Soriot's red flag for pharma: Trump's trade policies could have a devastating effect on healthcare, warns MAGGIE PAGANO
Sir Pascal Soriot is usually several steps ahead of the game, so always worth listening to.
His latest red flag is that Europe is falling behind in healthcare innovation and manufacturing investments, risking lives, but also leaving the Continent trailing behind the US and China, with jobs moving across the Atlantic.
It is a timely warning from the boss of AstraZeneca, Britain's biggest company by value and one of the world's giant pharma combines, coming as a sluggish Europe faces further upheavals from potential US tariffs and lower growth.
Soriot is the most outspoken pharma boss so far to warn about the dangers. The heads of Switzerland's Novartis and France's Sanofi are also concerned, arguing that European price controls on medicines not only hurt innovation but make the region less attractive to investors.
Even the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations is so worried about the danger of companies relocating to the US that it has stuck its neck out with a stark letter to the European Commission's head, Ursula von der Leyen, outlining radical reforms.
Not surprisingly, Soriot was more cautious about criticising Donald Trump's proposed tariffs, saying instead that trade levies are not the most effective way of managing the pharma sector.
Yet even the threat seems to be working. Companies follow the money but also the brains, which are moving to the US too.
Like rival Roche earlier this week, Soriot also confirmed that the Cambridge-based giant would continue to invest in the US amid growing threats that tariffs may be imposed on pharmaceutical imports. AZ expects sales to the US will make up 50 per cent of the total over the next few years.
But Soriot is quite rightly far more vocal in his criticism of European leaders, claiming the region should spend more on medicines as it is planning to do on defence to 'protect its health sovereignty'.
The big question is whether EU leaders will take any notice. They commission endless reports on opening up the region to competition and innovation – the latest being a fat document from former ECB boss, Mario Draghi.
The Draghi report was highly critical of the region's inertia, pointing out the EU should focus on technological investments to close the innovation gap with the US. And spot-on.
But none of the proposals have been implemented. And time is running out if the bloc is to compete globally.
As the hedge fund boss Kyle Bass wrote scathingly on X this week: 'Europe is an anti-growth, anti-capitalist, pro-tax, super-regulatory, loose collection of broken economies.'
He did, however, make an exception for the Nordic countries and Poland.
Investors who have shipped billions into French, German and British stocks since Trump took office, he said, were foolish, adding that Europe was 'a travel destination and a retirement community for the world'. Ouch.
But could the fear of Trumpian tariffs – and European companies leaving – finally stir the EU block into action? It was only when Trump threatened to withdraw security support for his Nato allies that member countries started increasing their defence spending.
Maybe Trump's trade policies will have the same effect on healthcare.
Green heads roll
Activist US fund manager Elliott has claimed its first green scalp at BP. Giulia Chierchia, head of strategy and sustainability, is quitting in June after the oil giant's decision to slash renewables and refocus on fossil fuels.
She's gone because Elliott apparently wanted yet more proof from boss Murray Auchincloss that he is committed to moving even faster to cut costs and reduce spending.
But Elliott can't be happy that the shares are down a fifth since February's about-turn, which was supposed to bring its valuation closer to peers like Exxon. They should be patient. It takes time to turn a supertanker around.
Heard on the street
If Reform wins in Runcorn tomorrow, Sir Keir Starmer is minded to sack Ed Miliband amid Cabinet disagreement over energy strategy. Apparently Rachel Reeves would like to revive oil and gas licences in the North Sea and water down Net Zero.
If so, it is her first sensible idea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
10 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU imposes asset freeze, travel ban on five people tied to Syria's Assad
BRUSSELS, June 23 (Reuters) - The European Union imposed on Monday an asset freeze and a ban on travel to the EU on five people linked with toppled Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad for supporting crimes against humanity, including backing the use of chemical weapons against civilians and fuelling sectarian violence. The Council of the EU said the measures targeted three former members of the Syrian Republican Guard and Armed Forces responsible for human rights violations during Assad's rule, including torture and extrajudicial killings, and who were involved in a wave of violence that took place in March. Those affected also included two prominent businessmen who represented the Assad government's business and financial interests in Russia, which the EU says helped finance crimes against humanity.
