are looking for, don't let the price rally deter you from buying this MLP today. The distribution growth that has taken place continues to make this high-yield investment worth buying even as the unit price has climbed higher. Should you invest $1,000 in Enterprise Products Partners right now? Before you buy stock in Enterprise Products Partners, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Enterprise Products Partners wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
12 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
10 Reasons to Buy and Hold This Semiconductor Stock Forever
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE: TSM) is one of the most valuable companies in the world at a market cap of $1.1 trillion, but it doesn't get the same level of attention that other big tech stocks get like Nvidia or Microsoft do. Still, TSMC's competitive advantages can go toe to toe with any other stock, whether it's in the "Magnificent Seven" or not. On that note, let's take a look at 10 reasons to buy and hold this stock forever. 1. It has dominant market share TSMC is the clear leader in semiconductor manufacturing with roughly 67% market share, and an even higher share of advanced chips, estimated at roughly 90%. With that level of market share, TSMC has pricing power, and its customers have limited alternatives. The company has gained that market share over time, and it's unlikely to erode anytime soon. 2. Demand for semiconductors will continue to grow TSMC is in a great competitive position not just because of its dominant market share, but it's also benefiting from tremendous in its industry due to the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and technology more broadly. That's a major reason why revenue jumped 42% in the first quarter, and future innovations should continue to drive chip demand. 3. It pioneered the contract foundry model TSMC dominates the chip foundry industry in part because it was the first company to employ the third-party foundry model when it was founded in 1987. Over the years, that model has prevailed over the traditional integrated model. 4. It has top-level customers TSMC's collection of customers helps show why the company is so dominant. Among its top customers are Apple, Nvidia, AMD, and Broadcom, cutting-edge chip-design companies and some of the most innovative companies in technology. 5. It has a huge profit margins Profit margin is one of the clearest indicators of competitive advantage, and TSMC shines in that category. In the first quarter, the company reported an operating margin of 49%, showing it has pricing power and economies of scale. 6. It's getting government subsidies TSMC is not only a dominant company in its own right, but its services are in such high demand as semiconductors are crucial for the global economy. As part of the CHIPS Act, TSMC is receiving $6.6 billion in subsidies, and it's received $2 billion from the Chinese and Japanese governments in recent years. 7. It's historically undervalued Considering its growth rate and competitive advantage, TSMC has been historically undervalued, and that seems to be the case today as it trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 25, on par with the S&P 500. 8. It has a technological advantage TSMC dominates the market for advanced chips, which it considers to be 7 nanometers (nm) or under. Those chips made up 73% of the company's revenue in the first quarter, and chips for high-performance computing, much of which is used for AI. 9. Its competition is struggling The next two largest semiconductor manufacturers are Samsung and Intel and both of those companies have faltered of late. Samsung recently apologized to investors for not innovating enough and its poor performance. Intel, meanwhile, is in the midst of a yearslong crisis. Its stock price has tumbled as the company is struggling to grow and deliver a profit. 10. It has a great track record TSMC has outperformed the S&P 500 over virtually any time frame in its history. Over the last five years, the stock is up nearly 300% and 800% over the last decade. Past performance doesn't guarantee future returns in the stock market, but winners tend to keep winning, and TSMC looks poised to do that. Should you invest $1,000 in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing right now? Before you buy stock in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $664,089!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $881,731!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Jeremy Bowman has positions in Advanced Micro Devices, Broadcom, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Apple, Intel, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft, short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel, and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