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Who's selling? Breaking down the dollar's breakdown
ORLANDO, Florida, June 23 (Reuters) - With the dollar poised for its worst first-half performance since 1986, the selling may seem to be coming from everyone, everywhere, across every asset class. To some extent, that's true. Investors globally appear to be gradually reducing their exposure to dollar-denominated assets, driving the greenback down to its lowest level against a basket of major currencies in three and a half years. But some pressure points are greater than others. Unsurprisingly, non-U.S. investors are responsible for the bulk of the selling, with equity-related selling pressure concentrated among European investors and fixed income-based selling mostly coming from Asia. According to Bank of America's FX strategy team, European "real money" investors - institutions like pension funds and insurance companies - are the main drivers of the dollar's selloff in the second quarter, slashing their dollar positioning to the lowest since 2022 in a matter of weeks. But the story might not be so straightforward. While European investors increasing their dollar hedge ratios have garnered much attention recently, research shows that most of the dollar's average daily declines in the last few months have come in Asian trading hours, suggesting Asian holders of U.S. bonds may also be increasing their dollar hedges. So which is the bigger drag on the dollar: equity-led geographic diversification or fixed income selling? And where is the selling mostly coming from: Europe or Asia? At first glance, one might pin the blame on equities, as foreign holdings of U.S. stocks are larger than their U.S. debt assets in nominal terms. But percentage-wise, overseas investors' footprint in the U.S. fixed income markets is larger. Foreigners own just over $31 trillion of U.S. securities, with $17.6 trillion in equities and $13.6 trillion of bond holdings, according to the Bank for International Settlements. That represents around 18% of the overall U.S. equity market, compared with 21% of the U.S. agency and corporate bond market and a third of the U.S. Treasury market. Analysts at UBS estimate that euro zone investors account for 25% of the foreign-owned U.S. equity universe, having loaded up on U.S. stocks in recent years. This makes the dollar particularly vulnerable if Wall Street continues to underperform European and Asian markets, they reckon. Breaking down these exposures even further, they find that foreign investors' total net unhedged dollar asset exposure is $23.5 trillion. Of this, investors in G10 countries hold $13.4 trillion, with $9.3 trillion in equities and $4.1 trillion in fixed income. These are vast numbers, and it wouldn't require much of a switch to trigger large cross-border flows. UBS calculates that a hypothetical 5% reduction in G10 countries' dollar position would equate to around $670 billion of dollar selling. Most G10 countries, of course, are in Europe, so the bulk of that selling would come from there. While European investors have mostly been unloading equities thus far, it's good to remember that the region's investors significantly increased their exposure to U.S. bonds over the last decade too, particularly the 2014-2022 years when the European Central Bank's main interest rates were negative. UBS analysts estimate euro zone investors bought $3.4 trillion in foreign debt since 2014. So even a modest rebalancing away from U.S. bonds could have a meaningful impact on prices. Ultimately though, Asian investors still appear to wield more muscle in the U.S. bond market, owning around a third of foreign-held U.S. Treasuries and agency debt. And that figure is probably much higher given that euro zone, Caribbean and UK holdings include assets held on behalf of Asian countries, notably China. Up until this point, there has been no wholesale dumping of U.S. assets, and neither is there likely to be. But it is notable that U.S. assets are increasingly being held by private sector investors, who have replaced central banks as the main buyers of U.S. assets in recent years. The private sector is typically considered more price-sensitive than the official sector. That means these positions may prove less sticky than in the past, especially if the idea of waning "U.S. exceptionalism" truly takes root. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters) Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.
Western Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Russian attacks on Ukraine kill at least 10 people, most of them in Kyiv
Russia fired 352 drones and decoys overnight, as well as 11 ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles, Ukraine's air force said. Air defences intercepted or jammed 339 drones and 15 missiles before they could reach their targets, a statement said. The strikes came nearly a week after a Russian attack killed 28 people in Kyiv, 23 of them in a residential building that collapsed after a direct missile hit. Russian forces for several months have been trying to drive deeper into Ukraine as part of a summer push along the 620-mile front line, though the Institute for the Study of War said progress has failed to make significant gains. Rescue workers put out a fire of a building damaged by a Russian drone strike on Kyiv (Evgeniy Maloletka/AP) 'Russian forces are largely relying on poorly trained infantry to make gains in the face of Ukraine's drone-based defence,' the Washington-based think tank said late Sunday. Russia also has pounded civilian areas with long-range strikes in an apparent attempt to weaken Ukrainian morale. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky said preliminary data indicated that Russian forces used North Korean missiles in the Kyiv strike. He called Russia, North Korea and Iran, which has provided drones to Russia, a 'coalition of murderers'. Mr Zelensky said Ukraine's defence and new ways to pressure Russia will be the two main topics in his visit to the United Kingdom on Monday. Mr Zelensky is set to meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer ahead of this week's Nato summit in The Hague. French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said the latest strikes demonstrated Russia's 'unlimited cruelty' by deliberately aiming at civilian targets, and promised more European sanctions on Moscow. Drones and missiles hit residential areas, hospitals and sports infrastructure in numerous districts across Kyiv, emergency services said. The most severe damage was in Shevchenkivskyi district, where a section of a five-story apartment building collapsed. Six people were killed in the district, Kyiv mayor Vitali Klitschko said. Ten others, including a pregnant woman, were rescued from a nearby high-rise that also sustained heavy damage. Dozens of vehicles were burned or mangled by flying debris. An Iranian Shahed exploding drone launched by Russia (Efrem Lukatsky/AP) The Russian attack also damaged the entrance to the Sviatoshyn subway station in Kyiv, slightly injuring two people, said Timur Tkachenko, the head of Kyiv's military administration. He said more than 30 people were injured across the city. Underground subway stations have served as shelters for those seeking protection from aerial attacks. During almost nightly strikes, stations across Kyiv are often filled with people waiting out the danger. Elsewhere in Ukraine, a Russian short-range drone attack killed two people and wounded 10 more in the Chernihiv region late on Sunday, authorities said. Three children were among the wounded, according to the regional administration head, Viacheslav Chaus. Another person was killed and eight wounded overnight in the city of Bila Tserkva, around 53 miles south west of the capital. Meanwhile, Russia's Defence Ministry said its air defences shot down 23 Ukrainian drones overnight into Monday.
